cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Masduki
Contact Email
lppi@ums.ac.id
Phone
+62856-4096-0975
Journal Mail Official
lppi@ums.ac.id
Editorial Address
Magister Ilmu Hukum Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta Jln. A. Yani, Pabelan, Kartasura, Surakarta - 57162
Location
Kota surakarta,
Jawa tengah
INDONESIA
Jurnal Jurisprudence
Published by Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta
ISSN : 18295045     EISSN : 25495615     DOI : -
Core Subject : Social,
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice
Jurnal Jurisprudence is an academic journal published twice a year by the Magister Law Program of Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 61 Documents
 1   2   3   4   5 
Legal Reasoning of the Constitutional Court Verdict Number 25/PUU-XX/2022 on the State Capital Law According to Social Justice Value Farid, Achmad Miftah Farid; Nanik, Nanik Prasetyoningsih
Jurnal Jurisprudence Vol. 12, No. 2, December 2022
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23917/jurisprudence.v12i2.1285

Abstract

ABSTRACT Purpose of the study: This study analyzes the legal reasoning of the Constitutional Court judges in deciding the judicial review Number 25/PUU-XX/2022 against Law Number 3 of 2022 concerning the State Capital (Undang-Undang Ibu Kota Negara/State Capital Law), as well as analyzed based on social justice theory.  Methodology: This study uses a juridical-normative method through a statute approach and case studies. The method of analysis is carried out qualitatively, while the method of collecting legal materials is through documentary research. Results: An analysis of the Constitutional Court verdict concluded that the panel of judges considered that the State Capital Law was declared constitutional to the Constitution and rejected the review of the State Capital Law. The plaintiffs also did not have strong legal standing in the process of forming the State Capital Law. The judges had the opinion that all processes for establishing the State Capital Law met the formal and material requirements. Unfortunately, the Constitutional Court verdict has not fully met the value of social justice for society. Applications of this study: This research is expected to provide a contribution to constitutional law and provide scientific recommendations for the public in cases of judicial review at the Constitutional Court. Novelty/Originality of this study: The Constitutional Court’s verdict is final and binding, whether it fulfills the value of social justice or not. However, the constitutional value should be directly proportional to the value of justice for society. The Constitutional Court verdicts should have an equal proportion of justice for society and the government. Keywords: Constitutional Court Verdict; Constitutional; Legal Reasoning; Social Justice; State Capital Law.   ABSTRAK Tujuan: Kajian ini menganalisis pertimbangan hukum hakim konstitusi dalam memutus uji materil Nomor 25/PUU-XX/2022 terhadap Undang-Undang Nomor 3 Tahun 2022 tentang Ibu Kota Negara, serta dianalisis berdasarkan teori keadilan sosial.  Metodologi: Penelitian ini menggunakan metode yuridis-normatif melalui pendekatan undang-undang dan studi kasus. Metode analisis dilakukan secara kualitatif, sedangkan metode pengumpulan bahan hukum melalui penelitian dokumenter.  Hasil: Analisis putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi menyimpulkan bahwa majelis hakim menilai UU Ibukota Negara dinyatakan konstitusional terhadap UUD dan menolak pengujian UU Ibukota Negara. Para penggugat juga tidak memiliki legal standing yang kuat dalam proses pembentukan UU Ibukota Negara. Majelis hakim berpendapat bahwa semua proses pembentukan UU Ibukota Negara telah memenuhi syarat formil dan materil. Sayangnya, putusan MK belum sepenuhnya memenuhi nilai keadilan sosial bagi masyarakat.  Aplikasi penelitian ini: Penelitian ini diharapkan dapat memberikan kontribusi terhadap hukum tata negara dan memberikan rekomendasi ilmiah bagi masyarakat dalam perkara uji materil di Mahkamah Konstitusi.  Kebaruan/Orisinalitas: Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi bersifat final dan mengikat, apakah memenuhi nilai keadilan sosial atau tidak. Namun, nilai konstitusi harus berbanding lurus dengan nilai keadilan bagi masyarakat. Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi harus memiliki proporsi keadilan yang sama bagi masyarakat dan pemerintah.  Kata kunci: Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi; Konstitusional; Penalaran Hukum; Keadilan sosial; Ibu kota Negara.
Legal Reasoning of a Judge’s Dissenting Opinion in the Decision of the Constitutional Court No. 1/PUU-VIII/2010 Against the Judicial Review of Law No. 3 of 1997 on Juvenile Courts Haq, Hilman Syahrial; Pradnyawan, Sofyan Wimbo Agung; Rachman, M Taufik; Yanto, Edi; Dewi, Anies Prima; Sybelle, Jan Alizea
Jurnal Jurisprudence Vol. 12, No. 2, December 2022
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23917/jurisprudence.v12i2.1309

Abstract

ABSTRACT Purpose of the study: This paper aims to analyze the judicial considerations of the dissenting opinion of Constitutional Court judge member Akil Mochtar on Constitutional Court No. 1/PUU-VIII/2010 Against the Judicial Review of Law No. 3 of 1997 on Juvenile Courts. Methodology: This normative research was based on literary sources. It aimed to discuss the problems that have been formulated to then obtain the expected results. To maximize discussion, this study uses a statute approach and other concepts obtained from literary sources.  Results: The dissenting opinion conveyed by judge member Akil Mochtar only discussed the law as a written rule in the application of the law. Meanwhile, the Constitutional Court attempted to find substance in the Constitutional Court's decision. People's need for justice encourages constitutional judges as law enforcers to make various breakthroughs considering that the Constitutional Court's decisions are final and binding and have a general influence on the legal system. Observing the age range of children in Law No. 3 of 1997, which is between 8 and 18 years, legal provisions indirectly consider children in that age range to be able to commit criminal acts so that they can be sentenced like adults. In human development, a person of 8 years is still said to be immature (minderjarig) or still unable to be responsible. They have imperfect knowledge of the causes and consequences of their actions committed. Mistakes and wrongdoing should be considered child delinquency rather than a crime. Applications of this study: This paper can be applied by the Constitutional Court to make betterment to laws that are proposed for review by attempting to find the legal substance. Novelty/ Originality of this study: No previous researchers have studied the dissenting opinion in this decision  Keywords: Constitutional Court, Juvenile Court, dissenting opinion, judicial review, legal reasoning.  ABSTRAK  Tujuan: Tulisan ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis pertimbangan yuridis atas dissenting opinion anggota hakim Mahkamah Konstitusi Akil Mochtar tentang Mahkamah Konstitusi No. 1/PUU-VIII/2010 Terhadap Uji Materi Undang-Undang No. 3 Tahun 1997 tentang Peradilan Anak .  Metodologi: Penelitian normatif ini didasarkan pada sumber literatur. Hal ini bertujuan untuk membahas masalah yang telah dirumuskan untuk kemudian memperoleh hasil yang diharapkan. Untuk memaksimalkan pembahasan, kajian ini menggunakan pendekatan undang-undang dan konsep lain yang diperoleh dari sumber normative.  Hasil: Dissenting opinion yang disampaikan oleh anggota hakim Akil Mochtar hanya membahas undang-undang sebagai aturan tertulis dalam penerapan undang-undang. Sementara itu, Mahkamah Konstitusi berupaya mencari substansi dalam putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi tersebut. Kebutuhan masyarakat akan keadilan mendorong hakim konstitusi sebagai penegak hukum melakukan berbagai terobosan mengingat putusan MK bersifat final dan mengikat serta berpengaruh secara umum terhadap sistem hukum. Mencermati rentang usia anak dalam UU No. 3 Tahun 1997, yaitu antara 8 hingga 18 tahun, ketentuan hukum secara tidak langsung menganggap anak dalam rentang usia tersebut dapat melakukan tindak pidana sehingga dapat dipidana seperti orang dewasa. Dalam perkembangan manusia, seseorang yang berumur 8 tahun masih dikatakan belum dewasa atau masih belum mampu bertanggung jawab. Mereka memiliki pengetahuan yang tidak sempurna tentang sebab dan akibat dari tindakan yang mereka lakukan. Kesalahan harus dianggap sebagai kenakalan anak daripada kejahatan.  Kegunaan: Kajian ini dapat digunakan oleh Mahkamah Konstitusi untuk melakukan perbaikan terhadap undang-undang yang diajukan untuk diuji dengan mencoba menemukan substansi hukumnya.  Kebaruan/ Orisinalitas: Belum ada penelitian sebelumnya yang mempelajari dissenting opinion dalam putusan ini  Kata Kunci: Mahkamah Konstitusi, Pengadilan Anak, Dissenting Opinion, Peninjauan Kembali, Penalaran Hukum
The Judicial Reasoning Behind Decision No. 262/Pid.B/2018/Pn.Skt on a Case of Mass Violence: The Perspective of Human Aggressiveness and the Ashobiyah Terminology Purwadi Wahyu Anggoro; Khudzaifah Dimyati; Absori; Kelik Wardiono; Waljinah, Sri
Jurnal Jurisprudence Vol. 12, No. 2, December 2022
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23917/jurisprudence.v12i2.1314

Abstract

ABSTRACT Purpose of the study: This research aimed to analyze the judicial rationing behind Decision No. 262/Pid.B/2018/Pn.Skt. According to Article 170 of the Indonesian Criminal Code in the legal event of a mass violence crime that occurred in Surakarta City.  Methodology: This was normative legal research that used the case approach. It emphasized the legal consideration of judges in deciding and giving a verdict upon a case. Results: This research analyzed Decision No. 262/Pid.B/2018/Pn.Skt. Judges considered that the actions committed by the group of perpetrators originated from the aggressive nature of humans due to their animal power that can cause law-violating actions. This aggressive human nature in a group caused a sense of affection and bond creates similarities in desires, goals, and ideas. It resulted in a sense of solidarity in the group according to the ashobiyah terminology. Applications of this study: to provide knowledge on: (1) the judicial analysis based on the factors that influence the occurrence of mass violence; and (2) the judicial consideration in deciding upon a case of mass violence in Surakarta City based on the judicial rationing in Decision No. 262/Pid.B/2018/PN.Skt. Novelty/Originality of this study: This paper provided new information on the action of mass violence on Decision No. 262/Pid.B/2018/PN.Skt correlated with Ibnu Khaldun’s ashobiyah terminology. Keywords: judicial reasoning, mass violence, aggressivity, ashobiyah    ABSTRAK  Tujuan: Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis pertimbangan yuridis di balik Putusan Nomor 262/Pid.B/2018/Pn.Skt. Menurut Pasal 170 KUHP dalam peristiwa hukum tersebut, tindak pidana kekerasan massal terjadi di Kota Surakarta.  Metodologi: Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian hukum normatif yang menggunakan pendekatan kasus. Ditekankan pada pertimbangan hukum hakim dalam memutus dan memberikan putusan atas suatu perkara.  Hasil: Penelitian ini menganalisis Keputusan No. 262/Pid.B/2018/Pn.Skt. Hakim menilai bahwa perbuatan yang dilakukan oleh kelompok pelaku tersebut berawal dari sifat agresif manusia karena animal power yang dapat menimbulkan perbuatan melanggar hukum. Sifat agresif manusia dalam suatu kelompok menimbulkan rasa kasih sayang dan ikatan yang menimbulkan kesamaan keinginan, tujuan, dan gagasan. Hal itu mengakibatkan rasa solidaritas dalam kelompok menurut terminologi ashobiyah.  Aplikasi penelitian ini: memberikan pengetahuan tentang (1)analisis yuridis berdasarkan faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi terjadinya kekerasan massal, (2)pertimbangan yuridis dalam memutus perkara kekerasan massal di Kota Surakarta berdasarkan yuridis rationing dalam Putusan No. 262/Pid.B/2018/PN.Skt.  Kebaruan/Orisinalitas: Tulisan ini memberikan informasi baru tentang aksi kekerasan massal pada Putusan No. 262/Pid.B/2018/PN.Skt yang berkorelasi dengan terminologi ashobiyah Ibnu Khaldun.  Kata kunci: penalaran yudisial, kekerasan massal, agresivitas, ashobiyah
Analysis Of A Judge’s Progressive Decision In The Pretrial Examination On The South Jakarta District Court Decision No.04/Pid.Prap/2015pn.Jkt.Sel Weldy Jevis Saleh; Upik Mutiara
Jurnal Jurisprudence Vol. 12, No. 2, December 2022
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23917/jurisprudence.v12i2.1321

Abstract

ABSTRACT Purpose of the study: This paper aims to provide an analytical review of the judicial progressive thoughts in the pretrial process in Decision No. 04/Pid.Prap/2015/PN.Jkt.Sel. Methodology: This legal research used a normative juridical approach. The writers used the literary approach by studying books and legal regulations related to this research. Results: The judges’ basis of thought delivered in Decision No. 04/Pid.Prap/2015/PN.Jkt.Sel was part of the judicial authority to make laws (judge-made laws). This is so that the law can provide the value of justice or certainty. But in this context, the method used by the judges was legal interpretation due to "other actions" in Article 95 of the Criminal Code that has an ambiguous meaning. Meanwhile, the stipulations that discussed the authority of indictors have not been regulated in the Criminal Code that is categorized as a pretrial object. The arrival of Decision No. 04/Pid.Prap/2015/PN.Jkt.Sel was a form of a legal update that makes indictors and prosecutors more professional. It makes them increase the quality of their human resources in carrying out indictment and prosecution; thus, no parties experience loss in the examination carried out by the law enforcing apparatus. Applications of this study: This analysis can be used to motivate judges to make more progressive decisions. Novelty/Originality of this study: This writing analyzed the judicial progressive thoughts in Decision No. 04/Pid.Prap/2015/PN.Jkt.Sel that has never been done before. Keywords: pretrial; progressive judges; indictment warrant; the eradication of corruption.   ABSTRAK  Tujuan: Artikel ini bertujuan untuk memberikan tinjauan analitis terhadap pemikiran hukum progresif dalam proses praperadilan dalam Putusan No. 04/Pid.Prap/2015/PN.Jkt.Sel.  Metodologi: Penelitian hukum ini menggunakan pendekatan yuridis normative dengan pendekatan studi pustaka dengan mempelajari buku-buku dan peraturan hukum yang berkaitan dengan penelitian ini.  Hasil: Dasar pemikiran hakim yang tertuang dalam Putusan Nomor 04/Pid.Prap/2015/PN.Jkt.Sel merupakan bagian dari kekuasaan kehakiman untuk membuat undang-undang. Hal ini dimaksudkan agar hukum dapat memberikan nilai keadilan atau kepastian. Namun dalam konteks ini, metode yang digunakan hakim adalah interpretasi hukum karena “perbuatan lain” dalam Pasal 95 KUHP yang memiliki makna ambigu. Sedangkan ketentuan yang membahas tentang kewenangan penyidik belum diatur dalam KUHP yang dikategorikan sebagai obyek praperadilan . Hadirnya Putusan Nomor 04/Pid.Prap/2015/PN.Jkt.Sel merupakan bentuk pembaharuan hukum yang menjadikan para jaksa dan penuntut lebih profesional. Hal itu membuat mereka meningkatkan kualitas sumber daya manusia dalam melakukan dakwaan dan penuntutan; dengan demikian, tidak ada pihak yang dirugikan dalam pemeriksaan yang dilakukan oleh aparat penegak hukum.  Aplikasi penelitian ini : Kajian ini dapat digunakan untuk memotivasi para hakim dalam membuat keputusan yang lebih progresif.  Kebaruan/Orisinalitas: Tulisan ini menganalisis pemikiran progresif peradilan dalam Putusan No. 04/Pid.Prap/2015/PN.Jkt.Sel yang belum pernah dilakukan sebelumnya.  Kata kunci: praperadilan; hakim progresif; surat dakwaan; pemberantasan korupsi.
Integrated Legal Protection of Women in Conflict with the Law in the Criminal Judicial Process (Decision Case Number 677/Pis.Sus/2018/PN Cbi) Amarini, Indriati; Nikmah Fitriah; Rizky Aulia Cahyadri
Jurnal Jurisprudence Vol. 12, No. 2, December 2022
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23917/jurisprudence.v12i2.1329

Abstract

ABSTRACT Purpose of the study: The state has an obligation to ensure that women obtain justice and are free from all discrimination in the criminal judicial process. Women in conflict with the law frequently feel uncomfortable when facing court proceedings in the position of suspect, victim, or witness. This paper analyzed legal considerations in the court decision of Bogor Cibinong District Court number 677/Pis.Sus/2018/PN Cbi.  Methodology: This research employed the doctrinal legal analysis methodology. This study aimed to analyze the legal protection of women in conflict with the law in the courtroom. This investigation could be a regulating juridical consideration with philosophical and conceptual approaches.  Results: The result of the consideration appeared that the criminal equity handled in court was full of ethical issues. Recently, there was the issuance of Supreme Court Regulation Number 3 of 2017 concerning Rules on the Hearing of Cases Including Women in Conflict with the Law. The Decision of Bogor Cibinong District Court Number 677/Pis.Sus/2018/PN Cbi managed a rapist of two children free from the charge of 14 years in prison for there is no witness who saw the rape. The integrated protection of women is required since they deal with the law during court proceedings and in the stages of inquiry, investigation, prosecution, and punishment.  Applications of this study: Regulation through legislation is required to protect women in conflict with the law in the criminal justice process.  Novelty/Originality of this study: In contrast to previous research, this research focused on studying how significant legal protection is for women in conflict with the law. Keywords: Legal Protection, Women, Litigation   ABSTRAK  Tujuan: Negara memiliki kewajiban untuk memastikan perempuan memperoleh keadilan dan bebas dari segala diskriminasi dalam proses peradilan pidana. Perempuan yang berkonflik dengan hukum seringkali merasa tidak nyaman ketika menghadapi proses peradilan dalam posisi sebagai tersangka, korban, atau saksi. Artikel ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis pertimbangan hukum dalam putusan Pengadilan Negeri Bogor Cibinong nomor 677/Pis.Sus/2018/PN Cbi.  Metodologi: Penelitian ini menggunakan metodologi analisis hukum doktrinal. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis perlindungan hukum terhadap perempuan yang berkonflik dengan hukum di ruang sidang. Investigasi tersebut menjadi pertimbangan yuridis dengan pendekatan filosofis dan konseptual.  Hasil: Dari hasil penelitian ditemukan bahwa peradilan pidana yang ditangani di pengadilan sarat dengan persoalan etik. Baru-baru ini, telah diterbitkan Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 3 Tahun 2017 Tentang Pedoman Mengadili Perkara Perempuan Berhadapan dengan Hukum. Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Bogor Cibinong Nomor 677/Pis.Sus/2018/PN Cbi membebaskan pemerkosa dua anak dari dakwaan 14 tahun penjara karena tidak ada saksi yang melihat pemerkosaan tersebut. Perlindungan terpadu terhadap perempuan diperlukan karena mereka berhadapan dengan hukum selama proses peradilan dan pada tahap penyelidikan, penyidikan, penuntutan, dan hukuman.  Aplikasi penelitian ini: Pengaturan melalui peraturan perundang-undangan diperlukan untuk melindungi perempuan yang berkonflik dengan hukum dalam proses peradilan pidana.  Kebaruan/Orisinalitas: Berbeda dengan penelitian sebelumnya, penelitian ini berfokus untuk mengkaji seberapa signifikan perlindungan hukum bagi perempuan yang berkonflik dengan hukum.  Kata kunci: Perlindungan Hukum, Perempuan, Litigasi
Cumulated Lawsuit And Tort: Legal Reasoning of Judges and Major Decision’s Ratio Decidendi (Study of Supreme Court Decision No. 575 K/Pdt/1983 and Supreme Court Decision No. 2686/Pdt/1985) Isnandar, Aries; Lyandova, Vanka; Prasetyo, Yogi; Febriansyah, Ferry Irawan; Indiantoro, Alfalachu; Agiyanto, Ucuk
Jurnal Jurisprudence Vol. 12, No. 2, December 2022
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23917/jurisprudence.v12i2.1332

Abstract

ABSTRACT Purpose of Study: This research aimed at analyzing Supreme Court Decision No. 575 K/Pdt/1983 and Supreme Court Decision No. 2686/Pdt/1985 concerning cumulative lawsuits and tort according to the judge's legal reasoning.  Methodology: This is library research using the normative juridical method. The approach used was the statutory approach. The statutory approach was carried out by analyzing Supreme Court Decision No. 575 K/Pdt/1983 and Supreme Court Decision No. 2686/Pdt/1985 in the context of the cumulative lawsuit and tort section. Result: This research found that even though unlawful acts and contracts are conventionally separated, there are still issues regarding overlapping understandings of the concepts of tort, cumulative lawsuit, and default in law. For example, there is an act by one party that, on the one hand, can be classified as an unlawful act, but it also has a contractual element. Similarly, one party’s actions have contractual consequences for the other party, but they can also result in liability based on tort. This condition causes several parties to accumulate lawsuits for unlawful acts and defaults at the same time. Supreme Court accepted the cumulative lawsuit in decision No. 575 K/Pdt/1983 and Supreme Court Decision No. 2686/Pdt/1985, indicating that it does not violate procedural law. Applications of this study:  This research is useful for analyzing Supreme Court Decision No. 575 K/Pdt/1983 and Supreme Court Decision No. 2686/Pdt/1985. These Supreme Court decisions have a ratio decidendi or jurisprudence that a cumulative lawsuit is permitted and it does not violate procedural law. Novelty: There are no previous researchers who conducted a legal analysis of the Supreme Court's decision, even though the Supreme Court is the jurisprudence in cases or legal issues of cumulative lawsuits and tort.   Keywords: Cumulation, Against the Law, Default, Decision, Ratio Decidendi  ABSTRAK  Tujuan: Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis Putusan Mahkamah Agung No. 575 K/Pdt/1983 dan Putusan Mahkamah Agung No. 2686/Pdt/1985 tentang gugatan kumulatif dan perbuatan melawan hukum menurut penalaran hukum hakim.  Metodologi: Penelitian kepustakaan ini menggunakan metode yuridis normatif. Pendekatan yang digunakan adalah pendekatan Perundang-undangan. Pendekatan perundang-undangan dilakukan dengan menganalisis Putusan MA No. 575 K/Pdt/1983 dan Putusan MA No. 2686/Pdt/1985 dalam konteks gugatan kumulatif dan pasal perbuatan melawan hukum.  Hasil: Penelitian ini menemukan bahwa meskipun perbuatan melawan hukum dan perjanjian dipisahkan secara konvensional, masih terdapat permasalahan mengenai tumpang tindih pemahaman tentang konsep gugatan, gugatan kumulatif, dan wanprestasi dalam hukum. Misalnya, ada perbuatan salah satu pihak yang di satu pihak dapat digolongkan sebagai perbuatan melawan hukum, tetapi juga mengandung unsur perjanjian. Demikian pula, tindakan satu pihak memiliki konsekuensi kontraktual bagi pihak lain, tetapi tindakan tersebut juga dapat mengakibatkan pertanggungjawaban berdasarkan kesalahan. Kondisi ini menyebabkan beberapa pihak menumpuk tuntutan atas perbuatan melawan hukum dan wanprestasi secara bersamaan. Mahkamah Agung menerima gugatan kumulatif dalam putusan No. 575 K/Pdt/1983 dan Putusan MA No. 2686/Pdt/1985, yang berarti tidak melanggar hukum acara.  Aplikasi penelitian ini: Penelitian ini berguna untuk menganalisis Putusan Mahkamah Agung No. 575 K/Pdt/1983 dan Putusan Mahkamah Agung No. 2686/Pdt/1985. Putusan Mahkamah Agung ini memiliki ratio decidendi atau yurisprudensi bahwa gugatan kumulatif diperbolehkan dan tidak melanggar hukum acara.  Kebaruan/Orisinalitas: Belum ada peneliti terdahulu yang melakukan analisis hukum terhadap putusan MA, padahal MA merupakan yurisprudensi dalam perkara atau permasalahan hukum kumulatif gugatan dan perbuatan melawan hukum. Kata kunci: Kumulasi, Melawan Hukum, Wanprestasi, Putusan, Rasio Decidendi
Judicial Consideration Of Decision No. 273/Pdt.G/2021/Pa.Bkt In The Perspectives Of Benefit And Justice In Murabahah Contract Septyanun, Nurjannah; Setiaji, Bambang; Harun, Rina Rohayu; Jaya, Indra
Jurnal Jurisprudence Vol. 12, No. 2, December 2022
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23917/jurisprudence.v12i2.1344

Abstract

ABSTRACT Purpose of the Study: This paper aims to analyze the judicial consideration of judges in Decision No. 273/Pdt.g/2021/PA.Bkt from the perspective of benefit and justice for all parties in the murabahah and its legal consequences.  Methodology: This research used the literature review method. It used the descriptive qualitative analysis, which was conducted by profoundly reading the decision, analyzing the case, examining the appropriateness of the legal basis, and how to define them. Results: The legal considerations of judges in Decision No. 273/Pdt.g/2021/PA.Bkt are: (1) the resolution of disputes on sharia economy is the absolute authority of the Religious Court; (2) the judge assembly must maintain the legal interests and rights of the plaintiff from the actions of the defendant to undergo an auction, as well as avoiding the losses and harm that may befall the plaintiff; (3) there was an emphasis on good intentions, benefit, and justice for all parties but the judges punished the defendant to undergo rescheduling, restructuring, and reconditioning. Applications of this study: It can inspire judges to create legal reasoning that supports the aspect of legal certainty. It can inspire banks and customers to emphasize the aspects of good intention, benefit, and justice in implementing contracts. Novelty/ Originality of this study: It explained the legal consideration of judges that emphasized the aspect of mediation through contract renegotiation based on the positive law and relevant sharia principles. Keywords: Judicial consideration, murabahah contracts, banks, good intention, benefit, justice.  ABSTRAK  Tujuan: Tulisan ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis pertimbangan yuridis hakim dalam Putusan No. 273/Pdt.g/2021/PA.Bkt dari perspektif kemanfaatan dan keadilan bagi semua pihak dalam murabahah dan akibat hukumnya.  Metodologi: Penelitian ini menggunakan metode literature review. Analisis yang digunakan adalah deskriptif kualitatif, yang dilakukan dengan membaca putusan secara mendalam, menganalisis kasus, memeriksa kesesuaian dasar hukum, dan bagaimana mendefinisikannya.  Hasil: Pertimbangan hukum hakim dalam Putusan Nomor 273/Pdt.g/2021/PA.Bkt adalah: (1) penyelesaian sengketa ekonomi syariah merupakan kewenangan mutlak Peradilan Agama; (2) majelis hakim harus menjaga kepentingan hukum dan hak penggugat dari tindakan tergugat untuk menjalani lelang, serta menghindari kerugian dan kerugian yang mungkin menimpa penggugat; (3) ada penekanan pada itikad baik, kemanfaatan, dan keadilan bagi semua pihak tetapi hakim menghukum terdakwa dengan penjadwalan ulang, penataan ulang, dan rekondisi.   Aplikasi penelitian ini: Dapat menginspirasi hakim untuk menciptakan penalaran hukum yang mendukung aspek kepastian hukum. Hal tersebut dapat menggugah bank dan nasabah untuk mengedepankan aspek itikad baik, manfaat, dan keadilan dalam pelaksanaan kontrak.  Kebaruan/Orisinalitas: Dijelaskan pertimbangan hukum hakim yang menekankan aspek mediasi melalui renegosiasi kontrak berdasarkan hukum positif dan prinsip syariah yang relevan.  Kata kunci: akad murabahah, bank, itikad baik, kemanfaatan, keadilan
Legal Considerations from Judges in Supreme Court Decree No. 85 K/Pid.Sus/2013 Concerning the Acquittal of Exhibitionism Perpetrators and Their Implications as a Jurisprudence Alwan, Sultan; Arsad, Jamal Hi; Alauddin, Rusdin; Faisal, Faisal; Laha, Fatma; Amirudin Umasangaji
Jurnal Jurisprudence Vol. 12, No. 2, December 2022
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23917/jurisprudence.v12i2.1401

Abstract

ABSTRACT Purpose of the study: This paper aims to provide a juridical analysis and the implications of the Supreme Court Decision Number 85 K/Pid.Sus/2013, where an exhibitionist perpetrator was declared to have a mental illness and he could not be held responsible. Methodology: This research used a normative juridical method with a library research approach. It was a descriptive study, which aimed to provide insight into the implication of judges in Supreme Court Decree No. 85 K/Pid.Sus/2013 for the case exhibitionism as a jurisprudence.  Results: Based on the results of the Supreme Court Decision, the judge was wrong in placing exhibitionism as an excuse for eliminating criminal liability. This was based on theories and opinions which say that exhibitionism is not included in the provisions as a reason for eliminating criminal liability because exhibitionism is a type of disorder that is different from the disorders contained in the provisions regarding reasons for criminal elimination, i.e., Article 44 of the Criminal Code concerning the ability to be responsible. Exhibitionism is a sexual disorder, as opposed to a type of psychiatric disorder or psychosis contained in Article 44 of the Criminal Code. The judge also failed to base his decision on an examination by a psychiatrist who has the expertise to accurately determine the perpetrator’s mental condition. Applications of this study: This paper can be applied to prevent future occurrences of similar cases, where exhibitionists are not held accountable for their actions. This may bring more harm than good because exhibitionists will feel they have the freedom to disturb public peace by carrying out exhibitionism. Novelty/Originality of this study: No previous researchers have studied this decision and its implications. Keywords: legal consideration; supreme court; exhibitionism; implications; jurisprudence.   ABSTRAK  Tujuan: Artikel ini bertujuan untuk memberikan analisis yuridis dan implikasi dari Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 85 K/Pid.Sus/2013, dimana seorang pelaku eksibisionis dinyatakan sakit jiwa dan tidak dapat dimintai pertanggungjawaban.  Metodologi: Penelitian ini menggunakan metode yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan penelitian kepustakaan. Penelitian ini bersifat deskriptif, yang bertujuan untuk memberikan pemahaman tentang implikasi hakim dalam Keputusan Mahkamah Agung No. 85 K/Pid.Sus/2013 terhadap kasus eksibisionisme sebagai yurisprudensi.  Hasil: Berdasarkan hasil Putusan MA, hakim salah menempatkan eksibisionisme sebagai dalih penghapusan pertanggungjawaban pidana. Hal ini didasarkan pada teori dan pendapat yang mengatakan bahwa eksibisionisme tidak termasuk dalam ketentuan sebagai alasan penghapusan pertanggungjawaban pidana karena eksibisionisme merupakan jenis gangguan yang berbeda dengan gangguan yang terdapat dalam ketentuan mengenai alasan penghapusan pidana yaitu Pasal 44 KUHP tentang kesanggupan untuk bertanggung jawab. Eksibisionisme adalah gangguan seksual, berbeda dengan jenis gangguan kejiwaan atau psikosis yang terdapat dalam Pasal 44 KUHP. Hakim juga tidak mendasarkan putusannya pada pemeriksaan psikiater yang memiliki keahlian untuk menentukan secara akurat kondisi kejiwaan pelaku.  Aplikasi penelitian ini : Artikel ini dapat diterapkan untuk mencegah kejadian serupa di masa mendatang, di mana eksibisionis tidak bertanggung jawab atas tindakan mereka. Hal ini mungkin membawa lebih banyak kerugian karena eksibisionis akan merasa memiliki kebebasan untuk mengganggu ketentraman masyarakat dengan melakukan eksibisionisme  Kebaruan/Orisinalitas: Tidak ada peneliti sebelumnya yang mempelajari keputusan ini dan implikasinya.  Kata kunci: pertimbangan hukum; Mahkamah Agung; eksibisionisme; implikasi; yurisprudensi
The Legal Consideration of Judges in the Crime of Village Fund Corruption: A Case Study of Decision No. 32/Pid.Sus-Tpk/2021/Pn.Pal Hartanto, Hartanto; Putro, Juan Sebastian Kusumo
Jurnal Jurisprudence Vol. 12, No. 1, June 2022
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23917/jurisprudence.v12i1.1526

Abstract

ABSTRACT Purpose of the study: This research aims to analyze the crime of village fund corruption by a Village Head in Criminal Case No. 32/Pid.Sus-TPK/2021/PN.Pal in the legal territory of Palu State Court.  Methodology: This research used the normative juridical method with the statute and case approaches. This was descriptive qualitative research. Results: Results showed that the decision of the state court on the crime of village fund corruption in Criminal Case No. 32/Pid.Sus-TPK/2021/PN.Pal defendant has violated Article 2 clause (1) jo. Article 8 of Law No. 31 of 1999 on the Eradication of the Crime of Corruption as what was amended and added with Law No. 20 of 2001 on the Change of Law No. 31 of 1999 on the Eradication of the Crime of Corruption. The judicial considerations on the sanctions for perpetrators of corrupting village funds are already according to the applicable regulations under the guideline of the Law on Corruption. It was also found that the crime of corruption violated Islamic Sharia. Applications of this study: It is hoped that the results of this paper may answer the issues it analyzed and so that it may become material for consideration in finding accurate and valid resolution guidelines to resolve issues on the crime of village fund corruption in Indonesia. Novelty/Originality of this study: This paper focused on the crime of village fund corruption in Criminal Case No. 32/Pid.Sus-TPK/2021/PN.Pal and it was added with the perspective of Islamic values. Keywords: Village fund, corruption, judicial consideration, Islamic values
Stepchildren And Incest: Law Enforcement Efforts Against Sexual Abuse In Families (A Case Study on the Decisions of Wonogiri State Court, Idi Sharia Court, and Banda Aceh Sharia Court) Surbakti, Natangsa; Samodra, Nerisia Bunga; Kurnianingsih, Marisa
Jurnal Jurisprudence Vol. 12, No. 1, June 2022
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23917/jurisprudence.v12i1.1531

Abstract

ABSTRACT Purpose of the study: This paper aims to analyze three cases of sexual violence perpetrated by stepfathers to underage stepdaughters (incest) in Wonogiri Regency and Aceh Province. Methodology: This legal research used a normative juridical approach. The literary legal research was conducted by studying literary materials or secondary data. The writers used the Legal System Theory of Lawrence M. Friedman. Results: Friedman opined that there are four elements in law enforcement. In the analyzed cases, they were: (1) legal structure: the court and sharia courts, (2) legal substance: laws used by judges in deciding upon the cases, namely Law No. 17 of 2016 and Aceh Qanun No. 6 of 2014, (3) legal culture: society had a role in enforcing the law in these cases, as the police force, general prosecutors, and judges have carried out their functions well, and (4) legal impact: the strict implementation of punishments will bring a greater deterrent effect on the perpetrators. Some factors triggered the crime of incest to happen, namely: (1) the perpetrator, (2) the victims as underage children are deemed powerless against the perpetrator, and (3) the environmental condition where the houses were deserted. Applications of this study: This analysis can be used by the government to better enforce the law on sexual violence in families in Indonesia. Novelty/Originality of this study: This writing analyzes three cases using two aspects, namely Friedman's theory and judicial consideration in making decisions. Keywords: Stepchild, Law Enforcement, Sexual Violence, Incest.

Page 2 of 7 | Total Record : 61

 1   2   3   4   5 

Filter by Year

2022 2025


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 15 No. 1 (2025): Vol. 15, No. 1, June 2025 Vol. 14, No. 2, December 2024 Vol. 14, No. 1, June 2024 Vol. 13, No. 2, December 2023 Vol. 13, No. 1, June 2023 Vol. 12, No. 2, December 2022 Vol. 12, No. 1, June 2022