cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Ahmad Syofyan
Contact Email
ahmad.syofyan@fh.unila.ac.id
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
fiatjustisia@fh.unila.ac.id
Editorial Address
Ruang Jurnal, Gedung B, Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Lampung. Jl. Sumantri Brojonegoro No.1 Bandar Lampung. 35145. Indonesia
Location
Kota bandar lampung,
Lampung
INDONESIA
FIAT JUSTISIA: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum
Published by Universitas Lampung
ISSN : 19785186     EISSN : 24776238     DOI : http://doi.org/10.25041/fiatjustisia
Core Subject : Social,
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice
Fiat Justisia: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum is an open access and peer-reviewed journal that aims to offer an international academic platform for cross-border legal research encompassing specifically concerning human rights, policy, values of Islam. These may include but are not limited to various fields such as: ● humanity ● heritage law ● family law ● civil and political rights ● economic, social, and cultural rights ● solidarity rights ● philosophy of law ● private law ● international law ● civil law ● criminal law ● administrative law ● constitutional law ● adat law ● Intellectual Property Rights ● commercial court ● district court ● high court ● supreme court ● constitutional court ● industrial relations court ● administrative court ● fishery court ● military court ● taxation court ● court of human rights ● court of religion
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 667 Documents
 63   64   65   66   67 
Preventing Illegal Levies in Senior High School Public Services: Assessing the Role of the Anti-Extortion Task Force in Jambi Province Hartati Hartati; Erwin Erwin; Fitria Fitria; Beny Saputra
Fiat Justisia: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol. 20 No. 2 (2026)
Publisher : Universitas Lampung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25041/fiatjustisia.v20no2.4567

Abstract

This study examines the effectiveness of the Saber pungli Task Force in preventing illegal levies in senior high school public services in Jambi Province using an empirical legal (socio-legal) approach with qualitative methods. Data were collected through in-depth interviews with task force members, school administrators, teachers, and other education stakeholders, supported by regulations, reports, and institutional records. The findings indicate that, although the task force has adequate institutional authority to implement prevention and enforcement measures, its effectiveness remains constrained by structural and cultural challenges, including weak internalization of anti-corruption values in schools, low public reporting, and limited participatory oversight. The study recommends strengthening complaint mechanisms, integrating anti-corruption policies into school governance, and improving legal literacy among education stakeholders. These findings contribute to the development of clean education governance and collaborative corruption prevention at the regional level.
Jurisdictional Synergy and Contradictions: Religious and State Courts in Indonesia's Pluralistic Inheritance Disputes Ade Fariz Fahrullah; Nurhayati Zein; Muhammad Hafis; Juliani Syafitri; Wahyu Kurniawan
Fiat Justisia: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol. 20 No. 2 (2026)
Publisher : Universitas Lampung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25041/fiatjustisia.v20no2.4920

Abstract

Legal pluralism in Indonesia’s inheritance law, encompassing Islamic law, customary law, and the Civil Code, creates institutional dualism in dispute resolution. This article analyzes the roles of the Religious Court and District Court, identifies jurisdictional synergies and conflicts, and evaluates their implications for legal certainty and substantive justice using a normative juridical method supported by regulations, jurisprudence, and secondary data. The findings show that the Religious Court plays a central role, particularly in post-mortem marital property disputes and cases prone to forum shopping, while synergy appears in the execution of decisions through notaries and Land Deed Officials (PPAT) linking judicial determinations with land administration. Contradictions arise when such disputes are brought before the District Court, creating inefficient multi-stage processes and prolonging resolution, which weakens legal certainty and procedural efficiency. The study underscores the need for clearer regulatory alignment through Supreme Court instruments to define jurisdictional limits and prevent forum shopping, alongside strengthening judicial capacity and harmonizing the role of notaries and PPAT to achieve a more integrated and reliable system of inheritance dispute resolution.
Political Intervention in Post-Reform State Official Recruitment Saiful Anam; Cakra Heru Santosa; Fahririn Fahririn; Muhammad Fachrul Hudallah; Regita Widya Prameswari
Fiat Justisia: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol. 20 No. 2 (2026)
Publisher : Universitas Lampung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25041/fiatjustisia.v20no2.5011

Abstract

The recruitment of state officials in post-reform Indonesia remains vulnerable to political intervention, which can undermine the independence of public officials and contribute to corruption, collusion, and nepotism. This study employs a normative juridical approach to examine the political dynamics of state official recruitment and identify measures to reduce political interference. The findings indicate that strengthening merit-based recruitment, limiting political influence, and implementing comprehensive legal and institutional reforms based on the theories of Max Weber and Lawrence M. Friedman are essential to promoting professional, transparent, and accountable governance in Indonesia.
Consumer Legal Protection in Telecommunication: Doctrinal and Comparative Insights from Indonesia and Spain Anggreany Arief; Asriati Asriati; Sahban Sahban; Retno Sari Dewi; Antonio Gutiérrez-Pozo
Fiat Justisia: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol. 20 No. 2 (2026)
Publisher : Universitas Lampung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25041/fiatjustisia.v20no2.5050

Abstract

Digital transformation has turned telecommunications into essential infrastructure for social and economic life. This shift creates legal challenges, including consumer inequality, opaque electronic contracts, data protection risks, and ineffective dispute resolution. This study compares telecommunications consumer protection frameworks in Indonesia and Spain, focusing on regulatory effectiveness, supervisory institutions, and consumer rights in the digital era. Using doctrinal and comparative analysis, it examines national legislation, legal instruments of the European Union, and reports from telecommunications regulators. The findings show that Spain has developed a more integrated and adaptive system through regulatory harmonization, particularly in contract transparency, data protection, and enforcement of provider obligations. Indonesia still faces institutional fragmentation, weaker enforcement, and slower regulatory adaptation to technological change. Strengthening protection in Indonesia requires reforms focused on digital rights, independent oversight, and efficient dispute resolution. These findings contribute to digital consumer protection scholarship and offer policy guidance for technology-driven economies..
Secondary Victimization and Criminal Liability of Crime Victims in the Sleman Snatching Case: A Human Rights Criminology Perspective Hajar Salamah Salsabila Hariz; M. Rizal Qosim; Muchlis Fathulloh; Hariyanto Hariyanto
Fiat Justisia: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol. 20 No. 3 (2026)
Publisher : Universitas Lampung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25041/fiatjustisia.v20no3.5449

Abstract

Snatching is a street crime that threatens personal security and prompt spontaneous responses from victims or their family members when formal protection is unavailable or perceived as inadequate. This article examines secondary victimization and criminal liability in the Sleman snatching case, in which the victim's husband pursued the alleged offender after his wife was robbed and later became subject to legal scrutiny following the alleged offender's death during the pursuit. This study employs normative legal research using statutory, conceptual, case, and human rights criminology approaches. The analysis demonstrates that the case cannot be reduced to a simple narrative of victim criminalization. Instead, it highlights the interaction between victim-offender overlap, lawful defense, causation, proportionality, and human rights protection. Criminal liability in cases involving spontaneous victim responses should be assessed by examining necessity, immediacy, proportionality, causation, culpability, and due process. The article concludes by proposing a human rights-based framework for assessing criminal liability that prevents secondary victimization while preserving accountability for serious legal consequences.
Reconstructing Political Finance Regulation in Indonesia’s Multiparty Democracy Firmansyah Putra; Dimas Subekti; Dinda Syufradian Putra; Ansorullah Ansorullah; Mochammad Farisi
Fiat Justisia: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol. 20 No. 3 (2026)
Publisher : Universitas Lampung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25041/fiatjustisia.v20no3.5327

Abstract

This study examines how Indonesia's political party finance regulations can be redesigned to strengthen transparency and accountability in a multiparty system. Using normative legal research based on statutory and legal theory approaches, it finds that the current framework remains ineffective because of limited public disclosure, weak independent auditing, fragmented oversight, and inadequate regulation of political contributions. The study proposes an integrated governance model comprising six regulatory pillars: standardized public financial reporting, a national digital reporting system, independent audits by the State Audit Agency (BPK), stricter regulation of private donations, performance-based public funding, and institutionalized public oversight. The study contributes to the political finance literature by advancing an integrated governance model for political party finance in multiparty democracies.
Sustainability Agreements and Green Collaboration: Challenges and Opportunities within the Indonesian Competition Law Framework Diana Fitriana; Mella Ismelina Farma Rahayu; Sugeng Sugeng; Andre Jr Cardenas
Fiat Justisia: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol. 20 No. 3 (2026)
Publisher : Universitas Lampung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25041/fiatjustisia.v20no3.5364

Abstract

This article examined the emerging concept of sustainability collaboration within Indonesia's competition law framework, highlighting the need to reconcile environmental sustainability with effective market competition. Indonesian competition law, particularly Law No. 5 of 1999, traditionally prohibited horizontal agreements under a rigid approach, whereas global developments increasingly recognized sustainability agreements that generated long-term consumer welfare. This study employed normative legal research with a comparative approach, using the regulatory frameworks of the European Union and the United Kingdom as benchmarks. The analysis identified a significant regulatory gap in Indonesia, where Article 50 of Law No. 5 of 1999 did not accommodate environmental efficiencies such as carbon reduction and sustainable supply chains. To address this gap, the study proposed revitalizing the public interest exception, adopting a dedicated KPPU Regulation on Sustainability Agreements, and introducing an open door policy to provide greater legal certainty for businesses. It concluded that shifting toward a long-term consumer welfare standard was essential to support both competitive markets and sustainable economic development in Indonesia.

Page 67 of 67 | Total Record : 667

 63   64   65   66   67 

Filter by Year

2007 2026


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 20 No. 3 (2026) Vol. 20 No. 2 (2026) Vol. 20 No. 1 (2026) Vol. 19 No. 4 (2025) Vol. 19 No. 3 (2025) Vol. 19 No. 2 (2025) Vol. 19 No. 1 (2025) Vol. 18 No. 4 (2024) Vol. 18 No. 3 (2024) Vol. 18 No. 2 (2024) Vol. 18 No. 1 (2024) Vol 17 No 3 (2023): Issue In progress (July 2023) Vol. 17 No. 4 (2023) Vol 17 No 3 (2023) Vol 17 No 2 (2023) Vol 17 No 1 (2023) Vol 16 No 4 (2022) Vol 16 No 3 (2022) Vol 16 No 2 (2022) Vol 16 No 1 (2022) Vol 15 No 4 (2021) Vol 15 No 3 (2021) Vol 15 No 2 (2021) Vol 15 No 1 (2021) Vol 14 No 4 (2020) Vol 14 No 3 (2020) Vol 14 No 2 (2020) Vol 14 No 1 (2020) Vol 13 No 4 (2019) Vol 13 No 3 (2019) Vol 13 No 2 (2019) Vol 13 No 1 (2019) Vol 12 No 4 (2018) Vol 12 No 3 (2018) Vol 12 No 2 (2018) Vol 12 No 1 (2018) Vol 11 No 4 (2017) Vol 11 No 3 (2017) Vol 11 No 2 (2017) Vol 11 No 1 (2017) Vol 10 No 4 (2016) Vol 10 No 3 (2016) Vol 10 No 2 (2016) Vol 10 No 1 (2016) Vol 9 No 4 (2015) Vol 9, No 4 (2015) Vol 9 No 3 (2015) Vol 9, No 3 (2015) Vol 9, No 2 (2015) Vol 9 No 2 (2015) Vol 9, No 1 (2015) Vol 9 No 1 (2015) Vol 8, No 4 (2014): FIAT JUSTISIA Vol 8 No 4 (2014) Vol 8, No 3 (2014): FIAT JUSTISIA Vol 8 No 3 (2014) Vol 8, No 2 (2014): FIAT JUSTISIA Vol 8 No 2 (2014) Vol 8, No 1 (2014): FIAT JUSTISIA Vol 8 No 1 (2014) Vol 7 No 3 (2013) Vol 7 No 2 (2013) Vol 7 No 1 (2013) Vol 6 No 3 (2012) Vol 6 No 2 (2012) Vol 6 No 1 (2012) Vol 5 No 3 (2011) Vol 5 No 2 (2011) Vol 5 No 1 (2011) Vol 4 No 3 (2010) Vol 2 No 3 (2008) Vol 2 No 2 (2008) Vol 1 No 2 (2007) Vol 1 No 1 (2007) Vol 7, No 3: FIAT JUSTISIA Vol 7, No 2: FIAT JUSTISIA Vol 7, No 1: FIAT JUSTISIA Vol 6, No 3: FIAT JUSTISIA Vol 6, No 2: FIAT JUSTISIA Vol 6, No 1 Vol 5, No 3: FIAT JUSTISIA Vol 5, No 2: FIAT JUSTISIA Vol 5, No 1 Vol 4, No 3 Vol 2, No 3 Vol 2, No 2 Vol 1, No 2 Vol 1, No 1 More Issue