Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
3.2
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal FIAT JUSTISIA: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM Sriwijaya Law Review Jurnal Ilmiah Kebijakan Hukum Hasanuddin Law Review Jambura Law Review Gorontalo Law Review Guru Tua : Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran Jurnal Yudisial JUSTISI Cepalo JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW Tadulako Master Law Journal Amsir Law Jurnal (ALJ) Jurnal Adhyasta Pemilu IBLAM Law Review Jurnal Konstitusi Journal Evidence Of Law Jurnal Penyuuhan dan Pemberdayaan Masyarakat (JPPM) Mimbar Hukum Qaumiyyah: Jurnal Hukum Tata Negara
Andi Intan Purnamasari
Fakultas Hukum Universitas Tadulako, Palu, Indonesia
Religion Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Humanities Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Education Environmental Science Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 23 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 23 Documents
Search

 1   2   3 
Legal Children Protection as Victim of Psychological Violence in Surakarta Oktaviary, Adinda Rizky; Kurnianingsih, Marisa; Andi Intan Purnamasari
JUSTISI Vol. 10 No. 3 (2024): JUSTISI
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Muhammadiyah Sorong

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33506/js.v10i3.3232

Abstract

This study aims to reveal how Surakarta government faces legal protection. Also, constraints in providing fulfillment of the rights of child victims of psychological violence committed in the family environment. This study uses an empirical juridical method interview and examine the legal provisions that apply in society. It focuses on violence against children committed by their parents, which has an impact on the child's psychology with valid data sourced from the authorities. Although violence against children is a violation of human rights, without realizing it, there are still many people who are willing to commit acts of psychological violence against children. It is because the child is unlikely to rebel when they receive improper treatment from adults, including within the scope of their own family, even though this treatment will have an impact on the child's psychology in the future. The results revealed that illustrate the psychological violence is only considered an internal family problem, and not many people realize it as an act of violence. Surakarta government has actually made efforts to prevent and reduce the number of violence against children, such as by providing an understanding of the importance of giving good parenting, being more able to control emotions, and being sensitive to the conditions and needs of children. This study concludes that the Surakarta government, through DP3AP2KB, has made various efforts to deal with cases of violence that can have an impact on children's psychology. However, these efforts are not fully supported by the public due to the lack of understanding and awareness of the dangers of violence against children, so the number of child abuse in Surakarta has not been a significant change.
PERTIMBANGAN HUKUM DALAM PERJANJIAN KERJA KATEGORI PKWTT: Kajian Putusan Nomor 47/Pdt.Sus-PHI/2018/PN.Pbr Supriyadi, Supriyadi; Purnamasari, Andi Intan; Kasim, Aminuddin
Jurnal Yudisial Vol. 17 No. 3 (2024): DISPUTE OF RIGHT
Publisher : Komisi Yudisial RI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29123/jy.v17i3.726

Abstract

Artikel ini menganalisis Putusan Nomor 47/Pdt.Sus-PHI/2018/PN.Pbr untuk menilai ketepatan dan aspek keadilan dari pertimbangan hukum oleh majelis hakim. Analisis menggunakan pendekatan analisis teks dalam putusan yang berfokus pada hukum acara, penalaran hukum, dan kesesuaian antara pertimbangan hakum dengan amar putusan. Untuk memfokuskan analisis terhadap putusan ini, dirumuskan pertanyaan utama yang menjadi landasan kajian, yaitu: pertama, apakah pertimbangan hakim dalam Putusan Nomor 47/Pdt.Sus-PHI/2018/PN.Pbr sudah tepat dan sudah memenuhi aspek keadilan terhadap karyawan dengan perjanjian kerja waktu tidak tertentu (PKWTT); kedua, mengapa pendapat berbeda dalam putusan tersebut merupakan concurring opinion. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian deskriptif-analitis. Penelitian ini juga menggunakan pendekatan peraturan perundang-undangan, pendekatan fakta hukum, dan pendekatan studi kasus (case study) untuk menemukan pengaturan prospektif berkaitan dengan konsep PKWTT melalui penalaran hakim dan konsep concurent opinion dalam putusan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa hakim menggunakan pendekatan realisme hukum dalam menilai fakta. Peristiwa hukum yang terjadi antara pemberi kerja dan penerima kerja dalam perjanjian kerja merupakan pekerjaan yang termasuk dalam kategori PKWTT, bukan perjanjian kerja waktu tertentu (PKWT). Perbedaan pertimbangan dari hakim anggota kedua nampaknya bukan merupakan dissenting opinion melainkan concurrent opinion. Hakim anggota kedua memiliki kesamaan pandangan dengan majelis hakim lainnya dalam menafsirkan bahwa hubungan kerja yang terjadi merupakan PKWTT, bukan PKWT. Namun demikian, perbedaan pendapat muncul terkait besaran upah proses yang dinilai layak untuk dibayarkan kepada pekerja.
AI Revolution: The Legal Battle Between Indonesia and the European Union to Protect Copyright from Artificial Intelligence Maddusila, Sitti Fatimah; Lanini, Agus; Purnamasari, Andi Intan
Hasanuddin Law Review VOLUME 11 ISSUE 3, DECEMBER 2025
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Hasanuddin University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20956/halrev.v11i3.6499

Abstract

The global surge in generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) has triggered unprecedented legal complexities in copyright protection. This article examines how Indonesia and the European Union (EU) approach the challenges posed by AI driven content creation and potential copyright infringement. Through doctrinal and comparative legal analysis, this study explores regulatory frameworks, liability questions, and enforcement mechanisms in both jurisdictions. The analysis reveals that Indonesia's Copyright Law No. 28 of 2014 remains anthropocentric, lacking recognition of AI generated works and mechanisms for regulating AI training using copyrighted materials. By contrast, the EU has developed a more comprehensive approach through the EU Copyright Directive and the AI Act, which incorporates risk-based AI governance and explicit opt out rights for copyright holders. The study identifies significant regulatory asymmetries between the two jurisdictions and examines potential areas for legal development. Drawing on international frameworks such as the OECD AI Guidelines, this research suggests that Indonesia could benefit from adopting more anticipatory regulatory approaches similar to the EU's principle-based strategy. The findings indicate that proactive legal reforms are necessary to address emerging AI copyright challenges in developing legal systems. This study contributes to the growing body of comparative legal scholarship on AI governance and offers insights for policymakers navigating the intersection of artificial intelligence and intellectual property law.
Co-Authors Adiguna Kharismawan Aminuddin Kasim Awaliyah , Awaliyah Awaliyah, Awaliyah Bin Mohd Zahir, Mohd Zamre Darmiati Darmiati Fattimah Maddusila Fidyah Faramita Utami Hamdan Rampadio Haniyatul Husna binti Md Mohtar Kasim , Aminuddin Lanini, Agus Lembang Palipadang M. Hatta Roma Tampubolon Manga Patila Marisa Kurnianingsih Md Said, Muhamad Helmi MUHAMMAD RIZAL Muja'hidah, Muja'hidah Nurhayati Mardin Nursiah Moh. Yunus Nurul Miqat Oktaviary, Adinda Rizky Rafika Nur Rahmat Bakri Sulbadana Sulbadana Supriyadi Supriyadi Supriyadi Supriyadi Supriyadi Supriyadi Supriyadi Supriyadi Supriyadi Supriyadi Supriyadi Supriyadi Surahman Surahman Syamsuddin, Adiesty Septhiany Prihatiningsih Utami, Fidyah Paramita