Garuda - Garba Rujukan Digital

p-Index From 2020 - 2025

6.293

P-Index

This Author published in this journals

All Journal Jurnal Legalitas DE JURE Pembaharuan Hukum Jurnal Konstitusi Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum LEGALITY Nagari Law Review Jurnal Hukum Samudra Keadilan Jambura Law Review Al Ahkam Jurnal Suara Hukum Budapest International Research and Critics Institute-Journal (BIRCI-Journal): Humanities and Social Sciences Sultan Jurisprudence : Jurnal Riset Ilmu Hukum Jurnal Konstitusi DAS SEIN: Jurnal Pengabdian Hukum dan Humaniora Trunojoyo Law Review Indonesia Law Reform Journal (ILREJ) Estudiante Law Journal Perkara: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Dan Politik Jurnal Hukum Islam Journal of Law and Legal Reform Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia LamLaj Lex Scientia Law Review Indonesian State Law Review (ISLRev) JILS (Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies)

Novendri M Nggilu

Universitas Negeri Gorontalo

Author-ID : 1035275

Religion Arts Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Environmental Science Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences Other

Published : 38 Documents Claim Missing Document

Claim Missing Document

Articles

Title

Denyut Nadi Amandemen Kelima UUD 1945 melalui Pelibatan Mahkamah Konstitusi sebagai Prinsip the Guardian of the Constitution Ahmad Ahmad; Novendri M. Nggilu
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 16, No 4 (2019)
Publisher : The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia

Perubahan UUD 1945 yang telah dilakukan MPR membuktikan, bahwa ada benturan kepentingan sehingga menjadikan perubahan konstitusi yang ‘tambal sulam’ dan tidak berorientasi kepentingan jangka panjang, serta jauh dari kata memuaskan karena ‘elitis’ dan kurang partisipatif, maka perubahan konstitusi seharusnya tidak dilakukan oleh satu lembaga saja yang dalam hal ini adalah MPR. Oleh karna itu, penting kirannya melibatkan Mahkamah Konstitusi agar tercipta hasil perubahan UUD NRI 1945 yang partisipatif. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui tentang apa urgensi pelibatan mahkamah konstitusi dalam perubahan Undang Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945, dan bagaimana prospektif pelibatan mahkamah konstitusi dalam perubahan undang undang dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945. Penelitian ini mengunakan Jenis penelitian normatif. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukan bahwa Urgensi pelibatan MK dalam perubahan Undang Undang Dasar di dasarkan pada beberapa hal, antara lain: Pertama, terdapat banyak kelemahan dalam amandemen pertama sampai dengan amandemen ke-empat; Kedua, Eksistensi MPR sebagai lembaga politik; ketiga, Pelakasanaan prinsip Checks and Balance System; Keempat, Perwujudan MK sebagai The Guardian Of Consitution. Bahwa Prospektif pelibatan MK dalam perubahan UUD NRI 1945 adalah dengan menekankan pada political good will dari MPR untuk menyusun Mekanisme perubahan UUD NRI 1945 dengan melibatkan MK sebagai lembaga negara yang memberikan Sertfikasi Konstitusi dari hasil kajian perubahan yang dilakukan oleh Komisi konstitusi sebelum mendapatkan persetujuan dari MPR untuk ditetapkan sebagai hasil perubahan UUD 1945 yang baru. hasil dari mekanisme perubahan konstitusi dengan melibatkan MK ini ditujukan untuk menghasilkan perubahan konstitusi yang bersifat the people of the constitution.The amendments of the 1945 Constitution that the MPR has done proves that there is a conflict of interest that makes constitutional changes ‘patchy' and not oriented to a long term interest and far from satisfying because of 'elitist' and less participatory. Thus, the changes to the constitution should not be carried out by one institution only which in this case is the MPR. Therefore, it is important to involve the Constitutional Court in order to create a participatory change in the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia. This study aims to find out about the urgency of involving the Constitutional Court in the amendment of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia, and how prospective the Constitutional Court to involve in the amendment to the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia. This study uses a type of normative research and several approaches, namely; law approach (statue approach), comparative approach, and conceptual approach. The results of this study indicate that the urgency of involving the Constitutional Court in amending the Constitution is based on several things, including: First, the weaknesses in the first amendment to the fourth amendment; Second, the existence of the MPR as a political institution; third, the implementation of the Checks and Balance System principle; Fourth, the realization of the Constitutional Court as the Guardian of Constitution. The prospective involvement of the Constitutional Court in the amendment to the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia is to emphasize the political goodwill of the MPR to develop a mechanism for amending the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia by involving the Constitutional Court as a state institution which provides a review of changes made by the constitution before obtaining approval from the MPR to be determined as a result of the amendment to the new 1945 Constitution. The result of the constitutional change mechanism by involving the Constitutional Court was intended to produce constitutional changes that have the character the people of the constitution.

Menggagas Sanksi atas Tindakan Constitution Disobedience terhadap Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Novendri M. Nggilu
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 16, No 1 (2019)
Publisher : The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia

Mahkamah Konstitusi sebagai lembaga yang secara fungsional menjalankan tugas untuk mengawal konstitusi Indonesia, untuk memastikan apakah Konstitusi Indonesia dilaksanakan secara penuh dan bertanggung jawab atau tidak. Putusan-putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi yang mencerminkan jaminan constitution justice value baik dalam perkara Pengujian Undang-Undang terhadap Undang-Undang Dasar Tahun 1945, maupun dalam perkara Perselisihan Hasil Pemilihan Umum yang seharusnya dijalankan oleh semua pihak yang terkait dengan putusan tersebut, tak jarang memunculkan situasi terbalik. Oleh sebab itu, tulisan ini hendak menjawab pertanyaan penelitian tentang ; 1) bentuk-bentuk tindakan constitution disobedience terhadap putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi, 2) implikasi dari tindakan constitution disobedience tersebut, dan 3) bagaimana sanksi bagi tindakan constitution disobedience agar dapat menjamin penegakan konstitusi di Indonesia. Metode penelitian yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah penelitian normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan, pendekatan konseptual, dan pendekatan kasus, dengan sumber bahan hukum kepustakaan dan teknik analisis preskriptif. Temuan dari penelitian ini adalah ; 1) adanya bentuk pembangkangan terhadap putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi baik dengan cara menghidupkan kembali pasal-pasal yang telah dibatalkan oleh MK, atau bahkan pembangkangan terhadap putusan MK melalui putusan pengadilan di lingkungan Mahkamah Agung. 2) pembangkangan terhadap putusan MK berakibat pada ketidakpastian hukum sampai pada terjadinya constitutional justice delay. 3) alternatif sanksi yang dapat dibebankan pada pihak yang melakukan pembangkangan terhadap putusan MK adalah sanksi contempt of court melalui perluasan makna contempt of court, atau dengan cara pembebanan dwangsom atau uang paksa.The Constitutional Court as an institution that functionally carries out the duty to oversee the Indonesian constitution, to ascertain whether the Indonesian Constitution is implemented in full and is responsible or not. Decisions of the Indonesian constitutional court reflecting guarantees of constitutional justice values both in the case of constitution 1945 judicial review and in cases of general election results disputes which should be enforce by all parties related to the decision, often creating inverse situations. Therefore, this paper is about to answer research questions about; 1) forms of constitution disobedience actions of constitutional court decisions, 2) Implications of constitution disobedience actions, and 3) how sanctions for constitution disobedience acts in order to guarantee the enforcement of the constitution in Indonesia. The research method used is normative research with a statute approach, conceptual approach, and case approach, with library legal materials and prescriptive analysis techniques. The findings of this study are; 1) there is a form of defiance of the Indonesian constitutional court's decision either by reviving the articles that have been canceled by the constitutional court, or even disobdiance of the constitutional court's decision through supreme court decisions. 2) The disobdiance of the constitutional court's decision resulted in legal uncertainty until the occurrence of constitutional justice delay. 3) the alternative sanctions that can be imposed on the party who commits disobediance of the constitutional court decision is the contemp of court sanction through the expansion of the meaning of the contemp of court, or by imposing dwansom or forced money.

Ratio Legis Pembatasan Kedudukan Hukum bagi Pembentuk Undang-Undang dalam Pengujian Undang-Undang Fence Wantu; Novendri Mohamad Nggilu; Suwitno Imran; Rahmat Teguh Santoso Gobel
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol. 19 No. 3 (2022)
Publisher : Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31078/jk1931

The discourse on limiting the legislators standing to submit a constitutional review is not an entirely new issue to analyze. However, these things still need to be examined to explore the legal ratio of limitation of the legislator’s standing to submit a constitutional review by the Constitutional Court. This research specifically answers the questions: (a) how are the dynamics of the use of the legislators standing in the constitutional review? (b) what is the legal ratio for limiting legislators standing in the constitutional review? This study uses a normative legal research method by analyzing secondary data in the form of legislation, the Constitutional Court decisions, and literature related to legislators standing to submit the constitutional review. The results of this study indicate that the legal ratio limiting legislators’ standing can be traced through the legal considerations of the Constitutional Court decisions from 2003-2019.

Co-Authors Abdurahman, Ali Adnan, Raihan Sahrul Ahmad Ahmad Ahmad Ahmad Ahmad Ahmad Amancik Amancik Andi Inar Sahabat Apripari, Apripari Arsyad, Yusna Badu, Linawaty Wadju Barus, Sonia Ivana Chami, Yassine Delvi Putri Kaparang Dian Ekawaty Ismail Evi Noviawati Evi Noviawati Fence M Wantu Fenty U. puluhulawa Indra Perwira, Indra Ismail, Nurwita Julisa Aprilia Kaluku Ladiku, Muhammad Amin Lisnawaty W. Badu Luksiana Lasimpala Mellisa Towadi Moh. Ihsan Husnan Moh. Ihsan Husnan Mohamad Hidayat Muhtar Mohamad Rivaldi Moha Mohamad Rizky Alhasni Mohammad AbdAllah Alshawabkeh Mohammad Abdi Lanjahi Muhamad Rusdiyanto Puluhuluwa Muhammad Amin Ladiku Muhammad Hatta Roma Mutia Cherawaty Thalib Nur Mohamad Kasim Nur, Asrul Ibrahim Puluhulawa, Rusdiyanto U Putra Perdana Ahmad Saifulloh, Putra Perdana Ahmad Rachmaniar, Adelia Rahmat Teguh Santoso Gobel Raihan Sahrul Adnan Ramdhan Kasim Rasyid, Usman Sahabat, Andi Inar Sinaga, Muhammad Ridho Sri Indriyanti Mahmud Sulaiman, Dindha Shahrazade Suwitno Yutye Imran Vivi Oktaviani Pulukadang Wahidullah Wahidullah, Wahidullah Wirnangsi Puluhulawa Yassine Chami Yassine, Chami Yayuk Rizki Hulukati Zulkifli Zulkifli Zulkifli

Title Search

Found 3 Documents Search Journal : Jurnal Konstitusi

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title

Found 3 Documents
Search
Journal : Jurnal Konstitusi