Garuda - Garba Rujukan Digital

Increasing Legal Awareness of Village Communities Through an Integrated Legal Counseling Program: A Case Study of Pasir Angin Village Samosir, Tetti; Maslihati Nur Hidayati; Didi Sunardi; Kevin Malinowski Simanjuntak
International Journal of Community Service (IJCS) Vol. 4 No. 2 (2025): July-December
Publisher : PT Inovasi Pratama Internasional

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55299/ijcs.v4i2.1560

Legal awareness among rural communities remains relatively low due to limited access to legal information and minimal outreach from authorities. This study aims to analyze the effectiveness of the implementation of an integrated legal outreach program in increasing legal awareness among the people of Pasir Angin Village. The study used a qualitative approach with a case study design and participatory action research involving 87 participants from various community groups over a six-month period. Data collection was conducted through participant observation, in-depth interviews, focus group discussions, and document analysis, then analyzed using thematic analysis techniques. The outreach program integrated five main topics: land and electronic certificates, narcotics prevention, personal data protection in fintech, family and inheritance law, and notary aspects. The results showed a significant increase in the level of community legal understanding from an average of 34% to 78%, with a program satisfaction level reaching 4.3 on a scale of 5. This program successfully shifted the community's paradigm from a traditional approach to a more structured formal legal settlement. Key success factors included the competence of the resource persons, interactive-participatory delivery methods, village government support, and the relevance of the material to the real needs of the community. This research provides an important contribution to the development of a community service model in the legal field and can be replicated in other villages with adjustments to the local context to create a more legally aware community and able to access justice optimally.

Study of the Cancellation of the Deed of Sale and Purchase Agreement By the Court of ConsequencesAct against the law (Case Study of Decision Number 55/Pdt.G/2022/Pn.Dpk) Arifin, Ajun; Samosir, Tetti
Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities Vol. 6 No. 1 (2025): (JLPH) Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities
Publisher : Dinasti Research

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/jlph.v6i1.2454

The Sales and Purchase Agreement (PPJB) is a crucial legal instrument in property transactions in Indonesia, but its cancellation by the court creates significant legal complexity for legal certainty and investor protection. This study analyzes the court's legal considerations in canceling a PPJB deed due to unlawful acts through a case study of Decision Number 55/Pdt.G/2022/PN.DPK which was upheld at the cassation level, using normative juridical methods and a descriptive analytical approach to examine the consistency of the application of contract law and the effectiveness of legal protection for land title holders. The research findings show a fundamental inconsistency in the court's decision, which declared the plaintiff a good-faith buyer in the conventional case, but in the counter-conventional case, declared the plaintiff to have committed a breach of contract with disproportionate sanctions in the form of cancellation of the agreement and loss of payment of Rp. 2,320,000,000. This contradiction indicates a systemic weakness in distinguishing the concepts of default and unlawful acts, a disregard for the principle of proportionality of sanctions, and the ineffectiveness of available legal protection mechanisms because the land registration system can be canceled based on inconsistent considerations. This study concludes the need for reformulation of the judicial approach in handling PPJB disputes through the development of a consistent, proportional, and just legal framework to maintain public trust in the legal system and support a healthy and sustainable property investment climate.

Rasionalitas Majelis Hakim dalam Pembatalan Akta Hibah Tanah Akibat Perbuatan Melawan Hukum oleh Ahli Waris: Studi Putusan Nomor 175/Pdt.G/2023/PN Kpn Dewi, Eriska Desianti; Samosir, Tetti; Harlina, Indah
SIGn Jurnal Hukum Vol 7 No 1: April - September 2025
Publisher : CV. Social Politic Genius (SIGn)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37276/sjh.v7i1.423

Disputes concerning the annulment of land grant deeds between Inheritors constitute a complex issue within civil and agrarian law, requiring an in-depth understanding of the rationale behind court decisions. This research aims to analyze the rationale of the Panel of Judges of the Kepanjen District Court in Decision Number 175/Pdt.G/2023/PN Kpn regarding the annulment of Grant Deed Number 167/KEP-35.10/IX/2020. Employing a normative legal research method with a case study approach, the qualitative analysis focused on the legal considerations (ratio decidendi) within the decision. The analysis results indicate the Panel of Judges’ rationale was primarily based on the assessment of evidence corroborating the Plaintiff’s pre-grant proper claim derived from an oral transaction, setting aside the formal strength of the authentic deed due to the Defendant’s absence of rebuttal evidence. The juridical annulment of the deed was grounded in the direct application of the Nemo dat quod non habet principle, referenced through Article 210 section (2) of the Compilation of Islamic Law because the Grantor was proven to have granted part of the object that was not his right. The qualification of unlawful act against the Defendant was determined as a logical consequence of this finding, albeit without in-depth elaboration of the elements, demonstrating pragmatic reasoning. In conclusion, the judicial rationale, in this case, tends to prioritize substantive justice over formal legal certainty, yet it raises discourse concerning evidentiary standards and potential issues of inheritance law coherence that remain unaddressed.

Implications for the Power of Attorney to Sell Deed Made by a Notary Due to Inaccuracy Samosir, Tetti; Indah Harlina; Vicky
Jurnal Smart Hukum (JSH) Vol. 3 No. 2 (2025): October-January
Publisher : Inovasi Pratama Internasional. Ltd

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55299/jsh.v3i2.1090

The role of a notary is crucial in facilitating legal certainty and protection for the community. In civil law, notaries hold a highly strategic position as their profession deals with fundamental and critical issues in every legal action, particularly within civil law. The public, both as subjects and objects of legal transactions, bear significant burdens regarding legal administration. Violations by notaries can be classified as breaches of professional ethics or breaches of the law, with consequences that may include civil liabilities (compensation), criminal penalties (imprisonment and fines), and administrative sanctions (dismissal from office). Every unlawful action causing harm to others must be accounted for by the perpetrator. In criminal law theory, offenses are categorized into intentional and negligent acts. Any action causing undue harm and violating the law constitutes an illegal act. This study analyzes the juridical implications of drafting a power of attorney for sale from normative and case-based perspectives. The research revealed that a notary's failure to conduct adequate checks on document legality for a Power of Attorney for Sale resulted in unlawful actions that harmed legitimate parties, leading to material losses.

Legal Certainty of the Proof Power of Notary Deeds in the Concept of Cyber Notary according to Indonesian Positive Law Iswari, Katrin Yogi; Adzania, Pelangi; Novilawati, Rizka; Samosir, Tetti
JURNAL AKTA Vol 11, No 3 (2024): September 2024
Publisher : Program Magister (S2) Kenotariatan, Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Islam Sultan Agung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30659/akta.v11i3.39750

The development of technology in the field of notary in the digital era requires notaries to provide public services in accordance with their roles and authorities based on cyber notary. Therefore, the urgency of this study is to analyze the guarantee of legal certainty over the evidentiary power of Notarial Deeds made in the concept of cyber notary along with all the legal consequences that arise, especially for agreements that are required to be in the form of Authentic Deeds. This study is a normative legal research conducted by examining library materials or secondary data which is also commonly referred to as literature study research. This study concludes that there is no legal certainty regarding the evidentiary power of notarial deeds made in the concept of cyber notary according to Indonesian positive law because there are no clear regulations regarding cyber notary based on Law No. 2 of 2014 concerning Amendments to Law No. 30 of 2004 concerning Notary Positions and Law No. 11 of 2008 concerning Information and Electronic Transactions. There is a degradation of the evidentiary power of notarial deeds which should be authentic deeds that have perfect evidentiary power into private deeds. Such conditions will also ultimately result in the failure to fulfill the formal agreement elements required by legislation and have a further impact on the fulfillment of obligations under legislation that require the use of a notarial deed.

The Legal Implications of Forgery Sale & Purchase Binding Agreement by Notary Public Samosir, Tetti; Harlina, Indah; Akbar, Fikri Miftakhul
JURNAL AKTA Vol 9, No 4 (2022): December 2022
Publisher : Program Magister (S2) Kenotariatan, Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Islam Sultan Agung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30659/akta.v9i4.27920

The notary is a public official who is authorized to make authentic deeds, in which the obligation of a notary in carrying out his position must act honestly, reliably, independently, impartially, thoroughly, and safeguard the interests of the parties involved in legal actions. This is known as the precautionary principle for a notary in carrying out his position as a public official. The purpose of this writing is to examine the legal implications of counterfeiting and the responsibility of a notary to the binding sale and purchase agreement he made. The research method used in this paper is normative juridical with a statutory and case study approach. The results and findings obtained after conducting research and analysis of the problems in this paper, namely the legal impact due to the negligence of a notary in making a binding sale and purchase agreement because to forgery, so that the legal consequences of these PPJB are void, this is because it is not in accordance with the legal requirements of an agreement as stated in Article 1320 of the Civil Code, namely those relating to lawful causes. This happens because the notary in carrying out his authority does not carry out his obligations related to the principle of precautionary, therefore the notary must be responsible for his actions that have been carried out in accordance with the law and code of ethics. So it can be concluded that the deed made by the notary is null and void and is not an authentic deed but a private deed.

Study of the Cancellation of the Deed of Sale and Purchase Agreement By the Court of ConsequencesAct against the law (Case Study of Decision Number 55/Pdt.G/2022/Pn.Dpk) Arifin, Ajun; Samosir, Tetti
Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities Vol. 6 No. 1 (2025): (JLPH) Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities
Publisher : Dinasti Research

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/jlph.v6i1.2454

The Sales and Purchase Agreement (PPJB) is a crucial legal instrument in property transactions in Indonesia, but its cancellation by the court creates significant legal complexity for legal certainty and investor protection. This study analyzes the court's legal considerations in canceling a PPJB deed due to unlawful acts through a case study of Decision Number 55/Pdt.G/2022/PN.DPK which was upheld at the cassation level, using normative juridical methods and a descriptive analytical approach to examine the consistency of the application of contract law and the effectiveness of legal protection for land title holders. The research findings show a fundamental inconsistency in the court's decision, which declared the plaintiff a good-faith buyer in the conventional case, but in the counter-conventional case, declared the plaintiff to have committed a breach of contract with disproportionate sanctions in the form of cancellation of the agreement and loss of payment of Rp. 2,320,000,000. This contradiction indicates a systemic weakness in distinguishing the concepts of default and unlawful acts, a disregard for the principle of proportionality of sanctions, and the ineffectiveness of available legal protection mechanisms because the land registration system can be canceled based on inconsistent considerations. This study concludes the need for reformulation of the judicial approach in handling PPJB disputes through the development of a consistent, proportional, and just legal framework to maintain public trust in the legal system and support a healthy and sustainable property investment climate.

MEMBANGUN LEGAL CAPABILITY UNTUK AKSES KEADILAN: ANALISIS TRANSFORMASI KESADARAN HUKUM MELALUI PROGRAM PENYULUHAN HOLISTIK DI TINGKAT DESA Surono, Agus; Hidayati, Maslihati Nur; Abdullah, Zaitun; Samosir, Tetti
Abdi Implementasi Pancasila:Jurnal Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat Vol 5 No 2 (2025): November
Publisher : Universitas Pancasila

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35814/tn609791

Penelitian ini menganalisis transformasi kesadaran hukum masyarakat dan keberlanjutan dampak program penyuluhan hukum terpadu berbasis intervensi komunitas di Desa Pasir Angin. Melalui pendekatan mixed-method yang mengintegrasikan studi kasus partisipatif dan pengukuran kuantitatif pre-test serta post-test, penelitian ini mengeksplorasi perubahan paradigma masyarakat dari penyelesaian sengketa berbasis adat menuju mekanisme formal-legal, sekaligus menguji efektivitas program dalam empat dimensi isu hukum utama: pertanahan, perlindungan data pribadi dan fintech, narkotika, serta hukum keluarga dan waris. Hasil menunjukkan peningkatan signifikan rata-rata pemahaman hukum masyarakat dari 34 menjadi 78 poin, diiringi dengan pergeseran nilai normatif—seperti bergesernya preferensi masyarakat dari hukuman represif terhadap penyalahgunaan narkoba menuju pendekatan rehabilitatif. Program juga berhasil mendorong pembentukan spontan empat kelompok sadar hukum yang menunjukkan keberlanjutan internalisasi pengetahuan dan aksi kolektif, tanpa ketergantungan insentif eksternal. Penelitian ini juga mengidentifikasi adanya “knowledge-action gap” di mana peningkatan pengetahuan tidak otomatis berimplikasi pada perubahan perilaku konkret akibat hambatan struktural, stigma sosial, serta keterbatasan akses dan infrastruktur. Rekomendasi utama meliputi integrasi pembangunan legal capability dalam setiap penyuluhan, pendampingan berkelanjutan, penguatan kelompok sadar hukum, desentralisasi dan digitalisasi layanan, serta harmonisasi nilai hukum adat dengan mekanisme formal. Studi ini menegaskan bahwa transformasi paradigma hukum di tingkat desa menuntut intervensi partisipatif, berkelanjutan, dan sistemik yang memberdayakan komunitas menuju akses keadilan yang nyata.

Dishonorable Removal of a Notary for Breach of Professional Ethics: An Analysis of Decision No. 3/Pdt.G/2022/PN Plk Waluya, Kintan Salma; Samosir, Tetti; Anggriani, Jum
Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Kyadiren Vol 7 No 2 (2026): Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Kyadiren
Publisher : PPPM, Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum (STIH) Biak-Papua

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46924/jihk.v7i2.422

Dishonorable dismissal of a notary constitutes the most severe administrative sanction, directly affecting the continuity of office and the professional legitimacy of notaries as public officials. This study examines the legality of dishonorable dismissal imposed on a notary for ethical violations and evaluates the role of the Regional Supervisory Council within the notarial oversight system, focusing on Decision Number 3/Pdt.G/2022/PN Plk. The research employs a normative legal method using statutory and case-based approaches. Primary and secondary legal materials are analyzed qualitatively through legal interpretation and juridical reasoning. The findings reveal that although the authority to dismiss notaries is normatively regulated under the Notary Office Act, its implementation in the case under study raises significant concerns regarding legal certainty, proportionality of sanctions, and compliance with procedural justice, particularly the right to defense. Furthermore, the Regional Supervisory Council has not functioned optimally as a professional guidance mechanism and tends to operate in a predominantly procedural-administrative manner. This study underscores the need to recalibrate the notarial supervision framework to ensure that dishonorable dismissal is imposed in an accountable, proportional, and legally reasoned manner consistent with the principles of good governance.

Reconstruction of Indonesian Tax Law Based on The Principle Of Distributive Justice To Establish A Welfare State In The Framework of The Rule of Law Pamungkas, Ery; Samosir, Tetti; Munzil, Fontian; Hidayati, Maslihati Nur
Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities Vol. 6 No. 2 (2025): (JLPH) Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities
Publisher : Dinasti Research

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/jlph.v6i2.2670

Amidst efforts to establish a welfare state, the current tax system actually creates economic injustice through the dominance of regressive indirect taxes, asymmetric law enforcement, and a transparency deficit that weakens public legitimacy. This study uses a dogmatic research method and deeply analyzes the vertical and horizontal consistency between legal norms and tax practices. The study was conducted using a textual and conceptual approach, as well as an assessment of the harmonization of various related regulations. The results show a disharmony between the constitutional mandate demanding distributive justice and consumption tax policies and weak enforcement against corporate tax avoidance. This phenomenon is exacerbated by limited transparency and accountability in the use of tax funds, leading to a crisis of public trust. The paper recommends a comprehensive reconstruction of the tax system, including strengthening progressive taxation, equal law enforcement, increasing fiscal transparency, harmonizing regulations, and adopting international practices, so that the tax system can function optimally as an instrument for redistributing welfare in accordance with the principles of the Pancasila rule of law.

Title

Found 32 Documents
Search

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title Search

Found 32 Documents Search

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title

Found 32 Documents
Search