Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
5.602
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal LAW REVIEW Jurnal IUS (Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan) Jurisprudentie International Journal of Law Reconstruction Jurnal Ilmu Hukum The Juris SOL JUSTICIA Waskita: Jurnal Pendidikan Nilai dan Pembangunan Karakter Jurnal Jatiswara Jurnal Hukum Volkgeist Jurnal Restorative Justice Al-Adalah: Jurnal Hukum dan Politik Islam Jurnal Ilmu Hukum KYADIREN Musamus Devotion Journal Jurnal Komunitas Yustisia Widya Pranata Hukum : Jurnal Kajian dan Penelitian Hukum Indonesian Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology (IJCLC) Devotion: Journal of Research and Community Service Parta: Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat Cakrawala: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Global Law and Justice SASI Sagu: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat
Mulyadi Alrianto Tajuddin
Fakultas Hukum Universitas Musamus
Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Arts Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences Other

Published : 49 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : Indonesian Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology (IJCLC)

 1 
Kewenangan KPK dalam Melakukan Penggabungan Perkara TPPU dengan Predicate Crime Korupsi Eki Tolanda; Estes Metelmety; Ragil Sanjaya Marjuki; Mulyadi Alrianto Tajuddin
Indonesian Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology (IJCLC) Vol 5, No 1 (2024)
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.18196/ijclc.v5i1.21441

Abstract

Crime is an act that can cause harm to other people and even to the state and is called a delict or criminal act which is regulated in the criminal code. The crime of money laundering (TPPU) is one of the criminal acts regulated in Law Number 8 of 2010. Several TPPU cases are crimes originating from corruption, so disclosure of these TPPU cases is carried out by the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK). ). During the investigation and investigation process, the Corruption Eradication Committee found that the money resulting from corruption had been changed in form through the money laundering process, but in the process of enforcing the court's decision, it only decided on criminal acts of corruption even though money laundering had been carried out. The aim of the research is to determine the authority of the Corruption Eradication Committee (KPK) in combining TPPU cases with the predicate crime of corruption. The research method used is normative juridical. The results of the research can be concluded based on articles 74 and 75 of the TPPU Law which state that investigators of predicate crimes can carry out TPPU investigations if they find sufficient initial evidence of TPPU occurring when conducting predicate crime investigations in accordance with their authority so that the Corruption Eradication Commission is one of the investigators referred to based on the explanation in article 74 In terms of prosecution, it can be carried out by a public prosecutor from the Prosecutor's Office and a public prosecutor from the Corruption Eradication Commission if the original crime was corruption
Implementasi Penelitian Kemasyarakatan sebagai Pertimbangan Putusan Hakim dalam Perkara Anak yang Berkonflik Dengan Hukum Salsabella, Karina Farah; Tajuddin, Mulyadi Alrianto; Y. Badilla , Nurul Widhanita
Indonesian Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology (IJCLC) Vol. 6 No. 2 (2025)
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.18196/ijclc.v6i2.26591

Abstract

Community research is an instrument in the juvenile justice system used to provide a comprehensive overview of the social, psychological, and family conditions of children involved in criminal acts. This study examines the extent to which community research results influence judges' decisions in imposing sanctions or rehabilitation on children in conflict with the law. This research was conducted using an empirical juridical method that examines approaches to legal studies and phenomena occurring in Merauke Regency. The data obtained were then processed into primary and secondary data. The results indicate that although community research provides invaluable information in determining more rehabilitative decisions, there are challenges in terms of limited time and available resources, which can affect the quality of the research results. This study recommends improvements in the process of implementing community research and increasing the time allotted to obtain more accurate results that are appropriate to the needs of children. Furthermore, the study emphasizes that decisions made by judges can provide better recovery and rehabilitation for children  
Co-Authors Agus Sunaryo Alputila, Marlyn Andi Baso Kumala Andi Ervin Novara Jaya Asriadi Zainuddin Darmawati Darmawati Darmawati Darmawati Dina Fitri Septarini Dyva Choirunnisa Eki Tolanda Emiliana Bernadina Rahail Erni Dwita Silambi, Erni Dwita Estes Metelmety Firman Hadi Gusti Ayu Utami Hadi, Firman Handika Dwi. A Pelu Imran Rusli Tarsan Jumriani Nawawi leonardus Abung Marlyn Jane Alputila Marlyn Jane Alputila Mohamad Aris Dianto Aris Dianto Muhammad Afrian Gae Muhammad Saiful Fahmi Nur Jalal Nurul Widhanita Y Badilla Nurul Widhanita Y. Badilla Nutakor , Briggs Samuel Mawunyo Ohoilulin, Adrian Rian Parera, Zegovia A Pramukti, Lilis Ragil Sanjaya Marjuki Ricardo Goncalves Klau Rudini Hasyim Rado Salsabella, Karina Farah Salvadoris Pieter Stefanie Gabriella Putri Sukirman Sukirman Sumarsono, Adi Tolanda, Eki Utami, Gusti Ayu Y. Badilla , Nurul Widhanita Y. Badilla, Nurul Widhanita Yuda Musatajab