Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 24 Documents
Search

Cultivating Religious Moderation through Ḥadīth Content in Junior High School: A Psychological Perspective on State and Al-Azhar Teaching Materials Rochmawati, Nikmah; Musyafiq, Ahmad; Rika Novalina; Mohamad Maulana Magiman
Mutawatir : Jurnal Keilmuan Tafsir Hadith Vol. 15 No. 2 (2025): DECEMBER
Publisher : Department of Qur'an dan Hadith Faculty of Ushuluddin and Philosophy UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15642/mutawatir.2025.15.2.86-116

Abstract

The spread of intolerance and radicalism among adolescents has made the internalization of religious moderation increasingly urgent for basic and secondary education. This study examines the ḥadīth content of the Islamic Religious Education (PAI) teaching materials used in parallel at SMP Islam Al-Azhar 29 Semarang and its implications for cultivating moderation, viewed through a psychological lens. Through a qualitative content analysis and comparative reading of the two sets of materials, those of the Ministry of Primary and Secondary Education and those of the Al-Azhar Islamic Education Foundation (YPI Al-Azhar), the study classifies ḥadīth content into four fields (creed, jurisprudence, Islamic history and culture, and ethics) and assesses the strength of its implications for moderation. Three findings emerge. First, both sets present ḥadīths in two modes, explicit (with Arabic text, translation, and source) and implicit (paraphrase or attribution without them). Second, the Ministry materials show greater moderation potential by number of chapters, the YPI Al-Azhar materials by number of ethics-related ḥadīths. Third, the Ministry materials emphasize the social dimension of moderation, while the YPI Al-Azhar materials emphasize its ritual dimension. The two sets are therefore complementary, and their use is best reinforced by a psychological-pedagogical approach: experiential learning, modeling and habituation, and emotion regulation.
Reproducing Patriarchy in Digital Islam: A Feminist Critical Discourse Analysis of Women’s Leadership Narratives on Muslimahnews.net Abidin, Achmad Azis; Musyafiq, Ahmad; Purwaningsih, Sri; Rochmawati, Nikmah
Teosofi: Jurnal Tasawuf dan Pemikiran Islam Vol. 15 No. 2 (2025): December
Publisher : Department of Aqidah and Islamic Philosophy, Faculty of Ushuluddin and Philosophy, Sunan Ampel State Islamic University Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15642/teosofi.2025.15.2.530-554

Abstract

This article examines the reproduction of patriarchal interpretations of women’s leadership within contemporary digital Islamic discourse, focusing on Muslimahnews.net. Employing a feminist Critical Discourses Analysis framework developed by Sara Mills and integrating insights from digital religion theory, particularly those of Heidi Campbell and Gary Bunt, the study analyzes how hadith narratives are discursively mobilized to construct and legitimize gender hierarchy. Through content analysis of a leadership-related article, the findings reveal that patriarchal authority is naturalized through selective intertextuality, subject-object positioning, and affective moral framing, which present male leadership as normative and divinely sanctioned while delegitimizing women’s public roles. The platform operates as a digital node within a broader cyber-Islamic environment, where networked participation, shifting religious authority, and algorithmic circulation reinforce ideological coherence. This study argues that patriarchal ideology in digital Islam is sustained through the interplay of discourse, technological mediation, and affective engagement, offering a critical contribution to scholarship on gender, religion, and digital media.
A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF AHMAD IBN HANBAL AND IMAM AL-SHAWKANI ON HADITHS OF OBEDIENCE TO UNJUST RULERS: Between Political Stability and Moral Accountability Palupi, Kamelia Hardaning; Rochmawati, Nikmah; Hikmah, Siti; Tsani, Fatimah Zulfa; Haq, Giovani Jadal
RIWAYAH Vol 12, No 1 (2026): Riwayah : Jurnal Studi Hadis
Publisher : Ilmu Hadis, Fakultas Ushuluddin, Universitas Islam Negeri (UIN) Sunan Kudus

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21043/riwayah.v12i1.34361

Abstract

Obedience to rulers constitutes an important theme in hadith studies because of its close relationship with the political stability and social order of the Muslim community. This article compares the perspectives of Ahmad Ibn Hanbal and Imam al-Shawkani regarding hadiths on obedience to unjust (zhalim) leaders. It analyzes how both scholars evaluate the authenticity of these traditions through sanad and matan criticism and examines the interpretive implications of their understanding and application. Employing a qualitative method based on library research with a comparative approach, the study uses Usul al-Sunnah by Ahmad Ibn Hanbal and Nayl al-Awtar by Imam al-Shawkani as primary sources. The data are analyzed descriptively and comparatively to highlight differences in their approaches to both riwayah (assessment of chains of transmission and textual quality) and dirayah (interpretation and practical implications). The findings reveal that Ahmad Ibn Hanbal emphasized near-absolute obedience to rulers in order to preserve political stability and prevent fitnah, permitting disobedience only when rulers explicitly command disbelief. In contrast, Imam al-Shawkani advocated conditional obedience and recognized the legitimacy of criticizing and rejecting policies that contradict Islamic law. By comparing two prominent scholars from different historical periods, this study demonstrates that the understanding of hadiths on leadership is not fixed or absolute but rather dynamic and shaped by varying social and political contexts. Ketaatan kepada pemimpin merupakan salah satu tema penting dalam kajian hadis karena memiliki hubungan yang erat dengan stabilitas politik dan tatanan kehidupan umat Islam. Artikel ini membandingkan pandangan Ahmad Ibn Hanbal dan Imam al-Syaukani mengenai hadis-hadis tentang ketaatan kepada pemimpin yang zhalim. Kajian ini menganalisis bagaimana kedua tokoh tersebut menilai autentisitas hadis melalui kritik sanad dan matan, serta menelaah implikasi interpretatif dari pemahaman dan penerapannya. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode kualitatif berbasis studi kepustakaan dengan pendekatan komparatif. Sumber data utama berasal dari Usul al-Sunnah karya Ahmad Ibn Hanbal dan Nayl al-Awtar karya Imam al-Syaukani, yang dianalisis secara deskriptif dan komparatif untuk mengungkap perbedaan pendekatan keduanya dalam aspek riwayah (penilaian terhadap rantai periwayatan dan kualitas teks) serta dirayah (penafsiran dan implikasi praktis). Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa Ahmad Ibn Hanbal menekankan ketaatan yang hampir bersifat mutlak kepada penguasa demi menjaga stabilitas politik dan mencegah fitnah, dengan pengecualian ketika penguasa secara jelas memerintahkan kekufuran. Sebaliknya, Imam al-Syaukani menegaskan bahwa ketaatan bersifat kondisional dan mengakui legitimasi untuk mengkritik bahkan menolak kebijakan penguasa yang bertentangan dengan syariat Islam. Dengan membandingkan dua ulama terkemuka dari periode sejarah yang berbeda, penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa pemahaman terhadap hadis-hadis tentang kepemimpinan tidak bersifat tetap dan absolut, melainkan dinamis serta dipengaruhi oleh konteks sosial dan politik yang melingkupinya.
Isra' Mikraj sebagai Divine Consolation: Analisis Psikologis atas Resiliensi Nabi Muhammad Saw. Pasca Tahun Kesedihan Nikmah Rochmawati; Ahmad Musyafiq; Nur Azizah Fitriana
KACA (Karunia Cahaya Allah): Jurnal Dialogis Ilmu Ushuluddin Vol. 16 No. 2 (2026): Agustus
Publisher : Fakultas Ushuluddin dan Dakwah Institut Al Fithrah Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36781/kaca.v16i2.1339

Abstract

Peristiwa Isra Mikraj umumnya dikaji melalui perspektif teologis, fisika, maupun saintifik. Namun, penelitian ini berupaya mengisi celah literatur dengan menganalisis peristiwa tersebut melalui pendekatan psikologi agama. Tujuan penelitian adalah mengeksplorasi Isra Mikraj sebagai divine consolation atau hiburan Ilahi bagi Nabi Muhammad SAW setelah melewati ‘ām al-ḥuzn (tahun kesedihan), yang ditandai dengan wafatnya Sayyidah Khadijah RA dan Abu Thalib, serta penolakan ekstrem dari masyarakat Makkah dan Thaif. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode kualitatif deskriptif dengan pendekatan studi pustaka (library research) dan teknik hermeneutika psikologis. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa Isra Mikraj merupakan bentuk intervensi psikologis dari Allah SWT yang berfungsi sebagai divine healing dan spiritual coping. Peristiwa ini tidak hanya memulihkan ketangguhan mental (resilience) Nabi Muhammad SAW, tetapi juga menghadirkan mandat ibadah salat sebagai proses terapeutik berkelanjutan bagi kesehatan mental umat Islam dalam menghadapi krisis kehidupan.