Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 23 Documents
Search

Independensi Hakim dalam Berbagai Disparitas Putusan Perkara Korupsi di Mahkamah Agung Zuhrah; Adi Sulistiyono; Ridwan; Syamsuddin; Iksan
Fundamental: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Vol. 13 No. 1 (2024): Fundamental: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Bima

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.34304/jf.v13i1.236

Abstract

Artikel ini mengkaji tentang independensi hakim serta disparitas putusan hakim pada perkara kasus korupsi di lingkup Mahkamah Agung. Faktor Undang-Undang sangat substansial, di mana Undang-Undang merupakan acuan penetapan jenis dakwaan dan tuntutan bagi pelaku. Fakta hukum dan independensi hakim juga turut mempengaruhi terjadinya disparitas putusan dan disparitas putusan juga dijadikan landasan untuk mengukur apakah hakim telah independen atau belum dalam menetapkan sebuah putusan. Adapun metode yang digunakan dalam penulisan ini adalah yuridis normatif atau library research (kepustakaan) dengan menggunakan Undang-Undang Kekuasaan Kahakiman, Undang-Undang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi, KUHP dan putusan perkara korupsi yang mengalami disparitas sebagai bahan hukum primer dan karya ilmiah yang berkaitan dengan topik penelitian sebagai bahan hukum sekunder. Artikel ini dianalisis menggunakan teori kepastian hukum Hans Kelsen dan teori sistem hukum Lawrence M. Friedman. Penulisan ini menemukan penyebab terjadinya disparitas putusan pada perkara tindak pidana korupsi, independensi hakim terhadap sejumlah putusan perkara korupsi, dan indikator independensi Hakim dalam Disparitas Putusan Korupsi. Kata Kunci: independensi hakim; disparitas; korupsi; mahkamah agung.
Legal Protection of Local Product of Tambora Coffee as A Product of Geographical Indications in West Nusa Tenggara Province Saputri, Ika; Taufik Firmanto; Ilyas; Zuhrah; Erham; Ainun Wulandari
Law and Justice Vol. 10 No. 1 (2025): Law and Justice
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23917/laj.v10i1.2133

Abstract

This article is a legal research that discusses the legal protection of local tambora coffee products as a product of geographical indications in the province of West Nusa Tenggara (NTB). Writing this article aims to analyze the form of legal protection for local Tambora coffee products as a product of geographical indications in the Province of NTB. Method the method used is normative legal research, with several approaches used, namely, the statutory approach, the concept approach, the historical approach, and the analytical approach. Novelty , from this research it was found that legal facts had not been optimal in legal protection efforts for local Tambora coffee products as a product of geographical indications by the local government in NTB. The discussion from this study found the fact that legal protection efforts for local tambora coffee products as a product of geographical indications by the local government in NTB were not optimal. The local government in NTB needs to guarantee legal protection for Tambora coffee as a geographical indication in order to maintain the uniqueness of local products as a regional identity so as to avoid claims by other regions for local Tambora coffee products to be able to compete nationally and internationally. In conclusion , legal protection for local Tambora coffee products as a geographical indication product in NTB Province is not optimal. The lack of attention and supervision by the regional government in protecting the local Tambora coffee product as a geographical indication is at least indicated by the absence of regional legal products in the form of Regional Regulations (Perda) and/or Perkada which guarantee legal protection for local Tambora coffee products as a geographical indication product. Likewise, the implementation of legal protection and supervision of local Tambora coffee products as a product of geographical indications in the province of NTB still tends to be weak. The local government in NTB neglected to guarantee supervision and legal protection for local Tambora coffee products as a geographical indication. Even though it does not rule out the possibility that Tambora coffee can be branded /marketed as a product that is not only worth selling in the region but can also compete in national and international markets.  
Tinjauan Yuridis Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Konsumen Pinjaman Online di Indonesia Anis; Zuhrah; Didik Irawansah
As-Syar i: Jurnal Bimbingan & Konseling Keluarga  Vol. 7 No. 4 (2025): As-Syar’i: Jurnal Bimbingan & Konseling Keluarga
Publisher : Institut Agama Islam Nasional Laa Roiba Bogor

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47467/as.v7i4.9449

Abstract

This study aims to determine consumer protection for users of fintech services (Peero-Peer Lending) in the perspective of consumer protection law in Indonesia and to find out efforts to resolve disputes against JULO application Fintech Peer To Peer Lending services. This research uses normative juridical methods with statutory and conceptual approaches. As a literature research, the main focus is on analyzing primary legal materials such as Law No. 8 of 1999 concerning Consumer Protection, Law No. 11 of 2008 concerning ITE, as well as various OJK regulations including POJK No. 10/POJK.05/2022. A statutory approach is applied to comprehensively review regulations relevant to online loan consumer protection, while a conceptual approach is used to analyze theories of consumer protection, principles of justice, and legal certainty. This research aims to provide an in-depth understanding of the legal framework governing consumer protection in online lending services as well as its implementation in practice. This research reveals that although FinTech P2P Lending consumer protection in Indonesia has a strong legal foundation through the Consumer Protection Law and POJK No. 77/POJK.01/2016, its implementation still faces challenges in the form of regulatory gaps with practices in the field. The study on the JULO platform shows that 78% of complaints are resolved through internal mechanisms, while adjudication is an effective solution with an 85% satisfaction rate and faster resolution time (14 working days). The findings identified three main issues: inconsistency in the application of rules, low consumer legal literacy (42%), and the complexity of cross-jurisdictional disputes. The research recommends strengthening OJK's technology-based supervision, improving consumer education, and optimizing adjudication, emphasizing the importance of collaboration between regulators, businesses, and communities to create an equitable and sustainable P2P Lending ecosystem.