Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 22 Documents
Search

Right to Information and Anti-SLAPP on Consumer Protection in Indonesia Sauni, Herawan; Saifulloh, Putra Perdana Ahmad; Barus, Sonia Ivana; Akhmad, Akhmad; Nur, Asrul Ibrahim
Sriwijaya Law Review Volume 10 Issue 1, January 2026
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Sriwijaya University, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.28946/slrev.v10i1.4544

Abstract

Anti-Strategic Lawsuit Against Public Participation (SLAPP) is a provision that provides legal protection to the public who fight for public interests recognisedrecognised in legislation, usually in the environmental field; however, this study examines the projection of Anti-SLAPP for consumer protection. This research is normative legal research with a legislative, case, and conceptual approach, examining legal protection for consumers when submitting reviews on social media by highlighting the freedom of opinion guaranteed by legislation. The results of this study led to a balance of rights to information, and SLAPP was implemented for the benefit of all Indonesian people to foster meaningful participation in consumer protection. This study provides suggestions to Lawmakers on issuing regulations that specifically address Anti-SLAPP. These regulations are important to protect consumers from all threats, especially criminal entanglements, and as a guide for law enforcement officers in handling SLAPP cases in Indonesia. Lawmakers can issue regulations that, in revising the Consumer Protection Law, include anti-SLAPP provisions.
RECONSTRUCTING THE STATUS OF CONSTITUTIONAL COURT RESEARCHERS: MEREKONSTRUKSI STATUS PENELITI MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSIONAL Barus, Sonia Ivana; Saifulloh, Putra Perdana Ahmad; Amancik; Nikenuna, Syifa
Constitutional Law Society Vol. 5 No. 1 (2026): March
Publisher : Pusat Studi Konstitusi dan Perundang-undangan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36448/jcls.v5i1.143

Abstract

Researchers at state institutions were forced to leave their positions, including those at the Constitutional Court. Researchers then lose the opportunity to hold the title of research professor. These researchers were also given a new duty, which was to help courts and give Constitutional Justices substantial support. The predicate “assistance" in this rule, which receives no detailed explanation, leads to multiple interpretations and affects the productivity of assistants to expert constitutional judges. Based on this, it is interesting to discuss how the status quo regulates career paths and academic freedom of Constitutional Court researchers in personnel law and how the ideal concept of setting career paths and academic freedom for researchers at the Constitutional Court. This study uses a normative research method, in which its results implicitly suggest a return to the previous rules. The researcher also suggests that the positions of assistant judge and researcher be strictly separated and that opportunities be provided for researchers to hold the title of academic professor. Researchers think BRIN should merge research institutions with the same form and function.