Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Analysis of Radical and Radicalism Collocations in Indonesia Online Media Reporting Based on Linguistics Corpus Pirmansyah Pirmansyah; Fahmy Lukman
KEDJATI Journal of Islamic Civilization Vol. 1 No. 1 (2024): KEDJATI Journal of Islamic Civilization
Publisher : KEDJATI Foundation

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

In 2018, the words Radical and Radicalism (RaR) became very popular and a matter of public discussion. Reporting on this issue was directed at radical movements and acts of terrorism that had entered the academic environment on campus. This research analyzed the meaning of collocation of RaR in online media reporting. This study used a combined approach: quantitative and qualitative. Quantitative was used to gather data from the linguistic corpus (digital linguistics) taken from online news media such as Detik.com, Okezone.com, Kompas.com, Viva.co.id, Media Indonesia, Kompas, Bisnis Indonesia, Pikiran Rakyat, Republika Online, BBC.com, and CNN Indonesia.com. Qualitative was used to identify the number of frequencies of the word Radical and the occurrence of the collocation of RaR, as well as clusters/n-grams contained in the AntConc application tools. The results show that the words RaR were powerful for Islamic groups, with the high frequency of appearance of the word radicalism in rank 7 with a frequency of 624, Islam in rank 16 with a frequency of 355, religion in rank 24 with a frequency of 249, and campus in rank 32 with a frequency of 200. Hence, this data reveals that online media tended to be subjective in reporting, where radical groups always connoted certain religious groups and symbols. Moreover, the radical movement was suspected to have spread this term among students on several campuses in Indonesia, especially Islamic groups. Thus, this research provides an overview of the RaR collocation on online news.
Diplomasi Publik melalui Bahasa Berita: Analisis Wacana Kritis Model Ruth Wodak terhadap Strategi Diskursif CNN Arabic dalam Memberitakan Demonstrasi “No Kings” bagi Audiens Arab Moh Zidan Raffi Sayyidinna; Lukman, Fahmy
Jurnal Kajian Bahasa, Sastra dan Pengajaran (KIBASP) Vol. 9 No. 3 (2026): Jurnal KIBASP (Kajian Bahasa, Sastra dan Pengajaran)
Publisher : Institut Penelitian Matematika, Komputer, Keperawatan, Pendidikan dan Ekonomi (IPM2KPE)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31539/g4dssy07

Abstract

Bahasa berita yang diproduksi media internasional tidak pernah berdiri di luar relasi kekuasaan dan kepentingan, sehingga setiap pilihan diksi berpotensi menjadi instrumen pembentukan persepsi publik lintas negara. Studi terhadap media berbahasa Arab afiliasi Barat dalam membingkai dinamika politik domestik Amerika masih terbatas, terlebih dari sudut pandang diplomasi publik. Penelitian ini bertujuan mengidentifikasi strategi diskursif yang dominan dalam pemberitaan CNN Arabic tentang demonstrasi "No Kings" sekaligus menjelaskan bagaimana strategi tersebut bekerja sebagai praktik diplomasi publik termediasi yang membentuk persepsi audiens Arab terhadap demokrasi Amerika. Penelitian menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif deskriptif dengan kerangka Analisis Wacana Kritis model Ruth Wodak atau Discourse-Historical Approach (DHA). Data berupa 22 teks berita CNN Arabic periode Mei 2025 hingga Maret 2026 dikumpulkan melalui metode simak teknik catat dan dianalisis berdasarkan lima strategi diskursif Wodak dengan triangulasi konteks empat level. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa strategi argumentasi berbasis topos of numbers dan topos of authority menjadi strategi dominan, didukung perspektivasi yang memperluas ruang suara demonstran serta intensifikasi visual dan numerik. Kombinasi strategi tersebut mengonstruksi citra demonstrasi sebagai gerakan rakyat yang masif, beragam, damai, dan legitim, sementara pemerintahan Trump dicitrakan defensif dan kehilangan kontrol naratif. Penelitian menyimpulkan bahwa bahasa berita CNN Arabic berfungsi sebagai saluran diplomasi publik termediasi yang menampilkan demokrasi Amerika sebagai sistem yang mampu mengoreksi dirinya sendiri, sembari menjaga kepekaan kultural audiens Arab. Kata Kunci: Analisis Wacana Kritis, Bahasa Berita, Diplomasi Publik
Geopolitical Legitimacy Contestation of the 2026 Iran War in Al-Jazeera: A Critical Discourse Analysis Firdaus, Doni; Lukman, Fahmy
Journal Of Middle East and Islamic Studies
Publisher : UI Scholars Hub

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This study investigates the discursive strategies and geopolitical legitimacy contestation surrounding the 2026 conflict between Iran, the United States, and Israel, as reported by Al-Jazeera Arabic. Utilizing Norman Fairclough’s three-dimensional Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) framework-comprising textual analysis, discourse practice, and sociocultural practice-the research decodes how media language constructs power relations and ideological hegemony. The data is sourced from ten purposively sampled Al-Jazeera reports, spanning multiple journalistic genres, published between February and March 2026. The findings reveal a significant discursive shift in Al-Jazeera's editorial framing. Textually, the use of symmetric prepositions such as "بين" (between) and the juxtaposition of military capabilities (e.g., US/Israel's "Air Supremacy" versus Iran's "Blinding tactics") elevate Iran from a traditional victim status to an equal geopolitical giant. However, through intertextuality and specific lexicon choices like "العدوان" (aggression) and "تأجيل الانفجار" (delaying the explosion), the media simultaneously frames Iran as an active source of continuous regional instability. At the sociocultural level, this discourse reflects the complex Arab geopolitical reality, balancing anti-Zionist sentiments with the Gulf states' profound anxieties over Iranian hegemony. Ultimately, this research demonstrates that language in media is not a neutral communicative tool, but rather a performative arena where geopolitical legitimacy is aggressively constructed, maintained, and contested.