Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Protection of Women's Rights Against Cases of Domestic Violence from an Islamic Perspective A'isy Az-Zahra; Syaifuddin Zuhdi; Ulfah Dwi Rahmawati; Tyas Permata Dewi
Jurnal Al-Hakim: Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa, Studi Syariah, Hukum dan Filantropi Vol. 6 No. 2 November 2024
Publisher : Fakultas Syariah, Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Mas Said Surakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22515/jurnalalhakim.v6i2.10163

Abstract

Allah SWT created humans as the most perfect beings and in pairs, instilling affection within the bonds of marriage to achieve the ultimate goal of attaining His pleasure. However, marriage is not without challenges, and one significant issue is domestic violence, where women are often the primary victims. Such occurrences highlight a disregard for women's rights, which are an integral part of human rights. This study aims to explore the position and rights of women as human rights in Islam and examine the legal protections available in cases of domestic violence. Using a normative research method with a statutory approach, this study relies on secondary data collected through literature review and analyzed qualitatively for descriptive presentation. The findings reveal that Islam accords women a high and equal status with men, granting them rights that are fundamental to their humanity. Domestic violence against women is a clear violation of the principles outlined in the Qur'an, As-Sunnah, and Indonesia’s positive law.
PENOLAKAN PASIEN IGD ATAS ALASAN RAWAT INAP BERULANG: TINJAUAN SOSIO-LEGAL DALAM PRAKTIK PELAYANAN KESEHATAN Amha Sang Aji; Absori Absori; Syaifuddin Zuhdi
Law Studies and Justice Journal (LAJU) Vol. 3 No. 1 (2026): Law Studies and Justice Journal
Publisher : Penelitian dan Pengembangan Ilmu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62207/whtbj764

Abstract

Penolakan pasien rawat inap melalui Instalasi Gawat Darurat (IGD) masih sering terjadi di dalam pelayanan kesehatan terutama di IGD. Hal ini menjadi sorotan utama bidang Kesehatan, terutama tenaga kesehatan memberikan alasan bahwa pasien adalah dengan riwayat rawat inap berulang di rumah sakit. Praktik yang demikian menjadi perdebatan yang menarik bahwa tindakan tersebut menyalahi hak pasien, kepatuhan fasilitas Kesehatan yang rendah terhadap perundang-undangan, tekanan finansial karena klaim pasien belum dibayarkan, serta implikasi sosial dan etika dalam pelayanan pasien di IGD. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui fenomena terjadinya penolakan pasien IGD dengan alasan rawat inap berulang dengan pendekatan sosio-legal. Metode penelitian ini memadukan Analisis normatif dan data empiris yang bersumber pada literatur. Analisis normatif yang didapat pada kewajiban pelayanan IGD berdasarkan undang-undang dalam menangani kasus pasien rawat inap. sedangkan kajian empiris didapat dari sumber literatur, jurnal maupun laporan kasus penolakan pasien IGD. Hasil dari penelitian ini didapatkan terdapat kesenjangan yang signifikan antara norma hukum pelayanan IGD dan praktik penolakan pasien dengan alasan administrasi berupa rawat inap berulang yang dikarenakan kesalahan penafsiran efisiensi biaya klaim BPJS, kurangnya petugas medis dan bed IGD serta moral hazard rumah sakit. Perlu  penyelesaian  secara sosio legal dengan pemahaman hukum dan implementasinya bagi petugas medis, penguatan regulasi penerimaan pasien serta penegakan etika medis di IGD.
Bipolar Disorder and Child Custody in Indonesian Religious Courts: Operationalizing Sadd al-Dharī‘ah to Balance Child Welfare and Parental Rights Syaifuddin Zuhdi; Lutfi Robiatul Adawiyah; Marisa Kurnianingsih; M Junaidi; Abdul Hakim
Al-Ahkam: Jurnal Ilmu Syari’ah dan Hukum Vol. 11 No. 1 (2026): Al-Ahkam: Jurnal Ilmu Syari'ah dan Hukum
Publisher : Faculty of Sharia, Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Mas Said Surakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22515/alahkam.v11i1.13136

Abstract

As mental health disorders have received more attention from modern-day legal systems, questions about the impact of such disorders in relation to child custody proceedings become increasingly pertinent. One of the controversial questions pertains to whether bipolar disorder may be regarded as a valid reason to restrict or transfer custody rights from one parent to another. This study discusses the legal status of bipolar disorder within cases of child custody litigation before Indonesian Religious Courts and formulates an Islamic legal framework to examine custody cases involving psychosocially disabled parents. Qualitative doctrinal legal research is used as the methodology of the study, and statutory, conceptual, case, and comparative approaches are employed. The findings reveal that there is no reason for bipolar disorder to be automatically considered as an obstacle to child custody. It must be noted that the significance of such a disorder lies in its impact on the ability of parent to provide adequate care to their children as well as posing risks to the welfare of children. To solve this problem, this study operationalizes sadd al-dharī‘ah into four phases of judicial evaluation: taḥqīq al-manāṭ (verification of facts), taqdīr al-mafsadah (risk evaluation), takyīf ḥukmī (classification of the risk into legal terms), and tadbīr muwāzan (balance between the risks and benefits). Thus, this framework allows for conducting evaluations of child custody cases based on rational criteria and at the same time protecting the interests of children. In this way, the this study argues that custody restrictions may only be imposed if there is proof that bipolar disorder poses risks to the safety or health of the child.
PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP PERKAWINAN BELUM DICATATKAN BERBASIS MAQASHIDU AL-SYARIAH Iskak Sulistiya; Absori Absori; Syaifuddin Zuhdi
JOURNAL IURIS SCIENTIA Vol. 4 No. 2 (2026): JOURNAL IURIS SCIENTIA
Publisher : Yayasan Merassa Indonesia Publikasi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62263/

Abstract

Unregistered marriage remains a family law problem in Indonesia because it creates a gap between religious validity and formal state recognition. This condition has a direct impact on the weak legal protection for women and children, particularly in fulfilling the rights to maintenance, joint property, inheritance, lineage, legal identity, and access to population documents. This study aims to analyze the forms of legal protection for women and children in unregistered marriages and to formulate a construction of legal protection based on Maqashidu al-Syariah. This study employs a normative legal research method with a statutory approach, a conceptual approach, and a maqashidi approach. Legal materials are analyzed qualitatively through descriptive-analytical and prescriptive techniques. The results show that the state has provided several forms of legal protection, namely preventive protection through the obligation of marriage registration, administrative protection through the inclusion of the status "married unregistered" in the Family Card and the use of the Absolute Responsibility Statement, and judicial protection through the marriage ratification (isbat nikah) mechanism. However, this protection is not yet fully effective due to its partial nature. While administrative protection helps fulfill population documents, it does not automatically guarantee the substantive rights of women and children. Therefore, Maqashidu al-Syariah is essential to be used as a basis for the construction of legal protection because it places marriage registration as a means of safeguarding religion, life, lineage, wealth, and family dignity. This study concludes that ideal legal protection must integrate marriage registration, population administration, integrated marriage ratification services, and public legal education to achieve legal certainty, justice, and family welfare.
DIVORCE IN KANGEAN ISLANDS: The Study on Judge's Legal Reasoning of Kangean Religious Court, 2020-2022 Syaifuddin Zuhdi; Khudzaifah Dimyati; Absori Absori; Kelik Wardiono; Filzah Ilda Syafirah
Jurnal Jurisprudence Vol. 12, No. 2, December 2022
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23917/jurisprudence.v12i2.1229

Abstract

Purpose of the study: This article aims to find out how the divorce conditions in the Kangean Islands are and to see how the factors that influence it and the legal reasoning used by the judge in deciding the divorce case. Methods: the method used in this study is a normative juridical method with a decision approach, the data used is secondary data, namely the decisions of the religious courts in 2020-2022, which every year 30% of the decisions are taken, the data are analyzed descriptively Results: From the research conducted, it was found that the majority of divorces in Kangean Island were carried out by a contested divorce mechanism, while the factors behind the majority were due to disputes, then followed by economic factors, legal reasoning judges were divided into empathy, namely the use of legal norms, conformity between facts and norms. , interpretation of problems and norms, as well as the use of the rules of Islamic law in its legal opinion Applications of this study: This article is useful to support research on divorce and legal opinions, especially on Kangean Island and Indonesia in general Novelty: The novelty of this research is that there are still very few people doing research on the Kangean Islands, as well as the discovery of several legal reasoning concepts for judges at the Kangean Religious Court.   ABSTRAK   Tujuan Penelitian: Artikel ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui bagaimana kondisi perceraian di Kepulauan Kangean dan melihat bagaimana faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhinya serta alasan hukum yang digunakan hakim dalam memutus perkara perceraian. Metode : Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah metode yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan putusan, data yang digunakan adalah data sekunder yaitu putusan pengadilan agama tahun 2020-2022 yang setiap tahun diambil 30% putusannya, data tersebut dianalisis secara deskriptif Hasil: Dari penelitian yang dilakukan diketahui bahwa mayoritas perceraian di Pulau Kangean dilakukan dengan mekanisme cerai gugat, sedangkan faktor penyebab mayoritas adalah karena perselisihan, kemudian disusul faktor ekonomi, pertimbangan hukum hakim terbagi menjadi empati, yaitu penggunaan norma hukum, kesesuaian antara fakta dan norma. , interpretasi masalah dan norma, serta penggunaan aturan hukum Islam dalam opini hukumnya Aplikasi penelitian ini: Artikel ini bermanfaat untuk mendukung penelitian tentang perceraian dan opini hukum khususnya di Pulau Kangean dan Indonesia pada umumnya Kebaruan: Kebaruan dari penelitian ini adalah masih sedikitnya orang yang melakukan penelitian di Kepulauan Kangean, serta ditemukannya beberapa konsep penalaran hukum bagi hakim di Pengadilan Agama Kangean.
Optimization of Arabic Language Learning through Probing Prompting with Instagram Application Widi Astuti; Mega Primaningtyas; Ameliani Ameliani; Syaifuddin Zuhdi
International Journal of Science and Applied Science: Conference Series Vol 8, No 1 (2024): International Journal of Science and Applied Science: Conference Series
Publisher : Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/ijsascs.v7i2.96335

Abstract

Abstract: This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of the probing prompting technique in learning Arabic through the Instagram platform at the MBS Jatinom Islamic Boarding School, Klaten. With a descriptive qualitative approach, this study involved teachers and students as the main subjects. Data were obtained through observation, interviews, documentation, and questionnaires. Observations focused on learning interactions using Instagram features, such as stories and live streaming, while interviews and questionnaires explored teachers' and students' perceptions regarding the application of the probing prompting method in the teaching and learning process. The results showed that the application of probing prompting combined with the use of Instagram significantly improved Arabic language skills, especially in speaking and listening aspects. Students in the experimental group showed greater improvement than the control group, with better learning outcomes and a deeper understanding of the material. The use of Instagram as a learning medium also allows for more flexible and dynamic interactions between teachers and students, expanding the scope of learning from the classroom to the digital realm. The conclusion of this study confirms that the probing prompting method through Instagram can be an effective learning strategy in improving Arabic language skills. However, there are challenges that need to be considered, such as access to technology and user readiness to utilize social media optimally. Integration between traditional learning methods and digital technology can increase motivation, participation, and the quality of learning outcomes, making learning more relevant to the needs of the times.
Government Policies in Resolving Conflicts between Traditional Markets and Online Markets from A Maqashid Sharia Perspective Hisyam Ramadhan; Syaifuddin Zuhdi
Proceeding International Conference Restructuring and Transforming Law Vol. 3 No. 2 (2025): Proceeding International Conference Restructuring and Transforming Law
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

In social psychology, there are various ways for people to lead fulfilling lives. There are those who use peaceful paths such as dividing groups, but there are also those who use violent paths such as invading a territory. There are several reasons why traditional educators hesitate to recommend Tiktok Shop to the government. One reason is that people are more comfortable making purchases online. Events that occur in traditional markets and those that occur online can be likened to Islamic sayings based on the Qur'an, Hadith, Ijma, and Qiyash. Descriptive and normative analysis methods will provide clear and concise results as well as examples or actions that can be a springboard for further research. Trade in goods was developed between 1457 and 1540 B.C.. According to article 1457 B.W. According to Syatibi, one way to understand and comprehend maqashid al-syariah is to analyze the lafaz of commands and prohibitions (al-awamir wa an-nawahi) contained in the law. This is because the purpose of prohibitions and orders is to promote health and prevent damage. One of the things that often happens in human life is dispute. Disputes are also a little point of view on problems that arise and cause disruption of living standards because humans are social creatures. The presence of unreliable payment systems in online markets, also known as online marketplaces, causes online shop users who connect with each other through these marketplaces to feel less connected to each other than in traditional markets. Social discord indicates that they experienced social discord and eventually led to the conflict. Their economic weakness is that their sales have decreased since the establishment of online stores in Indonesia. The downside of their technology is that people in traditional markets are not ready to learn and keep up with the rapid advancement of modern technology. Islam teaches us that all truth is in the hands of Allah, and the righteous will always be able to overcome evil. A lack of sense of responsibility makes people feel uncomfortable, especially caretakers of public facilities. There are so many laws that talk about this, mostly about consumer privacy rights when making a purchase or sale.
Donation based Crowd Funding Reviewed from The Sadd Adz-Dzari'ah Perspective Syaifuddin Zuhdi; Sarah Camila Octavian
Proceeding International Conference Restructuring and Transforming Law Vol. 2 No. 2 (2023): Proceeding International Conference Restructuring and Transforming Law
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Uncertainty regarding regulations regarding the implementation of donation-based crowdfunding in Indonesia has resulted in a weak supervisory function carried out by the Ministry of Social Affairs. so this creates the potential for misappropriation of funds, donation fraud, money laundering and other criminal acts. Sadd Dzari'ah as a method of preventing harm is used to weigh the level of harm in implementing donation based crowdfunding. The aim of this research is to find out what the concept of donation based crowdfunding is in Indonesia, and how the legal status of donation based crowdfunding is viewed from a sadd dzari'ah perspective. The research method used is normative, the type of research is descriptive qualitative, and the data collection method is a literature study of legal and non-legal materials regarding donation based crowdfunding obtained by reading, viewing, listening or searching. The result of this research is to prohibit the implementation of donation-based crowdfunding based on Sadd Dzari'ah's analysis that eliminating harm takes priority over taking benefits.
Implementation of The Principle of Equality before The Law on The Fulfillment of The Rights of Persons with Disabilities in Obtaining Legal Services at The Religious Court of Surakarta City Mahendra Akbar Rachmadhani; Syaifuddin Zuhdi
Proceeding International Conference Restructuring and Transforming Law Vol. 4 No. 1 (2025): Proceeding International Conference Restructuring and Transforming Law
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This study investigates the implementation of the principle of equality before the law in terms of the rights of persons with disabilities to obtain legal services at the Surakarta City Religious Court. This study used interviews with judges, lawyers, court officers, and people with disabilities, as well as direct observation of existing facilities and accessibility in the court. This research method is based on an empirical juridical method. In addition, this study analyzes whether the principle of equality before the law is applied effectively, by looking at the example of Law Number 8 of 2016 concerning Persons with Disabilities. The results of the study show that, although there have been efforts to fulfill the rights of persons with disabilities in the judiciary, there are still some challenges to applying the principle of equality before the law. Among them are the lack of disability-friendly court facilities and the lack of adequate communication assistance. and the inability of court officers to understand the rights of persons with disabilities. People with disabilities often have difficulty accessing courtrooms, getting proper information about the law, and getting proper legal assistance. Therefore, while there are regulations that support the rights of persons with disabilities in the justice system, practice on the ground still needs to make further efforts to ensure that everyone has an equal opportunity to access legal services and access. The study suggests improving physical court facilities, improving legal support services, and specialized training for law enforcement to increase understanding and awareness of the rights of persons with disabilities in the judicial process.
Judges' Perspective on The Implementation of SEMA No. 2 of 2023 concerning The Registration of Interfaith Marriages Syaifuddin Zuhdi; Lutfiah Firdaus
Proceeding International Conference Restructuring and Transforming Law Vol. 4 No. 1 (2025): Proceeding International Conference Restructuring and Transforming Law
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This study aims to explore judges' perspectives on the Supreme Court Circular Letter (SEMA) No. 2 of 2023. It uses an empirical or non-doctrinal method, with primary data obtained through interviews with five judges selected via snowball sampling. The findings show that there are both pro and contra views among judges regarding SEMA No. 2 of 2023. Those opposed view it merely as guidance for judges, affirming their freedom to decide cases as it is not a binding rule. Meanwhile, supporters regard it as a breakthrough that provides legal certainty in the implementation of interfaith marriages. The novelty of this study lies in revealing that not all judges share the same opinion regarding a SEMA, indicating the need for more outreach among law enforcers, especially concerning interfaith marriage.