Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
9.809
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Yustisia Jurnal Dinamika Hukum Journal of Consumer Science LAW REVIEW JURISDICTIE Jurnal Hukum dan Syariah Jurnal Ilmu Keluarga dan Konsumen Empowerment : Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Mimbar Hukum - Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada Unes Law Review Jurnal Ilmiah Penegakan Hukum Media Iuris Jurnal Hukum Adigama International Journal of Law and Public Policy (IJLAPP) Journal of Law, Administration, and Social Science Jurnal AKAL: Abdimas dan Kearifan Lokal Hukum Pidana dan Pembangunan Hukum Jurnal Hukum Prioris Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Innovative: Journal Of Social Science Research Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Humaniora (JURRISH) Enrichment: Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Development Policy Brief Pertanian, Kelautan, dan Biosains Tropika Amicus Curiae Journal of Law and Legal Reform JILS (Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies) Tribuere Rechtsnormen: Journal of Law Pamulang Law Review
Anna Maria Tri Anggraini
Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Trisakti
Religion Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Humanities Automotive Engineering Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Computer Science & IT Earth & Planetary Sciences Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Engineering Environmental Science Health Professions Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Nursing Physics Public Health Social Sciences Transportation Other

Published : 82 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 82 Documents
Search

 1   2   3   4   5 
POTENSI PENGGUNAAN LENIENCY PROGRAM DALAM PERKARA KARTEL INDONESIA: STUDI PERBANDINGAN LENIENCY JEPANG M Faqih Surbakti; Anna Maria Tri Anggraini
Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol. 5 No. 1 (2023): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/refor.v5i1.15419

Abstract

The leniency program is a pardon mechanism that allows cartel members to complain to the business competition authorities about cartel operations and receive partial or whole exemption from the penalties and/or fines that should be imposed. In Japan, the Leniency Program is in use. This article's formulation of the problem is how to create a leniency program in Japan based on the Antimonopoly Act and what are the chances of doing so to expose cartels in Indonesia's competition law system. This article offers a normative legal analysis of Indonesia's prospective use of leniency schemes in cartel proceedings. The research is descriptive-analytical in character, and data collecting through literature reviews and interviews, whereas data processing is qualitative. The findings of the research and debate indicate that it is highly likely that Indonesia will implement the leniency program by enacting the bill as the new Business Competition Law. The research's finding is that the leniency program is likely to be implemented in Indonesia by passing the bill as the country's new Business Competition Law because it is comprehensively implemented in Japan, from reporting procedures to sentencing reductions. It is suggested that Law No. 5/1999, whose provisions include a leniency program system, be amended, and that the KPPU then work with the LPSK to offer protection for reporters in the leniency program system.
- Perbandingan Penerapan Predatory Pricing Menurut Hukum Persaingan Usaha Indonesia dan Amerika Serikat: - Farhandi Himawan; Anna Maria Tri Anggraini
Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol. 5 No. 3 (2023): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/refor.v5i3.16483

Abstract

Entrepreneurs engage in the practice of "selling and loss" in order to eliminate their rivals. Each nation has its own laws governing the proscription of selling at a loss. The formulation of the issue is the parallels and discrepancies between Indonesian and American laws governing sales and losses, business competition, and the application of the ban on predatory pricing based on KPPU-P Decision No. 03/KPPU-L/2020 and Brooke Group Ltd. v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. Legal normative approach opposed to legal comparison between Indonesian and American law. utilizing secondary qualitative data and inference. The findings of the study and discussion show that it is governed in Indonesia by Article 20 of Law No. 5/1999, while In the United States, agreements including predatory pricing are prohibited by Section 2 of the Sherman Act and Section 2(a) of the Clayton Antitrust Act. In terms of the business competition authorities in Indonesia and the United States, KPPU, DOJ, and FTC are autonomous Indonesian organizations. Only one authority in Indonesia, namely KPPU, is in charge of business competition matters, although DOJ and FTC are present in the United States. In conclusion, Indonesia and the United States are required to take into account economic theories.
PERLINDUNGAN KONSUMEN PERUMAHAN DALAM JUAL BELI RUMAH DENGAN SISTEM PRE PROJECT SELLING Jhon Haward Hutagaol; Anna Maria Tri Anggraini
Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol 3 No 4 (2021): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/refor.v4i2.13611

Abstract

Developers make more sales using the pre-project selling system, in which developers start selling before the project is built, where the properties being sold are still new in the form of images or concepts, but in the course of transactions with the system, many consumer rights are violated by business actors. Based on this, the author discusses the problem of consumer rights being violated and efforts to restore Darwin's consumer rights based on Supreme Court Decision Number 653 K/Pdt.Sus-BPSK/2021. This article uses normative research, using secondary, primary legal, and tertiary legal materials. The author concludes that there is a discrepancy in the transaction between Darwin and PT Buana Cipta Propertindo, thereby violating consumer rights as stated in Law number 8 of 1999 concerning Consumer Protection and laws and regulations in the housing sector. The author also considers that the Supreme Court Decision which annulled BPSK and Batam District Court decisions does not support efforts to restore consumer rights and does not accommodate the Consumer Protection Act because BPSK should have the ability and authority to examine the dispute between Darwin and PT Buana Cipta Propertindo based on an agreement.
PRAKTIK DISKRIMINASI PT GARUDA INDONESIA (PERSERO) TERKAIT PROGRAM WHOLESALER Alfiyyah Inayah Taqyuddin; Anna Maria Tri Anggraini
Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol 3 No 3 (2021): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/refor.v4i3.13821

Abstract

In March, PT Garuda Indonesia (Persero) issued GA Info which appointed six wholesalers in the distribution of direct sales of Jeddah - Medina umrah tickets and resulted in market barriers for 301 PPIUs to gain access to Garuda Indonesia tickets. The formulation of the problem is; how is the activity or behavior of PT Garuda Indonesia (Persero) in carrying out discriminatory practices resulting in losses to other business actors based on Article 19 letter d of Law Number 5 Year 1999? and whether the considerations of the KPPU Panel in deciding case Number 06/KPPU-L/2020 are in accordance with Law No. 5/1999 and applicable laws and regulations in the field of competition law? Research method is normative, descriptive in nature using secondary data obtained through literature studies and interviews. The data is qualitatively with deductive inference. The results of the research, discussion and conclusions of the author are; that Garuda Indonesia's activities in carrying out discriminatory practices are by appointing six wholesalers, resulting in 301 wholesalers not being able to access airplane tickets directly through Garuda Indonesia and the consideration the KPPU Panel in deciding case Number 06/KPPU-L/2020 is in accordance with Law No. 5/1999 and regulations in field competition law.
PENGAMBILALIHAN SAHAM PERUSAHAAN MENURUT UU ANTIMONOPOLI (PERBANDINGAN HUKUM INDONESIA DENGAN KOREA SELATAN) Nadya Angelina; Anna Maria Tri Anggraini
Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol 3 No 3 (2021): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/refor.v4i3.13829

Abstract

Competition law regulates the obligation to report the acquisition of company shares with certain requirements. However, each country regulates the reporting requirements with a different system, as well as Indonesia and South Korea. The problem formulation is how the regulation of the submission of share takeover reports according to Law No. 5 of 1999 concerning the Prohibition of Monopolistic Practices and Unfair Business Competition and the Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade Act in South Korea, as well as differences in the application of reporting delays in takeovers in Indonesia and South Korea. Normative juridical research method using secondary data, analyzed using qualitative methods with deductive inference. The results of research, discussion and conclusion that the submission of a share takeover report in Indonesia is regulated in Article 29 of the Antimonopoly Law jo. Article 5 of Government Regulation No. 57 of 2010 and South Korea in Article 12 of the MRFTA. Both countries use a post notification reporting system, but South Korea stipulates mandatory pre-notification with certain limitations. The sanction for late reporting in South Korea is relatively smaller, which is ₩100,000,000.00, while the late fine in Indonesia is calculated daily up to a maximum of Rp 25,000,000,000.
TANGGUNG JAWAB MERCHANT SHOPEE DALAM TRANSAKSI COD MENURUT HUKUM PERLINDUNGAN KONSUMEN Stella Trixie Jane; Anna Maria Tri Anggraini
Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol 3 No 3 (2021): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/refor.v4i3.13840

Abstract

One of the fast-growing e-commerce sites in Indonesia is Shopee. Shopee provides a Cash on Delivery (COD) payment method. The application of COD in fact gets a lot of public attention, because many consumers vent their anger at the courier because the goods sent do not match the order. The formulation of this problem is How are the legal consequences of business actors in Shopee application-based buying and selling transactions through Cash on Delivery (COD) for goods sent that are not in accordance with orders according to Law Number 8 of 1999 concerning Consumer Protection and related regulations? And how is the responsibility of business actors in buying and selling transactions based on the Shopee application through Cash on Delivery (COD) for goods that are sent not in accordance with the order according to Law Number 8 of 1999 concerning Consumer Protection and related regulations? Normative research method, analyzed using qualitative methods with deductive inference. The results of the research, discussion and conclusion, that the legal consequences of the Shopee application-based buying and selling transaction through COD, the business actor provides compensation and consumers can make complaints, and the responsibility of the business actor is contractual responsibility.
Core-Plasma Pattern Partnership Agreement with Micro-Small Business based on the Perspective of Competition Law Tri Anggraini, Anna Maria; Kerti, Renti Maharaini; Sabirin, Ahmad
International Journal of Law and Public Policy (IJLAPP) Vol 5 No 1: March 2023
Publisher : Lamintang Education and Training Centre, in collaboration with the International Association of Educators, Scientists, Technologists, and Engineers (IA-ESTE)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36079/lamintang.ijlapp-0501.476

Abstract

Partnership agreements that aim to mutually benefit both parties, especially empowering micro and small businesses, often have unfavorable consequences for parties whose bargaining position is weak, so that the business competition authority is also given supervisory authority over the implementation of the agreement. The imbalance in bargaining position in this agreement is the reason for writing to raise the issue of understanding owning and/or controlling micro and small businesses according to the applicable regulations and how it is implemented in the nucleus plasma partnership scheme for the oil palm plantation sector. This normative research includes prescriptive research using secondary data which is analyzed qualitatively and concluded using deductive methods. The results of this study indicate that the notion of having is defined as ownership of equity or capital, while the term control focuses more on managerial control which ultimately has an impact on asset control. The partnership agreement contains several clauses that have the potential to own and/or control micro-small businesses according to Law 20/2008 jo. Law 11/2020, besides that, it also has the potential to violate the provisions or principles of unfair business competition. However, this potential violation is difficult for competition authorities to reach due to the absence of technical regulations that explain the meaning of owning and/or controlling micro and small businesses. Therefore, KPPU needs to prepare further regulations in the form of guidelines that explain the limitations.
The Urgence of Renewal Investment Law and Investment Dispute Settlement in Indonesia Tubagus Andri Purnama; Yohanes Firmansyah; Anna Maria Tri Anggraini‬; Elfrida Ratnawati Gultom; Imam Hartanto
Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Humaniora Vol. 1 No. 2 (2022): Juli : Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Humaniora
Publisher : Lembaga Pengembangan Kinerja Dosen

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (169.16 KB) | DOI: 10.55606/jurrish.v1i2.403

Abstract

Legal certainty can be reached by good and explicit principles in a legislation, as well as its application. Investment requires legal certainty as well. On April 26, 2007, the Investment Law No. 25 of 2007 was enacted. This legislation was enacted to replace Law No. 1 of 1967 on Foreign Investment and Law No. 6 of 1968 on Domestic Investment. There are eleven factors that serve as benchmarks for gauging a country's ease of doing business. One of the indications is related to the resolution of investment conflicts, or in this case, contract enforcement and bankruptcy proceedings. According to the Doing Business 2019 report, Indonesia ranks 73rd (seventy-three) in terms of ease of doing business. Indonesia's EoDB ranking remains distant from the aim of entering the world's top 40 (forty) ranks. This is due to the fact that, among other things, dispute resolution in Indonesia still has various issues, including basic regulations, the trial procedure, and decision implementation. Meanwhile, affordable, fast, and simple conflict resolution facilities are required in the corporate world (according to EoDB indications). The results of this descriptive analytical research utilizing a normative juridical approach reveal that there is no implementing regulation of Law Number 25 of 2007 concerning Investment, which focuses on discussing investment disputes, therefore there is no strong legal certainty in investing in Indonesia. Furthermore, there are several issues concerning the resolution of bankruptcy cases, some of which stem from regulations, namely Law Number 37 of 2004 concerning Bankruptcy and Postponement of Debt Payment Obligations, some of which can result in certain interests, the length of the bankruptcy court process, and legal certainty following the bankruptcy decision. A breakthrough or update that can support EoDB is required, one of which can be done in the field of investment dispute resolution, particularly connected to contract enforcement and bankruptcy case settlement, by creating implementing regulations and updating associated regulations.
Dampak Pinjaman Online bagi Masyarakat: Mensejahterakan atau Menyengsarakan? (Studi Tentang Pandangan Masyarakat di Wilayah Bintaro, Tanggerang Selatan) Sharda Abrianti; Anna Maria Tri Anggraini; Ignatius Pradipta Probondaru
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 4 (2024): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2024)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i4.1926

Abstract

Financial Technology (Fintech) dan platform digital menawarkan model bisnis dan alternatif solusi yang dapat membantu pemerintah dan institusi finansial lainnya untuk memperluas jangkauan pemberian layanan finansial yang memadai. Masyarakat perlu mendapat edukasi untuk menambah pengetahuan dan pemahaman yang baik terkait kredit keuangan elektronik melalui perusahaan fintech khususnya Peer To Peer (P2P) Lending yang telah menjadi salah satu alternatif peminjaman dana dengan cepat. Metode pelaksanaan yang dilakukan dalam kegiatan PkM ini adalah melakukan penyuluhan dalam proses penyampaian pengetahuan mengenai obyek terkait, serta membuat rancangan metode penyampaian pengetahuan dan pemahaman regulasi dan kebijakan dalam pinjaman online atau fintech. Penyuluhan ini dilengkapi juga dengan contoh pelanggaran atau kasus pelanggaran hak debitur (konsumen) oleh perusahaan fintech yang menimbulkan kerugian bagi masyarakat. Kegiatan penyuluhan ini melibatkan beberapa penyuluh, yakni Otoritas Jasa Keuangan (OJK-RI), dosen hukum Bisnis Fakultas Hukum Universitas Trisakti, dan pengacara/advokat yang merupakan perwakilan dari pihak mitra, gereja St. Matius Penginjil, Bintaro. Adapun tujuan penyuluhan disesuaikan dengan tema PkM adalah untuk meningkatkan pemahaman kepada masyarakat khususnya masyarakat di sekitar Gereja St. Matius Penginjil akan manfaat dan risiko dalam melakukan pinjaman online. Adapun permasalahan dalam penyuluhan ini adalah kurangnya pemahaman masyarakat setempat mengenai bentuk perlindungan konsumen (debitur) apabila gagal melakukan pengembalian utang, baik perlindungan atas ancaman, kekerasan, maupun terhadap data pribadi. Hal ini diungkapkan pada pengajuan surat yang disampaikan pihak mitra kepada Fakultas Hukum Universitas Trisakti. Adapun solusi dari permasalahan ini adalah memberikan pengetahuan kepada masyarakat agar memahami risiko-risiko yang mungkin terjadi apabila tidak dapat mengembalikan pinjaman sesuai waktu yang dijanjikan.
Perlindungan Konsumen Terhadap Jeratan Pinjaman Online di Masa Pandemi Covid 19 Simanjuntak, Megawati; Safari , Arif; Anggraini , Anna Maria Tri
Policy Brief Pertanian, Kelautan, dan Biosains Tropika Vol 4 No 1 (2022): Policy Brief Pertanian, Kelautan dan Biosains Tropika
Publisher : Direktorat Kajian Strategis dan Reputasi Akademik IPB University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29244/agro-maritim.0401.235-238

Abstract

Pinjaman online (Pinjol) merupakan layanan pinjam meminjam berbasis teknologi informasi yang dilakukan secara online tanpa perlu tatap muka. Cara ini memberikan kemudahan dan kecepatan dalam proses pengajuan kredit. Pinjaman online yang mudah dan cepat dibandingkan dengan lembaga keuangan lainnya, menin gkat di masa Pandemi Covid 19. Berbagai permasalahan muncul karena kurangnya ketersediaan peraturan dan kebijakan yang menekankan kewajiban dan sanksi bagi pelaku usaha P2P Lending dan literasi konsumen yang rendah. Dalam upaya mewujudkan perlindungan konsumen jasa pinjaman online, berbagai pihak seperti Otoritas Jasa Keuangan (OJK), Satgas Waspada Investasi (SWI), Kementerian Komunikasi dan Informatika serta Bareskrim perlu berkoordinasi. Perlu pembuatan aturan yang lebih rinci, pengawasan P2P Lending legal dan ilegal lebih ketat, sosialisasi dan penindakan P2P Lending ilegal, penyebarluasan informasi tentang P2P Lending legal secara efektif dan masif; dan aturan yang tegas kepada pelaku usaha P2P Lending ilegal agar dalam melakukan penagihan wajib menerap kan etika bisnis dan prinsip humanisme.
Co-Authors Abriant, Sharda Abrianti, Sharda Ahmad Sabirin Ahmad Sabirin Ahmad Sabirin Ahmad Sabirin Alex Siswanto Alfin Sulaiman Alfiyyah Inayah Taqyuddin Andrina, Bidhari Arief Safari Azzahra, Mutiara Bachry, Ramadhana Anindyajati Berto Mulia Wibawa Dian Purnamasari Dian Purnamasari Dimas Ananta Putra Dwi Tiara Febrina Elfrida Ratnawati Elizaga , Jhon Rojell Y. Ermania Widjajanti Farhandi Himawan Farhandi Himawan Fitrah Bukhari Gladys Prita Pertiwi Grace Michaela Japranata Grace Riana Yudistira Hendrian Wulansari Ignatius Pradipta Probondaru Illona . Imam Hartanto Intan Purwanti Jhon Haward Hutagaol Jhon Rojell Y. Elizaga Jimi Rambo Arranchado Joice Chintya Mardohar Kabes, Irianto Kemal Kusuma Wardana Kerti, Renti Maharaini Laeli Rahmawati M Faqih Surbakti M Faqih Surbakti Magfirah, Wanda Pasya Mahal Frawansa, Syukron Mali, Yosefa Oktriviani Mutiara Mardohar, Joice Chintya Maria Silvya Elisabeth Wangga Maya Indrasti Notoprayitno Mayva, Verandha Megawati Simanjuntak Mia Amelia Monica Alina Yolanda Muhammad Fathan Zahran Dika Muhammad Raldo Johansyah Muhammad Riziq Babeheer Muhammad Vachry Irsyad Prasanna Muninggar, Roro Ajeng Nadya Angelina Notoprayitno, Maya Indrast Notoprayitno, Maya Indrasti Oktabiani, Andiya Putra, Dimas Ananta Putri Fildzah Andini Raafid Haidar Herfian Raafid Haidar Herfian Rafli Syah Maulana Rahma, Rais Akbar Rahmadhani, Zahra Fide Raras Ayundhani Rizal E. Halim Rizal Edy Halim Rizka Syarifa Roro Ajeng Muninggar Rumahorbo, Yoel Nixon A Sabirin, Ahmad Safari , Arif Safari, Arief Salsabila, Anzela Séréna Ortigosa Fernandez Serena Ortigosa Fernandez Sharda Abrianti Sharda Abrianti Simanullang, Venty Elisa Margareth Siti Nurbaiti Slamet Riyadi Slamet Riyadi Sri Bakti Yunari Stella Trixie Jane Sultan Naufal Sivha Syahreza Jakti Kusuma Syukron Mahal Frawansa Takenia Tifany Triani Nabila Diaqilah Surmana Tribuana Chris Shinta Tubagus Andri Purnama Vizna Qurrotul A’yuniyah Wangga, Maria Silvya Elisabeth Wati, Widiya Yohanes Firmansyah Zayyan, Khalillah