Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 13 Documents
Search

Konsep Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi BUMN Dalam KUHP Nasional dan Undang-Undang BUMN Ulil Amri; Sudiarsana, I Kadek; Sanata, Kalen; Gegana, Reza Pramasta
Judge : Jurnal Hukum Vol. 6 No. 04 (2025): Judge : Jurnal Hukum
Publisher : Cattleya Darmaya Fortuna

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54209/judge.v6i04.1755

Abstract

Pemisahan kekayaan negara dan BUMN telah membuka peluang untuk memidana BUMN sebagai entitas korporasi sebagaimana dalam KUHP Nasional dan UU BUMN Baru. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis pertanggungjawaban pidana BUMN dalam KUHP Nasional dan menganalisis bentuk harmonisasi konsep pertanggungjawaban pidana BUMN dalam KUHP Nasional dan UU No. 1 Tahun 2025. Tipe penelitian menggunakan tipe penelitian normatif menggunakan pendekatan konsep dan pendekatan perundang-undangan. Bahan hukum bersumber dari bahan hukum primer dan bahan hukum sekunder yang dianalisis menggunakan analisis preskriptif kualitatif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa 1) BUMN dapat dimintai pertanggungjawaban pidana berdasarkan Pasal 45 KUHP Nasional yang mengategorikan BUMN sebagai entitas yang dapat dimintai pertanggungjawaban pidana. Hal ini juga selaras dengan teori pertanggungjawaban pidana korporasi diantaranya teori vicarious liability, teori directing mind, teori identifikasi dan teori pelaku fungsional, dan 2) UU No. 1 Tahun 2025 memisahkan BUMN dari negara (kekayaan negara) yang bertujuan untuk membuat demarkasi yang jelas antara tanggung jawab publik dan tanggung jawab korporasi. Pemisahan ini berarti kekayaan negara yang digunakan untuk penyertaan modal pada BUMN tidak lagi menjadi bagian dari APBN dan dikelola berdasarkan prinsip-prinsip perusahaan yang sehat, bukan lagi berdasarkan sistem APBN. Pemisahan entitas tersebut mempertegas posisi BUMN sebagai entitas yang dapat dimintai pertanggungjawaban secara pidana.
SINKRONISASI REGULASI PEMBAYARAN TUNAI DAN NON-TUNAI: ANTARA INOVASI DIGITAL DAN KEPATUHAN PADA UU MATA UANG Tombi, Johan Tri Noval Hendrian; I Kadek Sudiarsana; Gegana, Reza Pramasta; Luthfan, Gusti Fadhil Fithrian; Fajrin, Fera Wulandari; Raden, Andi Nur Fikriana Aulia
JUSTITIABLE - Jurnal Hukum Vol. 8 No. 2 (2026): JUSTITIABLE -Jurnal Hukum
Publisher : Universitas Bojonegoro

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56071/justitiable.v8i2.1720

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the regulatory synchronization between innovations in digital payment systems and the obligation to use physical currency (cash) as a lawful means of payment. The principal issue examined is the growing prevalence of exclusive cashless policies adopted by business actors, which, in legal terms, result in the refusal to accept cash rupiah. The research employs a normative juridical method, using a statutory approach and a comparative approach. The findings indicate that the unilateral refusal to accept cash constitutes a violation of mandatory legal norms, rendering such agreements null and void by operation of law. From a sociological perspective, these policies create barriers to economic access for unbanked populations as well as for elderly groups. The study concludes that a policy reorientation is necessary to ensure the implementation of the mandate of Article 23 of the Currency Law. Accordingly, this research recommends the application of graduated administrative sanctions, ranging from financial penalties to the suspension of QRIS services, in order to ensure inclusivity and legal certainty within the national payment system.
Legal Analysis of Strengthening Legal Protection and Market Access for MSMEs in Kerta Buana Village Reza Pramasta Gegana; Kalen Sanata; Gusti Fadhil Fithrian Luthfan; Johan Tri Noval Hendrian Tombi; M. Andika Nur Sholeh
Widya Pranata Hukum : Jurnal Kajian dan Penelitian Hukum Vol. 8 No. 1 (2026)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Widya Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37631/widyapranata.v8i1.2276

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the effectiveness of legal protection and strategies to improve market access for Micro, Small, and Medium Enterprises (MSMEs) in Kerta Buana Village, Kutai Kartanegara Regency, East Kalimantan. Using a socio-legal approach and qualitative-empirical methods, this study explores legal and non-legal barriers in business formalization efforts through Business Identification Numbers (NIB), Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) ownership, and adaptation to market digitalization. The results show that 68% of MSME actors do not yet have an NIB and 84% do not yet have halal certification or SPPIRT, which directly implies low access to financing and digital markets. The proposed strengthening model consists of two main pillars: Legal Empowerment and Market Integration, developed within the collaborative framework of Penta-Helix (government, academia, private sector, community, and media). The implementation of programs such as Kredit Kukar Idaman (KKI) and the SME Clinic are strategic instruments for promoting business legality and increasing market competitiveness