Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 21 Documents
Search

Pertimbangan Hakim dalam Memutus Tindak Pidana Pembobolan Bank melalui ATM Ida Ayu Gede Kristina Dewi; I Nyoman Gede Sugiartha; Ida Ayu Putu Widiati
Jurnal Preferensi Hukum Vol. 1 No. 1 (2020): Jurnal Preferensi Hukum
Publisher : Warmadewa Press

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Nowadays, advances in technology and information, criminal acts also often occur, automatic teller machines (ATMs) in the banking world are a form of Bank Customer Service that uses machines or can be said as well as electronic devices. Service is an important factor in attracting the attention of customers. Because of this technological sophistication as we know cyber crime, crime is a new form of contemporary crime that has been in the spotlight worldwide. Internet users here become victims because of crime through this electronic system by utilizing and seeing their virtual. In this research, there are at least two problems of violating the automatic cash register (ATM) account theft account: And (2) how is the judge's consideration in determining the crime of bank robbery through an ATM. The research method used is information retrieval using a normative approach based on legal sources, study of literature in studying the legal materials of the legislation as a process to find the rule of law, legal source collection techniques used in this research are records and documentation. Based on research it can be started that the criminal sanctions regulation against account robbery criminal acts. Through the Automatic teller Machine (ATM) in the Criminal Code law contained in Article 362 of the Criminal Code, in the ITE Law the theft is contained in Article 30 paragraph (1), Article 30 paragraph (3), Article 32 paragraph (2), Article 32 paragraph (3 ), Article 36. And there is an addition to Law Number 3 of 2011 concerning the transfer of theft funds contained in Article 81, Article 83 paragraph (1), Article 83 paragraph (2), decision number: 688 / PID. B / 2012 / PN. The judge ruled the case that the defendant was firmly proven legally and convincingly guilty of committing a crime against the law of buying, renting, exchanging, accepting as a promise, accepting as a gift or by accepting as a gift or in the hope of getting a profit selling, saving, exchanging, mortgaging, transported, stored or hidden items.
Co-Authors A.A. Kompiang Dhipa Aditya Agus Wija Atmaja Anak Agung Made Angga Harta Yana Ayu Prasetya Dewi Carmelita Juliana Putri Benny Cok Rai Kesuma Putra Dewi, A.A Sagung Laksmi Diah Gayatri Sudibya Ferdinandus Kila Gede Agung Wirawan Nusantara I Dewa Gede Atmadja I G A A Gita Pritayanti Dinar I G.A.A.Gita P.Dinar I Gde Artha I Gede Sathya Narayana Andrade I Gede Yoga Paramartha Duarsa I Gusti Agung Ayu Candra Nigrat I Gusti Agung Ayu Gita Pritayanti Dinar I Gusti Agung Ayu Gita Pritayanti Dinar I Gusti Made Yudha Pramana I Gusti Ngurah Ananta Wardana I Kadek Dwi Melana Putra I Kadek Edy Sanjaya I Kadek Sudikma I Ketut Sukadana I Komang Aditya Sanjaya I Made Aditya Mantara Putra I Made Ananda Hardiantha I Made Arjaya I Made Jaya Wiguna I Made Minggu Widyantara I Made Minggu Widyantara I Made Ngurah Adi Kusumadewa I Nyoman Putu Budiartha I Nyoman Subamia I Nyoman Trian Prananta Wibawa I Putu Aditya Pramana I Putu Gede Budihartawan I Wayan Angga Pratama I Wayan Arthana I Wayan Arthanaya I Wayan Sunarta I.B Gede Agustya Mahaputra Ida Ayu Gede Kristina Dewi Josep Robert Khuana Kadek Dini Destianingsih Kadek Novita Dewi Kadek Widhiantari Ningsih Karma, Ni Made Sukaryati Ketut Adi Wirawan Komang Arya Ananta Setyawan Ni Komang Triana Diah Mahadewi Ni Luh Gita Saraswati Ni Luh Putu Amanda Cahayani Ni Made Ayu Trimayukti Ni Made Puspasutari Ujianti Ni Made Sinthya Kusuma Arisanthi Ni Nyoman Alit Meilinda Suasthi Pusaka, Semerdanta Putu Ayu Sarina Selsa Oktaviani Putu Suryani . Widiati, Ida Ayu Putu