Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
4.908
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal YUSTISI Jurnal Justitia : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Humaniora Yustisi: Jurnal Hukum dan Hukum Islam JOURNAL of LEGAL RESEARCH RIO LAW JURNAL Jurnal Bisnis Mahasiswa Shautuna: Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Perbandingan Mazhab Jurnal Impresi Indonesia Journal of Social Research SENTRI: Jurnal Riset Ilmiah Cerdika: Jurnal Ilmiah Indonesia Jurnal Hukum Indonesia JIM: Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Pendidikan Sejarah Jurnal Multidisiplin Indonesia Jurnal Riset Ilmiah Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengkajian Ilmiah Jurnal Sains, Ekonomi, Manajemen, Akuntansi dan Hukum Themis: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum
Franciska, Wira
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Aerospace Engineering Humanities Chemistry Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Earth & Planetary Sciences Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Health Professions Immunology & microbiology Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Public Health Social Sciences Veterinary Other

Published : 33 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 33 Documents
Search

 1   2   3   4 
KEPASTIAN HUKUM PUTUSAN ARBITRASE DALAM KONTEKS PEMBATALAN DITINJAU DARI ASAS FINAL AND BINDING Nurjanah, Popy; Franciska, Wira; Hakim, Nur
SINERGI : Jurnal Riset Ilmiah Vol. 3 No. 2 (2026): SINERGI : Jurnal Riset Ilmiah, February 2026
Publisher : Lembaga Pendidikan dan Penelitian Manggala Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62335/sinergi.v3i2.2363

Abstract

Law Number 30 of 1999 concerning Arbitration and Alternative Dispute Resolution stipulates that arbitration awards are final and binding. This nature is a manifestation of legal certainty. Final means the last, while binding means that the disputing parties are legally bound from the moment the award is pronounced to implement the arbitration award. However, the same law also regulates the annulment of arbitration awards that are final and binding. Parties who are dissatisfied with an arbitration award use the grounds for setting aside an arbitration award to avoid their obligations under the arbitration award. Such actions will certainly cause legal uncertainty for arbitration awards. The method used in this study is normative legal research conducted as an effort to obtain the data needed in relation to the problem. The primary data used in this study are laws and regulations and court decisions. The secondary legal data used are books/literature and journals. Meanwhile, the tertiary legal data are derived from general dictionaries and legal dictionaries. All data were then analyzed using qualitative legal analysis methods. Since the issuance of Constitutional Court Decision Number 15/PUU-XII/2014 on November 11, 2014, the grounds for annulment of an arbitration award no longer need to be proven by a court decision. Court judges are given the discretion to assess the existence of document forgery, document concealment and/or deception. The legal certainty of arbitration awards, which are final and binding, must be maintained. The annulment of arbitration awards as regulated in Law No. 30 of 1999 on Arbitration and Alternative Dispute Resolution must be interpreted as an effort to ensure that arbitration awards remain final and binding. Annulment is not an attempt to avoid obligations that have been decided. The role of the Court is also very important in maintaining the finality of arbitration awards. The Court must be able to issue decisions that have clear legal consequences for arbitration awards.
PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM BAGI PIHAK YANG DIRUGIKAN ATAS PENYALAHGUNAAN KEADAAN DALAM PEMBUATAN SURAT KESEPAKATAN BERSAMA PEMBAYARAN UTANG PIUTANG Gummara, Sesar; Franciska, Wira; Hutomo, Putra
SINERGI : Jurnal Riset Ilmiah Vol. 3 No. 2 (2026): SINERGI : Jurnal Riset Ilmiah, February 2026
Publisher : Lembaga Pendidikan dan Penelitian Manggala Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62335/sinergi.v3i2.2380

Abstract

The abuse of circumstances (misbruik van omstandigheden) is an act that exploits an unbalanced position between parties in an agreement to obtain economic benefits, which can force one party to enter into an agreement with disproportionate performance. This phenomenon often occurs in the creation of joint agreement deeds for debt payments, as seen in several court rulings, where the economically or psychologically stronger party exploits the weaknesses of the other party. This contradicts the principles of freedom of contract and consensualism in the Indonesian Civil Code (KUH Perdata), thus requiring legal protection for the aggrieved party. This research aims to examine and analyze the legal protection for parties harmed by the abuse of circumstances in the creation of joint agreement deeds for debt payments, as well as to analyze the legal consequences arising from such abuse. This research employs a normative juridical legal research method with approaches encompassing legislation, case studies, analysis, and concepts. Primary legal sources include the Civil Code (KUH Perdata), the Notary Public Law, and court decisions, while secondary and tertiary sources are derived from library materials such as books, journals, and legal dictionaries. Data collection techniques are conducted through literature studies, and data analysis utilizes descriptive analytic qualitative methods to describe and construct an understanding of the related legal issues. The research results show that the legal consequences of abuse of circumstances are that the agreement can be annulled or void by law, so the agreement is considered never to have existed and can be restored to its original condition, provided that the aggrieved party submits an application for annulment. Legal protection for the aggrieved party can be obtained through the mechanism of applying for annulment of the agreement based on the doctrine of abuse of circumstances as a defect of will, which allows the judge to annul the agreement if it is proven that there is exploitation of a weak position. This research provides theoretical and practical contributions to the development of legal science as well as considerations in making fair agreements
KEPASTIAN HUKUM TERHADAP STATUS KEWARGANEGARAAN ANAK DALAM PERKAWINAN CAMPURAN AKIBAT PERCERAIAN PERKAWINAN CAMPURAN Meliala, Octobita Anggia; Franciska, Wira; Marniati, Felicitas Sri
YUSTISI Vol 13 No 1 (2026)
Publisher : Universitas Ibn Khaldun Bogor

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32832/yustisi.v13i1.22685

Abstract

Kemajuan teknologi dan globalisasi telah membawa dampak signifikan terhadap pola pikir dan perilaku masyarakat Indonesia, termasuk dalam hal perkawinan. Salah satu fenomena yang muncul ialah meningkatnya perkawinan campuran antara warga negara Indonesia dengan warga negara asing. Namun, tidak semua perkawinan campuran berjalan harmonis. Perbedaan budaya, hukum, maupun pandangan hidup sering kali menimbulkan permasalahan serius yang berujung pada perceraian. Anak yang lahir dari perkawinan campuran memiliki kedudukan hukum yang berbeda dibanding anak dari perkawinan non-campuran, khususnya terkait status kewarganegaraan setelah perceraian orang tua mereka. Permasalahan utama dalam penelitian ini adalah: (1) bagaimana status kewarganegaraan anak akibat perceraian dalam perkawinan campuran, dan (2) bagaimana kepastian hukum terhadap status anak dalam kondisi tersebut. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan yuridis normatif dengan mengkaji peraturan perundang-undangan, putusan pengadilan, literatur hukum, serta penelitian terdahulu. Analisis dilakukan dengan penafsiran gramatikal, sistematis, serta konstruksi hukum. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa kepastian hukum terhadap status anak dalam perkawinan campuran akibat perceraian ditentukan melalui putusan pengadilan. Anak yang masih di bawah umur diberikan kewarganegaraan ganda terbatas hingga berusia 18 tahun, kemudian diberi hak untuk memilih salah satu kewarganegaraan. Sementara itu, hak asuh anak tetap ditentukan berdasarkan prinsip kepentingan terbaik bagi anak, di mana hakim memberikan pertimbangan utama pada usia, kondisi psikologis, serta kemampuan orang tua dalam memberikan perlindungan. Kesimpulan dari penelitian ini adalah bahwa meskipun regulasi telah memberikan kepastian hukum, praktik di lapangan sering kali menghadapi kendala, terutama dalam harmonisasi aturan nasional dengan hukum internasional. Oleh karena itu, dibutuhkan konsistensi penerapan hukum serta pembaruan regulasi untuk memberikan perlindungan optimal terhadap anak hasil perkawinan campuran. Kata Kunci: kepastian hukum, anak, perkawinan campuran, perceraian
Co-Authors Abdul Aziz Alif Santosa, Muhammad Ambon, Is Faisal Atmadja, Dhody.AR.Widjaja Bangapadang, Mona Yulianty Bantu, Sherly Candra, Mardi Dewantara, Govinda Dhan, Sandy Arif Fitrian, Achmad Gummara, Sesar Hakim, Nur Halim, Anriz Nazaruddin Halim, Santoso Hardhini, Euis Hutabarat, Bardamean Marulitua Milko Hutomo, Putra Indrawati, Dini Ayu Ismail Ismail Ismed, Mohamad Kadir, Taqiyuddin Khalimi Khalimi, Khalimi Koto, Zulkarnain Marbun, Elida Marbun, Monalisa Marniati, Felicitas Sri Martien, Doni Mau, Hedwig Adianto Mayusta, Silva Meliala, Octobita Anggia Nasseri, Jelly Nazarudin Halim, Anriz Nurjanah, Popy Nurwidyanti, Amelia Prihartonoa, Eric Ridwan, Refki Safitri, Esa Aprilia Sako, Alim Salim Saputra Salsabila, Aulia Sibarani, Christine Martha Rinauly Sirait, Ryanto Siringoringo, Susilawaty Sitanggang, Hermanto Soelistyo, Arie Sondang, Tarida Sudomo, Darasati Damarani Suminar, Enden Tirta Mutisari Situmorang, Riski Tjahjaningtyas, Kristien Turhamun*, M Slamet Wibowo, Agus Ari Widyanti, Amelia Nur Yani , Ahmad Yuhelson Yuhelson Zulki Zulkifli Noor