Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : International Journal of Business, Law, and Education

Authority of Administrative Court in Establishing Administrative Sanctions for Local Government Officials Who Do Not Implement Administrative Court Verdict Saputra, Bima; Hadiyantina, Shinta; Susmayanti, Riana
International Journal of Business, Law, and Education Vol. 6 No. 1 (2025): International Journal of Business, Law, and Education
Publisher : IJBLE Scientific Publications Community Inc.

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56442/ijble.v6i1.1040

Abstract

This study is motivated by the lack of adherence among local government officials in executing decisions issued by the Administrative Court (PTUN). Furthermore, there is a legal inconsistency between Law Number 51 of 2009, which amends Law Number 5 of 1986 on Administrative Courts, and Law Number 30 of 2014 on Government Administration. This discrepancy concerns the sanction mechanisms for government officials who disregard PTUN rulings, potentially leading to ineffective enforcement. The research aims to examine the existing administrative sanction regulations and develop an optimal sanction framework for local government officials who fail to comply with PTUN decisions. Utilizing a normative approach, the findings reveal two distinct methods for enforcing administrative sanctions. Consequently, the author advocates for regulatory reform by redefining Administrative Court authority, enabling it to impose administrative sanctions on non-compliant officials. This adjustment is intended to reinforce the principle of separation of powers and ensure legal certainty.
Synergy and Accountability of Financial Supervision in Governance Pranomo, Sigit; Istislam, Istislam; Hadiyantina, Shinta
International Journal of Business, Law, and Education Vol. 6 No. 1 (2025): International Journal of Business, Law, and Education
Publisher : IJBLE Scientific Publications Community Inc.

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56442/ijble.v6i1.1042

Abstract

This research aims to analyze the implications of supervision that is not based on synergy and accountability and how the regulatory criteria are in accordance with the legislation. This research uses normative juridical research method with statutory approach and conceptual approach. The implications of supervision that is not synergistic and accountable can have conssequences in the form of the risk of corruption and budget abuse, inefficiency in managing state finances, and lack of transparency to the public. 2. The implications of non-synergistic and accountability-based oversight suggest that inefficient oversight increases the risk of corruption, budgetary misappropriation, and inefficiency in the management of the state budget. Furthermore, distorted transparency in the presentation of audit results reduces public confidence in the government's financial oversight system. Follow-up on irregularities is also slow due to differences in audit results and the absence of synergy between oversight institutions.