Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
6.334
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal JURNAL HUKUM LAW REFORM Syiar Hukum: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum JURNAL LITIGASI (e-Journal) LEGITIMASI: Jurnal Hukum Pidana dan Politik Hukum Walisongo: Jurnal Penelitian Sosial Keagamaan Jurnal Daulat Hukum Jurnal Wawasan Yuridika Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Widya Pranata Hukum : Jurnal Kajian dan Penelitian Hukum Journal Justiciabelen (JJ) Multidiciplinary Output Research for Actual and International Issue (Morfai Journal) International Journal of Science and Society (IJSOC) Jurnal Riset Ilmu Hukum Jomantara International Journal of Art and Culture Journal of Mathematics Instruction, Social Research and Opinion JAPI: Jurnal Akses Pengabdian Indonesia Bandung Conference Series: Law Studies Tasyri' Indonesian Journal of Law Research Ekasakti Legal Science Journal Legalis : Journal of Law Review
Dini Dewi Heniarti
Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Bandung (UNISBA)
Religion Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Arts Humanities Chemical Engineering, Chemistry & Bioengineering Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Energy Engineering Environmental Science Health Professions Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Materials Science & Nanotechnology Mathematics Nursing Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 49 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 49 Documents
Search

 1   2   3   4   5 
APPLICATION OF THE NON-RETROACTIVE PRINCIPLE BY JUDGES IN DISPUTES REGARDING TERMINATION OF EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS AFTER THE ELIGIBILITY OF THE JOB LAW AS A MANIFESTATION LEGAL CERTAINTY Muhammad Mahendra Maskhur Sinaga; A. Harits Nu’man; Efik Yusdiansyah; Dini Dewi Heniarti
Multidiciplinary Output Research For Actual and International Issue (MORFAI) Vol. 5 No. 3 (2025): Multidiciplinary Output Research For Actual and International Issue
Publisher : RADJA PUBLIKA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54443/morfai.v5i3.2870

Abstract

This study examines the application of the principle of non-retroactivity by judges in Indonesian industrial relations courts, specifically in cases of termination of employment (PHK) arising after the enactment of the Job Creation Law (UU Cipta Kerja). The research analyzes how courts balance the application of the new law with the legal principles protecting workers' rights and ensuring legal certainty. By examining relevant court decisions and legal doctrines, the study finds that judges generally adhere to the principle of non-retroactivity, applying the labor laws in effect at the time the cause of action arose (the PHK event). This adherence upholds constitutional rights and prevents unfair application of the Job Creation Law to pre-existing disputes. However, challenges remain in ensuring consistent application and interpretation, highlighting the need for clear guidelines and ongoing judicial education to promote legal certainty and fairness in industrial relations disputes.
JURIDICAL REVIEW OF THE MERAH PUTIH COOPERATIVE AND THE ROLE OF THE NOTARY MAKING THE COOPERATIVE DEED (NPAK) IN ITS ESTABLISHMENT BASED ON INDONESIAN COOPERATIVE LAW Felly Faradina; Zulhendrawan; Dini Dewi Heniarti; Neni Sri Imaniyati; Dhody Ananta Rivandi W
Multidiciplinary Output Research For Actual and International Issue (MORFAI) Vol. 5 No. 3 (2025): Multidiciplinary Output Research For Actual and International Issue
Publisher : RADJA PUBLIKA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54443/morfai.v5i3.2933

Abstract

As a manifestation of the implementation of Article 33 paragraphs (1) and (4) of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia, the government initiated a community economic empowerment program in early 2025 through the establishment of the "Koperasi Merah Putih" (Red and White Cooperatives). In its initial phase, the government aims to establish up to 80,000 such cooperatives across villages and urban neighborhoods throughout Indonesia. Within this program, the Notary Making Cooperative Deeds (NPAK) plays a crucial role in ensuring the legal validity of these cooperatives' establishments. This study aims to examine the mechanisms involved in the formation of the Koperasi Merah Putih and to analyze the role of NPAK in this process. However, challenges arise for notaries, particularly NPAK, due to certain regulatory differences between the establishment of Koperasi Merah Putih and conventional cooperatives. Employing a normative juridical research method through literature study, this research utilizes an analytical approach to scrutinize the Koperasi Merah Putih and the role of NPAK from theoretical, regulatory, and practical perspectives. The findings reveal that the Articles of the Association of Koperasi Merah Putih differ from those of typical cooperatives in terms of naming conventions, types of business activities, management structures, membership areas, and procedures for obtaining legal entity status.
ANALYSIS OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL'S AUTHORITY IN CRIMINAL ECONOMIC LAW POLICY IN INDONESIA Zainur Arifin Syah; Nandang Sambas; Chepi Ali Firman Zakaria; Dini Dewi Heniarti
Multidiciplinary Output Research For Actual and International Issue (MORFAI) Vol. 5 No. 5 (2025): Multidiciplinary Output Research For Actual and International Issue
Publisher : RADJA PUBLIKA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54443/morfai.v5i5.3324

Abstract

The Public Prosecutor's Office's authority to investigate economic crimes in Indonesia remains limited, both normatively and institutionally. Yet the complexity and magnitude of losses resulting from economic offenses demand an institution with adequate juridical and technical capabilities. To address issues concerning the legal basis for these limitations, their impact on law enforcement, and an ideal legal‐policy model for the Public Prosecutor's Office, a normative legal approach was employed, incorporating statutory, case‐law, historical, comparative, and conceptual analyses. The discussion examines the grounds for such limitations under positive law, the prevailing legal‐policy direction, and the design of criminal institutions, according to which the Public Prosecutor's Office may exercise investigative functions only where governed by a lex specialis provision. Moreover, the normative and practical effects of these limitations on enforcement effectiveness are analyzed, particularly in relation to inter-agency coordination, legal certainty, and public confidence. In light of the Public Prosecutor's Office's success in handling major corruption cases, which are part of the broader category of economic crimes, there is a pressing need to formulate a legal‐policy model to expand and strengthen the institution's role. As a solution, a criminal‐law reform model is proposed that positions the Public Prosecutor's Office as the principal investigative body through centralized authority, accountable procedures, and integrated cross‐agency governance. This model is intended to establish a more centralized, efficient, and credible system for enforcing economic criminal law while reinforcing the direction of national criminal-law reform.
Perlindungan Hak Nafkah Anak dari Perkawinan Siri: Kajian Itsbat Nikah Dalam Perspektif Hukum Islam Dan Keadilan Warisni, Rinrin; Heniarti, Dini Dewi; Nurhasanah, Neneng
Tasyri' : Journal of Islamic Law Vol. 4 No. 2 (2025): Tasyri'
Publisher : STAINI Press

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.53038/tsyr.v4i2.284

Abstract

The increasing prevalence of unregistered (siri) marriages in Indonesia has raised serious social concerns and legal challenges, particularly regarding the protection of children's rights. Children born from siri marriages are often deprived of their legal entitlements, especially the right to financial support (nafaqah), due to the absence of official marriage registration that provides legal certainty. This study aims to analyze the role of itsbat nikah (marriage validation) as a legal mechanism to guarantee the child’s right to maintenance in the context of siri marriages. Using a normative juridical approach and library research method, the study draws from national regulations—such as Law No. 1 of 1974 and the Compilation of Islamic Law (KHI)—as well as Islamic legal doctrines and the framework of maqāṣid al-sharī‘ah. The findings reveal that the lack of legal documentation places children in a vulnerable and discriminatory position, especially in accessing their rights. Marriage registration is a crucial step toward ensuring justice and legal protection for children. Within the Islamic legal perspective, safeguarding children's welfare aligns with the objective of preserving lineage (ḥifẓ al-nasl) and promoting family well-being. Itsbat nikah services are thus viewed as a strategic state policy that addresses the legal gaps arising from unregistered marriages. This study recommends strengthening the accessibility, affordability, and efficiency of itsbat nikah procedures as a tangible form of state responsibility in securing justice for children and upholding the protective function of the law.
Reformulation of Political Party Support Requirements for Presidential Candidacy in Realizing an Aristocratic State in Indonesia Nana Supriana; Dini Dewi Heniarti
Jurnal Daulat Hukum Vol 9, No 1 (2026): March 2026
Publisher : Magister of Law, Faculty of Law, Universitas Islam Sultan Agung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30659/jdh.v9i1.50523

Abstract

This research aims to analyze the urgency of reformulating political party support requirements for presidential candidacy to mitigate oligarchic dominance in Indonesia while realizing a modern aristocratic state. The study employs a normative juridical approach integrated with a socio-legal approach, utilizing a descriptive-analytical research specification. Secondary data, including the 1945 Constitution, Law No. 7 of 2017, and recent Constitutional Court decisions, were analyzed qualitatively through document studies and international institutional comparisons. The findings indicate that the current quantitative presidential threshold has fostered political cartelization and restricted the emergence of competent alternative leaders by prioritizing financial capital over statesmanship. As a primary conclusion, this study offers novelty by proposing the Merit-Based Party Endorsement System (MBPES) as an alternative institutional design. This model reinterprets the concept of modern aristocracy not as hereditary rule, but as governance by individuals possessing superior moral and intellectual virtues. The research's novelty lies in shifting the nomination criteria from mere parliamentary seat counts to qualitative indicators, including internal party meritocracy, deliberative public scrutiny, and an independent epistemic filter. This reformulation is vital to fill the normative vacuum following Constitutional Court Decision No. 62/PUU-XXII/2024, ensuring that presidential candidates are selected based on objective ethical integrity and leadership capacity. Ultimately, this approach is expected to restore constitutional dignity and align the electoral process with the principles of substantive Pancasila democracy in Indonesia.
Legal Protection for Doctors Performing Pregnancy Termination in Anencephaly Cases under Law Number 17 of 2023 on Health Yusrawati Yusrawati; Dini Dewi Heniarti; A. Harits Nu'man
Journal of Mathematics Instruction, Social Research and Opinion Vol. 5 No. 3 (2026): September
Publisher : MASI Mandiri Edukasi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58421/misro.v5i3.1507

Abstract

Legal protection for healthcare professionals remains a significant issue in Indonesia, particularly regarding pregnancy termination in cases of anencephalic fetuses. Although Indonesian law permits abortion on limited grounds, including medical emergencies and pregnancies resulting from rape or other sexual violence, legal uncertainty persists when anencephaly is diagnosed after 14 weeks of gestation. This study analyzes the legal regulation of pregnancy termination in such cases and examines the legal protection available to doctors performing these procedures. Using juridical-normative and empirical-juridical approaches with a descriptive-analytical method, the study combines legal analysis with empirical data collected from 34 informants and respondents, including obstetricians, police officers, healthcare professionals, academics, religious leaders, hospital management, and legal practitioners. The findings indicate that the absence of clear operational regulations for late-detected anencephaly creates uncertainty and increases the risk of criminalization, even when procedures are performed in accordance with medical indications, informed consent, professional standards, and accredited healthcare facilities. Respondents emphasized the need for clearer procedural guidelines, stronger legal guarantees, professional protocols, and coordinated medicolegal mechanisms. The study concludes that pregnancy termination in cases of late-detected anencephaly should not automatically be treated as a criminal act when conducted by competent medical personnel in accordance with medical, ethical, and legal standards. It proposes a lex specialis-based legal protection model to strengthen legal certainty and support future health law reform in Indonesia.
Criminal Liability Policy for Organizers of the Free Nutritious Meal Program in Mass Food Poisoning Cases: A Legal Certainty Approach Suryana, Dian; Dini Dewi Heniarti
Legitimasi: Jurnal Hukum Pidana dan Politik Hukum Vol. 15 No. 1 (2026)
Publisher : Faculty of Sharia and Law, Universitas Islam Negeri Ar-Raniry Banda Aceh

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22373/legitimasi.v15i1.33752

Abstract

The free nutritious meal program is a national public service policy intended to strengthen nutritional fulfillment for vulnerable groups; however, its large-scale food distribution system also creates serious food safety risks, including the possibility of mass poisoning incidents. This study examines the normative problem of unclear criminal accountability in free nutritious meal governance, particularly the absence of a foreseeable accountability map that distinguishes administrative violations from criminal conduct and identifies the relevant legal subjects. The research addresses two questions about how criminal liability is constructed in food safety incidents within the free nutritious meal program, and how the chain of criminal responsibility among the government, the National Nutrition Agency, schools, and vendors should be structured within a public policy framework. This study employs doctrinal legal research using statutory, conceptual, and comparative approaches through the examination of criminal law, food law, consumer protection law, and selected comparative references from Japan, India, and China. The findings show that Indonesian positive law provides a fragmented basis for liability through negligence offenses in the Criminal Code and criminal provisions in food and consumer legislation, yet these norms remain insufficient for a multi-actor public policy program such as the free nutritious meal. This condition creates uncertainty in liability attribution and risks selective criminalization or structural impunity. The study concludes that the free nutritious meal requires a statutory lex specialis that clearly regulates minimum food safety standards, liable legal subjects, fault thresholds, causation standards, and tiered sanctions in order to ensure legal certainty and effective public protection.
Misuse of Artificial Intelligence in Cybercrime: Criminal Liability and Electoral Integrity Hadi Jumhadi; Dini Dewi Heniarti
Jurnal Daulat Hukum Vol 8, No 4 (2025): December 2025
Publisher : Magister of Law, Faculty of Law, Universitas Islam Sultan Agung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30659/jdh.v8i4.50286

Abstract

This study examines the misuse of artificial intelligence (AI) from the perspective of cybercrime and its implications for electoral integrity. The rapid development of AI has transformed cybercrime from conventional, human-centered acts into autonomous, large-scale, and structurally complex operations capable of manipulating public perception and democratic processes. This research aims to analyze the characteristics of AI-enabled cybercrime in elections, assess the applicability of the classical concept of mens rea in crimes involving autonomous systems, and formulate adaptive models of criminal liability in response to these challenges. The study employs a qualitative legal research method with a normative and conceptual approach. Data are collected through library research using primary legal materials in the form of statutory regulations and secondary legal materials consisting of scholarly articles, legal doctrines, and relevant academic publications. The analysis is conducted through descriptive-analytical techniques, legal interpretation, and conceptual analysis. The findings demonstrate that AI-driven cybercrime creates ontological and epistemological challenges for criminal law, particularly in attributing intent and responsibility. As AI cannot be recognized as a legal subject, criminal liability must be reconstructed and directed toward human and institutional actors through layered and contextual liability models. The novelty of this research lies in its integration of mens rea theory with the structural characteristics of AI-enabled cybercrime, offering a proactive and anticipatory criminal law framework to safeguard electoral integrity in the digital era.
TRANSFORMASI ALAT BUKTI ELEKTRONIK MENGGUNAKAN DIGITAL FORENSIK DALAM PEMBAHARUAN HUKUM ACARA PIDANA Dennis Fernando; Dini Dewi Heniarti; Chepi Ali Firman Zakaria
Journal Justiciabelen (JJ) Vol 5 No 01 (2025): January
Publisher : Univeristas Suryakancana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35194/jj.v5i01.5506

Abstract

ABSTRAKPerkembangan teknologi informasi dan komunikasi telah mendorong pergeseran sistem pembuktian pidana ke arah digitalisasi, di mana bukti elektronik memainkan peran penting dalam mengungkap tindak pidana. Meskipun telah diakui secara normatif dalam UU ITE dan RUU KUHAP, penerapan bukti elektronik masih menghadapi tantangan prosedural, khususnya terkait keabsahan dan integritasnya. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis urgensi integrasi digital forensik sebagai syarat formil keabsahan bukti elektronik dalam pembaharuan hukum acara pidana. Metode yang digunakan adalah pendekatan yuridis normatif dengan spesifikasi deskriptif-analitis, yang mengkaji data sekunder berupa peraturan perundang-undangan, literatur hukum, dan studi kasus. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa ketiadaan standar operasional prosedur digital forensik menyebabkan inkonsistensi penilaian alat bukti di pengadilan, mengancam kepastian hukum, dan membuka peluang pelanggaran hak terdakwa. Oleh karena itu, reformasi hukum acara pidana harus diarahkan pada penguatan regulasi teknis digital forensik sebagai bagian integral sistem pembuktian pidana di era digital. ABSTRACTThe development of information and communication technology has encouraged a shift in the criminal evidence system towards digitalization, where electronic evidence plays an important role in uncovering criminal acts. Although it has been normatively recognized in the ITE Law and the KUHAP Bill, the application of electronic evidence still faces procedural challenges, especially regarding its validity and integrity. This research aims to analyze the urgency of digital forensic integration as a formal requirement for the validity of electronic evidence in the reform of criminal procedure law. The method used is a normative juridical approach with descriptive-analytical specifications, which examines secondary data in the form of laws and regulations, legal literature, and case studies. The results showed that the absence of standard operating procedures for digital forensics led to inconsistencies in the assessment of evidence in court, threatened legal certainty, and opened up opportunities for violations of defendants' rights. Therefore, criminal procedure law reform should be directed at strengthening the technical regulation of digital forensics as an integral part of the criminal evidence system in the digital era.
Co-Authors A. Harits Nu'man A. Harits Nu'man Ahmad Faizal Adha Anurag Hazarika Arinto Nurcahyono Ath Thaariq Syah Putra Chepi Ali Firman Z Deisya Devita Mayshanda Dennis Fernando Dey Ravena Dey Ravena Dhody Ananta Rivandi W Dinda Sefiana Dito Permana Edi Setiadi Efik Yusdiansyah Eka Djoneri Elfrida Ratnawati Erni Rohaini Faishal Rakhman Felly Faradina Fernando, Dennis Fernando, Zico Junius Firman Zakaria, Chepi Ali Gialdah Tapiansari Batubara Hadi Jumhadi Hasya Fazni Pratiwi Heru Rustaman Hery Widijanto Husni Fahri Fani Ifeanyi M. Nwokeocha Indra Ramadhan Jaya, Belardo Prasetya Mega Jihan Fariha Suryana Kusumah, Fardana Luthfia Qurrota Aina M. Fahreza Arifin Moh. Ari Abdul Salam Muhammad Arbi Alghiyats Muhammad Firmansyah Baharuddin Muhammad Ilman Abidin Muhammad Mahendra Maskhur Sinaga Najieh, Muhammad Fauzan Nana Supriana Nandang Sambas Neneng Hasanah Neni Ruhaeni Neni Sri Imaniyati Nining Oksidelfa Yanto Pratiwi, Hasya Fazni Putri Ilma Sofiyullah Rahmat Raihan Fadhlullah R Ramdania, Dini Rena Yulia Ridwan Rizki Fujiyama Anindia Putri Ronaa Nabila Azzahra Setiawati, Suci Sindi Mulia Sitarini Satianti Soewarno Slamet Sarwo Edy, Slamet Sarwo Soge, Albertus D Sri Ratna Suminar Suci Setiawati Suryana, Dian Syahroni Syahroni Syireen Humaira Warisni, Rinrin Yudha Wino Prihandoko Yusrawati Yusrawati Zainur Arifin Syah Zulhendrawan