Wening Sahayu
Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Indonesia

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

Advancing SDG 4 through Biocultural Science Education: A PRISMA-Guided Systematic Literature Review of Traditional Medicine and Local Knowledge Integration Sulis Triyono; Wening Sahayu; Niken Kencono Ungu
Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia Vol. 15 No. 3 (2026): September 2026
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/jpii.v15i3.42190

Abstract

Integrating traditional medicine and local cultural wisdom into science education is increasingly recognized as vital for fostering contextualized, inclusive, and sustainability-oriented learning. However, despite its potential to bridge scientific literacy with cultural identity and ecological stewardship, a significant gap remains in systematic syntheses examining how biocultural knowledge can be integrated into school science curricula. This study addresses this gap through a PRISMA 2020-guided Systematic Literature Review (SLR). A total of 21 peer-reviewed empirical articles published between 2019 and 2025 were selected from the Scopus database using a structured screening and eligibility protocol. Data were analyzed thematically across research characteristics, pedagogical applications, educational impacts, methodological trends, and contextual gaps. The findings reveal three dominant patterns: the prevalence of ethnobotanical knowledge as the primary domain of Traditional Ecological Knowledge (TEK), the integration of TEK with contemporary scientific inquiry, and the profound socio-cultural and spiritual drivers shaping traditional medicine practices. Geographically, research is heavily concentrated in Africa and Asia, highlighting regional engagement but revealing a lack of comparative international research. Furthermore, non-plant domains (animal and fungal TEK) remain significantly underrepresented. The review provides critical pedagogical implications for curriculum design, culturally responsive teaching, and sustainability-oriented science learning aligned with SDG 4 (Quality Education) and SDG 11 (Sustainable Cities and Communities), offering a structured five-point blueprint for contextual implementation in culturally rich regions such as Yogyakarta, Indonesia.
Developing multidisciplinary B1-level reading exercises (Leseübungen) using a student-centered learning approach Surya Masniari Hutagalung; Balazs Huszkat; Melky Wijayanti; Sulis Triyono; Wening Sahayu
Jurnal Cakrawala Pendidikan Vol. 45 No. 3 (2026): Cakrawala Pendidikan (October 2026)
Publisher : LPMPP Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21831/cp.v45i3.99590

Abstract

The standardized B1-level German proficiency examination used in Indonesian higher education requires learners to read texts that increasingly combine everyday, public, academic, and semi-disciplinary content. However, locally contextualized materials that prepare students for these reading demands remain limited, and institutional evidence from two 2023 cohorts at one Indonesian university showed that Lesen was the weakest module, with pass rates of 14.7% and 9.5%. This early-cycle design-based research study reports the development and expert validation of a prototype package of multidisciplinary B1 reading exercises (Leseübungen) designed through a student-centered learning approach. The study covered problem analysis, prototype development, expert review, and first-cycle revision; it did not include classroom implementation or learner outcome testing. The prototype consisted of pre-reading activation, while-reading comprehension, vocabulary and strategy support, post-reading reflection, and optional collaborative tasks across domains such as education, public services, health, culture, environment, and technology. Three German language education experts evaluated 15 validation indicators using a four-point relevance scale. Aiken’s V values ranged from 0.67 to 1.00, with a mean of 0.86; values below 0.80 were treated as revision signals rather than evidence of established effectiveness. Qualitative feedback informed revisions to sentence naturalness, B1 readability, instruction clarity, time allocation, and visual support. The study contributes a preliminary, expert-validated design model for CEFR-aligned German reading materials and identifies priorities for subsequent classroom trials involving learners.
A Forensic Linguistic Review Of The Use Of The Word "Defendant" In Supreme Court Decisions Alkadri Ajwan; Pratomo Widodo; Sulis Triyono; Wening Sahayu
Alinea: Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra dan Pengajaran Vol. 6 No. 3 (2026): Alinea: Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra, dan Pengajaran
Publisher : Bale Literasi: Lembaga Riset, Pelatihan & Edukasi, Sosial, Publikasi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58218/alinea.v6i3.4099

Abstract

Corpus linguistics or forensic linguistics allows us to apply language theory to explore texts on a large scale along with the development of appropriate corpora sizes and powerful computing machines. The purpose of this study is to reveal the pattern of using the word "defendant" empirically in terms of frequency and concordance. The data source for this research was taken from a corpus of legal judicial documents obtained through the official directory website. The process of quantitative data analysis and tracking the appearance of words was carried out using digital text analysis software, namely Voyant Tools. Based on the results of the legal discourse analysis, it was found that the lexeme "defendant" is the most dominant word that appears in the case file when entered into the data file. Factual testing through Voyant Tools showed a very high frequency for the word "defendant", reaching a total of 167 occurrences, far outnumbering the appearance of other legal terms such as the word "suspect". The significant dominance of the lexeme "defendant" in the judgment document indicates a strong process of textual labeling and the potential bias of legal language that locks in identity and constructs the fault of the legal subject. This quantitative dominance indicates a strong referential labeling of the perpetrator's name throughout the text of the judicial decision document. This research demonstrates the effectiveness of utilizing digital corpus tools (Voyant Tools) to objectively and empirically evaluate the application of the presumption of innocence principle in forensic linguistics and legal discourse studies.