Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
3.802
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Pandecta Diktum PADJADJARAN Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law) Jurnal Wawasan Yuridika NUSANTARA : Jurnal Ilmu Pengetahuan Sosial Jurnal Pengabdian Dharma Laksana Res Nullius Law Journal KRTHA BHAYANGKARA PINISI Discretion Review Jurnal Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat Nusantara Justisi : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Journal Justiciabelen (JJ) Trunojoyo Law Review Jurnal Dialektika Hukum Jurnal Aktor Humanities, Society, and Community (HSC)
Diah Pudjiastuti
Fakultas Ilmu Sosial Dan Bisnis International Women University
Humanities Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 23 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 23 Documents
Search

 1   2   3 
Analysis of Law Enforcement Regarding Fault in Defamation Crimes Through Electronic Media Diah Pudjiastuti; Sahat Maruli Tua Situmeang
Humanities, Society, and Community Vol. 3 No. 2 (2026): Humanities, Society, and Community
Publisher : Research Synergy Foundation Press

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31098/hsc.v3i2.3068

Abstract

This research investigates the enforcement of defamation laws in electronic media, focusing on the interpretation of "intentional" and "unauthorized" elements under Law No. 1 of 2024, which amends Law No. 11 of 2008 on Electronic Information and Transactions (ITE Law). The urgency of this study arises from legal ambiguities and the rising number of online defamation cases, highlighting inconsistencies in judicial interpretations and enforcement challenges. Using a normative juridical approach, this study analyzes statutory provisions, jurisprudence, and fault theory to assess the practical application of defamation laws. The findings reveal a lack of uniformity in judicial decisions, emphasizing the need for clearer definitions and standardized legal interpretations. This study underscores the necessity of refining existing legal provisions to enhance legal certainty and the effectiveness of enforcement. Practical implications include increasing public legal awareness of responsible digital communication and implementing preventive measures against cyber defamation. To address legal gaps, this research recommends legislative reforms to clarify legal definitions, promote alternative dispute resolution mechanisms, and strengthen law enforcement training, ensuring a balance between legal protection and freedom of expression in the digital era.
The Role of Mediators in Dispute Resolution Based on Progressive Law to Achieve Substantive Justice Sutarjo Sutarjo; Diah Pudjiastuti
TRUNOJOYO LAW REVIEW Vol 8, No 2 (2026): August (On Progress)
Publisher : Faculty of Law Universitas Trunojoyo Madura

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21107/tlr.v8i2.32930

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the role of mediators in criminal dispute resolution within the framework of progressive legal theory to achieve substantive justice. It addresses the inconsistency between the ultimum remedium principle, which positions criminal punishment as a last resort, and the restrictive regulatory framework governing penal mediation in Indonesia. The study contributes a conceptual and critical evaluation of how restorative justice regulations limit mediators' authority and hinder the broader institutionalization of penal mediation within the criminal justice system. It proposes harmonizing restorative justice policies with progressive law to strengthen mediation as a humane and participatory mechanism. This research employs doctrinal legal research using statutory and conceptual approaches. The data were analyzed qualitatively through systematic and conceptual interpretation. The findings indicate that although restorative justice has been formally recognized, strict limitations on offense types, loss thresholds, non-recidivism, and victim consent significantly restrict penal mediation. Consequently, criminal case resolution remains predominantly formalistic and litigation-oriented. The study concludes that regulatory rigidity obstructs the realization of substantive justice. It recommends comprehensive legal reform to expand mediators’ authority and integrate penal mediation more fully into Indonesia’s criminal justice system in line with progressive legal principles.
LAW ENFORCEMENT AGAINST JUVENILE DELINQUENCY IN INDONESIA IN RELATION TO THE PURPOSE OF LAW Sutarjo; Diah Pudjiastuti; Subagyo Sri Utomo; Happy Ferovina Wuntu
Res Nullius Law Journal Vol. 8 No. 1 (2026): Volume 8 No. 1 Januari 2026
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Komputer Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.34010/rnlj.v8i1.18610

Abstract

Juvenile delinquency in Indonesia has shown an increasingly serious and complex trend, while the various legal instruments and child protection policies in place have not yet been fully effective in curbing the rate of such deviant behavior. This study specifically aims to analyze the gap between the normative framework of law enforcement against juvenile delinquency—particularly through the Juvenile Criminal Justice System and the principles of restorative justice—and empirical practices in the field, as well as to assess the extent to which responses to juvenile delinquency align with the purposes of law in terms of legal certainty, justice, and utility. Employing a normative and empirical juridical approach, this research examines relevant legislation, policies, and doctrinal views, and integrates them with case data, national statistics, and field findings at the levels of the police, prosecution, courts, and juvenile correctional institutions. The findings reveal that although, at the normative level, the Juvenile Criminal Justice System has shifted the orientation of law enforcement toward rehabilitation and restorative justice through diversion, its implementation remains constrained by the dominance of a legalistic–repressive approach, limited institutional capacity, inadequate rehabilitation facilities, and weak involvement of families and communities in supporting the social reintegration of children. This study offers a comprehensive mapping of the gap between norms and practice and proposes a more integrated response model that positions restorative justice as an instrument for realizing the purposes of law, by strengthening synergy among law enforcement agencies, promoting character education within families and schools, and advancing state policies oriented toward prevention and comprehensive child protection.   Kenakalan remaja (juvenile delinquency) di Indonesia menunjukkan kecenderungan yang semakin serius dan kompleks, sementara berbagai instrumen hukum dan kebijakan perlindungan anak belum sepenuhnya mampu menekan laju perilaku menyimpang tersebut. Penelitian ini secara spesifik bertujuan menganalisis kesenjangan antara kerangka normatif penegakan hukum terhadap kenakalan remaja. terutama melalui Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak dan prinsip keadilan restorative dengan praktik empiris di lapangan, sekaligus menilai sejauh mana penanggulangan kenakalan remaja selaras dengan tujuan hukum berupa kepastian, keadilan, dan kemanfaatan. Dengan menggunakan pendekatan yuridis normatif dan empiris, penelitian ini menelaah peraturan perundang-undangan, kebijakan, dan doktrin terkait, serta memadukannya dengan data kasus, statistik nasional, dan temuan lapangan pada tingkat kepolisian, kejaksaan, pengadilan, serta lembaga pembinaan khusus anak. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa meskipun secara normatif Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak telah menggeser orientasi penegakan hukum ke arah pembinaan dan keadilan restoratif melalui diversi, implementasinya masih dibatasi oleh dominasi pendekatan legalistik-represif, keterbatasan kapasitas aparat, minimnya sarana pembinaan, serta lemahnya keterlibatan keluarga dan masyarakat dalam mendukung reintegrasi sosial anak. Penelitian ini menawarkan pemetaan komprehensif atas kesenjangan antara norma dan praktik, sekaligus mengusulkan model penanggulangan yang lebih terpadu dengan menempatkan restorative justice sebagai instrumen aktualisasi tujuan hukum, melalui penguatan sinergi antarlembaga penegak hukum, pendidikan karakter di lingkungan keluarga dan sekolah, serta kebijakan negara yang berorientasi pada pencegahan dan perlindungan komprehensif terhadap anak.
Co-Authors Bagus Santoso Banyu Saputra Budiawan, Asep Dadang Munandar Deny Guntara Dey Ravena Fernanda Oktavia Larasati Ferovina Wuntu, Happy Happy Ferovina Wuntu Maruli Tua Situmeang, Sahat Mulyadi Suhardi Musa Darwin Pane Musa Darwin Pane Nababan, Sutarjo Pane, Musa Darwin Sahat Maruli Tua Situmeang Sahat Maruli Tua Situmeang Salma Nur Khalisa Sri Utomo, Subagyo Subagyo Sri Utomo Subagyo Sri Utomo Sutarjo Sutarjo Sutarjo Sutarjo Sutarjo Sutarjo Tamba, Ucok Rolando Parulian Tetet Cahyati Utomo, Subagyo Sri Wentri Merdiani Wuntu, Happy Ferovina Yuniar Rahmatiar Zakaria, Chepi Ali Firman