Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Analysis of the Effect of Direct Payments from the Owner to Nominated Subcontractors on Project Sustainability A. F, M. Dhika Adhitya; Hardjomuljadi, Sarwono
Indonesian Journal of Business Analytics Vol. 3 No. 6 (2023): December 2023
Publisher : PT FORMOSA CENDEKIA GLOBAL

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55927/ijba.v3i6.7586

Abstract

In the construction industry, the practice of direct payments by service users to subcontractors has become a common phenomenon. This practice occurs when service users, as main clients, pay subcontractors directly without going through the main contractor. This aims to speed up cash flow and ensure timely payments to subcontractors. However, the practice of direct payments also raises various problems and impacts that need to be considered. In this research, the approach used is quantitative. This research uses a causal analysis method because this research aims to test a hypothesis regarding the influence of one or several independent variables on the dependent variable. The population determined in this research includes building project stakeholders who focus on: Project Owners, and Main Contractors, Sub-contractors / Suppliers, totaling 110 respondents, using the Slovin formula with a 5% margin of error, the number of respondents was 86 people. Payment research results in direct project payments have a positive and significant effect on project costs, direct project payments have a positive and significant effect on project time, and direct project payments have a positive and significant effect on project quality.
Pengaruh kinerja waktu dan biaya terhadap munculnya potensi klaim di proyek-proyek pembangkit listrik nasional pada masa pendemi Covid-19 Nugroho, Rudy; Hardjomuljadi, Sarwono
REKAYASA: Jurnal Ilmiah Fakultas Teknik Universitas Lampung Vol. 26 No. 2 (2022)
Publisher : Jurusan Teknik Sipil Universitas Lampung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23960/rekrjits.v26i2.97

Abstract

Tujuan penelitian ini adalah peneliti akan melakukan peninjauan dan analisa sampai sejauh mana kondisi pendemi covid-19 mempengaruhi kinerja biaya dan kinerja waktu pada proyek- proyek pembangkit listrik nasional sehingga memunculkan potensi klaim konstruksi yang berujung pada sebuah sengketa konstruksi. Penelitian ini bersifat deskriptif kuantitatif dimana tahapan yang akan dilaksanakan oleh peneliti dalam rangka mencapai tujuan penelitian ini adalah dengan membuat pertanyaan sebagai pertanyaan penelitian (research question). Peneliti akan melakukan penelitian di beberapa proyek pembangkit listrik baik itu milik perusahaan swasta maupun milik BUMN yang sedang dalam fase proses konstruksi di periode pandemic Covid-19. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan ada pengaruh antara kinerja waktu dan biaya pada masa pandemi covid-19 terhadap munculnya potensi klaim pada proyek-proyek pembangkit listrik nasional. Dampak pendemi Covid-19 mempengaruhi secara dominan penurunan kinerja waktu yang mengakibatkan keterlambatan waktu pada proyek-proyek konstruksi pembangkit listrik nasional. Dampak Pendemi Covid-19 mempengaruhi kinerja biaya sehingga meningkatkan biaya proyek konstruksi pada proyek-proyek konstruksi pembangkit listrik nasional namun tidak dominan atau pengaruhnya tidak sebesar kinerja waktu.
The Efectiveness of Arbitration Mechanisms in The Resolution Of Construction Disputes In Indonesia: A Critical Analysis of Law No. 30 of 1999 on Arbitration And Alternative Dispute Resolution Pakpahan, Alfredo; Saragih, Hidbar Roberta; Wisatrioda, Bayu; Laia, Kharisman; Hardjomuljadi, Sarwono; Sami’an, Sami’an
Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities Vol. 6 No. 1 (2025): (JLPH) Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities
Publisher : Dinasti Research

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/jlph.v6i1.2619

Abstract

Disputes in construction projects often arise from divergent interpretations of contracts, delays in execution, and the complex dynamics of scope changes. Within this context, arbitration has long been regarded as an alternative dispute resolution mechanism that promises efficiency, fairness, and confidentiality outside the court system. However, more than two decades after the enactment of Law No. 30 of 1999 on Arbitration and Alternative Dispute Resolution, its effectiveness in the construction sector remains subject to debate and scrutiny. This study critically examines the effectiveness of arbitration in resolving construction disputes under the legal framework established by Law No. 30 of 1999. Using a normative juridical approach, it reviews statutory regulations, legal doctrines, and field practices, complemented by interviews with legal practitioners and construction arbitrators. The findings reveal that while arbitration offers advantages in terms of confidentiality, procedural flexibility, and finality of decisions, its practical effectiveness is often constrained by high procedural costs, limited contractual understanding among parties, and challenges in enforcing arbitral awards through the courts. Furthermore, the substance of Law No. 30 of 1999 appears insufficiently adaptive to the technical and multidimensional nature of modern construction disputes. This research therefore recommends revising and modernizing the law particularly by strengthening the enforceability of arbitral awards, standardizing arbitration institutions, and enhancing the competence of human resources in construction law. Ultimately, arbitration should evolve as a mechanism not only for efficient dispute resolution but also for upholding justice, legal certainty, and professional integrity in Indonesia’s construction sector.
Penyelesaian Sengketa Perdata Antara Kontraktor dan Sub Kontraktor dalam Proyek Konstruksi (PT. Hsing Loong Indonesia dan PT. Alfa Mandiri) Wicaksono, Ario; Sami'an, Sami'an; Hardjomuljadi, Sarwono
Syntax Literate Jurnal Ilmiah Indonesia
Publisher : Syntax Corporation

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36418/syntax-literate.v10i11.62501

Abstract

This study examines the civil dispute resolution process between contractors and subcontractors in a construction project, based on a case study of PT. Alfa Mandiri versus PT. Hsing Loong Indonesia (Decision Number 124/Pdt.G/2020/PN.JKT.SEL). The dispute arose from a subcontract agreement drawn up solely in English and not in Indonesian, as required by Law Number 24 of 2009 concerning the National Flag, Language, Emblem, and Anthem. Furthermore, differing interpretations of the contract's contents and disharmony in project implementation led to a lawsuit filed with the South Jakarta District Court. This study aims to analyze the parties' responsibilities, the legal basis for contract cancellation, and the civil dispute resolution mechanism in construction projects in Indonesia.
Analysis of Management of Legal Consequences of Service Provider Default on Project Delays: A Legal Study and Relational Approach to Dispute Prevention Setijanto, Augustinus; Hardjomuljadi, Sarwono; Sami’an, Sami’an
IJEBD (International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Business Development) Vol 8 No 6 (2025): November 2025
Publisher : LPPM of NAROTAMA UNIVERSITY

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29138/ijebd.v8i6.3470

Abstract

Delays in construction work execution represent one of the most common forms of default that trigger disputes between employers and contractors. Within Indonesia’s civil law framework, such default entails legal consequences including delay penalties, compensation, contract termination, and enforcement of performance bonds. This study examines these legal implications under the Indonesian Civil Code (KUHPerdata), Law No. 2 of 2017 on Construction Services, and several Supreme Court decisions with permanent legal force namely Decisions No. 294 PK/Pdt/2014, No. 3053 K/Pdt/2011, and No. 60 K/Pdt/2020. The research adopts a normative juridical approach supported by secondary data from literature review and judicial case analysis. It also proposes a dispute-prevention hypothesis founded on effective communication through guanxi, dynamic relationship, and personal approach, aimed at reinforcing loyalty and preventing conflict. The findings reveal that Indonesia’s positive legal system remains sanction-oriented and emphasizes legal certainty, whereas sustainable dispute prevention requires a paradigm grounded in relational trust. Integrating relational approaches into construction contract practice may establish equilibrium between legal certainty and substantive justice.
The Efectiveness of Arbitration Mechanisms in The Resolution Of Construction Disputes In Indonesia: A Critical Analysis of Law No. 30 of 1999 on Arbitration And Alternative Dispute Resolution Pakpahan, Alfredo; Saragih, Hidbar Roberta; Wisatrioda, Bayu; Laia, Kharisman; Hardjomuljadi, Sarwono; Sami’an, Sami’an
Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities Vol. 6 No. 1 (2025): (JLPH) Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities
Publisher : Dinasti Research

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/jlph.v6i1.2619

Abstract

Disputes in construction projects often arise from divergent interpretations of contracts, delays in execution, and the complex dynamics of scope changes. Within this context, arbitration has long been regarded as an alternative dispute resolution mechanism that promises efficiency, fairness, and confidentiality outside the court system. However, more than two decades after the enactment of Law No. 30 of 1999 on Arbitration and Alternative Dispute Resolution, its effectiveness in the construction sector remains subject to debate and scrutiny. This study critically examines the effectiveness of arbitration in resolving construction disputes under the legal framework established by Law No. 30 of 1999. Using a normative juridical approach, it reviews statutory regulations, legal doctrines, and field practices, complemented by interviews with legal practitioners and construction arbitrators. The findings reveal that while arbitration offers advantages in terms of confidentiality, procedural flexibility, and finality of decisions, its practical effectiveness is often constrained by high procedural costs, limited contractual understanding among parties, and challenges in enforcing arbitral awards through the courts. Furthermore, the substance of Law No. 30 of 1999 appears insufficiently adaptive to the technical and multidimensional nature of modern construction disputes. This research therefore recommends revising and modernizing the law particularly by strengthening the enforceability of arbitral awards, standardizing arbitration institutions, and enhancing the competence of human resources in construction law. Ultimately, arbitration should evolve as a mechanism not only for efficient dispute resolution but also for upholding justice, legal certainty, and professional integrity in Indonesia’s construction sector.
The Legal Consequences of Abuse of Power in the Implementation of Development Projects Aulia, Zuvika Alfi; Samian, Samian; Hardjomuljadi, Sarwono
Riwayat: Educational Journal of History and Humanities Vol 8, No 4 (2025): Oktober, Social Issues and Problems in Society
Publisher : Universitas Syiah Kuala

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24815/jr.v8i4.50710

Abstract

Legally, the issue of abuse of authority in development is an act that can be prosecuted under two legal frameworks, namely State Administrative Law and Criminal Law. This article analyzes the legal framework and implications of abuse of authority by government officials, with a focus on national strategic projects and the procurement of goods and services. Through normative legal research methods, this study concludes that the Government Administration Law brings a new paradigm by establishing administrative sanctions as the first resort, while criminal sanctions are placed as the last resort. Based on the lex posterior principle, the primary authority to examine the existence of abuse of authority lies with the Administrative Court. Furthermore, the findings prove that officials who unlawfully abuse their authority, causing financial losses to the state, are required to take personal responsibility for the payment of compensation. Although this legal framework aims to provide certainty and prevent the criminalization of policies, its implementation in national strategic projects has drawn criticism for potentially weakening efforts to eradicate corruption. As an implementative measure, this study recommends harmonizing perceptions, developing clear technical guidelines, and improving coordination between APIP, PTUN, and law enforcement agencies. This synergy is expected to ensure the realization of accountability.
Co-Authors A. F, M. Dhika Adhitya Ade Nurmala Ade Nurmala, Ade ADI SAPUTRO Ahmad Migdad Alaydrus Amalia Khusnawati, Atik Anak Agung Gede Sugianthara Anggi Raditya Anondho, Basuki Anrizal, Anrizal Arief, Ediyanto Arjon, Arjon Asep Rachmatullah Aulia, Zuvika Alfi Conshita Hubertha Dhiu Deka Yudhit Maristyo P. Dwian Prakoso, Angga Efendy, Prasetyo Elfriandi, Elfriandi Erik Winada Fransiska, Era Galih Adya Taurano Hari Anggeriksari Helmi Umar Ambadar Hendrik Sulistio Hendrik Sulistio Hendrik Sulistio Heni Kustiah Imanto, Yuwono Indahwati, Amaliyah Noor Irdayani Irdayani Jamhari Jamhari Jo Johnson Kenny Kapuasiana Khairul Imam Koespiadi Kusumastuti, Purnaning Siwi Kuswijanarko, Anjar Laia, Kharisman Lessy, Achmad Syabril Lutfi Mustakim M. Agung Wibowo Malinda, Yosie Marlia Dyah Salindri Hardjito Mawardi Amin Mega Maharani Hutahaean Mega Waty Mudri Mudri Muhammad Reza Aditya Ready Niniek Lannyati Nugroho, Rudy Nuris Wahyudi Nurul Listanto Pakpahan, Alfredo Putra Hidayat PUTU IKA WAHYUNI Roni Febrianto Rudy Nugroho Sami'an Sami'an, Sami'an Samian Sami’an Sami’an, S. Sami’an, Sami’an Sandi Andika Surya Putra Saragih, Hidbar Roberta Sebastian, Reza Rafly Setijanto, Augustinus Shanti Astri Noviani Simanjuntak, Indra Jadi Siti Kautsariyah Sriyono D. Siswoyo Sumantri, Mahfiar Fajar Akbar Sungkara, Fajar Sutikno Sutikno Suwandi Suwandi Suyono Dikun Syafrie, Hambali Syafrijon Triwijaya, Helmy Yulian Wesleyzon Sitompul Wibowo, Singgar Mataniari Wicaksono, Ario Widiatmoko, Ndaru Seto Winata, Eduardus Gerald Wiraantaka, Jaka Adiprasetya Wisatrioda, Bayu Wisnuaji, Haryo