Articles
<![CDATA[Menggugat Pemenuhan Hak Korban Pelanggaran Hak Asasi Manusia Masa Lalu ]]>
<![CDATA[Rena Yulia]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Hukum PRIORIS Vol. 4 No. 3 (2015): Jurnal Hukum Prioris Volume 4 Nomor 3 Tahun 2015 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Faculty of Law, Trisakti University ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (1942.68 KB)
|
DOI: 10.25105/prio.v4i3.386
<![CDATA[Pelanggaran hak asasi manusia tidak saja meninggalkan permasalahan proses penegakan hukum, tetapi juga menyisakan masalah perlindungan hukum bagi korban pelanggaran hak asasi manusia itu sendiri. Tulisan ini akan mengkaji perlindungan hukum bagi korban pelanggaran hak asasi manusia tidak saja dari proses penegakan hukum melainkan pemulihan kerugian korban pelanggaran hakim asasi manusia di masa lalu.]]>
<![CDATA[Model Pengembalian Aset (Asset Recovery) Sebagai Alternatif Memulihkan Kerugian Negara Dalam Perkara Tindak Pidana Korupsi ]]>
<![CDATA[Aliyth Prakarsa]]>;
<![CDATA[Rena Yulia]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Hukum PRIORIS Vol. 6 No. 1 (2017): Jurnal Hukum Prioris Volume 6 Nomor 1 Tahun 2017 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Faculty of Law, Trisakti University ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (404.66 KB)
|
DOI: 10.25105/prio.v6i1.1834
<![CDATA[Aset negara yang dikorupsi tidak saja merugikan negara secara sempit, tetapi juga merugikan negara beserta rakyatnya. Pendekatan formal prosedural melalui hukum acara pidana yang berlaku sekarang ternyata belum mampu untuk mengembalikan kerugian negara. Padahal kerugian negara yang diakibatkan oleh korupsi merupakan aset negara yang harus diselamatkan. Oleh karenanya, diperlukan cara lain untuk menyelamatkan aset negara tersebut. Yaitu dengan pengembalian aset pelaku tindak pidana korupsi (asset recovery). Ketika melihat negara dari perspektif korban, maka negara harus memperoleh perlindungan, dalam hal ini pemulihan dari kerugian yang diderita akibat tindak pidana korupsi. Tulisan ini mengkaji model pengembalian aset hasil kejahatan korupsi dalam proses penegakan hukum baik melalui jalur pidana yang memaksimalkan peran jaksa sebagai jaksa penuntut umum dalam membuktikan kesalahan terdakwa dan penerapan pidana uang pengganti sebagai pidana tambahan maupun melalui gugatan perdata dengan mengoptimalkan peran jaksa pengacara negara. Kata kunci: korupsi, pemulihan aset, kerugian Negara.]]>
<![CDATA[PRETRIAL JUDGE AUTHORITY IN ADJUDICATING ADMINISTRATIVE ACTIONS CARRIED OUT BY THE DIRECTORATE GENERAL OF CUSTOMS ]]>
<![CDATA[Erdianto Effendi]]>;
<![CDATA[Rena Yulia]]>
<![CDATA[ Cepalo Vol 7 No 1 (2023) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Lampung ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.25041/cepalo.v7no1.2863
<![CDATA[The Directorate General of Customs and Excise has administrative and law enforcement authority. In practice, judges often understand administrative authority as an investigative authority, thus granting pretrial requests for Acts that are the administrative authority. The method used is normative legal research is descriptive qualitative with qualitative analysis techniques using primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials. The results showed that pretrial judges differed in interpreting administrative authority. Only two of the five judges interpreted administrative authority as not pretrial objects. Supposedly, judges are not authorized to examine the administrative authority exercised by Customs and Excise. Recommendations This research is to minimize the expansion of interpretation of the authority of forced efforts so that the issuance of the Supreme Mahakamh Circular or revise the Customs and Excise Law.]]>
<![CDATA[Urgensi Victim Precipitation Dipertimbangkan oleh Hakim dalam Penjatuhan Putusan Pemidanaan ]]>
<![CDATA[Angkasa Angkasa]]>;
<![CDATA[Rena Yulia]]>;
<![CDATA[Ogiandhafiz Juanda]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Wawasan Yuridika Vol 5, No 1 (2021): Maret 2021 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Sekolah Tinggi Hukum Bandung ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (362.793 KB)
|
DOI: 10.25072/jwy.v5i1.431
<![CDATA[Peran korban dalam terjadinya kejahatan (viktimisasi) cenderung tidak menjadi pertimbangan hakim dalam menjatuhkan putusan. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengkaji victim precipitation dalam pertimbangan putusan hakim. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah penelitian hukum yuridis sosiologis dengan pendekatan kasus. Data primer bersumber dari wawancara hakim dan narapidana. Data sekunder berupa putusan hakim dan norma hukum positif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa peran korban dalam terjadinya viktimisasi tidak menjadi pertimbangan hakim dalam menjatuhkan putusan terhadap pelaku. Peran korban belum dominan dipergunakan sebagai pertimbangan untuk meringankan pidana yang dijatuhkan kepada terdakwa. Secara normatif dalam Pasal 197 ayat (1) huruf f KUHAP dapat digunakan sebagai ruang bagi hakim untuk memasukkan victim precipitation dalam pertimbangan putusannya sehingga berdampak pada rasa keadilan. Dalam praktik, aspek yang dipertimbangkan oleh hakim untuk meringankan terdakwa lebih ke arah aspek sosiologis, antara lain masih muda, berterus terang, sopan, dan menyesali perbuatannya.]]>
<![CDATA[Victimological Review of Psychological Fulfillment Towards Correctional Students at The Class I of Juvenile Rehabilitation Institute in Tangerang City ]]>
<![CDATA[Inggrit Steffi Lantang]]>;
<![CDATA[Rena Yulia]]>;
<![CDATA[Aliyth Prakarsa]]>
<![CDATA[ International Journal of Social Sciences Review Vol. 2 No. 1: April, 2021 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Epistemik Press ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (232.682 KB)
|
DOI: 10.57266/ijssr.v2i1.66
<![CDATA[Adjudicated juvenile described as a child which has to undergo a sentence determined by court’s judge in Correctional Institution of Educated Child and is referred to as a Educated Child. The Juvenile Justice System as an effort to educated child without ignoring their basic needs which is mainly to their psychological consequences facing adjudication at the court, but is questioned, until now there has been no clarity on fullfiling their psychological rights. Based on these problems, the researcher focused on victimological perspective how correctional students became victims of the Correctional Institution of Educated Child and how the psychological rights are carried in Correctional Institution of Educated Child Class I Tangerang City. The research uses legal empiric or sociological method, data and analytical descriptive approach. The research source mainly from secondary data and also supported by interviews with several parties in the Correctional Institution of Educated Child Class I Tangerang City and then analyzed qualitatively. The results of the research are adjudicated juveniles are sometimes individual and direct victims, they suffered losses because their rights were not properly fullfilled, their lossesare in the form of mental injuries due to lack of social support, authority and responsibilities regulated by the Juvenile Justice System has not been implemented optimally due to the abuse of power of officers of Correctional Institution of Educated Child, that do not provide guidance programs to fulfill the psychological rights of Educated Child to date and in the implementation of psychological rights fulfillment for Educated Child in the Correctional Institution of Educated Child Class I Tangerang City have not been implemented properly because there is no technical implementation of specific regulations related to special programs for psychological development and the absence of professional officers for fulfillment psychological of Educated Child.]]>
<![CDATA[Patients' Rights Fulfillment towards Medicines Information Services; Law Enforcement and Pharmacist Criminal Liability ]]>
<![CDATA[Dyah Suryani Sulistyaningtyas]]>;
<![CDATA[Rena Yulia]]>;
<![CDATA[Mohamad Noor Fajar Al Arif]]>
<![CDATA[ International Journal of Social Sciences Review Vol. 3 No. 2: October, 2022 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Epistemik Press ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (178.897 KB)
|
DOI: 10.57266/ijssr.v3i2.98
<![CDATA[This article aims to determine law enforcement towards pharmacists who do not fulfil patients' rights to access medical information services and criminal liability towards pharmacists who do not provide medical information services to patients. This research is normative juridical research using a legal approach. The results obtained in this study show that law enforcement towards pharmacists who do not provide fulfilment of patients' rights to medicines information services. In terms of legal substance, aspects have been regulated in Law Number 36 of 2009 on Health Article 196, Law Number 8 of 1999 on Consumer Protection Article 45 and Article 47, Article 359 and Article 360 of the Criminal Code, Organizational Regulation of the Indonesian Pharmacists Association Number: PO.007/PP.IAI/1822/XI/2020 concerning Assessment Guidelines and Standard Operating Procedures for Handling Violations of the Indonesian Pharmacist Code of Ethics, Indonesian Pharmacists Association. However, from the aspect of the legal structure, it is still not firm enough in its implementation. It is influenced by the culture of the apparatus and society, which still prioritizes using restorative justice methods and does not understand patients' rights in medical information. Related criminal liability for pharmacists who do not provide medical information services has not been implemented as per the existing rules. Implementing existing regulations resolves criminal liability by agreement between both parties, usually by replacing the appropriate medicine and covering the patient's medical expenses.]]>
<![CDATA[PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN PIDANA TERHADAP PENCEMARAN AIR BERASAL DARI USAHA FLOATING RESTO TANPA INSTALASI PENGELOLAAN AIR LIMBAH ]]>
<![CDATA[Rena Yulia]]>;
<![CDATA[Novita Ardiyanti Ningrum]]>;
<![CDATA[Dian Rachmat Gumelar]]>
<![CDATA[ VARIA HUKUM Vol 4, No 1 (2022): VARIA HUKUM ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Ilmu Hukum, Sharia and Law Faculty, Sunan Gunung Djati Islamic State University of Bandung ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.15575/vh.v4i1.26696
<![CDATA[AbstractEveryone who commits a crime must be given a sanction commensurate with his actions, including the imposition of criminal sanctions on someone who pollutes the environment, either on purpose or negligence. The purpose of this study is to determine criminal liability for water pollution originating from floating restaurant businesses without wastewater management installations and efforts to tackle water pollution originating from floating restaurant businesses. The method in this writing uses the juridical-normative legal research method which is analyzed qualitatively. The approach used is the legal approach. Criminal responsibility is the imposition of sanctions or penalties on perpetrators who violate a prohibition which can be in the form of imprisonment or fines. Perpetrators of water pollution can be criminalized if the impact really harms many people. Indonesia already has laws and regulations that specifically regulate and protect the environment, namely Law Number 32 of 2009, so every floating restaurant business or restaurant business must have a Wastewater Management Installation (IPAL) to minimize water pollution originating from the waste. However, in practice there are still restaurant businesses that have not been equipped with WWTP. So that it still causes a lot of water pollution that endangers the people around it.AbstrakSetiap orang yang melakukan suatu tindak pidana, maka harus diberikan sanksi yang setimpal dengan perbuatannya, termasuk penjatuhan sanksi pidana terhadap seseorang yang mencemari lingkungan hidup, baik karena kesengajaan ataupun kelalaian. Tujuan penelitian ini untuk mengetahui pertanggungjawaban pidana terhadap pencemaran air berasal dari usaha floating resto tanpa instalasi pengelolaan air limbah dan upaya untuk menanggulangi pencemaran air yang berasal dari usaha floating resto. Metode dalam penulisan ini menggunakan metode penelitian hukum yuridis-normatif yang dianalisis secara kualitatif. Pendekatan yang digunakan yaitu pendekatan undang-undang. Pertanggungjawaban Pidana adalah penjatuhan sanksi atau hukuman kepada pelaku yang melakukan pelanggaran terhadap suatu larangan dapat berupa sanksi pidana penjara atau sanksi pidana denda. Pelaku pencemaran air dapat dipidanakan apabila dampaknya benar-benar membahayakan banyak orang. Indonesia telah mempunyai peraturan perundang-undangan yang secara khusus mengatur dan melindungi lingkungan hidup, yaitu Undang-Undang Nomor 32 Tahun 2009, maka termasuk setiap usaha floating resto atau usaha restoran harus mempunyai Instalasi Pengelolaan Air Limbah (IPAL) untuk meminimalisir pencemaran air yang berasal dari limbah tersebut. Namun, dalam pelaksanaannya masih terdapat usaha restoran yang belum dilengkapi dengan IPAL. Sehingga masih banyak menimbulkan pencemaran air yang membahayakan warga disekitarnya.]]>
<![CDATA[MENGKAJI PENERAPAN SANKSI PIDANA DALAM PENCEGAHAN PENYEBARAN COVID-19 DI INDONESIA ]]>
<![CDATA[Prakarsa, Aliyth]]>;
<![CDATA[Herli, Dadang]]>;
<![CDATA[Yulia, Rena]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[UI Scholars Hub ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
<![CDATA[The police in handling policies that are applied in an emergency period use criminal sanctions, meanwhile, the police also need to provide education and legal protection for the community when there are repressive efforts from the police in enforcing government policies through the Chief of Polices Declaration. The specific target to be achieved is to examine the application of the Chief of Polices Declaration in the application of the contents of the edict that contains criminal sanctions and examine its effectiveness in its application. The method used in this study is a normative and empirical legal research method. Normative research is carried out by reviewing library data which is secondary data, in the form of government policies in handling the Corona Virus Disease (Covid-19) Public Health Emergency which is then related to the application of the Decree of the Chief of the Police of the Republic of Indonesia Number: Mak/2/III/2020 concerning Compliance with Government Policy in Handling the Spread of the Corona Virus (Covid-19) in an effort to enforce it through legal channels by means of criminal sanctions.]]>
<![CDATA[PENERAPAN SANKSI PIDANA TERHADAP PERBUATAN PENGALIHAN BARANG JAMINAN FIDUSIA (STUDI KASUS PADA POLRES SERANG KOTA) ]]>
<![CDATA[Wiguna, Rahmat]]>;
<![CDATA[Irawan, Benny]]>;
<![CDATA[Yulia, Rena]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[UI Scholars Hub ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
<![CDATA[At this time, many financial institutions (leasing) offer easy credit applications for potential customers. This has attracted consumers to apply for motor vehicle loans, both cars and motorbikes, in leasing companies. However, the problem that has occurred recently in financial institutions is the number of cases concerning the transfer of fiduciary collateral. In fact, the said act has been regulated in statutory regulations which have criminal consequences, namely if the debtor transfers goods or pawns the goods which are guaranteed to be Fiduciary without the creditor's permission, the debtor can be subject to a fiduciary crime. This research aims to determine how the application of criminal sanctions to the act of transferring fiduciary goods and how the law enforcement process against the act of transferring fiduciary collateral at the Police Office of Serang District. This research method uses a normative juridical method using secondary data. Secondary data is used to analyze various laws and regulations in the field of law, regulations regarding fiduciary collateral, books relating to fiduciary and articles.]]>
<![CDATA[PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP KORBAN KEJAHATAN PADA PROSES PENYELIDIKAN DAN PENYIDIKAN DALAM SISTEM PERADILAN PIDANA ]]>
<![CDATA[Yulia, Rena]]>;
<![CDATA[Herli, Dadang]]>;
<![CDATA[Prakarsa, Aliyth]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[UI Scholars Hub ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
<![CDATA[The police is the first and main gate in the process of law enforcement. Crime victims will report or complain about the criminal incident they experienced to the police. For reports or complaints of victims, the police will conduct an investigation to find and even that is suspected of being a criminal offense in order to determine whether or not an investigation can be conducted. In the process of investigation, victims are often treated as witnesses, or even reported. Victims are given entrapment questions and the attitude of the police treat victims not as victims. The victim becomes secondary victimization. This paper will examine how legal protection for crime victims on police investigation process in criminal justice system.]]>
