Garuda - Garba Rujukan Digital

الحكمة في تشريع الزواج: الحوار مع أنصار اللبرالية في تحريم زواج المسلمة بغير المسلم Harda Armayanto
TSAQAFAH Vol 13, No 2 (2017): Islamic Jurisprudence
Publisher : Universitas Darussalam Gontor

This article discusses the prohibition of interfaith marriage or “mixed marriage” between Muslimah and non-Muslim. According to the proponent of religious liberalism, there is no prohibition in Islam related to this kind of marrige. They argue that there is no clear and unambiguous prohibition in the Islamic scriptures about it. The prohibition is only coming from Muslim jurists (fuqahâ). Meanwhile, the prohibition of mixed marriage between Muslimah and non-Muslim in the era of the Prophet (PBUH) due to political conditions at that time, where the number of Muslims was still small, and so it was feared to have an impact on the decline in their quantity. In fact, Islam required a large number of adherents at its beginning. On that basis, the authors review the verses of the Koran, the hadith of the Prophet (PBUH), and the books of turâth in order to get the right answer related to this problem. Through the study of wisdom of the marriage legislation, it is known why Islam prohibited this type of marriage. The marriage legislation in Islam is not only to get descendant, but also to keep religion. It is clear, the Qur’an said that the main reason for the prohibition of this marriage is because Muslimah will fall into kufr. It is undeniable that a wife must submit and obey her husband. How can a Muslimah obey her husband, if the husband invites him to kufr? Surely this is a paradox.

شخصية عيسى عليه السلام في القرآن والإنجيل: دراسة مقارنة Harda Armayanto; Maria Ulfa
TSAQAFAH Vol 15, No 1 (2019): Da'wah and Islamic Communication
Publisher : Universitas Darussalam Gontor

AbstractThis study is kind of Christology which examined the central figure in Christianity, Isa bin Maryam. In this article, the figure of Isa will be studied using a comparative study between the teachings of Islam and Christianity. This study is very significant because Isa is important figure in both religions. In Islam, Isa is considered the Messenger of Allah who spread the message of God to His creatures. He is also one of the chosen messenger with the title ululazmi, which has a great fortitude and patience in carrying out his duties. Whereas in Christianity, Isa is God. The study in this article refers directly to the two religious scriptures: the Qur'an and the Bible. It has to be done because the scriptures are the main source of teaching in every religion. In this article the authors focuse on the study of Isa al-Masih in three discussions: his birth, his death, and his divinity. From this study, the authors find that there are many fundamental differences in both Islam and Christianity.Keywords: Isa, Qur'an, Bible, Birth, Death, Divinity. AbstrakKajian ini masuk ke dalam studi Kristologi yang mengkaji sosok sentral dalam agama Kristen, yaitu Isa bin Maryam. Dalam artikel ini, sosok Isa akan dikaji dengan menggunakan studi perbandingan antara ajaran agama Islam dengan Kristen. Kajian ini sangat penting dilakukan mengingat sosok Isa adalah pribadi yang penting dalam kedua agama tersebut. Dalam Islam, Isa dianggap Rasulullah yang menyebarkan risalah Allah kepada makhluk-Nya. Ia juga merupakan salah satu rasul pilihan dengan gelar ululazmi, yaitu rasul yang memiliki ketabahan dan kesabaran yang luar biasa dalam menjalankan tugasnya. Sedangkan dalam Kristen, Isa adalah Tuhan. Kajian dalam artikel ini merujuk langsung kepada kitab suci kedua agama: al-Qur’an dan Alkitab. Hal ini dilakukan, karena kitab suci merupakan sumber ajaran utama dalam setiap agama. Dalam artikel ini penulis memfokuskan kajian terhadap Isa al-Masih pada tiga hal: kelahirannya, kematiannya, dan perihal ketuhanannya. Dari kajian terhadap ketiga hal tersebut ditemukan banyak sekali perbedaan mendasar yang ada pada agama Islam maupun Kristen.Kata Kunci: Isa, Kelahiran, Kematian, Ketuhanan, al-Qur’an, Alkitab.

Mutakalimin's View on the Vision of Allah (Ru’yatullah) Harda Armayanto; Adib Fattah Suntoro; Martin Putra Perdana
Santri: Journal of Pesantren and Fiqh Sosial Vol 3 No 1 (2022): June 2022
Publisher : The Institute of Research and Service Community IPMAFA Pati

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35878/santri.v3i1.399

The problem of ru'yatullah (vision of Allah) is one of the problems of kalam that is still the topics of intense debate nowadays . This problem is specifically discussed by three schools of kalam: mu'tazilah, shi'ah, and ahl al-sunnah wa al-jama'ah. Each group claims that their understanding is the most truthful. This research aims to show how the strengths and weaknesses of each group are based on their epistemological doctrines and argumentation. This study is categorized as a literature review utilizing the documentation of data collection methodology. The collected data will be analyzed utilizing content analysis technique as well as the kalam scientific approach. The results of this research expose that the ahl al-sunnah wa al-jama'ah's opinions are more valid from an epistemological standpoint because they are based on a harmonization between the rationality of reason and the textuality of revelation.

Telaah Kritis Konsep Tuhan Dalam Agama Baha’i : Sebuah Tren Baru Pluralisme Agama Harda Armayanto Armayanto; Syaikhul Kubro Kubro; Amir Reza Kusuma
Religi: Jurnal Studi Agama-agama Vol. 18 No. 2 (2022): Vol. 18 No 2 Tahun 2022
Publisher : UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14421/rejusta.2022.1802-06

Di dalam undang-undangnya, Indonesia hanya mengakui enam agama besar, yakni Islam, Kristen, Katolik, Buddha, Hindu dan Konghucu. Namun baru-baru ini, di samping enam agama yang diakui tersebut, muncul sebuah agama lain yakni agama Baha’i. Meskipun secara resmi tidak diakui oleh pemerintah Indonesia, agama ini mendapatkan sebuah apresiasi dari Menteri Agama RI. Tepatnya, pada tanggal 26 Maret 2021, Menteri agama negara Republik Indonesia, secara resmi mengucapkan selamat Hari Raya Nawruz kepada umat agama Baha’i. Hal ini menarik dicermati karena menimbulkan pro kontra di kalangan masyarakat. Melihat fenomena diatas, peneliti akan memfokuskan tulisannya pada konsep ketuhanan agama ini. Melihat Konsep Tuhan adalah sebuah konsep inti dalam struktur keagamaan dan akan melahirkan konsepsi lain dalam suatu agama. Untuk itu, tulisan ini akan mengulas teologi yang ada di dalam agama Baha’i guna menemukan kebenaran yang dihasilkannya. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode deskriptif-analitis yang menganalisa seputar permasalahan dalam konsep Tuhan agama Baha’i melalui sumber kepustakaan (library research). Hasil penelitian ini membuktikan bahwa dalam konsep ketuhanan agama Baha’i terdapat unsur pluralisme agama. Di mana paham pluralisme agama sendiri mendapatkan penolakan dari berbagai agama yang ada, di karenakan paham ini menafikan truth claim masing-masing agama yang pada akhirnya akan mengikis keyakinan umat beragama. Dengan melihat hal ini, maka agama Baha’i menjadi problem bagi agama-agama yang ada.

Konsep Kalimat Sawa' dalam Hubungan Antaragama: Analisis Komparatif Pandangan Hamka dan Nurcholish Madjid Harda Armayanto; Adib Fattah Suntoro
Al-Misykah: Jurnal Studi Al-qur'an dan Tafsir Vol 3 No 2 (2022): Al-Misykah: Jurnal Studi Al-qur'an dan Tafsir
Publisher : Program Studi Ilmu Al quran dan Tafsir, Fakultas Ushuluddin dan Pemikiran Islam, Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Fatah Palembang

This paper seeks to explain kalimat sawa' in interreligious relations from the perspectives of Hamka and Nurcholish Madjid. Kalimat sawa' is a concept derived from Surah Ali Imran: 64 of the Qur'an frequently employed in interreligious relations. However, scholarly opinions on this concept differ. Some based this concept on religious pluralism, and some rejected it because it confirms that Islam is the only religion that Allah has blessed. Two notable Indonesian intellectuals, namely Hamka and Nurcholish Madjid, are associated with these two distinct concepts. This concept warrants further investigation because it is anticipated to be one of the approaches in interreligious relations. This type of research is qualitative and based on both printed and digital library research. Using comparative analysis, the author describes the perspectives of the two figures to be analyzed and compared in order to reveal their distinct thought patterns. According to Hamka, kalimat sawa' referred to in the Qur'an is an invitation to the Ahli Kitab group to return to monotheism, thereby establishing Islam as the only true religion. In contrast, Nurcholish Madjid interpreted the kalimat sawa' as an effort to unite religions on common ground. This idea is related to the concept of al-Islam as an attitude of submission to God so that no single religion has a monopoly on truth claims. Despite their differences, the idea of kalimat sawa' is an appropriate approach to interreligious relations, which is a similarity between the two.

DEKONSTRUKSI SYARI’AH DALAM PERNIKAHAN MUSLIMAH DENGAN NON-MUSLIM Harda Armayanto; Maria Ulfa
Ijtihad Vol. 7 No. 2 (2013)
Publisher : Universitas Darussalam Gontor

Tidak dipungkiri, Syariah Islam merupakan tujuan kritik para liberalis agama, bahkan kalau bisa di- dekonstruksi, dihancurkan, untuk dibangun kembali syariah yang baru yang sesuai dengan selera mereka. Salah satu yang diserang yaitu pernikahan Muslimah dengan non- Muslim. Dalam masalah ini, para liberalis menghalalkan-nya dengan tidak ada nash yang jelas (sharîh) dan tegas (qath’i) dalam al-Qur’an yang melarang pernikahan jenis ini. Pelarangan nikah campur hanya soal ijtihadi yang dianggap ketinggalan zaman. Sehingga perlu menganalisis, mengkritik, dan menjawab tuduhan para liberalis agama di atas agar segalanya menjadi jelas dan proporsional. Analis dimulai dengan merujuk ayat-ayat al-Qur’an dan hadis Nabi SAW yang berkenaan dengan pernikahan beda agama ini disertai dengan tafsir dan keterangan dari para ulama terdahulu. Hal ini sebagai jawaban sekaligus kritik terhadap su’udzhon kalangan liberalis terhadap hukum pelarangan pernikahan campur yang dianggap tidak memiliki dasar yang kuat dalam agama.

Ujaran Kebencian Berbasis Agama: Kebebasan Berbicara dan Konsekuensi Terhadap Kerukunan Umat Beragama Harda Armayanto; Pocut Milkya Muda Cidah
Al-Adyan: Journal of Religious Studies Vol 4, No 1 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Imam Bonjol Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15548/al-adyan.v4i1.5885

This article aims to explain the consequences of religious hate speech (RHS) on religious harmony in Indonesia. RHS, which has proven to be a serious challenge to Indonesian democracy, seems to have clashed with the concepts of rights and freedom of speech. That is, there are those who argue that actions containing RHS elements are a form of rights and freedoms guaranteed by law. On that basis, this topic is worth studying in order to examine whether RHS is a right and freedom of speech. The result of the study can be seen from the response of the Indonesian government and the consequences of the RHS. This research is qualitative in nature and based on library data, both printed and digital. Using a descriptive-analytic method, the author describes the meaning of RHS and analyzes its impact on religious harmony in Indonesia. It is found that RHS is in no way equivalent to rights and freedom of speech. It even includes religious blasphemy. Therefore, it leads to social disharmony and the disintegration of the Indonesian nation. Tulisan ini bertujuan untuk menjelaskan konsekuensi yang ditimbulkan dari ujaran kebencian berbasis agama (UKBA) terhadap kerukunan umat beragama di Indonesia. UKBA yang terbukti menjadi tantangan serius bagi demokrasi Indonesia tampaknya dibenturkan dengan konsep hak dan kebebasan berbicara. Artinya, ada yang berdalih bahwa tindakan yang mengandung unsur UKBA itu merupakan bentuk hak dan kebebasan yang dijamin undang-undang. Atas dasar itu, topik ini layak dikaji guna menguji apakah UKBA merupakan hak dan kebebasan berbicara. Hasil dari pengujian itu bisa dilihat dari respons pemerintah Indonesia dan konsekuensi yang ditimbulkan dari UKBA itu. Jenis penelitian ini adalah kualitatif dengan berbasis pada data kepustakaan (library research), baik cetak maupun digital. Dengan metode deskriptif-analisis, penulis menjabarkan makna UKBA dan menganalisis dampaknya bagi kerukunan umat beragama di Indonesia. Dari sini, ditemukan bahwa UKBA bukanlah termasuk hak dan kebebasan berbicara. Ia bahkan termasuk penistaan agama. Oleh karena itu, konsekuensi yang ditimbulkannya menyebabkan disharmoni sosial dan disintegrasi bangsa Indonesia.

Etika Al-Qur’an Terhadap Non-Muslim Harda Armayanto
TSAQAFAH Vol. 9 No. 2 (2013): Islamic Ethics
Publisher : Universitas Darussalam Gontor

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21111/tsaqafah.v9i2.54

This paper describes the ethics toward non-Muslims based on al-Qur’an. Islam as a religion of peace was accused and insulted by the orientalists frequently. These accusations and insulting stated in several articles, journals either in their books. Their books like Islamic Invasion wrote by Robert Morey and Islam Revealed by Anis A Shorrosh are some sample of how the orientalists discredits Islam. Whereas Islam is not like what they accused. On the contrary, Islam has responding their accusations with an elegant and tolerant doctrine. Islam has teaches its peoples to respects another religion’s people, Islam forbids his people to insult other religions, to excoriate their worships or forcing non-Muslims to convert or believes to Islam, even Islam teaches its people to acknowledge non-Muslims as brother and sister. This is Islam’s admiration toward non- Muslims. Surprisingly, these admirations inversely proportional to what non- Muslims did toward Islam and its people. The abuses as what we mention it before, was being happened even until now. Lately, one of Christian pastor in United State was told his people to burn the Holly Qur’an or as we known about suppression of Rohingya’s Muslims that was did by Myanmar’s Buddhists.

Problem Pluralisme Agama Harda Armayanto
TSAQAFAH Vol. 10 No. 2 (2014): Religious Studies
Publisher : Universitas Darussalam Gontor

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21111/tsaqafah.v10i2.191

As a part of liberal theology, the tenet of religious pluralism suggests tolerant systems toward all religious adherents. However, this tenet turned out to cause new problems for religious adherents. It is because of religious pluralism has the concept of truth relativism. This term has the doctrine that there is no absolute truth of each religion, as the acceptance of all religious paths as equally valid. Stating that all religious paths are equally valid, the bearers of religious pluralism hope no longer a religion that claims to be the owner of the ultimate truth because in essence, religion is the result of a variety of human feelings and religious experience, so every religion that exists in this world contains divine truth. Many religious experts did not agree with this worldview and they actually considered it a new religion that wants to unite all religions. Through this article, the author wants to prove that religious pluralism is a fierce polemic and it could cause many problems in religions. Although it has a good goal, it is very problematic to understand. In fact, many religions have turned out to reject this understanding. There are some movement of many religious experts shows that notion of pluralism is problematic, as containing polemical and highly problematic issue for instance when applied in the existing religions. Every religion saw religious pluralism is only a disguise to erode the confidence of believers who in turn gave rise to the atheists. Eventually, the adherents of each religion will be skeptical towards religion.

الحكمة في تشريع الزواج: الحوار مع أنصار اللبرالية في تحريم زواج المسلمة بغير المسلم Harda Armayanto
TSAQAFAH Vol. 13 No. 2 (2017): Islamic Jurisprudence
Publisher : Universitas Darussalam Gontor

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21111/tsaqafah.v13i2.1130

This article discusses the prohibition of interfaith marriage or “mixed marriage” between Muslimah and non-Muslim. According to the proponent of religious liberalism, there is no prohibition in Islam related to this kind of marrige. They argue that there is no clear and unambiguous prohibition in the Islamic scriptures about it. The prohibition is only coming from Muslim jurists (fuqahâ). Meanwhile, the prohibition of mixed marriage between Muslimah and non-Muslim in the era of the Prophet (PBUH) due to political conditions at that time, where the number of Muslims was still small, and so it was feared to have an impact on the decline in their quantity. In fact, Islam required a large number of adherents at its beginning. On that basis, the authors review the verses of the Koran, the hadith of the Prophet (PBUH), and the books of turâth in order to get the right answer related to this problem. Through the study of wisdom of the marriage legislation, it is known why Islam prohibited this type of marriage. The marriage legislation in Islam is not only to get descendant, but also to keep religion. It is clear, the Qur’an said that the main reason for the prohibition of this marriage is because Muslimah will fall into kufr. It is undeniable that a wife must submit and obey her husband. How can a Muslimah obey her husband, if the husband invites him to kufr? Surely this is a paradox.

Title

Found 32 Documents
Search

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title Search

Found 32 Documents Search

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title

Found 32 Documents
Search