Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 38 Documents
Search

HUMAN RIGHTS AND INDONESIAN LEGAL PROTECTION OF TRADITIONAL CULTURAL EXPRESSIONS: A Comparative Study in Kenya and South Africa Widyanti, Yenny Eta
Jurisdictie: Jurnal Hukum dan Syariah Vol 14, No 2 (2023): Jurisdictie
Publisher : Fakultas Syariah

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.18860/j.v14i2.24318

Abstract

Legal protection of traditional cultural expressions in Indonesia is paramount to human rights. Indonesia is home to its richness of cultures and tribes, offering economic, social, and cultural values. However, this potential will remain insignificant without proper regulatory provisions in the domains of intellectual property or human rights. Departing from this issue, this research seeks to profoundly analyze the interface between traditional cultural expressions and human rights from the perspectives of either national law or international convention, and this analysis involves the comparison between Kenya and South Africa that appropriately govern legal protection of human rights in traditional cultural expressions. This research aims to elaborate on the interface between human rights and the protection of traditional cultural expressions within the purviews of national law and an international convention. With a legal research method and statutory, conceptual, and comparative approaches, this research finds that there is a close correlation between traditional cultural expressions and human rights, as referred to in international laws in Indonesia, Kenya, and South Africa, and the international convention. This research is expected to serve as a reference for Indonesian national law, in which adopting the best practices in Kenya and South Africa can be taken into account. Perlindungan hukum Ekspresi Budaya Tradisional Indonesia adalah pending untuk diwujudkan sebagai bagian dari hak asasi manusia. Fakta Indonesia sebagai negara yang kaya dengan keanekaragaman budaya dan suku bangsa menjadi potensi luar biasa nilai ekonomi, sosial dan budaya. Potensi luar biasa tersebut tidak dapat diwujudkan tanpa diikuti pengaturan hukum yang memadai baik di bidang hak kekayaan intelektual maupun hak asasi manusia. Atas dasar hal tersebut, menjadi penting untuk menganalisis keterkaitan ekspresi budaya tradisional dengan hak asasi manusia dalam hukum nasional, konvensi internasional, dan perbandingan di negara-negara Afrika, yaitu Kenya dan Afrika Selatan yang telah mengatur dengan baik perlindungan hukum atas hak asasi ekspresi budaya tradisional. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk memaparkan interface hak asasi manusia dengan perlindungan ekspresi budaya tradisional baik dalam hukum nasional maupun konvensi internasional. Jenis penelitian hukum dengan pendekatan perundangan, konseptual, dan perbandingan maka ditemukan bahwa terdapat hubungan yang erat antara ekspresi budaya tradisional dengan hak asasi manusia sebagaimana terdapat dalam pengaturan di dalam hukum nasional Indonesia, Kenya, Afrika Selatan, dan konvensi internasional. Penelitian diharapkan dapat menjadi rujukan dalam hukum nasional Indonesia dengan mengadopsi praktik terbaik di Kenya dan Afrika Selatan.
Mitigation of Over-Indebtedness Risk in Online Lending: A Comparative Analysis of Regulatory Frameworks in China, Malaysia, and Thailand Abdullah, Salman; Widyanti , Yenny Eta; Djumikasih, Djumikasih
IBLAM LAW REVIEW Vol. 6 No. 1 (2026): IBLAM LAW REVIEW
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat (LPPM IBLAM)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.52249/ilr.v6i1.667

Abstract

The rise of defaults and over-indebtedness in online lending reflects failures in credit risk management, mainly due to weak lending limitations and an imbalance between platforms and borrowers. This raises legal protection concerns for debtors, as aggressive lending practices are not based on repayment ability. Therefore, imposing restrictions on online lending is crucial to mitigate risks of default and over-indebtedness, through measures like setting maximum loan limits, conducting proportional creditworthiness assessments, and reinforcing prudence in fintech regulations. This research adopts a normative juridical approach with statutory, conceptual, and comparative methods, focusing on China, Malaysia, and Thailand. The study aims to identify an ideal framework for online lending limits to combat defaults and over-indebtedness. Findings show Indonesia lacks sufficient regulation, especially in real-time integration of cross-platform credit data, enabling debt-cycling. Indonesia’s regulatory approach is reactive, while Malaysia’s is proactive. Law enforcement against illegal lending is weak, and debt relief mechanisms are underdeveloped, unlike China and Thailand, which have implemented lending limits and consumer protections. This research recommends a new legal framework integrating national credit reporting with
ANALYSIS OF IMPORTANT, CAREFUL, CERTAIN AND MUTUALLY AGREEABLE CRITERIA IN THE REGULATION OF ARTICLE 173 OF THE HERZIEN INLANDSCH REGLEMENT REGARDING EVIDENCE OF JUDGES' SUSPECTS Naufal Anfasa Firdaus; Yenny Eta Widyanti; Rachmi Sulistyarini
International Journal of Educational Review, Law And Social Sciences (IJERLAS) Vol. 5 No. 5 (2025)
Publisher : CV. RADJA PUBLIKA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54443/ijerlas.v5i6.4413

Abstract

The sentence in Article 173 HIR which states "important, thorough, certain and mutually agreeable" is a regulation that is still abstract and can be interpreted in many ways, where this is like what category of important or very important circumstances are, then what is thorough or precise, how to assess certain conditions, and whether they correspond to each other whether they should be applied to 2 (two) types of evidence or what. The purpose of this study is to analyze the criteria contained in the sentence important, thorough, certain and mutually agreeable in the regulation of Article 173 HIR. The research method used is legal research with a statutory regulatory approach, a conceptual approach, and a case approach. Based on the research that has been carried out, it is known that normatively the criteria "important, thorough, certain and mutually agreeable" in Article 173 HIR are not explained completely, then after a theoretical analysis through the doctrines of legal experts and linguistically, namely Indonesian and legal language, the meaning contained therein is obtained. The "important" criterion contains relevant and logical boundaries directly related to the subject matter of the case, the "thorough" criterion contains methodological boundaries for the application of caution, the "certain" criterion contains specific boundaries and the strength of the evidence is not questioned, and the "mutually agreed" criterion contains for consistency and mutually corroborating evidence.
THE LEGAL STATUS OF ARTISTIC WORKS CREATED BY GENERATIVE ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF INDONESIAN COPYRIGHT LAW Made Ardia; Yenny Eta Widyanti; Djumikasih
International Journal of Educational Review, Law And Social Sciences (IJERLAS) Vol. 5 No. 6 (2025)
Publisher : CV. RADJA PUBLIKA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54443/ijerlas.v6i1.4486

Abstract

The development of Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) has produced new forms of artistic works that generate uncertainty within Indonesia’s copyright law regime. Law Number 28 of 2014 on Copyright continues to position humans as the sole legal subjects eligible to be recognized as authors, thereby rendering works created entirely by AI unable to satisfy the requirements of originality and human authorship. The disparity between technological advancements and existing legal norms has resulted in regulatory gaps, particularly concerning the legal status of copyright holders and the scope of legal protection for generative AI based artistic works. Through normative juridical research, this study examines the necessity of legal reconstruction to accommodate this phenomenon without disregarding the foundational principles of copyright protection. The findings indicate that human intellectual contribution remains the essential basis for recognizing artistic works assisted by generative AI, while current regulations have yet to provide adequate legal certainty. Therefore, regulatory reforms that are adaptive and humanistic are required to ensure that legal protection remains relevant and equitable in the era of generative AI development.
IMPLEMENTATION OF LEGAL RESPONSIBILITY OBJECTIONS TO SIMPLE LAWSUITS TO ACHIEVE JUSTICE Novita, Dian; Widyanti, Yenny Eta; Sukadana, I Made
International Journal of Educational Review, Law And Social Sciences (IJERLAS) Vol. 5 No. 6 (2025)
Publisher : CV. RADJA PUBLIKA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54443/ijerlas.v5i6.4541

Abstract

This study examines the implementation of legal remedies for objections in small claims lawsuits at the Manado District Court based on PERMA No. 2 of 2015 in conjunction with PERMA No. 4 of 2019. The problem formulations include: (1) how to apply objections in small claims lawsuits; and (2) what efforts are made to realize justice in this mechanism. The study uses a socio-legal/juridical sociological approach by combining analysis of written legal norms and empirical data through literature studies, decision analysis, and interviews with judges and judicial officials. The results of the study indicate that procedurally and structurally, the objection mechanism at the Manado District Court is basically in accordance with the provisions of PERMA, both regarding procedures and deadlines, so that the principles of simplicity, speed, and low cost are relatively achieved. However, the justice realized is more prominent in the procedural aspect than in the substantive, especially for parties who are not accompanied by legal counsel and have difficulty compiling a legal objection memorandum. The study concludes that the main challenge lies in the legal culture and capacity of the actors, so that it is necessary to increase socialization, legal literacy, legal assistance, and technical guidelines so that objections in small claims are more effective and just.
LEGAL PROTECTION FOR BANKS AGAINST NON-CERTIFIED LAND COLLATERAL Dina Mardiana; Yenny Eta Widyanti; Reka Dewantara
International Journal of Educational Review, Law And Social Sciences (IJERLAS) Vol. 5 No. 6 (2025)
Publisher : CV. RADJA PUBLIKA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54443/ijerlas.v5i6.4963

Abstract

This study examines legal protection for banks in facing bad loans with non-certificate land as collateral, particularly in the context of distributing Working Capital Credit (KMK) to MSMEs. In banking practice, non-certificate land such as girik, petok D, or segel is still widely used as collateral even though it does not meet the formal requirements as an object of Mortgage Rights as regulated in Law Number 4 of 1996. This condition creates vulnerability for banks as creditors, because non-certificate land documents only function as proof of control, not proof of rights, so they do not have executorial power. This study uses a normative juridical method with a statutory and conceptual approach to examine the gap between positive law and banking practice. The results show that preventive legal protection for banks is reflected in the provisions on collateral assessment, the bank's obligation to apply the principle of prudence, and the bank's internal regulations regarding credit risk mitigation. Repressive legal protection is realized through legal remedies that can be taken if the debtor defaults, including through simple lawsuits, risk transfer through debt acknowledgment agreements, and civil execution based on debt-receivable relationships. This study also formulates a conceptualization of dispute resolution that includes mediation, credit restructuring, and litigation as a last resort. The results of this study confirm that the use of non-certificate collateral requires strengthened regulations and harmonization between agrarian and banking law to ensure legal certainty and protection for creditors.
Legal Review of Alluvial Land Conflicts from Seawater Sedimentation in Weru Village, Lamongan Regency Pranata, Keri; Zainudin, Arif; Widyanti, Yenny Eta; Herlindah; Puspitawati, Dhiana
Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Vol. 23 No. 1 (2024): Pena Justisia
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pekalongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31941/pj.v23i3.5339

Abstract

This research is intended to examine the alluvial land conflicts in Weru Village, Paciran District, Lamongan Regency from a legal perspective. The emergence of the Alluvial Land has given birth to disputes between the community and the Village Government. So far, the community has used the Alluvial Land to meet their needs as fishermen. Meanwhile, the village government claims that the land is an asset.  On the other hand, the village government wants to build a breakwater. To support the funding, the village government engages the community by buying and selling on behalf of donations to the Alluvial Land. So that this alliance exists, the community feels disadvantaged because of the unclear alliance. This study uses a normative juridical method strengthened with field data to analyse this case. Based on the legal review of this case, First, the Alluvial Land is state land, which, since the emergence of management, has become the responsibility of the state. However, the community or other legal entities can own such property rights based on the terms and conditions of laws and regulations. Second, the engagement carried out by the Village Government with some communities is considered null and void because one of the elements of the agreement is not fulfilled.
Interpreting “Held by the State”: Article 38 (1) Copyright Law and Traditional Cultural Expression Protection Amrulla, Mohammad Fahrial; Kusumadara, Afifah; Santoso, Budi; Widyanti, Yenny Eta
Rechtsidee Vol. 14 No. 1 (2026): June
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Sidoarjo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21070/jihr.v14i1.1119

Abstract

General Background Traditional cultural expressions constitute communal cultural heritage embodying identity, philosophy, and collective memory, requiring legal protection aligned with their communal and sacred nature. Specific Background In Indonesia, traditional batik motifs—particularly the sacred Parang motifs of the Yogyakarta Sultanate—are classified as traditional cultural expressions whose copyright is declared “held by the state” under Article 38 paragraph (1) of Law No. 28 of 2014 on Copyright. Knowledge Gap This formulation contains normative ambiguity, as it does not clearly define whether state authority represents ownership, public trusteeship, or mere administrative control, resulting in weak legal certainty for indigenous custodians. Aims This study examines the legal meaning of the phrase “held by the state” in relation to the protection of sacred Parang batik motifs within the framework of traditional cultural expressions. Results The analysis shows that the provision functions as a declarative norm lacking substantive mechanisms, failing to recognize customary authority, community consent, or benefit-sharing, and thereby permitting desacralization and misuse of sacred motifs. Novelty This research clarifies that state control over traditional cultural expressions should be interpreted as public trusteeship rather than ownership, drawing comparative insights from community-centered protection models in India and Thailand. Implications The findings support the development of a sui generis legal framework integrating customary law, community participation, and administrative facilitation to ensure sustainable and culturally respectful protection of sacred batik motifs. Highlights: Article 38 paragraph (1) operates as a declarative norm without concrete protective mechanisms Legal ambiguity weakens recognition of indigenous custodianship over sacred motifs Comparative models support community-based rights with state administrative roles Keywords: Batik, Traditional Cultural Expression, Copyright, State Held