Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 38 Documents
Search

Interpreting “Held by the State”: Article 38 (1) Copyright Law and Traditional Cultural Expression Protection Amrulla, Mohammad Fahrial; Kusumadara, Afifah; Santoso, Budi; Widyanti, Yenny Eta
Rechtsidee Vol. 14 No. 1 (2026): June
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Sidoarjo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21070/jihr.v14i1.1119

Abstract

General Background Traditional cultural expressions constitute communal cultural heritage embodying identity, philosophy, and collective memory, requiring legal protection aligned with their communal and sacred nature. Specific Background In Indonesia, traditional batik motifs—particularly the sacred Parang motifs of the Yogyakarta Sultanate—are classified as traditional cultural expressions whose copyright is declared “held by the state” under Article 38 paragraph (1) of Law No. 28 of 2014 on Copyright. Knowledge Gap This formulation contains normative ambiguity, as it does not clearly define whether state authority represents ownership, public trusteeship, or mere administrative control, resulting in weak legal certainty for indigenous custodians. Aims This study examines the legal meaning of the phrase “held by the state” in relation to the protection of sacred Parang batik motifs within the framework of traditional cultural expressions. Results The analysis shows that the provision functions as a declarative norm lacking substantive mechanisms, failing to recognize customary authority, community consent, or benefit-sharing, and thereby permitting desacralization and misuse of sacred motifs. Novelty This research clarifies that state control over traditional cultural expressions should be interpreted as public trusteeship rather than ownership, drawing comparative insights from community-centered protection models in India and Thailand. Implications The findings support the development of a sui generis legal framework integrating customary law, community participation, and administrative facilitation to ensure sustainable and culturally respectful protection of sacred batik motifs. Highlights: Article 38 paragraph (1) operates as a declarative norm without concrete protective mechanisms Legal ambiguity weakens recognition of indigenous custodianship over sacred motifs Comparative models support community-based rights with state administrative roles Keywords: Batik, Traditional Cultural Expression, Copyright, State Held
REGULATIONS ON THE VALIDATION OF MARRIAGE AGREEMENTS CARRIED OUT BY NOTARIES IN INDONESIAN POSITIVE LAW FOLLOWING CONSTITUTIONAL COURT DECISION NUMBER 69/PUU-XIII/2015 Safira Annisa; Djumikasi; Yenny Eta Widyanti
International Journal of Educational Review, Law And Social Sciences (IJERLAS) Vol. 5 No. 4 (2025)
Publisher : CV. RADJA PUBLIKA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54443/ijerlas.v5i2.2479

Abstract

The changes that occurred in the Constitutional Court Decision Number 69/PUU-XIII/2015 caused multiple interpretations, the change of the phrase "Making a written agreement" in Article 29 paragraph (1) of the Marriage Law to "submitting a written agreement" in the Constitutional Court Decision Number 69/PUU-XIII/2015 needs to be explained in more detail so that it creates legal certainty. The difference between the phrases "Making" and "Submitting" in the KBBI has a very different meaning, not explaining the meaning of this phrase will cause legal uncertainty, especially for Notaries. So it is necessary to study how the regulation of the ratification of marriage agreements carried out by notaries in Indonesian positive law after the Constitutional Court Decision Number 69/PUU-XIII/2015. The type of research used is the normative legal method, namely research conducted on legal sources such as laws or other literature that includes analysis of legal principles to identify and resolve legal issues that will be studied using the Theory of Legal Certainty. The results of the analysis explain that from the Constitutional Court Decision Number 69/PUU-XIII/2015, Notaries should have two new authorities.
THE ROLE OF JUDGES IN ADJUDICATING DEFAULT CASES CONTAINING ELEMENTS OF ABUSE OF CIRCUMSTANCES IN THE BANKING SECTOR Wandita Pramesthi; Reka Dewantara; Yenny Eta Widyanti
International Journal of Educational Review, Law And Social Sciences (IJERLAS) Vol. 5 No. 3 (2025)
Publisher : CV. RADJA PUBLIKA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54443/ijerlas.v5i3.2867

Abstract

In the Indonesian civil law system, the role of judges is crucial in adjudicating cases involving contractual legal relationships, particularly in banking default cases. Injustice often arises from the abuse of circumstances, where debtors who are in a weak position are often victims of adverse bank policies. Additionally, high interest rates and oppressive contractual clauses pose significant challenges for judges. This research shows that disparities exist in court decisions on abuse of circumstances, creating legal uncertainty. Using a normative juridical approach, this research examines the need for clear legal guidelines from the Supreme Court to establish uniformity in the handling of default cases. Stronger regulations are expected to ensure that judges make more judicious decisions and uphold justice for all parties. This research emphasises the importance of applying the principle of fairness in contracts, so that freedom of contract does not neglect the rights of weaker parties.
LEGAL RECONSTRUCTION OF COPYRIGHT AS MARITAL PROPERTY IN INDONESIAN LAW Piput Milandsari Milandsari; Yenny Eta Widyanti; Yuliati
International Journal of Educational Review, Law And Social Sciences (IJERLAS) Vol. 5 No. 6 (2025)
Publisher : CV. RADJA PUBLIKA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54443/ijerlas.v5i6.4248

Abstract

This study examines the reconstruction of copyright law as marital property within the Indonesian legal framework, focusing on the economic rights of works created during marriage. The research background stems from the complexity of the relationship between intellectual property rights and family law, where copyright often becomes a source of conflict in asset division during divorce. Employing a normative method with legislative, comparative, and conceptual approaches, this study compares regulations in Indonesia and the People's Republic of China. The findings indicate that Indonesia lacks specific rules on the division of economic copyright rights as marital property, whereas China has explicitly integrated them into the Civil Code. Reconstruction is proposed through harmonization of the Copyright Law and Marriage Law, differentiation between moral and economic rights, and the establishment of technical regulations to ensure legal certainty, justice, and protection of creators' rights. These findings contribute to the development of a more responsive national law towards intangible assets in family contexts.
ANALYSIS OF IMPORTANT, CAREFUL, CERTAIN AND MUTUALLY AGREEABLE CRITERIA IN THE REGULATION OF ARTICLE 173 OF THE HERZIEN INLANDSCH REGLEMENT REGARDING EVIDENCE OF JUDGES' SUSPECTS Naufal Anfasa Firdaus; Yenny Eta Widyanti; Rachmi Sulistyarini
International Journal of Educational Review, Law And Social Sciences (IJERLAS) Vol. 5 No. 5 (2025)
Publisher : CV. RADJA PUBLIKA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54443/ijerlas.v5i6.4413

Abstract

The sentence in Article 173 HIR which states "important, thorough, certain and mutually agreeable" is a regulation that is still abstract and can be interpreted in many ways, where this is like what category of important or very important circumstances are, then what is thorough or precise, how to assess certain conditions, and whether they correspond to each other whether they should be applied to 2 (two) types of evidence or what. The purpose of this study is to analyze the criteria contained in the sentence important, thorough, certain and mutually agreeable in the regulation of Article 173 HIR. The research method used is legal research with a statutory regulatory approach, a conceptual approach, and a case approach. Based on the research that has been carried out, it is known that normatively the criteria "important, thorough, certain and mutually agreeable" in Article 173 HIR are not explained completely, then after a theoretical analysis through the doctrines of legal experts and linguistically, namely Indonesian and legal language, the meaning contained therein is obtained. The "important" criterion contains relevant and logical boundaries directly related to the subject matter of the case, the "thorough" criterion contains methodological boundaries for the application of caution, the "certain" criterion contains specific boundaries and the strength of the evidence is not questioned, and the "mutually agreed" criterion contains for consistency and mutually corroborating evidence.
THE LEGAL STATUS OF ARTISTIC WORKS CREATED BY GENERATIVE ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF INDONESIAN COPYRIGHT LAW Made Ardia; Yenny Eta Widyanti; Djumikasih
International Journal of Educational Review, Law And Social Sciences (IJERLAS) Vol. 5 No. 6 (2025)
Publisher : CV. RADJA PUBLIKA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54443/ijerlas.v6i1.4486

Abstract

The development of Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) has produced new forms of artistic works that generate uncertainty within Indonesia’s copyright law regime. Law Number 28 of 2014 on Copyright continues to position humans as the sole legal subjects eligible to be recognized as authors, thereby rendering works created entirely by AI unable to satisfy the requirements of originality and human authorship. The disparity between technological advancements and existing legal norms has resulted in regulatory gaps, particularly concerning the legal status of copyright holders and the scope of legal protection for generative AI based artistic works. Through normative juridical research, this study examines the necessity of legal reconstruction to accommodate this phenomenon without disregarding the foundational principles of copyright protection. The findings indicate that human intellectual contribution remains the essential basis for recognizing artistic works assisted by generative AI, while current regulations have yet to provide adequate legal certainty. Therefore, regulatory reforms that are adaptive and humanistic are required to ensure that legal protection remains relevant and equitable in the era of generative AI development.
IMPLEMENTATION OF LEGAL RESPONSIBILITY OBJECTIONS TO SIMPLE LAWSUITS TO ACHIEVE JUSTICE Dian Novita; Yenny Eta Widyanti; I Made Sukadana
International Journal of Educational Review, Law And Social Sciences (IJERLAS) Vol. 5 No. 6 (2025)
Publisher : CV. RADJA PUBLIKA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54443/ijerlas.v5i6.4541

Abstract

This study examines the implementation of legal remedies for objections in small claims lawsuits at the Manado District Court based on PERMA No. 2 of 2015 in conjunction with PERMA No. 4 of 2019. The problem formulations include: (1) how to apply objections in small claims lawsuits; and (2) what efforts are made to realize justice in this mechanism. The study uses a socio-legal/juridical sociological approach by combining analysis of written legal norms and empirical data through literature studies, decision analysis, and interviews with judges and judicial officials. The results of the study indicate that procedurally and structurally, the objection mechanism at the Manado District Court is basically in accordance with the provisions of PERMA, both regarding procedures and deadlines, so that the principles of simplicity, speed, and low cost are relatively achieved. However, the justice realized is more prominent in the procedural aspect than in the substantive, especially for parties who are not accompanied by legal counsel and have difficulty compiling a legal objection memorandum. The study concludes that the main challenge lies in the legal culture and capacity of the actors, so that it is necessary to increase socialization, legal literacy, legal assistance, and technical guidelines so that objections in small claims are more effective and just.
LEGAL PROTECTION FOR BANKS AGAINST NON-CERTIFIED LAND COLLATERAL Dina Mardiana; Yenny Eta Widyanti; Reka Dewantara
International Journal of Educational Review, Law And Social Sciences (IJERLAS) Vol. 5 No. 6 (2025)
Publisher : CV. RADJA PUBLIKA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54443/ijerlas.v5i6.4963

Abstract

This study examines legal protection for banks in facing bad loans with non-certificate land as collateral, particularly in the context of distributing Working Capital Credit (KMK) to MSMEs. In banking practice, non-certificate land such as girik, petok D, or segel is still widely used as collateral even though it does not meet the formal requirements as an object of Mortgage Rights as regulated in Law Number 4 of 1996. This condition creates vulnerability for banks as creditors, because non-certificate land documents only function as proof of control, not proof of rights, so they do not have executorial power. This study uses a normative juridical method with a statutory and conceptual approach to examine the gap between positive law and banking practice. The results show that preventive legal protection for banks is reflected in the provisions on collateral assessment, the bank's obligation to apply the principle of prudence, and the bank's internal regulations regarding credit risk mitigation. Repressive legal protection is realized through legal remedies that can be taken if the debtor defaults, including through simple lawsuits, risk transfer through debt acknowledgment agreements, and civil execution based on debt-receivable relationships. This study also formulates a conceptualization of dispute resolution that includes mediation, credit restructuring, and litigation as a last resort. The results of this study confirm that the use of non-certificate collateral requires strengthened regulations and harmonization between agrarian and banking law to ensure legal certainty and protection for creditors.