Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 38 Documents
Search

Navigating Dual Lineage: Inheritance Uncertainty for Children of Pada Gelahang Marriages in Bali Ayu Putu Kusuma Wardhani; Sulistyarini, Rachmi; Widyanti, Yenny Eta
International Journal of Islamic Education, Research and Multiculturalism (IJIERM) Vol 7 No 3 (2025)
Publisher : The Islamic Education and Multiculturalism Foundation

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47006/ijierm.v7i3.591

Abstract

Abstrak Perkawinan “Pada Gelahang” merupakan bentuk perkawinan alternatif dalam masyarakat adat Bali yang dipilih ketika pasangan tidak dapat melaksanakan perkawinan biasa atau nyentana. Dalam praktiknya, baik suami maupun istri tetap berstatus purusa di rumah masing-masing dengan segala hak (swadikara) dan kewajiban (swadharma) yang melekat. Kondisi ini menimbulkan persoalan dalam hukum kewarisan karena sistem adat Bali memprioritaskan laki-laki sebagai penerus tanggung jawab keluarga dan pengelola warisan, sedangkan perempuan hanya berperan sebagai penerima manfaat. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis implikasi pelaksanaan hak waris anak dalam sistem perkawinan Pada Gelahang di Kabupaten Buleleng dan Kota Denpasar. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah Socio Legal Research dengan pendekatan yuridis sosiologis. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa kedudukan hak waris anak dalam perkawinan Pada Gelahang tidak memperoleh kepastian hukum yang jelas. Posisi anak sebagai ahli waris menjadi ambigu karena tidak terdapat perjanjian formal yang mengatur status mereka dalam struktur keluarga ganda. Hal ini menimbulkan ketidakpastian dalam distribusi harta warisan, sehingga diperlukan regulasi atau kesepakatan adat yang lebih tegas untuk memberikan kepastian hukum. Kata Kunci: Perkawinan Pada Gelahang, Purusa, Hukum Waris, Masyarakat Adat Bali, Kepastian Hukum Abstract Pada Gelahang marriage is an alternative form of marriage in Balinese customary law, chosen when couples are unable to perform either the common marriage system or the nyentana system. In this practice, both husband and wife retain their status as purusa in their respective families, along with the attached rights (swadikara) and obligations (swadharma). This situation creates challenges in inheritance law since Balinese customary law prioritizes males as family successors and estate managers, while females are regarded merely as beneficiaries. This study aims to analyze the implications of children’s inheritance rights in the Pada Gelahang marriage system in Buleleng Regency and Denpasar City. The research employs Socio Legal Research with a sociological juridical approach. The findings reveal that the inheritance rights of children born from Pada Gelahang marriages lack legal certainty. Their position as heirs remains ambiguous due to the absence of a formal agreement regulating their status within the dual family structure. This ambiguity creates uncertainty in the distribution of inheritance, indicating the need for clearer customary agreements or regulations to ensure legal certainty. Keywords: Pada Gelahang Marriage, Purusa, Inheritance Law, Balinese Customary Community, Legal Certainty
Harmonization of Personal Data Protection Principles With Electronic Justice Systems In Indonesia Mardyansyah, Dody Novizar; Sukarmi; Adi Kusumaningrum; Yenny Eta Widyanti
Yuridika Vol. 40 No. 3 (2025): Volume 40 No 3 September 2025
Publisher : Universitas Airlangga

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20473/ydk.v40i3.74179

Abstract

Modern digital-based justice is the answer to the challenges of the development of the times. Although modern justice reflects an adaptive judicial body, it must still be equipped with established regulations. This study aims to examine the harmonization of personal data protection principles between the Supreme Court Regulation No. 7/2022 concerning electronic case administration and trials and Law No. 27/2022 concerning Personal Data Protection (PDP Law). In this case, the researcher uses a normative juridical method, with a statutory regulatory and comparative combined approach. This study highlights the norms gap in the Supreme Court Regulation No. 7/2022, particularly in the aspect of protecting the personal data of the parties input into the electronic justice administration system. The main findings exhibited are that the Supreme Court Regulation No. 7/2022 does not regulate the basic principles of data protection as mandated by the PDP Law, which has the potential to cause legal uncertainty and privacy right violations. The fact that the principle of personal data protection in the Supreme Court regulation has not been absorbed is due to the PDP Law, which only came into effect in 2024, even though both were enacted in the same year in 2022. This is seen as weakening the legitimacy of electronic justice in Indonesia. This study is expected to provide a positive contribution in the form of regulatory reform through the revision of the Supreme Court regulations, the establishment of data protection units in the judicial environment, and strengthening institutional coordination. The results of the comparative analysis of common law systems such as England show the importance of integrating data protection principles into the legal infrastructure and institutions of electronic justice to be aware of the protection of privacy rights that intersect with the guarantee of the human rights of justice seekers.
Perlindungan Hukum Keris Aeng Tong-Tong Sumenep Dalam Hukum Nasional dan Konvensi Internasional Yenny Eta Widyanti
NUANSA: Jurnal Penelitian Ilmu Sosial dan Keagamaan Islam Vol. 20 No. 1 (2023)
Publisher : Research Institute and Community Engagement of UIN MADURA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.19105/nuansa.v20i1.7319

Abstract

Kris is an object of Indonesian culture which has beautiful artistic and high economic values. Kris making is still maintained in several areas, one of which is in Sumenep Regency. Since 2014, Sumenep Regency has been recognized by UNESCO as the area that has the most Mpu (makers of heirlooms) in the world and most of them are in Aeng Tong-Tong Village. The tradition of making kris in Sumenep has existed since the time of the Majapahit Kingdom and has continued to this day. The rapid development of the industry and the number of kris makers in Sumenep have made Sumenep the Indonesian Kris City. The aim of this research is to analyze the legal protection of the Aeng Tong-Tong Sumenep Kris based on national laws and international conventions using a statutory approach. The legal protection of the Aeng Tong-Tong Sumenep Kris in national law is contained in Law Number 28 of 2014 concerning Copyright and Law Number 5 of 2017 concerning the Promotion of Culture, while the legal protection of the Aeng Tong-Tong Sumenep Kris in International Conventions is contained in The Convention on the Protection and Promotion of the Diversity of Cultural Expressions 2005, The Convention for the Safeguarding of the Intangible Cultural Heritage 2003, and The Berne Convention for the Protection of Literary and Artistic Work. In realizing optimal legal protection for the Aeng Tong-Tong Sumenep Kris in national law and international conventions, a comprehensive legal protection must be provided including legal protection for Intellectual Property and Non-Intellectual Property. (Keris merupakan benda hasil budaya bangsa Indonesia yang memiliki nilai seni yang indah dan nilai ekonomi yang tinggi. Pembuatan keris tetap dipertahankan di beberapa daerah, salah satunya di Kabupaten Sumenep. Sejak Tahun 2014, Kabupaten Sumenep diakui oleh UNESCO sebagai daerah yang memiliki Mpu (pembuat benda pusaka) terbanyak di dunia dan sebagian besar ada di Desa Aeng Tong-Tong. Tradisi pembuatan keris di Sumenep sudah ada sejak zaman Kerajaan Majapahit dan masih terus bertahan hingga kini. Pesatnya perkembangan industri dan jumlah perajin keris di Sumenep menjadikan Sumenep sebagai Kota Keris Indonesia. Tujuan pada penelitian ini untuk menganalisis perlindungan hukum Keris Aeng Tong-Tong Sumenep berdasarkan hukum nasional dan konvensi internasional dengan menggunakan pendekatan perundangan. Perlindungan hukum Keris Aeng Tong-Tong Sumenep dalam hukum nasional terdapat dalam UU Nomor 28 Tahun 2014 tentang Hak Cipta dan UU Nomor 5 Tahun 2017 tentang Pemajuan Kebudayaan, sedangkan perlindungan hukum Keris Aeng Tong-Tong Sumenep dalam Konvensi Internasional terdapat dalam The Convention on the Protection and Promotion of the Diversity of Cultural Expression 2005, The Convention for the Safeguarding of the lntangible Cultural Heritage 2003, dan The Berne Convention for the Protection of Literary and Artistic Work. Dalam mewujudkan perlindungan hukum yang optimal terhadap Keris Aeng Tong-Tong Sumenep dalam hukum nasional dan konvensi internasional, maka harus dilakukan perlindungan hukum secara menyeluruh meliputi perlindungan hukum atas Kekayaan Intelektual dan Non Kekayaan Intelektual.)
Legal Protection for Appearers when the Notary's Existence is Unknown (Lost Contact) Yusti Merilistia; Istislam; Yenny Eta Widyanti
Jurnal Multidisiplin Madani Vol. 3 No. 5 (2023): May, 2023
Publisher : PT FORMOSA CENDEKIA GLOBAL

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55927/mudima.v3i5.3805

Abstract

This research examines the legal protection of clients when the notary's wherea-bouts are unknown (lost contact).describe and analyze the certainty of legal protection for appearers who are harmed by a notary whose whereabouts are unknown (lost contact) and to analyze and formulate forms of legal protection that can guarantee legal certainty for ap-pearers who are harmed by a notary whose whereabouts are unknown (lost contact).This research is a normative juridical research through literature studyusing statutory approach (statute approach) and conceptual approach (conceptual approach). The main issues were analyzed using primary legal materials includingProvisions of Article 463 in conjunction with Article 467 of the Civil Code, provisions of Article 15, Article 16, Article 17, Article 62, Article 63 Article 67, Article 69 and Article 70 of Law Number 30 of 2004 concerning the Position of Notary Public juncto Law Number 2 of 2014 concerning Amendments to Law Number 30 of 2004 concerning the Position of Notary, Regulation of the Minister of Law and Human Rights of the Republic of Indonesia Number 15 of 2020 concerning Procedures for Examining the Supervisory Board of Notaries and Notary Code of Ethics. Legal materials were analyzed based on prescriptive analysis and grammatical and systematic interpretation techniques. Based on the research results it is known thatLegal protection for appearers who are harmed by a notary whose whereabouts are unknown (lost contact) based on the analysis of UUJN Amendment) is weak, because basically (“UUJN”) juncto (“UUJN”) Amendment has accommodated arrangements regarding the presence of a notary in the exercise of his office. No matter of how, there are incomplete norms in regulating the absence of a notary in Law Number 2 of 2014 concerning Notary office  (“UUJN”) juncto (“UUJN”) Amend-ment because it cannot accommodate the existence of a notary whose whereabouts are un-known (lost contact), including not being able to guarantee legal protection to appearers who are disadvantaged because the event of absence of a notary is not contained in the provisions in UUJN juncto UUJN Amendment which is used as a guideline results in legal uncertainty which causes legal protection for aggrieved appearers to be also not guaranteed
HUMAN RIGHTS AND INDONESIAN LEGAL PROTECTION OF TRADITIONAL CULTURAL EXPRESSIONS: A Comparative Study in Kenya and South Africa Widyanti, Yenny Eta
Jurisdictie: Jurnal Hukum dan Syariah Vol 14, No 2 (2023): Jurisdictie
Publisher : Fakultas Syariah

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.18860/j.v14i2.24318

Abstract

Legal protection of traditional cultural expressions in Indonesia is paramount to human rights. Indonesia is home to its richness of cultures and tribes, offering economic, social, and cultural values. However, this potential will remain insignificant without proper regulatory provisions in the domains of intellectual property or human rights. Departing from this issue, this research seeks to profoundly analyze the interface between traditional cultural expressions and human rights from the perspectives of either national law or international convention, and this analysis involves the comparison between Kenya and South Africa that appropriately govern legal protection of human rights in traditional cultural expressions. This research aims to elaborate on the interface between human rights and the protection of traditional cultural expressions within the purviews of national law and an international convention. With a legal research method and statutory, conceptual, and comparative approaches, this research finds that there is a close correlation between traditional cultural expressions and human rights, as referred to in international laws in Indonesia, Kenya, and South Africa, and the international convention. This research is expected to serve as a reference for Indonesian national law, in which adopting the best practices in Kenya and South Africa can be taken into account. Perlindungan hukum Ekspresi Budaya Tradisional Indonesia adalah pending untuk diwujudkan sebagai bagian dari hak asasi manusia. Fakta Indonesia sebagai negara yang kaya dengan keanekaragaman budaya dan suku bangsa menjadi potensi luar biasa nilai ekonomi, sosial dan budaya. Potensi luar biasa tersebut tidak dapat diwujudkan tanpa diikuti pengaturan hukum yang memadai baik di bidang hak kekayaan intelektual maupun hak asasi manusia. Atas dasar hal tersebut, menjadi penting untuk menganalisis keterkaitan ekspresi budaya tradisional dengan hak asasi manusia dalam hukum nasional, konvensi internasional, dan perbandingan di negara-negara Afrika, yaitu Kenya dan Afrika Selatan yang telah mengatur dengan baik perlindungan hukum atas hak asasi ekspresi budaya tradisional. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk memaparkan interface hak asasi manusia dengan perlindungan ekspresi budaya tradisional baik dalam hukum nasional maupun konvensi internasional. Jenis penelitian hukum dengan pendekatan perundangan, konseptual, dan perbandingan maka ditemukan bahwa terdapat hubungan yang erat antara ekspresi budaya tradisional dengan hak asasi manusia sebagaimana terdapat dalam pengaturan di dalam hukum nasional Indonesia, Kenya, Afrika Selatan, dan konvensi internasional. Penelitian diharapkan dapat menjadi rujukan dalam hukum nasional Indonesia dengan mengadopsi praktik terbaik di Kenya dan Afrika Selatan.
Interpreting “Held by the State”: Article 38 (1) Copyright Law and Traditional Cultural Expression Protection Amrulla, Mohammad Fahrial; Kusumadara, Afifah; Santoso, Budi; Widyanti, Yenny Eta
Rechtsidee Vol. 14 No. 1 (2026): June
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Sidoarjo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21070/jihr.v14i1.1119

Abstract

General Background Traditional cultural expressions constitute communal cultural heritage embodying identity, philosophy, and collective memory, requiring legal protection aligned with their communal and sacred nature. Specific Background In Indonesia, traditional batik motifs—particularly the sacred Parang motifs of the Yogyakarta Sultanate—are classified as traditional cultural expressions whose copyright is declared “held by the state” under Article 38 paragraph (1) of Law No. 28 of 2014 on Copyright. Knowledge Gap This formulation contains normative ambiguity, as it does not clearly define whether state authority represents ownership, public trusteeship, or mere administrative control, resulting in weak legal certainty for indigenous custodians. Aims This study examines the legal meaning of the phrase “held by the state” in relation to the protection of sacred Parang batik motifs within the framework of traditional cultural expressions. Results The analysis shows that the provision functions as a declarative norm lacking substantive mechanisms, failing to recognize customary authority, community consent, or benefit-sharing, and thereby permitting desacralization and misuse of sacred motifs. Novelty This research clarifies that state control over traditional cultural expressions should be interpreted as public trusteeship rather than ownership, drawing comparative insights from community-centered protection models in India and Thailand. Implications The findings support the development of a sui generis legal framework integrating customary law, community participation, and administrative facilitation to ensure sustainable and culturally respectful protection of sacred batik motifs. Highlights: Article 38 paragraph (1) operates as a declarative norm without concrete protective mechanisms Legal ambiguity weakens recognition of indigenous custodianship over sacred motifs Comparative models support community-based rights with state administrative roles Keywords: Batik, Traditional Cultural Expression, Copyright, State Held
REGULATIONS ON THE VALIDATION OF MARRIAGE AGREEMENTS CARRIED OUT BY NOTARIES IN INDONESIAN POSITIVE LAW FOLLOWING CONSTITUTIONAL COURT DECISION NUMBER 69/PUU-XIII/2015 Safira Annisa; Djumikasi; Yenny Eta Widyanti
International Journal of Educational Review, Law And Social Sciences (IJERLAS) Vol. 5 No. 4 (2025)
Publisher : CV. RADJA PUBLIKA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54443/ijerlas.v5i4.2479

Abstract

The changes that occurred in the Constitutional Court Decision Number 69/PUU-XIII/2015 caused multiple interpretations, the change of the phrase "Making a written agreement" in Article 29 paragraph (1) of the Marriage Law to "submitting a written agreement" in the Constitutional Court Decision Number 69/PUU-XIII/2015 needs to be explained in more detail so that it creates legal certainty. The difference between the phrases "Making" and "Submitting" in the KBBI has a very different meaning, not explaining the meaning of this phrase will cause legal uncertainty, especially for Notaries. So it is necessary to study how the regulation of the ratification of marriage agreements carried out by notaries in Indonesian positive law after the Constitutional Court Decision Number 69/PUU-XIII/2015. The type of research used is the normative legal method, namely research conducted on legal sources such as laws or other literature that includes analysis of legal principles to identify and resolve legal issues that will be studied using the Theory of Legal Certainty. The results of the analysis explain that from the Constitutional Court Decision Number 69/PUU-XIII/2015, Notaries should have two new authorities.
THE ROLE OF JUDGES IN ADJUDICATING DEFAULT CASES CONTAINING ELEMENTS OF ABUSE OF CIRCUMSTANCES IN THE BANKING SECTOR Wandita Pramesthi; Reka Dewantara; Yenny Eta Widyanti
International Journal of Educational Review, Law And Social Sciences (IJERLAS) Vol. 5 No. 3 (2025)
Publisher : CV. RADJA PUBLIKA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54443/ijerlas.v5i3.2867

Abstract

In the Indonesian civil law system, the role of judges is crucial in adjudicating cases involving contractual legal relationships, particularly in banking default cases. Injustice often arises from the abuse of circumstances, where debtors who are in a weak position are often victims of adverse bank policies. Additionally, high interest rates and oppressive contractual clauses pose significant challenges for judges. This research shows that disparities exist in court decisions on abuse of circumstances, creating legal uncertainty. Using a normative juridical approach, this research examines the need for clear legal guidelines from the Supreme Court to establish uniformity in the handling of default cases. Stronger regulations are expected to ensure that judges make more judicious decisions and uphold justice for all parties. This research emphasises the importance of applying the principle of fairness in contracts, so that freedom of contract does not neglect the rights of weaker parties.
LEGAL RECONSTRUCTION OF COPYRIGHT AS MARITAL PROPERTY IN INDONESIAN LAW Piput Milandsari Milandsari; Yenny Eta Widyanti; Yuliati
International Journal of Educational Review, Law And Social Sciences (IJERLAS) Vol. 5 No. 6 (2025)
Publisher : CV. RADJA PUBLIKA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54443/ijerlas.v5i6.4248

Abstract

This study examines the reconstruction of copyright law as marital property within the Indonesian legal framework, focusing on the economic rights of works created during marriage. The research background stems from the complexity of the relationship between intellectual property rights and family law, where copyright often becomes a source of conflict in asset division during divorce. Employing a normative method with legislative, comparative, and conceptual approaches, this study compares regulations in Indonesia and the People's Republic of China. The findings indicate that Indonesia lacks specific rules on the division of economic copyright rights as marital property, whereas China has explicitly integrated them into the Civil Code. Reconstruction is proposed through harmonization of the Copyright Law and Marriage Law, differentiation between moral and economic rights, and the establishment of technical regulations to ensure legal certainty, justice, and protection of creators' rights. These findings contribute to the development of a more responsive national law towards intangible assets in family contexts.
ANALYSIS OF IMPORTANT, CAREFUL, CERTAIN AND MUTUALLY AGREEABLE CRITERIA IN THE REGULATION OF ARTICLE 173 OF THE HERZIEN INLANDSCH REGLEMENT REGARDING EVIDENCE OF JUDGES' SUSPECTS Naufal Anfasa Firdaus; Yenny Eta Widyanti; Rachmi Sulistyarini
International Journal of Educational Review, Law And Social Sciences (IJERLAS) Vol. 5 No. 5 (2025)
Publisher : CV. RADJA PUBLIKA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54443/ijerlas.v5i5.4413

Abstract

The sentence in Article 173 HIR which states "important, thorough, certain and mutually agreeable" is a regulation that is still abstract and can be interpreted in many ways, where this is like what category of important or very important circumstances are, then what is thorough or precise, how to assess certain conditions, and whether they correspond to each other whether they should be applied to 2 (two) types of evidence or what. The purpose of this study is to analyze the criteria contained in the sentence important, thorough, certain and mutually agreeable in the regulation of Article 173 HIR. The research method used is legal research with a statutory regulatory approach, a conceptual approach, and a case approach. Based on the research that has been carried out, it is known that normatively the criteria "important, thorough, certain and mutually agreeable" in Article 173 HIR are not explained completely, then after a theoretical analysis through the doctrines of legal experts and linguistically, namely Indonesian and legal language, the meaning contained therein is obtained. The "important" criterion contains relevant and logical boundaries directly related to the subject matter of the case, the "thorough" criterion contains methodological boundaries for the application of caution, the "certain" criterion contains specific boundaries and the strength of the evidence is not questioned, and the "mutually agreed" criterion contains for consistency and mutually corroborating evidence.