Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Prinsip Keadilan dalam Perlindungan Hukum Dokter Kandungan Atas Gugatan Malpraktik Berdasarkan UU No. 17 Tahun 2023 Elsy Nur Anggraeni; Rini Irianti Sundari; Hadi Susiarno; Aslan Noor
Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Humaniora Vol. 5 No. 1 (2026): JURRISH: Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Humaniora
Publisher : Pusat Riset dan Inovasi Nasional

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55606/jurrish.v5i1.6787

Abstract

Obstetricians are often confronted with medical malpractice lawsuits, even when they have acted in accordance with professional standards, medical service standards, operational procedures, and medical ethics. Medical malpractice is generally defined as negligence or deviation from professional standards that results in serious harm to patients (Fiscina, 1999). This study aims to examine the application of the concept of medical malpractice along with its legal implications and to analyze the forms of legal protection available to obstetricians under Law Number 17 of 2023 on Health, viewed from the perspective of the principle of justice. Using a normative juridical method with descriptive-analytical specifications, the research employed a literature study and qualitative deductive analysis. The results indicate that legal protection for obstetricians consists of two dimensions: preventive and repressive. Preventive protection includes the implementation of informed consent, proper medical records, and compliance with standard operating procedures. Repressive protection involves legal defense mechanisms and institutional or professional organizational support. However, this protection remains suboptimal, as the decisions of the Indonesian Medical Disciplinary Board (MKDKI) are not always taken into account by the courts (Rahman, 2022). From the perspective of Rawls’ principle of justice, protection for obstetricians should ensure a balanced recognition of both patients’ and doctors’ rights, thereby promoting fairness and equitable justice for all parties (Rawls, 1971).
Analisis Vicarious Liability dalam Pertanggungjawaban Rumah Sakit terhadap Gugatan Malpraktik Medis Doddy Putra Pratama Sudjana; Deddy Effendi; Chepi Ali Firman Zakaria; Aslan Noor; Elsy Nur Anggraeni
Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Humaniora Vol. 5 No. 1 (2026): JURRISH: Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Humaniora
Publisher : Pusat Riset dan Inovasi Nasional

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55606/jurrish.v5i1.6802

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the application of the doctrine of vicarious liability in the liability of hospitals for medical malpractice lawsuits in Indonesia. The increasing number of medical disputes raises questions regarding the extent to which hospitals can be held responsible for the negligence of medical personnel working under their authority. This research employs a normative juridical method with statutory, conceptual, and case approaches, by examining the Indonesian Civil Code, Law No. 44 of 2009 on Hospitals, Law No. 17 of 2023 on Health, and relevant court decisions. The findings reveal that, normatively, hospitals can be held accountable under Article 1367 of the Civil Code, which aligns with the doctrine of vicarious liability (Black, 2019). However, judicial practice in Indonesia remains inconsistent: in some cases judges place liability on hospitals, while in others they hold individual doctors fully responsible (Budiman, Absori & Rizka, 2023; Vitrianingsih, Miarsa & Yahya, 2025). This inconsistency demonstrates a gap between normative regulation and juridical implementation. The novelty of this study lies in emphasizing the importance of the principle of justice in applying vicarious liability. Legal protection should not be limited to written norms but must also be substantive by balancing patients’ rights to safe and quality healthcare with the rights of medical personnel and hospitals to legal certainty. This is in line with Rawls’ (1971) concept of justice as fairness and Radbruch’s (2006) idea of balancing justice, legal certainty, and expediency.
Legal Responsibility Of Land Deed Officials (PPAT) In The Implementation Of Government Regulation In Lieu Law (Perpu) Number 56 Of 1960 Concerning The Determination Of Agricultural Land Area Noor, Aslan; Salsabilla, Ainul Mardiyah; Meutia, Irviana; Subrata, Nabila Djuliana Suria; Saraswati, Nabila Trina Saumah
JHSS (JOURNAL OF HUMANITIES AND SOCIAL STUDIES) Vol 9, No 2. (2025): Journal of Humanities and Social Studies
Publisher : UNIVERSITAS PAKUAN

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33751/jhss.v9i2..12732

Abstract

Land reform policy is a strategic step towards creating equitable land ownership and eliminating agrarian inequality. In its implementation, Land Deed Officials (PPAT) play an important role because the deeds they draw up form the legal basis for the transfer or encumbrance of land rights. This study aims to analyse the role of PPAT, the form of their legal responsibility, and the obstacles in the implementation of land reform. This study uses a normative juridical method with a legislative, conceptual, and case approach. The results of the study show that PPATs have administrative, civil, and criminal legal responsibilities, but practices in the field face various obstacles, such as weak supervision, limited land data, and potential violations of the code of ethics. Therefore, strengthening regulations, digitising land administration, and improving the integrity of PPATs are necessary to achieve the objectives of land reform.
Reconstruction Of Ppat Regulations In The Context Of National Agrarian Law Harmonisation Noor, Aslan; Rangkoly, Mavelda R.; Poltica M, Refizma; Putry, Bani Amella Maha; Ghaida, Deyna Shafa; Aulia, Puspa Hygea; Habibie, Muhammad
JHSS (JOURNAL OF HUMANITIES AND SOCIAL STUDIES) Vol 9, No 2 (2025): Journal of Humanities and Social Studies
Publisher : UNIVERSITAS PAKUAN

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33751/jhss.v9i2..12733

Abstract

Land Deed Officials (PPAT) play a central role in the land registration system in Indonesia, functioning as the front line in ensuring legal certainty regarding land ownership rights. However, the regulations governing the position and authority of PPATs are currently still partial and not fully in line with the spirit of the Basic Agrarian Law (UUPA). This condition gives rise to various legal problems that have implications for the emergence of land disputes and hinder the goal of national agrarian law unification. This article examines the urgency of reconstructing PPAT regulations as a strategic step towards harmonising agrarian law in Indonesia. Through a juridical-normative approach, this article analyses the disharmony in existing regulations and offers a comprehensive reconstruction framework, covering the aspects of authority, guidance, supervision, and accountability of PPATs. This reconstruction is expected to strengthen the position of PPAT as professional and integrity public officials, as well as accelerate the realisation of an agrarian legal system that is fair and has legal certainty.
Electronic Land Certificates as Evidence of Ownership: An Analysis under Indonesian Civil Procedure Law Noor, Aslan; Khoerunisa, Alsa Mala; Julianti, Frida; Zulkarnain, Muhammad Azka Izzaturrahman; Bahyudin, Mukhamad; Lumbantoruan, Sukmawati; Praidno, Zahra Ardhanie
Jurnal Ilmiah Global Education Vol. 6 No. 4 (2025): JURNAL ILMIAH GLOBAL EDUCATION
Publisher : LPPM Institut Pendidikan Nusantara Global

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55681/jige.v6i4.4589

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the implementation of electronic land certificates in Indonesia and their role within the civil procedural law framework, particularly in strengthening legal certainty and protection for landowners. The research further seeks to identify challenges associated with electronic certification, such as data security risks and potential disputes, and to explore strategies for enhancing trust and reliability in the electronic certificate system. Employing a normative legal research method, this study relies on statutory and conceptual approaches. Primary legal sources include relevant legislation, notably the Agrarian Affairs and Spatial Planning/National Land Agency (ATR/BPN) Regulation No. 3 of 2023 on the issuance of electronic certificates, as well as the ITE Law. Secondary and tertiary sources, including scholarly literature and legal dictionaries, are used to provide interpretive depth and contextual analysis. The findings reveal that electronic certificates are legally recognized as valid evidence, bearing equal probative value to physical certificates in civil litigation. Their introduction enhances administrative efficiency, reduces risks of loss, forgery, and corruption, and promotes transparency in land management. Legal protection for certificate holders is provided through consumer rights, personal data protection regulations, and safeguards against cybercrime. However, implementation faces obstacles related to infrastructure readiness, regulatory harmonization, cybersecurity threats, and limited public awareness. In conclusion, the transition toward electronic land certification represents a significant step in digitalizing public administration, reinforcing legal certainty, and fostering efficiency in land registration. Nevertheless, sustained efforts are required to strengthen security protocols, enhance legal frameworks, and promote public trust through socialization and education programs. The contribution of this study lies in offering a comprehensive legal analysis of electronic land certificates as instruments of evidence in civil proceedings, while also providing practical insights for policymakers, legal practitioners, and stakeholders in advancing a more secure and transparent land administration system.
Legal Responsibility of Land Deed Officials in Overcoming Abuse of Land Sale and Purchase Deeds Noor, Aslan; Nurfaridah; Purnama, Selly; Meliani, Indri
Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Vol. 24 No. 1 (2025): Pena Justisia
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pekalongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31941/pj.v24i1.6112

Abstract

The Deed of Sale and Purchase (AJB) is a critical element in land transactions in Indonesia, requiring legal validity to ensure the certainty of land ownership status. However, the misuse of AJB, including document forgery by the Land Deed Official, has led to legal disputes that harm various parties and undermine public trust in the land law system. This study aims to analyze the legal responsibility of The Land Deed Official in addressing the misuse of AJB by identifying obstacles in task execution and potential violations. The research method used is a qualitative approach with case studies of land disputes involving The Land Deed Official, as well as an analysis of relevant regulations related to the duties and supervision of The Land Deed Official. The study also aims to provide policy recommendations to enhance The Land Deed Official accountability and strengthen a more transparent and accountable land system. The Land Deed Official plays an essential role in ensuring the legality of land sale transactions in Indonesia by verifying related documents, such as land certificates and tax payment evidence, in accordance with applicable regulations. Misuse of the AJB by The Land Deed Official can undermine legal certainty, trigger land disputes, and hinder economic growth. To prevent this, stricter supervision, the application of technology for transparency, and strict enforcement of sanctions in the land system are required.
Kendala Prosedural Pembentukan Peraturan Daerah dan Implikasinya terhadap Mekanisme Pengujian Yuridis: Studi Empiris pada Bapemperda DPRD Provinsi Jawa Barat Aslan Noor; Johan Amanda Maliku; Alifia Cahyanda Septiani; Rafalina Oktatia; Fadhil Putra Nurizal
Eksekusi : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Administrasi Negara Vol. 4 No. 1 (2026): Februari: Eksekusi: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Administrasi Negara
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Administrasi (STIA) Yappi Makassar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55606/eksekusi.v4i1.2599

Abstract

Regional Regulations (Perda) constitute a fundamental legal instrument in the administration of regional autonomy in Indonesia. This study aims to: (1) analyze the judicial review mechanism for laws that harm individuals or legal entities within Indonesia's constitutional system; (2) examine procedures for reviewing Government Regulations with implications for harm to individuals or legal entities; and (3) evaluate Perda formation procedures of the West Java Provincial Government and DPRD from the perspective of the State Administrative Court (PTUN). The study employs a normative-empirical method with a descriptive-analytical juridical-normative approach, supplemented by semi-structured interviews with representatives of Bapemperda DPRD West Java Province. Findings indicate that the Constitutional Court's judicial review mechanism is insufficiently responsive to individual remediation; judicial review of sub-statutory regulations by the Supreme Court is not optimally integrated with PTUN mechanisms; and Perda formation in West Java faces procedural constraints including budget limitations, shortage of legislative experts, inadequate substantive public participation, and institutional political dynamics. The theoretical implication affirms the need for incidental review reform within PTUN as a complement to judicial review.
Teknik Omnibus law dalam UU No. 11 Tahun 2020: Analisis Pembentukan Peraturan dan Dampak terhadap Kepastian Hukum dalam hal Pengupahan Aslan Noor; Miftahur Rizki; Bryan Gurnala Marpaung; Bryan Riquelme Heinz Samosir; Patricia Helena Elsa Siburian
Al-Zayn: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Hukum & Politik Vol 4 No 4 (2026): 2026
Publisher : Yayasan pendidikan dzurriyatul Quran

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61104/alz.v4i4.6626

Abstract

Pengadopsian metode Omnibus Law yang sebelumnya tidak identik dalam sistem hukum Indonesia yang diterapkan pada Undang - undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2020 tentang Cipta Kerja menciptakan perubahan dalam peraturan perundang-undangan. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis teknik pembentukan peraturan perundang-undangan melalui teknik omnibus law melalui penciptaan peraturan kerja, kesesuaian dengan asas dan prinsip serta kepastian hukum pengupaan bagi para pekerja melalui metode omnibus law ini. Penelitian menggunakan metode yuridis normatif dengan penilaian peraturan dan pendekatan konseptual. Hasil penelitian menyatakan metode omnibus law memberikan reformasi pada sistem regulasi demi memberikan penyederhanaan peraturan dan regulasi serta mengurangi tumpang tindih antar norma meski dalam implementasinya belum memenuhi asas yang berlaku secara penuh. Kepastian hukum ditentukan oleh konsistensi pengaturan, keselarasan undang-undang dan kejelasan norma.
Implikasi Yuridis Perda DKI Jakarta Nomor 7 Tahun 2025 tentang Kawasan Tanpa Rokok terhadap Urgensi Perlindungan UMKM dan Pelanggaran Hak Konstitusional Berusaha Aslan Noor; Misbahul Anam; Rafasya Nadia Ghifari; Falizha Dwi Saputri; Aldira Anggia Putri
Al-Zayn: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Hukum & Politik Vol 4 No 4 (2026): 2026
Publisher : Yayasan pendidikan dzurriyatul Quran

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61104/alz.v4i4.7874

Abstract

Jakarta Special Capital Region Regulation No. 7 of 2025 on Smoke-Free Zones (SFZs) restricts the sale and display of tobacco products, which has the potential to violate the constitutional rights of MSMEs to work and a decent livelihood (Article 27, Paragraph (2) of the 1945 Constitution). This study analyzes the conflict between the SFZ policy and the right to conduct business, legal protections for affected SMEs, and the role of local governments in balancing public health and social justice. The results indicate that while the regulation meets the principles of clarity and transparency, it conflicts with the hierarchy of regulations by disregarding the economic realities of SMEs. Supporting policies, such as SME capacity-building and the provision of proportionate smoking areas, are necessary. Abstrak Peraturan Daerah DKI Jakarta Nomor 7 Tahun 2025 tentang Kawasan Tanpa Rokok (KTR) membatasi penjualan dan display produk rokok, yang berpotensi melanggar hak konstitusional UMKM atas pekerjaan dan penghidupan layak (Pasal 27 Ayat (2) UUD 1945). Penelitian ini menganalisis konflik kebijakan KTR dengan hak berusaha, perlindungan hukum bagi UMKM terdampak, serta peran pemerintah daerah dalam menyeimbangkan kesehatan publik dan keadilan sosial. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa meskipun Perda telah memenuhi asas kejelasan dan keterbukaan, terdapat ketidaksesuaian dengan hierarki peraturan karena mengabaikan realitas ekonomi UMKM. Diperlukan kebijakan pendamping seperti pembinaan UMKM dan penyediaan ruang merokok yang proporsional.
Kedudukan Perempuan terhadap Laki-laki dalam Melakukan Perbuatan Hukum Perolehan dan Peralihan Hak Atas Tanah Berdasarkan UU Nomor 5 Tahun 1960 Aslan Noor
Jurnal Hukum Positum Vol. 3 No. 1 (2018): Jurnal Hukum Positum
Publisher : Prodi Magister Ilmu Hukum Fakultas Hukum Universitas Singaperbangsa Karawang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35706/positum.v3i1.2710

Abstract

Perempuan dan laki laki  memiliki derajat yang sama sebagai pemegang hak atas tanah baik kapasitasnya sebagai isteri ataupun suami. Keduanya mempunyai kapasitas melakukan perbuatan hukum terhadap hak atas tanahnya. Sebelum lahirnya UU no 1 Tahun 1974, perempuan dianggap tidak cakap dalam melakukan perbuatan hukum dan suamilah yang dianggap patut melakukan perbuatan hukum. Sejak diberlakukannya UU 1 Tahun 1974 tentang Perkawinan dan UU No. 5 Tahun 1960 tentang Ketentuan Dasar Pokok Pokok Agraria, maka baik perempuan maupun laki laki memiliki kedudukan yang sama dalam melakukan perbuatan hukum. Artinya, apabila dalam perolehan,  peralihan dan pembebanan harta bersama  suami hanya satu yang melakukan tindakan hukum, maka yang lain wajib memberikan persetujuan.
Co-Authors Abdillah Bararah Abidin, Jaenal Abyansyah, Aditya Fadil Adeffian, Choirul Aditya Pratama Adiwijaya, Ratna Sari Putri Adriansyah, Anggi Pratiwi Affandy, Muhammad Kurnia Agung Dwi Pranyoto Agustini, Denti Dwi Ayu Ajeng Pramesti Aldira Anggia Putri Alifia Cahyanda Septiani Alisha Jasmine Andika Dwi Yuliardi Andrew Christian Banjarnahor Andri Irawan Angelica Riza Claudya Anisa Estiyana Anita, Dewi Anjas Arlianzha Anugrah, M Reza Asihany Pakpahan , Dessy Aulia, Puspa Hygea Ayu Ambarwati Azhar Nur Fauzi Azizi, Fakhri Azzahra Dwi Rizki Azzahra, Tasya Dania Bahyudin, Mukhamad Bamumin, Wildan Barry Irma Perdana Barus, Theresia Juliana Ngarakken Bella, Yoshua Bram Hasian Daniel Hutagalung Bryan Gurnala Marpaung Bryan Riquelme Heinz Samosir Budi Santoso, Imam Chandra, Levina Abigail Chepi Ali Firman Z Citra Safitra Dani Ikhwanto David Auriel Pakpahan Deddy Effendi Dennisa Putri Saepullah Diansyah, Yogi Dias Rahmah Aprilia Dibrata, Shintadewi Doddy Putra Pratama Sudjana Dwika, Mohamad Bima Effrem Inocentius Seran Elsy Nur Anggraeni ENGKUS KUSNADI Engkus Kusnadi Fachrully Pratama Fadhil Putra Nurizal Falizha Dwi Saputri Farid Ahmad Fauzy Faridz Fathurrohman, Mohammad Fathurrohman, Mohammad Faridz Fauzi, Fauzan Muhamad Fauzy, Farid Ahmad Firdawuru, Seno Agung Florida Elyzabeth, Eka Ghaida, Deyna Shafa Gregorius Patrich Setiawan Guntur Atur Parulian Herlani, Lisa Hermindo, Hermindo Ilham Dwi P Ilva Yuniarsi Maruf Indri meliani Inten Dewata, Maraja Ira Anggraini Izzani, Muhammad Hasbi Rizqan Jaya Pakpahan , Edison Johan Amanda Maliku Julianti, Frida Junita, Riska Karin Veronica Wijaya Keren Winfry Theresia Ketut Astawa , I Kharisma, Andika Khoerunisa, Alsa Mala KMS Bintang Yustisia Saputra Kurnia, Agnes Adila Kurniawan, Kunkun Kusmiadi, Kusmiadi Liandani, Rosi Livia Kris Imani Lorenza, Melinda Lukman Lutfianto Lumbantoruan, Sukmawati Maman Suherman, Ade Manurung, Norika Maruf, Ilva Yuniarsi Maudina, Erika Mega Yuni Hospita Meliani, Indri Melliana Wijaya Meutia, Irviana Miftahur Rizki Misbahul Anam Muhamad Febriansyah Muhammad Yusuf MUHAMMAD YUSUF Muhammad Zaidan Firdaus Najmi, Nadila Nilna Salsabila Nur Solihah, Ilma Nurdiani, Herlin Nurfaridah Nurhasanah, Diva Ahda Nurmala Pitaloka Nurwidianti, Maudy of Donri Tinambunan , Revelation Pamungkas, Dwiky Hardika Patricia Helena Elsa Siburian Poltica M, Refizma Prabowo, Romi Galih Praidno, Zahra Ardhanie Pratama, Andhika Wijaya Pratama, Yusril Hardiansyah Pucuk Nyimas Sekar A.S Purwa, Patriana Putry, Bani Amella Maha Qolbiyatuzzahro Qolbiyatuzzahro Rafalina Oktatia Rafasya Nadia Ghifari Rahayu Nur Meilani Rahmaniah, Erlin Raihana Fathiya Raineka Faturani Quran Rangkoly, Mavelda R. Riansyah, Muhamad Rizki Rini Irianti Sundari Rizaldi, Dea Eka Rizky Adi Nugraha Rohmani, Rodiah Romi Galih Prabowo Rosadiana, Eber Ruhima, Asep Rudi t Rusaedi, Attansya Rafli Safriani, Vini Nurul Sahatatua , Richart Salsabila Putri Istnainy Salsabilla, Ainul Mardiyah Samuel Alonso Girsang Saraswati, Nabila Trina Saumah Sari, Raisa Selly Purnama Senator Giovani Putra Arlond Setiady, Try Setiawan, Gregorius Patrich Setiawati, Yeti Shady Shadana Muhammad Kirilofty Sheren Elsila Wijaya Shintadewi Dibrata Sihombing, Juan Carlos Adiyaksa Subrata, Nabila Djuliana Suria Sukamto, Ika Sumiyarsi Sule, Aprilia Maharani Suprapto, Lusi Apriyanti Suprianto, Yusup Susetyo, Ardisia Rahma Susiarno, Hadi Syahrul Ansari , Teuku Syakira Hilwa Tarigan, Notora Teddy Chandra Tetraning Retnowulan S Utama, Fajar Prawira Wassir, Bekawita Widyahastuti, Mila Wijaya, Anandya Tasya Wijaya, Karin Veronica Wijaya, Melliana Wildan Wildan Yeti Setiawati Yogi Diansyah Zulkarnain, Muhammad Azka Izzaturrahman