Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
7.893
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Ekonomi Muamalah Jurnal Akta Hasanuddin Law Review Jurnal Ius Constituendum Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pakar Unes Law Review Padjadjaran Journal of International Law Jurnal Hukum Adigama JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW Jurnal Ilmiah Wahana Pendidikan Devotion: Journal of Research and Community Service Jurnal Abdimas Bina Bangsa International Journal of Educational Review, Law And Social Sciences (IJERLAS) AIWADTHU: Jurnal Pengabdian Hukum International Journal Of Economics Social And Technology terAs Law Review: Jurnal Hukum Humaniter dan HAM Hukum Pidana dan Pembangunan Hukum Jurnal Hukum Prioris Reformasi Hukum Trisakti JPNM : Jurnal Pustaka Nusantara Multidisiplin Journal of Management Accounting, Tax and Production Kanun: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Amicus Curiae ALMUISY: Journal of Al Muslim Information System Tribuere Rechtsnormen: Journal of Law
Siti Nurbaiti
Faculty Of Law Universitas Trisakti
Religion Humanities Automotive Engineering Computer Science & IT Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Mathematics Physics Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 82 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 82 Documents
Search

 5   6   7   8   9 
An Integrated Model for the Forfeiture of Assets Derived from Illicit Drug Trafficking Crimes Mukti Juharsa; Eriyantouw Wahid; Siti Nurbaiti
International Journal Of Economics Social And Technology Vol. 5 No. 3 (2026): September 2026
Publisher : Lembaga Riset Ilmiah

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59086/ijest.v5i3.2477

Abstract

Illicit drug trafficking is classified under Indonesia’s legal system as an extraordinary crime that requires extraordinary measures, including the recovery and forfeiture of assets derived from such offenses. However, the existing forfeiture framework remains predominantly dependent on criminal proceedings and final court judgments, which may create challenges in securing assets that are vulnerable to transfer, concealment, or disguise during the legal process. This study examines the current model of asset forfeiture derived from illicit drug trafficking and develops an integrated model for its future implementation. Employing normative and descriptive legal research, the study analyzes secondary legal materials supported by primary data through qualitative analysis and deductive reasoning. The findings indicate that the existing framework remains primarily conviction-based, limiting the effectiveness of asset recovery when criminal assets are transferred or concealed before forfeiture can be executed. The study proposes an integrated forfeiture model based on the dimensions of legal substance, legal structure, and legal culture. Legal substance requires a comprehensive and general legal framework governing the forfeiture of assets derived from criminal offenses, including mechanisms that enable effective asset recovery while maintaining due process and legal protection. Legal structure requires coordinated procedures among the relevant components of the criminal justice system for tracing, securing, managing, and recovering criminal assets. Legal culture requires institutional harmonization and strengthened international cooperation to facilitate cross-border asset tracing and recovery. The proposed model contributes to the development of a more integrated and asset-oriented framework for combating illicit drug trafficking in Indonesia.  
Legal Frameworks for Insurance Disputes: Evaluating Policyholder Rights and Insurer Obligations in Emerging Markets Ni Gusti Nyoman Renti Maharaini Kerti; Dian Purnamasari; Siti Nurbaiti
JURNAL AKTA Vol 13, No 3 (2026): September 2026
Publisher : Program Magister (S2) Kenotariatan, Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Islam Sultan Agung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30659/akta.v13i3.53719

Abstract

Insurance disputes have become increasingly significant in emerging markets due to the growing complexity of insurance products, information asymmetry between insurers and policyholders, and challenges associated with claims settlement processes. These disputes often raise concerns regarding the adequacy of legal frameworks in balancing policyholder rights and insurer obligations while ensuring fairness, transparency, and legal certainty. This research aims to evaluate the effectiveness of legal frameworks governing insurance disputes in emerging markets by examining the relationship between policyholder rights, insurer obligations, and regulatory accountability within contemporary insurance law. The study employed normative legal research using a qualitative approach and library research methods. Data were collected through the examination of statutory regulations, international regulatory standards, scholarly literature, and legal doctrines related to insurance law, consumer protection, and dispute resolution. The analysis was conducted through content analysis, conceptual legal analysis, and comparative legal analysis to assess the strengths and weaknesses of existing legal frameworks. The findings indicate that insurance disputes are primarily influenced by information asymmetry, ambiguity in policy interpretation, deficiencies in claims handling procedures, and variations in regulatory effectiveness. Although current legal frameworks increasingly recognize policyholder rights and impose broader accountability obligations on insurers, significant challenges remain in ensuring effective implementation and equitable dispute resolution outcomes. This study concludes that effective insurance dispute resolution requires an integrated framework combining policyholder protection, insurer accountability, regulatory effectiveness, and accessible dispute resolution mechanisms. The novelty of this research lies in the development of a comprehensive analytical framework that integrates these four dimensions as interconnected pillars for evaluating and strengthening insurance dispute resolution systems in emerging markets.
Co-Authors A. Suwiyono A. Uwiyono Abdillah, Nabila Abdul Jabar Achmad Fazrin Adiasih, Ning Al Qaeda Putra Nusantara Alfin Sulaiman Amriyati Amriyati Amriyati Amriyati Ananda Okta Putra Anna Maria Tri Anggraini Annisa Riana Putri Arfi Azhari Arini Suliantari Artha, Willy Aryadila Martina Wijaya Atika, Nur Aulia Saphira Aini Chika Pratiwi Chriesty Angeline Clara . Clarita Monica Cynthia Aghata Belinda Alma Della Amalia Silawane Dian Adriawan Daeng Tawang Dian Kartika Dian Purnamasari Dina Al Adawia Dominique Ellen Elfrida Ratnawati Elfrida Ratnawati Gultom Eriyantouw Wahid Etika Pujianti Farah Airitsa Hermawan Febrizka Taufani Fraya Layola Nainggolan Gabriella Evanggelista Galadri Badar Muhammad Gunita Nindya Hamid, Abd. Haris Handayani, Astutik Hasian Doli Hestin Istianai Indon Sinaga Iriawan, Asep Iwan Jamal, Carissa Belia Putri Jasmine Farah Dita Jessica Francis Gunawan Jihan Syafira Jonathan Mangantar Octaviano Putra Kautsar Alwi Pradipta Kezia Natalia Christy Khosyi Putra Ariswari Khusnul Khitam Krisdian Dewi Layola Nainggolan, Fraya Lusi Septiyati Maria Ulfa Hidayatulloh Ulfa Hidayatulloh Masri Rumita Meta Indah Budhianti Muhammad Fathan Mustaqiem Mukti Juharsa Mutiara Karima Mutiara Karima Nabila Sesha Abdillah Nabila Sesha Abdillah Nainggolan, Binsar Ni Gusti Nyoman Renti Maharaini Kerti Nindya Ayu Rahmadita Noviana Annisa Nurwijayanti Paskah Aprilia Silalahi Permanasari, Arlina Phin, Bong Fo Piere Marquez Vandante Putri, Gina Sukma Putri, Marcella Ami Rini Purwaningsih Riski Maulana Salsabila Setyaningrum Samuel Samuel Saryo Saryo Septiyani Septiyani Stefani Erlina Halim Sunarti, Ilis Thanadi, Kenny Titin Sumarni Tryas Risanggono Valois, Yoana Thersia Listoravina Vanny Aryanti Wijaya, Geraldo Valento Wijaya, Wilson Yakub Yulia A. Hasan Zidane Gideon Fransiskus