Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
3.11
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Sosiohumaniora Al-Risalah : Jurnal Imu Syariah dan Hukum Bina Hukum Lingkungan Unes Law Review PALAR (Pakuan Law review) ACTA DIURNAL : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Kenotariatan JUSTISI Eksekusi : Journal Of Law JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW Alauddin Law Development Journal (ALDEV) Bina Hukum Lingkungan Eduvest - Journal of Universal Studies Innovative: Journal Of Social Science Research LITRA: Jurnal Hukum Lingkungan, Tata Ruang, dan Agraria Jurnal As-Syar’i: Jurnal Bimbingan & Konseling Keluarga Referendum
Yani Pujiwati
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Aerospace Engineering Arts Humanities Computer Science & IT Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Health Professions Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Neuroscience Physics Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 31 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 31 Documents
Search

 1   2   3   4 
Tinjauan Yuridis Penerapan Prinsip Hukum Waris dalam Sengketa Kepemilikan Berbasis Hukum Waris Adat Tionghoa ditinjau dari Hukum Positif di Indonesia Jeanice Chrisadi; Bambang Daru Nugroho; Yani Pujiwati
Referendum : Jurnal Hukum Perdata dan Pidana Vol. 2 No. 4 (2025): Desember : Referendum : Jurnal Hukum Perdata dan Pidana
Publisher : Asosiasi Peneliti dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/referendum.v2i4.1426

Abstract

The pluralistic development of Indonesian national law creates a dynamic relationship between national civil law and customary law, including in the context of resolving inheritance disputes in Chinese families who adhere to patrilineal traditions. Supreme Court Decision No. 1204 K/Pdt/2024 shows that there is a tension between legal certainty under the Civil Code and substantive justice originating from living law. This research aims to analyze the judge's interpretation of family documents as a basis for inheritance rejection, inheritance sharing mechanisms that ignore Chinese customary norms, and their implications for legal pluralism in Indonesia. The method used is normative juridical with a case study approach and a descriptive-analytical legislative approach, using literature studies of primary, secondary and tertiary legal materials. The results showed that the ruling applied neither the Civil Code nor the principle of Chinese customary inheritance consistently. The family declaration on which the judge relied was not actually a refusal of inheritance, but an internal agreement granting authority to the testator. Moreover, the distribution of inheritance carried out is not in accordance with the principle of patrilineal custom which places the eldest son as the recipient of the largest share. This finding shows the weak application of legal pluralism (weak legal pluralism) and reveals the gap between das sollen and das sein, so it is necessary to strengthen the role of judges in exploring the traditional values that live in society.
Co-Authors Adhyatma, Sulaeman Adzannya Basuki, Siti Hatia Agung Ramadhan Seli Amelia Sundari Waliyani Athallah, M. Nadhif Bambang Daru Nugroho Betty Rubiati Darmawan, Yuda Pratama Dewi Kania Sugiharti Dinur Zulfikar, Moch Dwi Rahayu, Tiara Ghaniyyu, Faris Faza Gio Saputra Hakim, Rachseria Isneni Hazar Kusmayanti, Hazar Husaeni, Rifky Bustami Ida Nurlinda Jeanice Chrisadi Kusumadewi, Nadya Mutiara Marenda Ishak s Maret Priyanta Milda Milda, Milda Mulyani Djakaria Muqtarib, Muqtarib Nadia Astriani Nia Kurniati Nulhakim, Aqdilla Diba Nurhayati, Elis Pramanthana, Salsabila Purnama Trisnamansyah Ramadani, Moch Januar Rukmana, Yenni Yunithawati Suetani, Lies Wahjuni, Sari Yusuf Saepul Zamil Zamil, Yusuf Saeful