Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 13 Documents
Search

Effective and Efficient Dispute Resolution Through Optimation of Court Connected Mediation Indriati Amarini; Noorfajri Ismail; Ratna Kartika Wati; Marsitiningsih Marsitiningsih; Ika Ariani Kartini
Proceedings Series on Social Sciences & Humanities Vol. 14 (2023): Proceedings of International Conference on Legal Studies (ICOLAS 2023)
Publisher : UM Purwokerto Press

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30595/pssh.v14i.908

Abstract

The judiciary is a mechanism provided by the state to resolve disputes. However in practice, dispute resolution in court is not in accordance with the principles of justice, namely effective and efficient judicial institutions. This research aims to analyze the legality and development of mediation in court. The research method used is library research with secondary data sources in the form of laws and regulations, research results and literature. One of the progressive ideas of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia in order to realize effective and efficient courts, among others, is to strengthen the institution of mediation in the Court for the settlement of civil disputes. However, it seems that the efforts of the Supreme Court institutions need to be further refined through improving the quality and quantity of human resources, improving supporting infrastructure and court institutions are consistent in supporting the mediation development programs in the Court.
Double Certificates and Its Resolution in (Study of Supreme Court Decision Number 976 K/PDT/2015) Soediro Soediro; Ika Ariani Kartini; Efi Miftah Faridli; Nur’aeni Nur’aeni
Proceedings Series on Social Sciences & Humanities Vol. 14 (2023): Proceedings of International Conference on Legal Studies (ICOLAS 2023)
Publisher : UM Purwokerto Press

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30595/pssh.v14i.910

Abstract

One of the goals of the Basic Agrarian Law (Undang-Undang Pokok Agraria, UUPA) is to provide legal certainty for all individuals and to facilitate the functioning of the earth, water, and space, as well as natural resources. In reality, however, the law has not yet provided legal certainty over land in the case of double certificates, as stated in Supreme Court Decision No. 976 K/PDT of 2015. The problem posed by this study is how and what the obstacles are for prevent the development of duplicate certificates. This is normative legal research employing secondary data, the statute approach, and the conceptual approach. To prevent the occurrence of double certificates, it is necessary to implement a computerization/digitization program for land registration maps to reduce error by humans, acquire data on land parcels that have certificates, make plotting efforts utilizing GPS (Global Positioning System) technology, restrict the land registration process and administration pertaining to village land, and implement blockchain technology in land administration. Meanwhile, the public's lack of interest in registering their land through the Comprehensive Systematic Land Registration (Pendaftaran Tanah Sistematis Lengkap, PTSL) scheme, procedural errors in the land assessment procedure, a negative land publication system in which the data presented is not necessarily valid, and the state's inability to guarantee the accuracy of the data presented are impediments to these efforts. Moreover, the present agrarian law is a colonialist relic that is not in the community's best interests.
Analisis Penerapan Kode Etik dan Pedoman Perilaku Hakim : Studi Pelanggaran Prinsip Berdisiplin Tinggi Erza Julia Azahra; Ika Ariani Kartini; Indriati Amarini; Marsitiningsih
Jurnal Sakato Ekasakti Law Review Vol. 5 No. 2 (2026): Jurnal Sakato Ekasakti Law Review
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/krh93f71

Abstract

Penelitian ini mengkaji penerapan prinsip “Berdisiplin Tinggi” dalam Kode Etik dan Pedoman Perilaku Hakim (KEPPH) di Indonesia, khusunya terkait pelanggaran kedisiplinan hakim. Prinsip ini mengatur kewajiban hakim untuk melaksanakan tugas sebagai bagian dari integritas dan profesionalitas hakim dalam menegakkan kekuasaan kehakiman yang independen dan akuntabel. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah penelitian hukum yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan analisis deskriptif terhadap dokumen hukum dan literatur terkait. Data yang digunakan berupa data sekunder yang diperoleh melalui studi kepustakaan terhadap peraturan perundang-undangan, dokumen resmi, buku, dan jurnal ilmiah yang relevan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa prinsip berdisiplin tinggi merupakan instrumen etik yang berfungsi menjaga integritas, profesionalitas, dan akuntabilitas hakim. Penegakannya dilakukan melalui pengawasan internal oleh Mahkamah Agung dan pengawasan eksternal oleh Komisi Yudisial. Pelanggaran terhadap prinsip ini dapat dikenakan sanksi mulai dari teguran hingga pemberhentian tetap. Oleh karena itu, penegakan disiplin yang konsisten diperlukan untuk menjaga kehormatan lembaga peradilan dan meningkatkan kepercayaan masyarakat terhadap sistem peradilan di Indonesia.