Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
3.049
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal LAW REFORM Jurnal Daulat Hukum Jurnal Konstitusi Constitutional Review Jurnal Ilmu Hukum KYADIREN Jurnal Hukum Adigama JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW Jurnal Bakti Masyarakat Indonesia Academia Open Indonesian Journal of Law and Economics Review Jurnal Cahaya Mandalika Jurnal Tunas Agraria Jurnal Ilmiah Wahana Pendidikan Indonesia Law Review (ILREV) Journal of Law, Poliitic and Humanities QISTINA: Jurnal Multidisiplin Indonesia Riwayat: Educational Journal of History and Humanities Jurnal Serina Abdimas
Tundjung Herning Sitabuana
Universitas Semarang
Religion Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Arts Humanities Chemistry Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Earth & Planetary Sciences Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Electrical & Electronics Engineering Engineering Environmental Science Health Professions Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Medicine & Pharmacology Nursing Physics Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 23 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 23 Documents
Search

 1   2   3 
Fragmentasi Hukum dalam Pengaturan Perizinan Pertambangan dan Dampaknya terhadap Kepastian Hukum Pemohon IUP melalui Sistem Minerba One Data Indonesia Giovanni, Yohanes Jeriko; Sitabuana, Tundjung Herning
Riwayat: Educational Journal of History and Humanities Vol 8, No 4 (2025): Oktober, Social Issues and Problems in Society
Publisher : Universitas Syiah Kuala

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24815/jr.v8i4.50856

Abstract

Fragmentasi hukum dalam pengaturan perizinan pertambangan menjadi salah satu faktor utama yang memengaruhi efektivitas penyelenggaraan perizinan melalui Sistem Minerba One Data Indonesia (MODI). Studi ini menganalisis bentuk-bentuk fragmentasi hukum yang muncul pada berbagai tingkat regulasimulai dari Undang-Undang Nomor 3 Tahun 2020, PP Nomor 96 Tahun 2021, hingga Keputusan Menteri ESDM Nomor 297.K/MB.01/MEM.B/2023serta dampaknya terhadap kepastian hukum pemohon Izin Usaha Pertambangan (IUP). Dengan menggunakan metode penelitian yuridis normatif, penelitian ini menemukan bahwa disharmonisasi norma, ketidaksinkronan persyaratan administratif, tumpang tindih kewenangan pusat dan daerah, serta divergensi antara dokumen hukum dan database MODI telah menciptakan hambatan struktural dalam proses perizinan. Pemohon seringkali menghadapi situasi di mana permohonan tidak diproses atau tertunda akibat adanya perbedaan standar verifikasi, keterbatasan integrasi data, serta persyaratan teknis tambahan yang tidak sejalan dengan norma yang lebih tinggi. Ketidakmampuan MODI untuk mengeksekusi putusan PTUN tertentu karena persyaratan amar yang ditentukan secara sepihak dalam Keputusan Menteri dan juga memperlihatkan bentuk fragmentasi remedial yang mengurangi perlindungan hukum pemohon. Penelitian ini menegaskan bahwa fragmentasi hukum tidak hanya mengganggu efektivitas sistem digital perizinan, tetapi juga menurunkan kepastian hukum dan kepercayaan pelaku usaha terhadap tata kelola pertambangan. Harmonisasi regulasi dan penyederhanaan prosedur menjadi langkah mendesak untuk memastikan bahwa digitalisasi perizinan benar-benar menghadirkan transparansi, akuntabilitas, dan kepastian hukum.
The Urgency of Regulating Provisions That Cannot Be Changed in Amendments to the Indonesian Constitution: Urgensi Pengaturan Ketentuan Tidak Boleh Diubah Dalam Amandemen Konstitusi Indonesia Amri, Ibra Fulenzi; Sitabuana, Tundjung Herning
Academia Open Vol. 10 No. 2 (2025): December
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Sidoarjo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21070/acopen.10.2025.12969

Abstract

General Background: Since the Reform Era, Indonesia has undergone extensive political and constitutional transformation that renewed demands to reorganize national governance through amendments to the 1945 Constitution. Specific Background: The re-emergence of constitutional amendment discourse after 27 years of Reform raises concerns about unstructured changes that may weaken constitutional authority and threaten national integrity. Knowledge Gap: Indonesia has not yet established explicit constitutional provisions identifying which foundational norms must remain unamendable. Aims: This study aims to formulate a normative framework for determining non-amendable constitutional provisions to ensure orderly amendments and preserve constitutional stability. Results: The findings show that the MPR must adopt fundamental agreements protecting the following from amendment: the Preamble, the state ideology, the goals of the state, the form of the state, the separation of powers under checks and balances, human rights guarantees, and procedures for constitutional amendment in emergencies. Comparative analysis shows that many countries, including Germany, France, Portugal, Spain, and Turkey, maintain similar immutable clauses. Novelty: This study offers a comprehensive normative construction of unamendable provisions within Indonesia’s constitutional framework. Implications: Explicitly regulating immutable constitutional clauses is essential to safeguard constitutional supremacy and prevent national disintegration. Highlights: Identifies core constitutional elements that must remain unamendable to preserve state integrity. Highlights the need for structured and principled constitutional amendment procedures. Shows that Indonesia aligns with global constitutional practices protecting foundational norms. Keywords: Constitutional Amendment, Unamendable Provisions, Constitutional Stability, Indonesia, Constitutional Law
The Urgency of Applying the Principles of Accuracy and Public Interest in the Evaluation Process and the Imposition of Administrative Sanctions on Mining Business Permits Natasha, Evelyn; Sitabuana, Tundjung Herning
Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Kyadiren Vol 7 No 2 (2026): Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Kyadiren
Publisher : PPPM, Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum (STIH) Biak-Papua

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46924/jihk.v7i2.372

Abstract

This article analyzes the urgency of applying the principles of due diligence and public interest in evaluating and imposing administrative sanctions on Mining Business Permits (IUP) in Indonesia. Using normative legal research methods, the study examines statutory regulations, principles of administrative law, and decisions of the Administrative Court (PTUN) to assess the consistency of government actions in mining oversight. The findings indicate that many IUP revocation decisions are overturned because of insufficient data verification, the absence of on-site inspections, and the failure to consider community and environmental impacts. This demonstrates that these two principles are essential prerequisites for ensuring the legality, accountability, and social legitimacy of administrative decision-making. The article recommends strengthening coordination between central and regional governments, enhancing supervisory capacity, and involving local communities as key strategies for improving mining governance and promoting more accountable administrative law enforcement.
Co-Authors Ade Adhari Ahmad Redi, Ahmad Amri, Ibra Fulenzi Armando, Very Azizah, Nida Indriani Clarosa, Vivian Delpedro Marhaen Earlene, Felishella Evelyn Natasha, Evelyn Giovanni, Yohanes Jeriko Goldwen, Filshella Juniar, Nadia Tasha Lengkong, Keyzia Betarli Lie, Cathleen Mantiri, Juttah Christian Milianty, Yessa Nagaria, Christopher David Nethan Nethan, Nethan Novriyanti, Meidiana Octavia S, Christine Retaly, Andrea Tamaranova Salim, Patrick Winson Sanjaya, Dixon Shrishti Siregar, Yessyurun Oscar Janfaron Suryani, Leony Sondang Syamila, Najma Yuwono Prianto