Articles
<![CDATA[32. DILEMA KEBIJAKAN OPERASI MARE NOSTRUM TERHADAP ARUS MIGRASI DI ITALIA 2012 – 2015 ]]>
<![CDATA[Phedra Phelia, Almira Devina]]>;
<![CDATA[Susiatiningsih, Hermini]]>;
<![CDATA[Basith Dir, Andi Akhmad]]>
<![CDATA[ Journal of International Relations Volume 2, Nomor 4, Tahun 2016 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[International Relations, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Diponegoro ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (277.163 KB)
<![CDATA[Migration flows in Italy increased post-Arab Spring that happeneed in North Africa andthe Middle East. Libya as a major gateway shipments directly affected migrants from theArab Spring so that there is instability in the conditions of the region. Smugglers fromLibya used to send irregular migrants from Libya towards Italy. On the way to Italy, manymigrants suffered at sea, the vessel which carrying migrants was not worth with excesscapacity. Lampedusa tragedy claimed 360 people died at sea, the Italians immediatelyresponded by establishing an operations to rescue migrants named Operation MareNostrum. This rescue operation received a negative response from the other party, becausethe operation regarded as the cause of the high flows of irregular migration in Italy andspread to other EU countries, then causing a dilemma. Italy have to bear a very high cost torun the operation alone, but Italy still carry out such operations alone. This research triedto find the Italian reasons to run Operation Mare Nostrum and effectiveness of the policy.This research found that Operation Mare Nostrum done in obedience to comply the normand it was not so effective in its implementation.]]>
<![CDATA[Kerjasama Keamanan Maritim Indonesia-Australia dalam Menangani IUU Fishing di Laut Arafura ]]>
<![CDATA[Ekaputra, Muhammad Edrian]]>;
<![CDATA[Susiatiningsih, Hermini]]>;
<![CDATA[Hanura, Marten]]>
<![CDATA[ Journal of International Relations Volume 4, Nomor 2, Tahun 2018 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[International Relations, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Diponegoro ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (256.977 KB)
<![CDATA[IUU (illegal, unreported, unregulated) fishing was deemed by Indonesia as a crime thatinflicted many loss. In Indonesia, IUU fishing mostly occured at Arafura Sea whereAustralian sea territory were partially included. The mentioned problems in this researchare why Indonesia and Australia establish a cooperation to deter IUU fishing at Arafurasea and the affects. The purpose of this research is to explain and analyse the cooperationthat undertaken by Indonesia and Australia to deter IUU fishing at Arafura Sea. For thosepurposes, this research using the liberalism theory, cooperation concept, maritime securityconcept and transnational crime concept as a tool of analysis. This research is conductedby using the qualitative research method with explanative research type through interviewsand literature studies. The cooperation between Indonesia and Australia to deter IUUfishing at Arafura Sea were conducted through bilateral an multilateral efforts. For bothstates, particulary Indonesia, the cooperation are the part of their efforts to create amaritime security with the protection of economic and reliability sector of respective statesas the ultimate goal.]]>
<![CDATA[Peran Interpol dalam Upaya Pemberantasan Obat-Obatan Palsu di Indonesia ]]>
<![CDATA[Adhinugroho, M. Yudhistira]]>;
<![CDATA[Susiatiningsih, Hermini]]>;
<![CDATA[Farabi, Nadia]]>
<![CDATA[ Journal of International Relations Volume 4, Nomor 1, Tahun 2018 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[International Relations, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Diponegoro ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (181.272 KB)
<![CDATA[Interpol is an international organization whose focus on transnational and international crime. One of the concerns is pharmaceutical crimes related to the distribution of counterfeit drugs. Indonesia, as the largest country in Southeast Asia, is surely cannot be separated from the cycle of counterfeit drugs distribution. This study aimed to understand the role and purpose of Interpol as international organization om combating counterfeit drugs in Indonesia. Therefore, this study used the concept of role and purpose of international organization through neoliberalism institutional perspective. This study showed that Interpol had fulfilled the expectation which was determined by the aforementioned concept. One of which is by doing Pangea Operation. It resulted that this operation has given benefits to Indonesia by creating platform for different sectors to cooperate synergistically.]]>
<![CDATA[Kerjasama Indonesia dan Thailand dalam Menangani Kasus Illegal, Unreported, and Unregulated (IUU) Fishing di Indonesia ]]>
<![CDATA[Rikzan, M. Alvin]]>;
<![CDATA[Susiatiningsih, Hermini]]>
<![CDATA[ Journal of International Relations Volume 4, Nomor 4, Tahun 2018 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[International Relations, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Diponegoro ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (350.95 KB)
<![CDATA[Indonesia is an easy target for IUU actors (Illegal, Unreported, Unregulated) fishing due to abundant marine resources. IUU fishing is a problem that can not be underestimate because inflict many disadvantages for Indonesia. In handling IUU fishing, Indonesia requires cooperation with other countries, especially with neighbour countries to solve the problem. This research is aimed to studying the cooperation between Indonesia and Thailand in handling IUU fishing. For analyzing the cooperation, this research use liberalism theory with qualitative method, and explanatory-based research by doing some literature studies. In this research we can see that cooperation between Indonesia and Thailand produces Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) which are expected to help handling IUU fishing. With this cooperation, all the factors of IUU fishing shall be solved.]]>
<![CDATA[2. KERJASAMA INDONESIA – BRASIL DALAM PENANGANAN PERDAGANGAN NARKOTIKA ASAL BRASIL DI INDONESIA PERIODE 2010-2015 ]]>
<![CDATA[Abihail, Didier]]>;
<![CDATA[Susiatiningsih, Hermini]]>;
<![CDATA[Hanura, Marten]]>
<![CDATA[ Journal of International Relations Volume 3, Nomor 3, Tahun 2017 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[International Relations, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Diponegoro ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (656.318 KB)
<![CDATA[Indonesia is a big a country that being targeted by international narcotics trafficker which is Transnational Organized Crime. One of the example is the Brazilian who tried to smuggle narcotics to Indonesia. This research is using two cases of studies, i.e. Rodrigo Gularte that has been apprehended in 2003 and Reginaldo Bom Fim is in 2012 by Indonesian National Police for smuggling Brazilian narcotics to Indonesia. In this regard, Indonesia – Brazil cooperation on combating narcotics becomes an interesting point to be studied. The research questions of this study is “How is Indonesia – Brazil cooperation on combating narcotics originated from Brazil? ; and Is there any factors that might supports or detains the cooperation?†The point of this research is to explain the procedure of cooperation between Indonesia – Brazil on combating drugs and explaining the factors that tied this cooperation. This research is using Liberalism theory and Implementation Policy theory. The Liberalism is being used to explain the procedure of cooperation between two countries effectively and then being ratified to be implemented. Also Implementation Policy theory is used for explaining the procedure of implementation on combating the drugs. Descriptive methods are being used in this research to explain the cooperation and the implementation of combating drugs policy. As the result, this study found that Indonesian – Brazil cooperation formally established after legal basis has been ratified, and then implemented by two ways of cooperation, which are cooperation between the Government (G to G) and cooperation between national police department (P to P). As for the process of cooperation, has its own tidal wave caused by inhibitor and stimulant factors by the two cases that’ve been the fundamental to this research. The stimulant factors that being referred is the two cases indicate that both of the party needs to cooperate to combat against TOC; both party shared common aspiration and commitment on combating against TOC. The inhibitor factors that being referred is about death penalty still being used towards narcotics convict and difficulties to gather inteligence source for combating narcotics trafficking.]]>
<![CDATA[PERAN MNC MENCEGAH PENCEMARAN LINGKUNGAN : STUDI KASUS EXXONMOBIL DI BLOK CEPU ]]>
<![CDATA[Kertiyasa, Wandha Lucia]]>;
<![CDATA[Susiatiningsih, Hermini]]>
<![CDATA[ Journal of International Relations Volume 4, Nomor 4, Tahun 2018 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[International Relations, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Diponegoro ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (650.742 KB)
<![CDATA[The emergence of public distrust of the oil and gas giant ExxonMobil Indnesian was proven by various accusations that were filed for environmental pollution by ExxonMobil. The accusation was filed because there were several cases which resulted in an increase of temperature, gas leakage, and other charge that threatened human security. The thought framework used in this study uses the theory of good governance, human security, and also the preacautionarry principle. This type of research is descriptive-explanatory with qualitative data analysis techniques through data collection of library techniques. This study provides results that ExxonMobil isn’t the cause of environmental damage carried out in the Cepu Block exploration area. Through the results of the PROPER obedience (Corporate Performance Rating Assessment Program) applied by the Government, CSR (Corporate Social Responsibility), the implementation of the Operations Integrity Management System (OIMS) as a guide in doing business, and enviromental care efforts carried out by the company was enough to dismiss these environmental pollution allegations.]]>
<![CDATA[5. EFEKTIVITAS KERJA SAMA INDONESIA – TIONGKOK DALAM UPAYA PEMBERANTASAN JARINGAN SINDIKAT NARKOBA DI WILAYAH INDONESIA TAHUN 2012-2014 ]]>
<![CDATA[Bandung, Bimasakti Aryo]]>;
<![CDATA[Susiatiningsih, Hermini]]>;
<![CDATA[Hanura, Marten]]>
<![CDATA[ Journal of International Relations Volume 2, Nomor 4, Tahun 2016 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[International Relations, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Diponegoro ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (411.287 KB)
<![CDATA[spread all over the country’s provinces. Those situations were realized by BNN as theprime government organization for Narcotic crime in Indonesia with the main source ofthis problems is China. So that, the Indonesia and Chinese Governments establishedMemorandum of Understanding (MoU) for eradication of illicit drug syndicates in 2012.The purpose of this research is to know the effectiveness of a relation between Indonesiaand China in eradicating illicit drugs syndicates. The research methodologies are withqualitative method, descriptive-analysis type of research, and the data collection ofinterview and literature review type. Since the MoU activated in 2012, a qualitativeanalysis of effectiveness did in purpose of testing the relations between Indonesia andChina based on three parameters, which are: communication intensity, result of eradication,and appreciation. Results from the analysis based on the parameters will prove that thecooperation between the nations are effective and can be refer to ‘Golden Triangle’. Thereason of this results are because there were an increasing number in disclosure of the caseand people arrest that affected to the reduction of the drugs users in 2014.]]>
<![CDATA[3. KEGAGALAN DIPLOMASI PEMERINTAH AUSTRALIA DALAM PEMBEBASAN TERPIDANA HUKUMAN MATI KASUS BALI NINE DI INDONESIA ]]>
<![CDATA[Alfeini, Yulia]]>;
<![CDATA[Susiatiningsih, Hermini]]>;
<![CDATA[Farabi, Nadia]]>
<![CDATA[ Journal of International Relations Volume 3, Nomor 1, Tahun 2017 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[International Relations, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Diponegoro ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (277.895 KB)
<![CDATA[Execution of the death penalty in The Bali Nine Case made The Government of Australiadid some of diplomatic efforts to rescue the two Australian prisoners, namely MyuranSukumaran and Andrew Chan. Those efforts are made through smart diplomacy, the typeof diplomacy that combines soft power diplomacy and hard power diplomacy. Moreover,there were also diplomatic efforts that undertaken by the international organization torescue both of convicted from the death penalty. However, the entire diplomacy was failedafter the decisions to reject the clemency for the two prisoners was issued by ThePresident Jokowi, which in turn made the bilateral relation between Indonesia andAustralia were in conflict. This research aim to analyze the cause of releasing thedecisions to reject the clemency in The Bali Nine case, which is also causing the failure ofAustralian Government’s diplomacy to Indonesia in that case. The framework used in thisresearch is the concept of diplomacy and foreign policy to explain the case of Bali Nine,and also the theory of foreign policy analysis by Snyder to analyze the decisions in therejection of clemency. The type of this research is explanatory, using qualitative dataanalysis techniques from the primary and secondary data accumulation. The result of thisresearch explains that there are four determinant factors that come from the internal andexternal state, which makes the rejection of clemency decision (Indonesia). These fourfactors include: The first factor comes from the perspective of President Jokowi and hisgovernment as the main actor of policymakers for the rejection of clemency. The secondcomes from the public opinion of Indonesian people through the case of Bali Nine. Thethird comes from the relation between Indonesia and Australia in Tony Abbott’s era, whilethe fourth comes from the perception of the countries in Southeast Asia against drugscrime.]]>
<![CDATA[10. PERAN INTERNATIONAL TELLECOMMUNICATION UNION DALAM MENGATASI CYBER CRIME DI INDONESIA TAHUN 2011 - 2013 ]]>
<![CDATA[Kusumah Anshary, Ahmad Daniel]]>;
<![CDATA[Susiatiningsih, Hermini]]>;
<![CDATA[Farabi, Nadia]]>
<![CDATA[ Journal of International Relations Volume 2, Nomor 2, Tahun 2016 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[International Relations, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Diponegoro ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (860.133 KB)
<![CDATA[International Telecommunication Union (ITU) is an organization founded in 1865 with thegoal of developing the technology and Informatics. Indonesia is one country that has anoffice member of ITU since 1984 as a coordination center in the Southeast Asia regionworking together to develop and secure ICT in the countries of Southeast Asia. Thisresearch seeks to analyze the role of ITU in combatting cyber crime rate in Indonesia in2011 - 2013, at which time the level of criminal activity in Indonesia cyber crime hasincreased. By using the method descriptive study, researchers found that the ITU has beeninstrumental in making every effort to develop and secure ICT in Indonesia, but there arefactors that make cyber crime in Indonesia has increased in 2011 - 2013. However afterfurther testing through a variety of data and a pooled analysis, the researchers concludedthat there are barriers that keep cyber crime in Indonesia increased despite the ITU hasbeen instrumental in Indonesia.]]>
<![CDATA[23. FAKTOR-FAKTOR YANG MEMPENGARUHI KEBERHASILAN KERJASAMA INDONESIA DENGAN VIETNAM DALAM MENANGANI IUU FISHING ]]>
<![CDATA[Putri, Anindia Cahya]]>;
<![CDATA[Susiatiningsih, Hermini]]>;
<![CDATA[Hanura, Marten]]>
<![CDATA[ Journal of International Relations Volume 2, Nomor 3, Tahun 2016 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[International Relations, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Diponegoro ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (254.873 KB)
<![CDATA[The increasing rate of fish consumption in the world has made some countries flocking tofulfill their needs of fish. In the process of fulfilling their needs of fish, they are doingeverything they can, both legally and illegally, in these case through Illegal UnreportedUnregulated Fishing. The act of these IUU fishing has caused a lot of damage and losses tothe affected countries and also could ruin the ecosystem of the affected sea. Indonesia as acountry with plenty of fish resources has became an appealing target for these act. One of theneighbouring countries who has been caught doing these act was Vietnam. To reduce thefrequencies of these illegal act and lessen the damages and losses, Indonesia cooperated withVietnam by making a Memorandum of Understanding or MOU. These cooperation betweenIndonesia and Vietnam ended with a good result, thankfully. This research was done in orderunderstand the factors of the successful cooperation against IUU fishing between Indonesiaand Vietnam. In accordance to achieve the goal of these research and solve the problem thatoccured, it was done by using theory of international cooperation, analyzing the indicators ofsuccess of the cooperation, concept theory of foreign policy and theory of cooperation inliberalis-paradigm, These research was done in qualitatif method with descriptic-analythicalway through journal research and interview. Results of the study are the success ofIndonesia's cooperation with Vietnam in dealing with IUU fishing due to the proximity offactor, communications, law enforcement.]]>
