Articles
<![CDATA[Sekuritisasi Pemerintah Kanada era Justin Trudeau dalam Mengatasi Masalah Keamanan Negara akibat Pencemaran Lingkungan di Situs Penambangan Minyak Pasir di Alberta, Kanada 2015-2017 ]]>
<![CDATA[Akbar, Zulfikar Kharisma]]>;
<![CDATA[Utomo, Tri Cahyo]]>
<![CDATA[ Journal of International Relations Volume 5, Nomor 1, Tahun 2019 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[International Relations, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Diponegoro ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (540.119 KB)
<![CDATA[The development of globalization has made the environmental issue must be notice by the world. Exploration and exploitation in Alberta tar sands oil mining has proven to cause environmental damage which includes the effects of greenhouse gases, air pollution, and water pollution. The impact of environmental damage and pollution due the mining processes has fueled cynical response from international environmental organizations, society, and international regimes to the Government of Canada. In addition, being involved under environmental regime also requires Government of Canada to realize the conditions which has been approved upon the regime. This research aims to explain how the Canadian Government's policies secure environmental pollution in Alberta, Canada tar sands oil mining which had previously been a non-political issue and eventually led to public condemnation. By using a securitization approach, this research describe the efforts and policies of the Canadian Government to secure the threat of environmental damages due to exploration and exploitation of Alberta tar sands oil mining. Canadian Government has made some efforts to securing the case of environmental damage in Alberta tar sands oil mining, but has not reached maximum results.]]>
<![CDATA[Peran WHO (World Health Organization) dalam Menangani Peredaran Counterfeit Drugs (Studi Kasus: Implementasi Member States Mechanism di Indonesia) ]]>
<![CDATA[Hidayah, Anif]]>;
<![CDATA[Utomo, Tri Cahyo]]>
<![CDATA[ Journal of International Relations Volume 4, Nomor 3, Tahun 2018 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[International Relations, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Diponegoro ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (253.088 KB)
<![CDATA[Transnational crime on counterfeit drugs circulation poses a real threat to the countries ofthe world, including Indonesia. Case of counterfeit drugs in Indonesia has increased in2012-2016. Therefore, a mechanism of cooperation is needed to overcome this crime.WHO (Worlds Health Organization) has established Member State Mechanism, amechanism of cooperation between member states in order to protect public health fromthe dangers of counterfeit medicines in order to achieve access to affordable, safe andquality medical products. This research aimed to explain the role of WHO for combatingthe number of counterfeit drugs distribution through case studies the Implementation ofMember States Mechanism in Indonesia in 2012-2016. Based on analysis by using datafrom several source, this research found the conclusion that the role of WHO is to providerecommendations, guidelines and coordination for health authorities (BPOM) to detect anddeal with actions, activities and behaviours that result in SSFFC medical products inIndonesia. However, the role of WHO through the implementation of MSM on SSFFC inIndonesia is not entirely successful, because the public awareness of counterfeit drugs arestill weak. Indonesia should find out the root of this problem by increasing detection at theentrance of illegal goods from abroad.]]>
<![CDATA[KERJA SAMA BILATERAL INDONESIA DAN AUSTRALIA DALAM PENANGANAN TERORISME DI INDONESIA TAHUN 2002 – 2013 ]]>
<![CDATA[Ansari, Rahmat]]>;
<![CDATA[Utomo, Tri Cahyo]]>;
<![CDATA[Farabi, Nadia]]>
<![CDATA[ Journal of International Relations Volume 2, Nomor 1, Tahun 2016 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[International Relations, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Diponegoro ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (258.998 KB)
<![CDATA[The development of terrorism on global scale triggers Indonesia and Australiato increase their capacity by working together to tackle terrorism in Indonesia.In order to determine the actions undertaken by the Government of Indonesiaand Australia to respond and prevent terrorism crime growing in Indonesia,the research use the approach of liberalism, that the relationship betweenIndonesia and Australia based on the same view to protect themselves from thethreat of terrorism through cooperation to increase the capacity of the countryagainst non-state actor, terrorist organizaton. Details about the importance ofcooperation between Indonesia and Australia done within the scope ofcooperation to deal with terrorism in Indonesia focused on government acttoward police institution, Indonesian National Police (Polri) for Governmentof Republic of Indonesia, and Australian Federal Police (AFP) for Governmentof Australia in the area of counter terrorism. Polri and AFP relationship inorder to overcome terrorism crime using curative and preventive action basedon the following bilateral cooperation between states. Counter terrorism actbased on Momerandum of Understanding Between Government of Republic ofIndonesia and Government of Australia signed on 7th February 2002.]]>
<![CDATA[Alasan Rusia Melibatkan Diri dalam Konflik Bersenjata Suriah Tahun 2011-2015 ]]>
<![CDATA[Kusumastuti, Dita Arum]]>;
<![CDATA[Utomo, Tri Cahyo]]>;
<![CDATA[Hanura, Marten]]>
<![CDATA[ Journal of International Relations Volume 3, Nomor 4, Tahun 2017 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[International Relations, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Diponegoro ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (454.278 KB)
<![CDATA[Arab Spring which was happened in 2011 had ceated nationwide protest movement of the Syrian people to throw the regime of the President Bashar Al Assad. The conflict that was, at first,only protest then turned into armed conflict where the government, opposition and terrorism groups such as ISIS and Jabhat Al Nusra involved. The number of the deaths caused by the conflict were then called by the UN as crime against humanity. The UN initiated Geneve Peace Talks as an agenda to hold a political transition towards Bashar Al Assad’s regime. The effort was rejected by Russia Federation. In 2013, the U.S. and its alliance deployed its miltary forces in Syria to suport opposition group while in 2015 Russia then responded to the U.S. action by deploying its military troops in order to support the regime of Bashar Al Assad. This research is aimed to explain the motives of why Russia involved in the Syrian armed conflict. The research used qualitative method and Offensive Realism Theory by John J. Mearsheimer. The result of this research is that the involvement of Russia was meant to exercise its geopolitical influence in the Middle East and to repress the expansion of U.S. influence in Syria.]]>
<![CDATA[Analisis Kepatuhan Dalam Implementasi Kerjasama Indonesia-Tiongkok Menangani Kasus Penyelundupan Narkoba Melalui Jalur Laut Pada Tahun 2012-2015 ]]>
<![CDATA[Wardani, Ella Aditya]]>;
<![CDATA[Utomo, Tri Cahyo]]>;
<![CDATA[Wahyudi, Fendy Eko]]>
<![CDATA[ Journal of International Relations Volume 4, Nomor 2, Tahun 2018 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[International Relations, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Diponegoro ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (262.911 KB)
<![CDATA[The higher number of drugs users in Indonesia, indicated that drugs smuggling inIndonesia is also increasing. The paths that used by drug traffickers also change by seabecause the sea lane is considered a safe path and can generate more profits compared toother routes. One of the biggest drugs suppliers in Indonesia is China. Therefore, both theGovernment of Indonesia and the Chinese Government agreed to create a cooperation thatis contained in the form of a Memorandum of Understanding. This study analyzed how thecompliance of Indonesia and China in running the Memorandum of Understanding that hasbeen formed in dealing with cases of drugs smuggling through the sea. The author will usethe theory of compliance from Ronald B. Mitchell and seen from the point of view ofIndonesia because Indonesia is a destination country of drugs smugglers from China. Acompliance is closely related to the effectiveness of a form of cooperation. The compliancehere will be measured based on the implementation of the MoU. Indicators of theimplementation are seen from the outputs, outcomes, and impacts of the cases raised.]]>
<![CDATA[UNITED STATES’ UNWAVERING SUPPORT TO ISRAEL: BIASED FOREIGN POLICY IN ISRAEL-PALESTINE CONFLICT UNDER PRESIDENT DONALD TRUMP’S ADMINISTRATION (2016-2019) ]]>
<![CDATA[Soekarno, Anisah Amalia]]>;
<![CDATA[Utomo, Tri Cahyo]]>
<![CDATA[ Journal of International Relations Volume 5, Nomor 3, Tahun 2019 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[International Relations, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Diponegoro ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (966.496 KB)
<![CDATA[Human Rights has been a prominent topics in contemporary international relations. The United States has long been a leader in the development and enforcement of international Human Rights regime. But there are controversies on how The U.S. conduct its policies related to Human Rights. The international society has acknowledge U.S.’ double standard practices. This kind of attitudes can be found in regard of U.S. policy in Israel-Palestine conflict. For many years, despite its support towards human rights, the U.S. has been biased favoring Israel which reflected in its foreign policy related to this matter. The U.S. has supports whatever Israel do, backing its leader’s actions, and even protecting Israel from the accusation of Human Rights violations in international arena. This biased attitudes are far deeper under President Donald Trump’s administration. This research aims to analyze why this attitude happen and try to explain factors behind biased foreign policy conducted by the U.S. regarding Israel-Palestine conflict. This research will use Neoclassical Realism’s perspective in analyzing the factors behind U.S. unwavering supports towards Israel. The result of this research indicates that the U.S.’ foreign policy is influenced by systemic as well as domestic factors, which help to explain its biased attitudes in Israel-Palestine conflict that favor Israel.]]>
<![CDATA[Analisis Konflik Sudan dan Sudan Selatan Pasca Referendum Pemisahan Diri Sudan Selatan dari Sudan ]]>
<![CDATA[Cahyanti, Putri]]>;
<![CDATA[Utomo, Tri Cahyo]]>;
<![CDATA[Paramasatya, Satwika]]>
<![CDATA[ Journal of International Relations Volume 3, Nomor 4, Tahun 2017 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[International Relations, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Diponegoro ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (607.334 KB)
<![CDATA[Conflict is a circumstance which conflict actors such as individuals or groups have dispute between each other to gain the same goal(s). Conflict actors may use violent or peaceful means to settle the conflict. One way to end it is to use referendum of secession if conflict happens within a state territory. South Sudan did referendum of secession in 2011 due to prolonged conflict with Sudan since 1955. But in fact, after South Sudan's independence, conflicts have continued between Sudan and South Sudan such as oil conflicts and border conflicts. This research’s aim is to know why Sudan and South Sudan still in conflict even after South Sudan did referendum of secession in 2011. This research use The Conflict Triangle theory and Conflict Dynamcis theory and is qualitative type that intend to understand social phenomenon. The research results are Sudan and South Sudan still in conflict even after South Sudan’s secession because both parties has not reach agreement in South Sudan’s oil transit price that will be exported through Port Sudan, both parties are accused in funding the rebel forces in each territory, and there is no agreement yet regarding border area especially Abyei. Author suggest Sudan and South Sudan should immediately discuss their conflict over border area so that conflict source can be resolved properly and dialogue between both parties should be necessary so there will be no misunderstandings abouth funding the rebel forces in each territory.]]>
<![CDATA[15. ANALISIS KEBIJAKAN PEMERINTAH AMERIKA SERIKAT ERA PRESIDEN BARACK OBAMA TERHADAP PRAKTIK FORCED LABOUR DI INDUSTRI PERIKANAN THAILAND 2009-2014 ]]>
<![CDATA[Abdurrasyid, Muhammad Naufal]]>;
<![CDATA[Utomo, Tri Cahyo]]>;
<![CDATA[P, Shary Charlotte]]>
<![CDATA[ Journal of International Relations Volume 2, Nomor 3, Tahun 2016 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[International Relations, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Diponegoro ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (442.897 KB)
<![CDATA[Thailand is the third largest fishery products exporter to the United States. There are twoThailand's fishery products that has a large proportion of the United States imports, cannedtuna controls 51% of the total imports and shrimp with 11%. Both products are the type offish that is most widely consumed in the United States. Behind the magnitude of Thailand'srole in the supply of fisheries products to the United States there is a fact that most of theseproducts are produced through forced labor practices. Under its domestic law, namely Section307 of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff Act of 1930 the government prohibited to import productsproduced by forced labor, however the US government ignores the law and keeping theimport policy towards Thailand. This study tries to analyze the policy by using descriptiveanalytical research. Based on wide range data related to the supply and consumption offishery products in the United States along with realism theory argument about policy makingthat prioritize self-interest, this study found that US government policy to ignores theirnational law and keeping the import policy towards Thailand was influenced by their nationalinterest to ensure food security for its people.]]>
<![CDATA[Analisis Implementasi Kerja Sama Filipina dan Amerika Serikat dalam Penanggulangan Aksi Terorisme di Filipina ]]>
<![CDATA[Wardani, Linda Ayu]]>;
<![CDATA[Utomo, Tri Cahyo]]>
<![CDATA[ Journal of International Relations Volume 4, Nomor 4, Tahun 2018 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[International Relations, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Diponegoro ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (171.412 KB)
<![CDATA[Terrorist acts in the Philippines come from terrorist groups such as MNLF, MILF, JI, NPA, and ASG, who have existed long before the events of 9/11 that hit United States. Not only are they created a number of losses to the Philippines but also to the United States. Military or non-military counter-terrorism cooperation with the United States is one of the Philippines' efforts to overcome the terror of these groups. This study aims to determine the implementation of counter-terrorism cooperation between the Philippines and the United States in dealing with act of terrorism in the Philippines from 2010-2016. This research was analyzed by using the framework of liberalism. This research was done by using qualitative research method with descriptive research type. The results of this study indicate that counter-terrorism cooperation between the Philippines and the United States has been quite successful as evidenced by the approval of military cooperation with the establishment of the JSOTF-P program to train AFP and PNP SAF, then ATA programs to train PNP SAF. In addition, from non-military cooperation, the humanitarian and development assistance from USAID is also used to build Mindanao communities, especially those affected by act of terrorism. However, the cooperation has not completely reduced the high number of terrorist attacks and captured all the most wanted terrorists in the Philippines.]]>
<![CDATA[Identitas dalam Hubungan Internasional: Dilema Kebijakan Luar Negeri Finlandia Dalam Krisis Ukraina 2014 ]]>
<![CDATA[Margareth, Fitri Kamelia]]>;
<![CDATA[Utomo, Tri Cahyo]]>;
<![CDATA[Rosyidin, Mohamad]]>
<![CDATA[ Journal of International Relations Volume 3, Nomor 4, Tahun 2017 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[International Relations, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Diponegoro ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (532.424 KB)
<![CDATA[This research aims to explain why Finland did not play role as peacemaker in UkraineCrisis. The great contribution on mediating conflicts in international relation has made Finland plays role as peacemaker, a country who being well known with their peace action.But as Ukraine Crisis occurs, Finland only helps by sending foreign aid and giving advice toRussia and Ukraine to arrange a mediation, without present itself as the mediator. Usingconstructivist approaches, this research argues that there is identity conflict betweenFinland’s identity as a peacemaker and as a member of The European Union which isagainst Russia. The strong solidarity between The European Union and Finland causedFinland tends to support The European Union’s decision to impose economic sanctionagainst Russia, instead of mediating the conflict. This research confirms a constructivist assumption that states must consider their identities in determining foreign policy, so they will not turned dilemma when they face a situation where they need to use more than one identity to conduct foreign policy.]]>
