Articles
<![CDATA[Faktor-Faktor Manuver Politik Qatar dalam Penguatan Aliansi dengan Iran Pasca Kasus Krisis Diplomatik Qatar tahun 2017 ]]>
<![CDATA[Cahyani, Sukma Bintang]]>;
<![CDATA[Utomo, Tri Cahyo]]>
<![CDATA[ Journal of International Relations Volume 5, Nomor 3, Tahun 2019 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[International Relations, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Diponegoro ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (913.34 KB)
<![CDATA[Qatar as a small and wealthy country in the Persian Gulf was being hit by serious diplomatic crisis in the past 2017. The Crisis began when Saudi Arabia, Uni Arab Emirat, Bahrain, and Egypt (named as anti Qatar-quartet) accused Qatar for supporting terrorist group and Its alliance with Iran by doing blockade and terminated their diplomatic relations to Qatar. Some resolution efforts have been made to solve the conflict which happened inside the GCC. It was failed, included mediation from Kuwait. This conflict resolution efforts were leaving 13 demands from anti-Qatar Quartet that hurting the independence and sovereignty of Qatar, especially the demand of shutting down Al-Jazeera, to cut relations with Ikhwanul Muslimin and Iran. The real problem started when Qatar rejected those 13 demands and contrary has strengthening its alliance with Iran. The purpose of this research is to explain what are the driving factors of Qatar to take the political risk by strengthening its alliance with Iran rather than recovering its diplomatic relations with anti-Qatar Quartet by comply the 13 demands. The main argument of this research believes that Qatar as a small country is being weakened by the strong power of quartet. It causes the imbalance of power between them so Qatar choose to strengthens its alliance with Iran to increase its power in the crisis to confront the power of anti-Qatar Quartet threats. This research is analyzed using the concept of bandwagoning in the theory framework of neo-realist’s balance of power with qualitative descriptive research methods by using interview and literature review. The Qatar’s alliance strengthening with Iran will be explained by four factors based on theory analysis, such as: security factor, the inefficiency of GCC’s factor, The Trump’s factor and the LNG’S factor. The result is proved that the bandwagon effort of Qatar to Iran in the diplomatic crisis 2017 became the strategic solution for Qatar. In the end Qatar were able to survive and obtain its own security.Together with Iran, Qatar managed to increase its power to face the threats of Anti-Qatar Quartet and keep surviving in the regional structure.]]>
<![CDATA[29. PERBANDINGAN KEBIJAKAN KOREA SELATAN ERA LEE MYUNG BAK DAN PARK GEUN HYE TERHADAP JEPANG TERKAIT ISU KUIL YASUKUNI SEBAGAI SIMBOL KEJAHATAN PERANG ]]>
<![CDATA[Fiqri, Harry]]>;
<![CDATA[Utomo, Tri Cahyo]]>;
<![CDATA[Hanura, Marten]]>
<![CDATA[ Journal of International Relations Volume 2, Nomor 4, Tahun 2016 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[International Relations, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Diponegoro ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (244.649 KB)
<![CDATA[South Korea and Japan are often involve in dynamics relationship which’s effected by thepast issue that bind both of them. That issue is about the existence of Yasukuni Shrine, theshrine became controversy because South Korea believe that the shrine represent Japan’sbrutality during World War II and colonialism were happened. The existence of theTemple stoked tensions and a critcism response from South Korea. Through this issue,South Korea want all of the problem that involve Japan in the past such as ComfortWomen, history text books, and the ownership of Dokdo / Takeshima to be settled. Thepurpose of this study are to compare the foreign policy of Lee Myung Bak and the ParkGeun Hye as the President of South Korea towards the issue of Yasukuni Shrine as asymbol of war crimes. Writer uses neo realism perspective for the theory. For the methodof research writer uses descriptive analytic and qualitative data analysis. The result of theresearch explain the similarity of foreign policy by President Lee Myung Bak andPresident Park Geun Hye and also the difference of foreign policy towards YasukuniShrine Issue as the symbolistic of war crime.]]>
<![CDATA[Penanganan Illegal Tapping, Illegal Drilling dan Penyelewengan Bahan Bakar Minyak (BBM) Bersubsidi di Indonesia Tahun 2011-2015 ]]>
<![CDATA[Lioty, Riyandani Rahmadiah]]>;
<![CDATA[Utomo, Tri Cahyo]]>;
<![CDATA[Pattipeilohy, Shary Charlotte]]>
<![CDATA[ Journal of International Relations Volume 3, Nomor 4, Tahun 2017 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[International Relations, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Diponegoro ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (600.91 KB)
<![CDATA[Oil stealing with illegal tapping, illegal drilling and misusing of fuel subsidy mode had often occurred in the period of 2011 until 2015 in Indonesia. Indonesia incurred losses as much as ten billions every year. It was important to find out the efforts of Indonesia government because in 2011 until 2015, the number of stealing oil not only increased but also decreased. This research used qualitative method that tried to explain the efforts of Indonesia government. Furthermore, the efforts of Indonesia government were analyzed to find out the main factor why oil stealing still happened until present. The Institutional liberal theory was used for answering these phenomenon. The result showed that the efforts of Indonesia government were not enough. Indonesia government only focused on oil stealing and smuggling in domestic area, so it was the reason why oil stealing still happened in Indonesia. The international illegal oil trade syndicate that could not handle was the main reason related to oil stealing. Therefore, multilateral cooperation called institutional or regime cooperation that specifically against the international illegal oil trade syndicate was needed.]]>
<![CDATA[THE MILITARY ESCALATION BY THE ARCTIC FIVE MEMBERS IN THE ARCTIC OVER THE PERIOD OF 2007 - 2019 ]]>
<![CDATA[Jayanti, Benita Sashia]]>;
<![CDATA[Utomo, Tri Cahyo]]>
<![CDATA[ Journal of International Relations Volume 5, Nomor 2, Tahun 2019 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[International Relations, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Diponegoro ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (1004.103 KB)
<![CDATA[The Arctic recently has shifted into one of the most appealing topic to be debated in terms of International Politics. The Arctic Five, membered by the United States, Denmark, Canada, Norway, and Russia are undergoing military escalation in the Arctic. Some precedings reports have linked the correlation between the military escalation with the dispute of territorial claims and the abundant of natural resources lying under the bottom of the Arctic Ocean. Perceiving that early conclusion given to this case, writer is being skeptical. The main object of this research is to discover the driven factors causing the military escalation in the Arctic. Throughout the research, writer analyses the case using the defensive realism theory with qualitative method and descriptive research by using literature review. At the end of the research, result is pointing out that the territorial dispute and natural resource are not the main driving factors causing the military escalation. The military escalation is not being used to threat other countries and it is only part of the capabilities fulfillment which has to be done by every country to attain the maximum security and survive within the anarchical international system.]]>
<![CDATA[Isu Kejahatan Perang dalam Penyelesaian Konflik Azerbaijan-Armenia Memperebutkan Nagorno-Karabakh ]]>
<![CDATA[Febriani, Herlan]]>;
<![CDATA[Utomo, Tri Cahyo]]>;
<![CDATA[Paramasatya, Satwika]]>
<![CDATA[ Journal of International Relations Volume 4, Nomor 1, Tahun 2018 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[International Relations, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Diponegoro ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (261.367 KB)
<![CDATA[The conflict between Azerbaijan and Armenia over Nagorno-Karabakh began with territorial disputes. Nagorno-Karabakh has de facto recognition as Azerbaijan territory, but 95% of its population is Armenian. The relations between both countries continued to tense after a ceasefire in 1994. War crimes issue also affected these two states conflict resolution. This research discusses conflict resolution efforts by Azerbaijan and Armenia and the effect of war crimes issue on their conflict resolution efforts from 2006 to 2015 with the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE) as mediator. This research is carried out by using descriptive-explanative and qualitative method. This study incorporates the framework of Galtung’s triangle conflict theory and conflict resolution concepts to observe the effect of war crimes issue in conflict resolution between Azerbaijan and Armenia. This study found that the war crimes issue which affected the conflict resolution created the unconducive situation for negotiation. Therefore, it is necessary for those parties to build trust and to reaffirm the importance of international law and international humanitarian law enforcement, also putting conscience as the embodiment of a civilized society.]]>
<![CDATA[EFEKTIVITAS CODE OF CONDUCT FOR RESPONSIBLE FISHERIES DI SAMUDERA HINDIA STUDI KASUS: KERJASAMA INDONESIA DAN AUSTRALIA MENANGGULANGI ILLEGAL UNREGULATED UNREPORTED (IUU) FISHING ]]>
<![CDATA[Salfauz, Claudiya Radekna]]>;
<![CDATA[Utomo, Tri Cahyo]]>;
<![CDATA[Putranti, Ika Riswanti]]>
<![CDATA[ Journal of International Relations Volume 1, Nomor 2, Tahun 2015 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[International Relations, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Diponegoro ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (261.031 KB)
<![CDATA[Illegal fishing has become an important issue because it threatens themaritime security. The activity of illegal unregulated unreported(IUU) fishing in the Indian Ocean not only does it jeopardize themaritime security of Indonesia and Australia, but also does it causefinancial deficit to the country, moreover, if the activity of IUU fishingkeeps increasing it will endanger the sustainability both fish andenvironment. The situation encourages member countries of Food andAgriculture Organization (FAO) in devising an applicable concept tomany countries in the world regarding organized, responsible, andsustainable fisheries management and development, namely Code ofConduct for Responsible Fisheries (CCRF) which was settled in 1995.The activity of IUU Fishing in the Indian Ocean initiates Indonesiaand Australia to conduct a fisheries cooperation agreement toprevent, deter and eliminate illegal fishing in the Indian Ocean.Indonesia and Australia adopt the CCRF into the fisheries treaty. Thisresearch aims to identify the efficacy of CCRF implementation in thefisheries cooperation agreement between Indonesia and AustraliaGovernment to cope with IUU fishing. The result of the researchshows that CCRF as a regime is able to work effectively to cope withIUU fishing in the Indian Ocean.]]>
<![CDATA[Doktrin Poros Maritim Dunia Era Jokowi dan Keamanan di Bidang Maritim Studi Kasus: Perdagangan Narkotika Jalur Laut Tahun 2014-2018 ]]>
<![CDATA[Hakiki, Nur]]>;
<![CDATA[Utomo, Tri Cahyo]]>
<![CDATA[ Journal of International Relations Volume 5, Nomor 4, Tahun 2019 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[International Relations, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Diponegoro ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (218.953 KB)
<![CDATA[Immediately after being elected in 2014, President Joko Widodo put forward the desire to makeIndonesia's sea territory the main policy focus. This is implemented by issuing the doctrine ofthe "Global Maritime Axis". President Jokowi also launched a development agenda focusingon five pillars, one of which concerns maritime security. Narcotics trafficking through the seais one of the various threats to maritime security in Indonesia. This is also exacerbated by thestatus of Indonesia which is called a narcotics emergency. This research aims to analyze theimpact of the "Global Maritime Axis" doctrine on maritime security, as seen from thedevelopment of cases of trafficking in narcotics through the sea that occurred in 2014 to 2018.This research uses the concept of maritime security in understanding the policies of PresidentJokowi's government in dealing with narcotics trafficking by sea. This research analyzes theimpact of the global maritime axis doctrine on government policies, both internal andinternational cooperation. The results of this research indicate that the policies issued by thegovernment have a positive influence, but are still not optimal in dealing with the problem oftrafficking in narcotics through the sea that occurred in the period of 2014 to 2018. This isbecause there are limitations in terms of facilities and infrastructure, the lack of coordinationbetween the parties involved, and the cooperation that is carried out mostly is still at an earlystage and has not shown significant results.]]>
<![CDATA[9. PERAN INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION FOR MIGRATION (IOM) DALAM MENANGANI HUMAN TRAFFICKING DI UKRAINA PADA TAHUN 2010-2014 ]]>
<![CDATA[I.G, Sukmastuti Putri]]>;
<![CDATA[Utomo, Tri Cahyo]]>;
<![CDATA[Hanura, Marten]]>
<![CDATA[ Journal of International Relations Volume 2, Nomor 2, Tahun 2016 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[International Relations, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Diponegoro ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (329.424 KB)
<![CDATA[Ukraine is a former Soviet country located in the Eastern Europe with strategicgeographical and geopolitical advantage as the country directly borders Asia and Europe.During 1990, due to poverty and law employment, many Ukrainian women migrated andthus created a market for human trafficking. Ukraine is placed the 2nd tier watch by the USbecause the Ukrainian government does not follow the minimum standard for reducinghuman trafficking although significant effort has been made to adhere to the minimumstandard stated. IOM is an NGO that has become Ukrainian’s biggest partner in combatinghuman trafficking. Since 2000, the IOM office in Ukraine has been the center to give helpto the victims of human trafficking. This research aim to take a closer look at the humantrafficking cases in Ukraine. Case studies and interviews have been a method used tounderstand the role of IOM in overcoming such cases from 2010 to 2014. The study foundthat IOM has played a big part I helping Ukrainian government combatting humantrafficking, in that organization has helped reducing victims and increasing regulation from2010 to 2014.]]>
<![CDATA[Usaha Malsindo Trilateral Coordinated Patrol dalam Menangani Perampokan Bersenjata di Selat Malaka ]]>
<![CDATA[Indriani Wijaya, Sri Magfirah]]>;
<![CDATA[Utomo, Tri Cahyo]]>;
<![CDATA[Puspapertiwi, Sheiffi]]>
<![CDATA[ Journal of International Relations Volume 3, Nomor 4, Tahun 2017 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[International Relations, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Diponegoro ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (405.49 KB)
<![CDATA[The strategic location of the Strait of Malacca makes it one of the busiest straits in the world. The Malacca Strait serves as a channel for the distribution of oil and natural gas as a need for energy security and world trade commodities through the sea. But the high activity in the Strait is not balanced with security guarantees. Therefore, the cooperation of coastal countries is needed to maintain the security of the waters around the Strait of Malacca. Indonesia, Malaysia and Singapore formed cooperation to handle armed robbery in Malacca Strait in 2004 named Malsindo. The type of this research is analytic describtive using qualitative method to apply neoliberalism theory. This research is aimed to know the reason measures to combat armed robbery cases in Malacca Strait between 2004-2013. The result of this research finds that measures taken by coastal country to combat armed robbery consists of Malacca Strait Sea Patrol (MSP) which was launched in 2004, Eyes in The Sky (EIS) which was launched in 2005 and MSP-IS in 2006.]]>
<![CDATA[OPERASI ATALANTA OLEH UNI EROPA DI TELUK ADEN DALAM MENANGANI PEROMPAK SOMALIA PERIODE TAHUN 2009-2013 ]]>
<![CDATA[Prasetyo, Hafid Dwi]]>;
<![CDATA[Utomo, Tri Cahyo]]>;
<![CDATA[Farabi, Nadia]]>
<![CDATA[ Journal of International Relations Volume 2, Nomor 1, Tahun 2016 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[International Relations, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Diponegoro ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (567.724 KB)
<![CDATA[European Union departed Operation Atalanta in the Gulf of Aden, acollective navy operation by European Union’s member countries. Theobjective of Operation Atalanta is to combat Somali piracy in the Gulf ofAden. The background of this research is based on piracy cases thathappened in the Gulf of Aden by Somali pirates. Research questions of thisresearch are why did European Union decide to launch Operation Atalantain the Gulf of Aden, and how do they manage combating Somali piracy. Inorder to answer the research questions, the paradigm of liberal institualismis applied as the theoretical framework. This framework is linked to theconcept of regional security and collective action. Through the framework,the answers are concluded that Operation Atalanta appears to be EuropeanUnion’s effort regarding the United Nations Security Council’s resolutionin combating Somali piracy. Moreover, the main mandate of OperationAtalanta is to protect the shipping of food aid from World FoodProgramme to Somalia. The main focus of this research is regarding theEuropean Union’s strategy through Operation Atalanta to combat Somalipiracy in the Gulf of Aden, and the impact given by Operation Atalanta inthe Gulf of Aden. Operation Atalanta has given a positive impact in theGulf of Aden. The number of piracy cases has declined and the situation inthe area of the Gulf of Aden has gotten more secured, and the mandates ofOperation Atalanta have been fulfilled.]]>
