Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : JURNAL MAGISTER HUKUM UDAYANA

Indonesian Clean Water Availability in SDGs: Analysis of Emerging Legal Problems Shelvi Rusdiana; Ninne Zahara Silviani; Sri Zanariyah; Ratna Kumala Sari
Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) Vol 12 No 4 (2023)
Publisher : University of Udayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24843/JMHU.2023.v12.i04.p01

Abstract

The right to access clean water is a fundamental human right and an important part of SDGs. Indonesia as a country committed to developing SDGs-compliant policies to respond to climate challenges need to make sure that it has enough normative support from its legal framework. Using normative legal research method, this study analyzes the emerging legal problems regarding the Indonesian government’s responsibility to provide clean water to its citizens. To support the analysis, this study employs the statutory approach to find the normative problems contributing to a number of possible legal problems that might hinder Indonesia’s commitment to SDGs, particularly the one to make sure that every person has the right to access clean water. Analysis of this research finds that there are normative confusions within the Indonesian legal framework that are related to the government’s responsibility in providing access to clean water, along with the urgency to tackle to these normative issues to better deal with the emerging legal problems, in the face of climate change.
Political Rights of Ex-Corruptors vis a vis Electoral Integrity in Indonesia Rusdiana, Shelvi; Hotmaulana Hutauruk, Rufinus; Fitri, Winda; Jaya, Febri
Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) Vol 14 No 1 (2025)
Publisher : University of Udayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24843/JMHU.2025.v14.i01.p13

Abstract

This study investigates the normative inconsistency vis a vis the political rights of ex-corruption convicts and the principle of electoral integrity within the framework of Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), particularly SDG 16, in Indonesia. The problem addressed centers on whether allowing individuals convicted of corruption to participate as election candidates aligns with democratic values and sustainable governance. While inclusivity is a key component of both democracy and SDG 16, this research critically examines the extent to which such inclusivity may conflict with the imperative of maintaining public trust and ethical standards in political leadership. Employing a normative legal research method supported by a statutory approach, the study analyzes Indonesian legal instruments. The research identifies a significant legal paradox: integrity is mandated for election officials but not for legislative or presidential candidates. This discrepancy raises critical questions regarding the consistency and credibility of Indonesia’s democratic processes. Findings indicate that allowing ex-corruption convicts to run for office undermines public confidence, hampers political regeneration, and dilutes the ethical foundation of electoral integrity. The analysis also reveals that an uncritical application of SDG 16 as a justification for political inclusivity may inadvertently legitimize impunity and erode democratic accountability. The study calls for urgent legal reforms to align candidacy requirements with broader democratic and developmental objectives. By reinforcing integrity as a universal qualification for public office, Indonesia can uphold the principles of justice, restore electoral legitimacy, and promote sustainable political development.