Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
4.06
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal FIAT JUSTISIA: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum MONOGRAF Jurnal Cita Hukum Jurnal IUS (Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan) PADJADJARAN Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law) Jurnal Konstitusi JURNAL EDUCATION AND DEVELOPMENT Jurnal Jatiswara Sosio Dialektika Indonesia Berdaya Jurnal Kompilasi Hukum Jurnal Rechts Vinding : Media Pembinaan Hukum Nasional Unram Journal of Community Service (UJCS) Jurnal Konstitusi Jurnal Risalah Kenotariatan Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan Jurnal Hukum Mimbar Justitia Mataram Journal of International Law
Muh. Risnain
Facully Of Law University Of Mataram
Religion Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Arts Humanities Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Health Professions Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Medicine & Pharmacology Nursing Public Health Social Sciences Veterinary Other

Published : 52 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 52 Documents
Search

 2   3   4   5   6 
IDEAS FOR STRENGTHENING SUPREME COURT JUDICIAL REVIEW AUTHORITY IN REVIEW OF REGIONAL REGULATIONS Risnain, Muh
Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan Vol 9 No 3 (2020)
Publisher : Pusat Strategi Kebijakan Hukum dan Peradilan Mahkamah Agung RI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25216/jhp.9.3.2020.505-522

Abstract

AbstractThe problem of judicial review of regional regulations in the Supreme Court is a serious academic and practical issue that needs to be resolved after the issuance of the decision of the Constitutional Court Number 137 / PUU-XIII / 2015. There are two problems in this paper, first, the legal implications of the Constitutional Court Decision Number 137 / PUU-XIII / 2015 on institutional and legal procedures for judicial review of regional regulations in the Supreme Court, secondly, how is the concept of the Supreme Court judicial review carried out through renewal of procedural law Trial Judicial Review in the Supreme Court? Based on the discussion above, we can conclude two things, first, the legal implications of the Constitutional Court Decision Number 137 / PUU-XIII / 2015 on the institutional and legal procedures for judicial review of regional regulations in the Supreme Court are the stronger and increasing authority of judicial review in Supreme Court. This decision ended the dualism of review of local regulations from judicial review by the Supreme Court and executive review of regional regulations by the Ministry of Home Affairs to only a judicial review by the Supreme Court, also potentially increasing the number of cases of judicial review in the Supreme Court. Second, the concept of the implementation of a judicial review by the Supreme Court is carried out through legal renewal of the judicial review proceedings in the Supreme Court by including several important substances, related to hearings that are open to the public, the existence of a preliminary examination, hearing, verdict and decision making that are more open and fair.Keywords: Regional Regulation, Judicial Review, and Reformation  ABSTRAKProblem judicial review Perda di Mahkamah Agung menjadi persoalan akademik dan praktikal serius yang perlu dipecahkan pascakeluarnya putusan Mahkamah konstitusi Nomor 137/PUU-XIII/2015. Terdapat dua masalah dalam tulisan ini, pertama, implikasi hukum Putusan Mahkamah konstitusi Nomor 137/PUU-XIII/2015 terhadap kelembagaan dan hukum acara judicial review perda di mahkamah agung, kedua, bagaimanakah konsep pelaksanaan judicial review perda oleh mahkamah agung dilakukan melalui pembaharuan hukum acara persidangan judicial review di mahkamah agung?. Berdasarkan pembahasan di atas maka dapat disimpulkan dua hal , pertama, implikasi hukum Putusan Mahkamah konstitusi Nomor 137/PUU-XIII/2015 terhadap kelembagaan dan hukum acara judicial review perda di mahkamah agung adalah semakin kuat dan meningkatnya kewenangan judicial review di mahakamah agung. Putusan ini mengakhiri dualisme review perda dari judicial review oleh MA dan executive review perda oleh kemendagri menjadi hanya judicial review oleh Mahkamah Agung, juga berpotensi meningkatkan jumlah perkara judicial review perda di mahkamah agung. Kedua, konsep pelaksanaan judicial review perda oleh mahkamah agung dilakukan melalui pembaharuan hukum acara persidangan judicial review di mahkamah agung dengan memasukan beberapa substansi penting, terkait sidang yang terbuka untuk umum, adanya proses pemeriksaan pendahuluan, pemeriksaan persidangan, pembuktian dan pengambilan putusan yang lebih terbuka dan fair.Kata Kunci : Peaturan Daerah, JudicialReview, dan Pembaharuan.
The Legal Force of the International Court of Justice Decision on the Appeals Dispute: (Case Study: ICJ Decision No. 173 on the Appeals Dispute between Bahrain, Saudi Arabia, Egypt, and the UAE versus Qatar) Hafina Haula Arsy; Risnain, Muh; Guna Nugraha, Lalu
Mataram Journal of International Law Vol. 1 No. 2 (2023): Mataram Journal of International Law
Publisher : Department of Law, Faculty of Law, University of Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29303/majil.v1i2.3663

Abstract

The Statute of the International Court of Justice does not include provisions regarding the authority or jurisdiction of the International Court to handle appellate cases. However, in practice, the International Court of Justice has issued judgments on appeals related to the ICAO Council's jurisdiction in disputes over flight restrictions in Qatar imposed by Bahrain, Egypt, Saudi Arabia, and the United Arab Emirates (UAE). This study aims to analyze the nature of decisions related to these appellate disputes. The research methodology employed is normative research with a legislative, conceptual, and case study approach. The findings of this research indicate that decisions on appellate cases are deemed final and binding as stipulated in Article 60 of the Statute of the International Court of Justice and Article 86 of the Chicago Convention, and the obligation of UN member states to comply with the judgments of the International Court of Justice is regulated in Article 94 of the United Nations Charter.
THE AUTHORITY OF THE COUNCIL OF REPRESENTATIVES OF THE REPUBLIC OF INDONESIA (DPR RI) IN RATING INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS POST THE RULING OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT (MK) NUMBER 13/PUU-16/2018 Bah Jatun Nadrati; Risnain, Muh; Zunnuraeni
Mataram Journal of International Law Vol. 2 No. 1 (2024): Mataram Journal of International Law
Publisher : Department of Law, Faculty of Law, University of Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29303/majil.v2i1.3862

Abstract

This research aims to find out and understand the meaning of the DPR RI's authority to ratify international agreements based on Constitutional Court Decision No. 13/PUU-16/2018 and to understand and analyze the direction of regulating the authority of the DPR RI in ratifying international agreements after Constitutional Court Decision No. 13/PUU-16/2018. This research method uses a type of normative legal research. The meaning of the DPR RI's authority to ratify international agreements based on Constitutional Court Decision No. 13/PUU-16/2018 expands the definition of DPR approval, which is not limited to the provisions of Article 10 of Law no. 24 of 2000 concerning international agreements, but in all international agreements which have the nature of having broad and fundamental consequences for people's lives related to the financial burden on the state, and requiring changes or formation of laws. The Constitutional Court's decision pertaining to the DPR's authority in ratifying international agreements, the Constitutional Court expanded the meaning of Article 10 by cancelling the Article and returning to the norms contained in article 11 of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia, the Constitutional Court interpreted it extensively. The direction of regulating the authority of the DPR RI in ratifying international agreements after the Constitutional Court decision no. 13/PUU-16/2018 is by changing or replacing the existing norms in article 10 of Law No. 24 of 2000 concerning International Agreements by regulating the substance of international agreements as intended in article 11 of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia and following the pattern of article 84 of Law no. 7 of 2014.
STATE RESPONSIBILITY IN THE DISPOSAL OF RADIOACTIVE SUBSTANCES IN THE ASIA-PACIFIC AREA (Case Study on Japanas Disposal of Nuclear Waste in Fukushima Waters) Annisa Raudlatul Rahmah; Risnain, Muh; Guna Nugraha, Lalu
Mataram Journal of International Law Vol. 2 No. 1 (2024): Mataram Journal of International Law
Publisher : Department of Law, Faculty of Law, University of Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29303/majil.v2i1.4135

Abstract

This research aims to find out and examine Japan's responsibility for disposing of radioactive waste in the waters of the Asia Pacific region and to find out and understand the steps that the IAEA should take in resolving the disposal of radioactive waste in the waters of the Asia Pacific region by Japan. This research method uses a type of normative legal research, namely by taking a conceptual approach and a case approach. The actions taken by Japan give rise to responsibilities that must be fulfilled because they violate obligations in several principles and provisions of international law. Actions in disposing of radioactive by Japan have received approval from the IAEA because the level or content of radioactive waste disposed of by Japan is still classified as safe as per the results of laboratory research carried out by TEPCO and the IAEA.
BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION IN THE EXPLOITATION OF NATURAL RESOURCES IN INTERNATIONAL SEABED AREAS UNDER THE BIODIVERSITY BEYOND NATIONAL JURISDICTION AGREEMENT Ihdal Umam; Risnain, Muh; Zunnuraeni
Mataram Journal of International Law Vol. 2 No. 1 (2024): Mataram Journal of International Law
Publisher : Department of Law, Faculty of Law, University of Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29303/majil.v2i1.4169

Abstract

This research aims to analyze and understand the conservation of biodiversity in international seabed areas based on BBNJ, and to analyze the urgency of the State of Indonesia to ratify the BBNJ Agreement. The research method used is normative legal research. The results show that conservation in the context of the BBNJ (Biodiversity Beyond National Jurisdiction) Agreement includes protection and conservation of natural resources and management. Protection and conservation are regulated through the establishment of area-based management instruments and the requirement of environmental impact assessments for activities on the high seas and the international seabed. Meanwhile, conservation within management is addressed through equitable benefit sharing, technology transfer and capacity building. Therefore, the ratification of the BBNJ Agreement is very important for Indonesia because Indonesia's geographical situation as an archipelago with a large marine area requires effective protection of marine biodiversity, most of which is beyond national jurisdiction. Ratification of the BBNJ Agreement will strengthen national capacity in marine technology, provide better access to marine genetic resources, and strengthen Indonesia's commitment to sustainable ocean management and contribute positively to global ocean governance.
Analysis Of The World Trade Organization Panel Decision Between Indonesia And The European Union In Case Number Ds592 Of 2022 Concerning Restrictions On Exports Of Low-Grade Nickel Ore Zampara Mernissi; Risnain, Muh; Pitaloka, Diva
Mataram Journal of International Law Vol. 1 No. 2 (2023): Mataram Journal of International Law
Publisher : Department of Law, Faculty of Law, University of Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29303/majil.v1i2.4221

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to analyse the suitability of Indonesia's nickel export restriction policy to international trade rules at the WTO and analyse the actions taken by the Indonesian Government following the WTO Panel Decision regarding the nickel export restriction policy. The research method uses the normative-legal research method. The legal approach methods use statutes, cases, international agreements, and conceptual approaches. The legal material sources or types of legal materials use primary and secondary legal materials. The legal material collection technique used is library data. The analysis of legal materials used is a review of statutory regulations and international agreements. The result of the study showed that the panel has decided that Indonesia has violated Article XI:1 GATT 1994 so Indonesia's policy cannot be justified by Articles XI:2 (a) and XX GATT 1994. Indonesia finally appealed the WTO Panel Report Number DS592. Researchers recommend considering the use of the Principles of Permanent Sovereignty over Natural Resources and Special and Different Treatment as a defence for the Indonesian Government. Furthermore, Indonesia can connect the policy of limiting nickel ore exports to the Net Zero Emission’s mission. Retaliation against the EU could be an alternative solution, but with the caveat that the Indonesian Government must ensure that the retaliation is right on target and does not harm the country's economy and the country's politics.
Pembatasan Pembatasan Penggunaan Hak Veto Dewan Keamanan Melalui Mekanisme Uniting for Peace Majelis Umum Perserikatan Bangsa-Bangsa: Restrictions on the Use of Security Council Veto Rights Through the United Nations General Assembly's Uniting for Peace Mechanism Maya, Lailatil; Risnain, Muh; Nugraha, Lalu Guna
Mataram Journal of International Law Vol. 3 No. 1 (2025): Mataram Journal of International Law
Publisher : Department of Law, Faculty of Law, University of Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29303/majil.v3i1.6175

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk; pertama, menganalisis pengaturan hak veto dalam Piagam, dan kedua, menganalisis akibat hukum resolusi Majelis Umum bagi pembatasan penggunaan hak veto Dewan Keamanan. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode normatif dengan menggunakan pendekatan perjanjian internasional, konseptual dan sejarah. Pengumpulan bahan hukum dilakukan dengan studi pustaka dengan memanfaatkan bahan hukum primer, sekunder dan tersier yang kemudian dilanjutkan dengan menggunakan analisis kualitatif preskptif untuk memberikan penilaian terhadap masalah yang sedang diteliti. Simpulan, mekanisme Uniting for Peace mampu mengatasi ketidakmampuan Dewan Keamanan dalam menjalankan tugasnya akibat dari pemberian veto oleh anggota tetap dan memungkinkan tindakan cepat dalam situasi darurat. Namun, resolusi yang dihasilkan bersifat rekomendasi dan tidak mengikat secara hukum, sesuai dengan Article 14 UN Charter dan berakibat pada pelaksanaannya yang tergantung pada negara anggota. Akibat hukum ini membuat kekuatan resolusi Majelis Umum terbatas dan tidak sekuat resolusi Dewan Keamanan, sehingga efektivitasnya dalam membatasi hak veto Dewan Keamanan menjadi lebih terbatas. Di lain sisi, meskipun mampu membatasi kekuasaan hak veto Dewan Keamanan namun dalam pelaksanaannya mekanisme Uniting for Peace memiliki tantangan dalam implementasinya seperti, tidak dilaksanakannya resolusi oleh semua negara karena tidak memiliki kekuatan mengikat, tingginya kepentingan politik diantara negara-negara, munculnya anggapan keberadaan mekanisme Uniting for Peace mengambil kekuasaan Dewan Keamanan yang terdapat dalam ketentuan Article 24 Paragraph one UN Charter untuk menjaga perdamaian dan keamanan dunia, dan yang terakhir adalah karena tidak ada aturan yuridis yang mengadopsi mekanisme ini dalam Piagam.
PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA EKSPOR MINYAK KELAPA SAWIT ANTARA INDONESIA DAN UNI EROPA PADA KASUS DS593 Farhan, Muhammad Ammar; Risnain, Muh; Nugraha, Lalu Guna
Mataram Journal of International Law Vol. 3 No. 1 (2025): Mataram Journal of International Law
Publisher : Department of Law, Faculty of Law, University of Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29303/majil.v3i1.6503

Abstract

Abstrak Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengkaji kesesuaian antara kebijakan penolakan impor minyak kelapa sawit Indonesia melalui Renewable Energy Directive II (RED II) dan Delegected Act Uni Eropa terhadap aturan perdagangan Internasional di WTO. Jenis penelitian yang digunakan adalah penelitian hukum normatif. Metode pendekatan yang digunakan adalah pendekatan perundang-undangan, pendekatan konseptual, dan pendekatan kasus. Sumber bahan hukum yang digunakan adalah bahan hukum primer dan sekunder. Teknik pengumpulan bahan hukum yang digunakan berupa data kepustakaan. Adapun analisis bahan hukum yang digunakan adalah telaah perjanjian Internasional. Hasil dari penelitian ini adalah kebijkan Uni Eropa RED II dan Delegected Act dari persepektif prinsip non diskriminasi bertentangan dengan General Agreement on Tariff and Trade (GATT). Panel DSB telah memutuskan bahwa Uni Eropa melanggar pasal Pasal I:1 GATT 1994, Pasal III:4 GATT 1994, Pasal 2.1 TBT Agreement yang mana ini membuat Uni Eropa dinyatakan kalah dalam putusan panel dengan nomor DS593. Kata Kunci: CPO; MFN; panel; RED II Abstract This study aims to analyze the compatibility between the rejection policy of Indonesia’s palm oil export through Renewable Energy Directive II (RED II) and Delegated Act of European Union towards WTO’s international trade regulation. This study was normative legal research which applied statute, conceptual, and cases approaches. The applicable legal materials were primary and secondary types, and collected with library study. Moreover, they are assesses based on international agreement framework. Result of this study illustrates that European Union’s Red II and Delegated Act policies according to the principle of non-discrimination are in conflict with the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT). The Dispute Settlement Body’s panel declared that the European Union violated the provisions in Article I:1 GATT 1994, Article III:4 GATT 1994, and Article 2.1 TBT Agreement. This resulted in the losses of the EU according to panel decision number DS593. Keywords: CPO; MFN; panel; RED II
PELINDUNGAN DATA PENGGUNA DALAM PENGGUNAAN ALGORITMA OLEH PLATFORM MEDIA SOSIAL Ramadan, Galih; Muhammad Risnain; Lalu Guna Nugraha
Mataram Journal of International Law Vol. 3 No. 2 (2025): Mataram Journal of International Law
Publisher : Department of Law, Faculty of Law, University of Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29303/z9ttkc13

Abstract

Teknologi saat ini mengalami perkembangan terkhusus penggunaan algoritma media sosial. Meningkatnya penggunaan algoritma media sosial oleh platform media sosial beresiko meningkatkan pelanggaran privasi pengguna media sosial. Undang-Undang Nomor 27 Tahun 2022 tentang Pelindungan Data Pribadi dan instrumen internasional seperti GDPR mampu melindungi hak privasi pengguna media sosial dalam konteks pemrosesan data oleh algoritma platform digital, serta menilai mekanisme penegakan hukum administratif, perdata, dan pidana yang tersedia bagi pengguna media sosial jika terjadi penyalahgunaan data pribadi. Penelitian ini adalah hukum normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan (statute approach), konseptual (conceptual approach), perjanjian internasional (international treaty approach), dan studi kasus (case approach) menunjukkan bahwa meski UU PDP telah mengadopsi prinsip GDPR, implementasinya terhambat oleh rendahnya kesadaran pengguna dan kapasitas pengawasan, belum ada kewajiban transparansi atau audit algoritma sehingga potensi bias tetap tinggi, dan upaya represif terhadap pelanggar platform masih jarang dijalankan. Perlu adanya harmonisasi hukum nasional dengan kerangka hukum internasional, pembentukan lembaga independen, dan pengaturan yang eksplisit mengenai algoritma media sosial.
IMPLIKASI ADVISORY OPINION MAHKAMAH INTERNASIONAL TENTANG KONSEKUENSI HUKUM PENDUDUKAN ISRAEL ATAS WILAYAH PALESTINA Azmi Nasyath Nabila; Muh Risnain; Ayu Riska Amalia
Mataram Journal of International Law Vol. 3 No. 2 (2025): Mataram Journal of International Law
Publisher : Department of Law, Faculty of Law, University of Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29303/r3qjkf40

Abstract

On July 19th 2024, the International Court of Justice issued an advisory opinion affirming that Israel's occupation of Palestinian territories is illegal under international law. The opinion states that Israel has violated the principle of prohibition of acquisition of territory by force and the right of the Palestinian people to self-determination. Although non-binding, the advisory opinion has high normative power and provides a legal and moral basis for states and international organizations to act. This research aims to analyze the legal consequences and obligations of UN member states arising from the opinion, as well as to evaluate its effectiveness in promoting the resolution of international disputes. The method used is normative legal research with an international treaty, case, conceptual, and historical approach. Legal materials were collected through literature review and analyzed qualitatively. The results of theresearch indicate that although this opinion is not legally binding, it remains an important instrument in clarifying the legal status of an action, strengthening the legitimacy of the Palestinian diplomatic struggle, and encouraging global collective action. However, its substantial implementation is still hindered by international political factors, such as the fragmentation of member states' positions. Therefore, collective efforts are needed to strengthen the influence of advisory opinions in the enforcement of international law.
Co-Authors Abuzar . Amar Tyanto Annisa Raudlatul Rahmah Asmara, M. Galang Ayu Riska Amalia Azmi Nasyath Nabila Bah Jatun Nadrati Diva Pitaloka Djumardin, Djumardin Dwi Putro, Widodo Erwin, Yulias Fani Shania Putri Farhan Farhan, Muhammad Ammar Galang Asmara Galang Asmara, Galang Gatot Dwi Hendro W Gatot Dwi Hendro Wibowo Gatot Dwi Hendro Wibowo, Gatot Dwi Hendro Guna Nugraha, Lalu Hafina Haula Arsy Harun, Andi Ihdal Umam Ilham Ilham Imran Imran Irawan Kusumahadi Kaharudin Kaharudin Lalu Guna Nugraha M. Galang Asmara Maya, Lailatil Muhammad Sood, Muhammad Muhammad, Teguh Ernaldi Nata Legawa, Baiq Hemas Nugraha, Lalu Guna Parman, Lalu Pitaloka, Diva Rajab Fadli, Muhamad Ramadan, Galih Rodliyah Rodliyah RR. Cahyowati Sekarningrum, Elvira Alya Sembiring, Rinawati Sirtufillaeli Sri Karyati Suadi, Amran Sukma W, Pebriana Putri Wahyudi, Ikhsan Wardhana, Yunanto Estika Widodo Dwi Putro Yunanto Estika Wardhana Zampara Mernissi Zunnuraeni Zunnuraeni, Zunnuraeni