Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
4.293
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal LAW REFORM International Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research Jurnal Konstitusi Jurnal Yudisial Jurnal Muara Ilmu Sosial, Humaniora, dan Seni Jurnal Hukum Adigama Devotion: Journal of Research and Community Service Jurnal Konstitusi Indonesian Journal of Multidisciplinary Science Journal Of World Science Journal of Comprehensive Science Journal of Social Science INJURITY: Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies Jurnal Indonesia Sosial Sains Lex Publica Eduvest - Journal of Universal Studies Rechtsnormen Journal of Law JURNAL RETENTUM Asian Journal of Social and Humanities Jurnal Greenation Sosial dan Politik Journal of Multidisciplinary Sustainability Asean Dialog Legal: Jurnal Syariah, Jurisprudensi dan Tata Negara
Ahmad Redi, Ahmad
Unknown Affiliation
Aerospace Engineering Arts Humanities Astronomy Biochemistry, Genetics & Molecular Biology Chemistry Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Earth & Planetary Sciences Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Electrical & Electronics Engineering Energy Engineering Environmental Science Health Professions Immunology & microbiology Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Materials Science & Nanotechnology Mathematics Neuroscience Physics Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 33 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 33 Documents
Search

 1   2   3   4 
Legal Protection for Dentists Against Unauthorized Video Recording by Patients in Clinical Environments Sarwono, Aditya Pratama; Redi, Ahmad
Journal of Multidisciplinary Sustainability Asean Vol. 1 No. 5 (2024)
Publisher : Yayasan Adra Karima Hubbi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70177/ijmsa.v1i5.1750

Abstract

The widespread use of smartphones with video recording features has significantly impacted interactions in healthcare settings. Unauthorized recordings by patients, especially during clinical interactions, are becoming more common. Such recordings often lead to privacy concerns, legal challenges, and a breakdown of trust. Some patients use these recordings to demand refunds, threatening to make the videos viral if their demands are not met, thereby compromising healthcare professionals' privacy and creating an intimidating atmosphere that affects care quality. This study aims to examine legal protections for dentists against unauthorized recordings by patients, highlighting the need for clear regulations and public education on the rights and responsibilities of healthcare providers and patients. A qualitative approach was used, involving interviews with dentists to explore their experiences with unauthorized recordings. Relevant legal documents were analyzed to understand the current legal framework, and regulations from other countries were compared to evaluate how different jurisdictions address unauthorized recordings in healthcare. The study found that current regulations in Indonesia, such as the Information and Electronic Transactions Law and the Personal Data Protection Law, provide insufficient protections for healthcare providers. Unauthorized recordings by patients often lead to privacy violations and reputational damage to dentists. More explicit regulations are needed to protect healthcare providers from unauthorized recordings, supported by effective enforcement and public education on privacy rights. Clear legal guidelines and proactive policies can better protect healthcare providers and maintain a therapeutic relationship with patients.
Legal Vacancies Regarding Notarial Deeds Made In Foreign Languages Without Official Translation And Their Implications for The Validity Of The Deed Hartati, Titin; Redi, Ahmad
Dialog Legal: Jurnal Syariah, Jurisprudensi dan Tata Negara Vol. 2 No. 1 (2026): Januari
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Syariah Wal Aqidah Ash-Shofa Manonjaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.64367/dialoglegal.v2i1.133

Abstract

In accordance with Article 43 of Law Number 2 of 2014 concerning Amendments to Law Number 30 of 2004 concerning the Position of Notary (UUJN), this study investigates the legal gaps pertaining to the drafting of notarial deeds in foreign languages without an official translation. This phenomenon often occurs in transactions involving foreign parties or cross-border transactions. Although the UUJN stipulates that deeds must be prepared in Indonesian and, if the parties do not understand Indonesian, an official translation must be provided, there are no detailed regulations regarding the legal consequences if this provision is ignored. As a result, legal uncertainty arises that has the potential to reduce the validity of the deed from an authentic deed to a private deed, even triggering the cancellation of the deed in a dispute. This study outlines the existing regulations, identifies the legal gaps, and analyzes their implications from the perspectives of civil law, administrative law, protection of foreign parties, and legal risks for notaries. Several case studies and court decisions indicate differing interpretations regarding the validity of foreign-language deeds without an official translation, indicating the need for clear technical guidelines. Recommendations include revising the UUJN or issuing implementing regulations by the Ministry of Law and Human Rights, as well as implementing the precautionary principle by notaries through sworn translators to ensure legal protection and certainty for the parties. The results are expected to provide an academic basis for policymakers in strengthening regulations governing the language used in notarial deeds.
KOMISI INDEPENDEN PERLINDUNGAN DATA PRIBADI: QUASI PERADILAN DAN UPAYA TERCIPTANYA RIGHT TO BE FORGOTTEN DI INDONESIA Lie, Gunardi; Ramadhan, Dylan Aldianza; Redi, Ahmad
Jurnal Yudisial Vol. 15 No. 2 (2022): HUKUM PROGRESIF
Publisher : Komisi Yudisial RI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29123/jy.v15i2.530

Abstract

ABSTRAK Penyelesaiaan persoalan data pribadi di Indonesia sekarang ini diselesaikan melalui pengadilan negeri, karena belum adanya aturan hukum yang mengatur hadirnya peradilan khusus data pribadi di Indonesia. Hal ini tercermin dalam permasalahan beberapa kasus, seperti Putusan Nomor 438/Pid.Sus/2020/PN.JKT.UTR, kasus a quo yang dijatuhkan berdasar Undang-Undang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik. Putusan Nomor 438/Pid.Sus/2020/ PN.JKT.UTR yang sejatinya juga terdapat ketidaktepatan pada pertanggungjawaban pihak perusahaan. Selain itu ada pula masalah efesiensi dan penegakan hak korban. Kasus ini mencerminkan adanya kesulitan dalam mewujudkan terlaksananya hak yaitu right to be forgotten pada hukum positif di Indonesia. Gambaran membuat satu lembaga independen yang menjadi quasi peradilan dan kelak bisa menegakkan prinsip right to be forgotten di Indonesia, belum lagi kasus data pribadi yang sangat banyak di Indonesia. Hal itu menjadi latar belakang ketertarikan penulis mengulas persoalan ini. Metode penelitian yang digunakan yaitu normatif, dengan beberapa pendekatan yaitu: pendekatan perundang-undangan, pendekatan konseptual, pendekatan historis, pendekatan kasus, dan pendekatan perbandingan. Data yang digunakan dalam penelitian terdiri dari bahan hukum primer, bahan hukum sekunder, dan bahan non hukum. Analisis yang digunakan yaitu kualitatif. Berdasarkan dari analisis dan penelusuran, ditemukan peluang untuk Komisi Perlindungan Data Pribadi ini menjadi quasi peradilan di ranah data pribadi. Analisis berhasil memetakan terkait korelasi kehadiran Komisi Perlindungan Data Pribadi ini dengan penegakan prinsip right to be forgotten, dan quasi yudisial di Indonesia. Kesimpulan ditemukan Komisi Perlindungan Data Pribadi kelak bisa menjadi quasi peradilan perlindungan data di Indonesia dan menegakkan prinsip right to be forgotten. Sebaiknya pemerintah segera menunjuk badan yang menyelenggarakan fungsi Komisi Perlindungan Data Pribadi ini.Kata kunci: quasi peradilan; perlindungan data pribadi; komisi independen; right to be forgotten. ABSTRACTSince there is no statutory regulation governing the special court for personal data, its settlement in Indonesia is currently being resolved in the district court. Reflecting on several decisions, such as Decision Number 438/ Pid.Sus/2020/PN.JKT.UTR, the quo case which was decided by the Information and Electronic Transactions Law, or Decision Number 438/Pid.Sus/2020/PN.JKT.UTR which actually also contains inaccuracies in corporate accountability, not to mention the problem of efficiency and enforcement of victims’ rights. This case reflects the difficulty of realizing the implementation of ‘right to be forgotten’ in positive law in Indonesia. This is like creating an independent institution that becomes a quasi-judicial court capable of upholding the right to be forgotten principle in Indonesia, apart from the many cases of personal data in Indonesia. This is discussed in this analysis using normative research methods, including statutory, conceptual, historical, case-based, and comparative approaches. The research data consisted of primary, secondary, and non legal legal materials, analyzed by qualitative analysis methods. Based on analysis and tracking, the Personal Data Protection Commission has the possibility of becoming quasi judicial in terms of personal data. The analysis succeeded in mapping the correlation between the presence of this Personal Data Protection Commission for enforcing the right to be forgotten, and quasi-judicial principles in Indonesia. In conclusion, the Personal Data Protection Commission might become a quasi-judicial court for data protection in Indonesia and uphold the principle of the right to be forgotten. For this reason, the government should immediately appoint a body that will carry out the functions of this Personal Data Protection Commission. Keywords: quasi-judicial; personal data protection; independent commission; right to be forgotten.
Co-Authors Abdul Kadir Achmad, Suparji Ade Adhari Ahmad Sahroni, Ahmad Arief Fakrulloh, Zudan Azis, Miftakul Bakir, Herman Bakry, Mohammad Ryan Desman, Yose Faisal Santiago, Faisal Fitri, Selvi Relita Haq, Muhammad Alhadi Hartati, Titin HENDRA GUNAWAN B11211055 Isretno Israhadi, Evita KOSUKE MIZUNO, KOSUKE Kristiani, Verlia Lie, Gunardi Marfungah, Luthfi Nasution, Izhar Zahri Nurjana, Nunu Pambudi, Pambudi Parikesit, Satya Bhakti Prathama Pardamean Hutauruk, Kristofel Aditya Purbowati, Lindri Purnamasari, Wita Ramadhan, Dylan Aldianza Ridwan Syaidi Sarwono, Aditya Pratama Setiadi, Elen Situmeang, Ojak Sulaiman, Abdullah Sumartono Sumartono Sungsang, Jamaluddin Suparno Suparno Tiawarman K., Andriansyah Tundjung Herning Sitabuana Wahyu Utami, Widya Wulandari, Santi Yuwono Prianto Zainal Arifin Hoesein