Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
5.071
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal DE JURE Brawijaya Law Journal : Journal of Legal Studies Arena Hukum Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Pancasila dan Kewarganegaraan Jurnal Akta JURNAL HUKUM dan KENOTARIATAN Risalah Hukum International Journal of Environmental, Sustainability, and Social Science International Journal of Business, Law, and Education International Journal of Business, Economics, and Social Development YURISDIKSI : Jurnal Wacana Hukum dan Sains International Journal of Educational Review, Law And Social Sciences (IJERLAS) NEGREI: Academic Journal of Law and Governance IBLAM Law Review International Journal of Humanities Education and Social Sciences International Journal of Islamic Education, Research and Multiculturalism (IJIERM) Warkat RechtIdee Jurnal Hukum dan Pembangunan Asian Journal of Management, Entrepreneurship and Social Science
Djumikasih
Fakultas Hukum Universitas Brawijaya
Religion Aerospace Engineering Arts Humanities Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Health Professions Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Neuroscience Social Sciences Other

Published : 42 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 42 Documents
Search

 1   2   3   4   5 
REPOSITIONING THE VICTIM’S LEGAL STANDING: TRANSFORMING UNLAWFUL ACT LAWSUITS INTO SUBSTANTIVE RESTITUTION EXECUTION CERTAINTY IN ASSAULT CASES UNDER LAW NO. 20 OF 2025." Stefanus Fernandus Pardosi; Faizin Sulistio; Djumikasih
International Journal of Educational Review, Law And Social Sciences (IJERLAS) Vol. 5 No. 6 (2025)
Publisher : CV. RADJA PUBLIKA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54443/ijerlas.v5i6.5094

Abstract

This study examines the paradigm shift in criminal procedure law, moving from an offender-centered focus toward the restoration of victim rights through restitution mechanisms. Article 101 of the old Criminal Procedure is considered to have failed in providing effective justice because it positioned compensation as an "accessory" claim subject to civil procedure. This placed the burden of independent proof on the victim and resulted in court orders that were difficult to execute. Using normative legal research with a conceptual approach, this study analyzes the urgency of Law No. 20 of 2025 (the New Criminal Procedure Code), effective as of January 2, 2026. The results indicate that Articles 183-192 of the New Criminal Procedure Code carry out a significant transformation by fully integrating restitution into the criminal justice system. This innovation shifts the burden of proof to the Public Prosecutor and provides enforcement power through substitute imprisonment for offenders who refuse to pay. This procedural transformation cuts through the complexity of judicial bureaucracy and guarantees legal certainty and substantive recovery of victim rights. This arrangement serves as a solution to the legal vacuum and the ineffectiveness of the old mechanism, particularly in ordinary criminal cases, to realize comprehensive restorative justice.
Legal Analysis of Amendments To Marital Property Separation Agreements In Civil Law Perspective Calysta Dwiayu Wisnu Putri; Djumikasih; Wilamarta, Stephanie
YURISDIKSI : Jurnal Wacana Hukum dan Sains Vol. 22 No. 1 (2026): June in progress
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Merdeka University Surabaya, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55173/yurisdiksi.v22i1.349

Abstract

Marital property separation agreements are governed by Article 29 of Law Number 1 of 1974 on Marriage and Articles 139–148 of the Indonesian Civil Code, which originally restricted their execution to the period prior to marriage. The issuance of Constitutional Court Decision Number 69/PUU-XIII/2015, however, permits postnuptial amendments with court approval, thereby generating legal uncertainty regarding the legal status of marital assets and inconsistencies in judicial decisions. This study aims to examine the legal status of joint property acquired prior to the amendment of a marital agreement following the Constitutional Court’s decision and to analyze the legal implications of amendments or annulments of marital agreements on the position and distribution of marital property. This research employs a normative juridical method with statutory, conceptual, and case approaches, conducted through library research of primary legal materials, including marriage legislation, the Civil Code, and relevant court decisions, as well as secondary and tertiary legal materials. The data are analyzed qualitatively using a descriptive-analytical approach. The results indicate that marital property acquired prior to the amendment of a marital agreement is subject to prospective application and does not have retroactive effect, thereby maintaining its original legal status in accordance with the principle of legal certainty. Furthermore, the study underscores the necessity of implementing regulations to ensure uniformity in notarial and judicial practices and to promote distributive and corrective justice.
Co-Authors Abdul Rachmad Budiono Abdullah, Salman Afifah Kusumadara Ahmad Shoifi Anandita, Azzavira Salsa Ane Fany Novitasari Ane Fany Novitasari Anggita Tridiani Sirait Baiq Tiffani Yunita Budi Santoso Calysta Dwiayu Wisnu Putri Chusnida, Nabilah Dwi Qurbani, Indah Dyah Widhiawati Eliza, Rahmi Elmaila, Izzah Endang Sri Kawuryan FADLI, MOH Faisal Muhammad, Faisal Muhammad Faizin Sulistio Fathul Laila Fathul Laila, Fathul Herlindah Herlindah Hidayat, Fitri I Nyoman Nurjaya I Nyoman Nurjaya Imam Koeswahyono Imam Koeswahyono Imam Koeswahyono Indri Puspitasari, Indri Kusuma Dewi , Amelia Sri Lely Sulthoniah Leony Sutanto, Christanty Liora, Noela Luth, Thohir Made Ardia Manap, Norhoneydayatie Abdul Melati Putri Nusa, Luh Putu Ayu Meilina Miftahus Sholehudin Muhammad Azmi Khoirurrijal Muliani, Alisya Natasha Graciela Hastika Nur Chanifah Nusa, Luh Putu Ayu Meilina Melati Putri Rachmi Sulistyarini Redanti, Maya Rino Arief Rachman Rosyida Tri Yunita Rumi Suwardiyati Samuel Fajar Hotmangara Tua Siahaan Shrimanti Indira Pratiwi Shrimanti Indira Pratiwi Sihabudin SIHABUDIN Stefanus Fernandus Pardosi Suci Risma Deta Sukarmi Sukarmi, Sukarmi Susilo, Hariyanto Syaid, Ishma Safira Tata PELITA Thohir Luth Trie Sulistiowarni Widhiawati, Diah Widhiawati, Dyah Widjanarko, Wildan Kristanto Widyanti, Yeni Eta wijaya, Sevi Puri Wilamarta, Stephanie Yenny Eta Widyanti Zees, Rizky Fauzi R