Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

THE LEGAL STATUS OF ARTISTIC WORKS CREATED BY GENERATIVE ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF INDONESIAN COPYRIGHT LAW Made Ardia; Yenny Eta Widyanti; Djumikasih
International Journal of Educational Review, Law And Social Sciences (IJERLAS) Vol. 5 No. 6 (2025)
Publisher : CV. RADJA PUBLIKA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54443/ijerlas.v6i1.4486

Abstract

The development of Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) has produced new forms of artistic works that generate uncertainty within Indonesia’s copyright law regime. Law Number 28 of 2014 on Copyright continues to position humans as the sole legal subjects eligible to be recognized as authors, thereby rendering works created entirely by AI unable to satisfy the requirements of originality and human authorship. The disparity between technological advancements and existing legal norms has resulted in regulatory gaps, particularly concerning the legal status of copyright holders and the scope of legal protection for generative AI based artistic works. Through normative juridical research, this study examines the necessity of legal reconstruction to accommodate this phenomenon without disregarding the foundational principles of copyright protection. The findings indicate that human intellectual contribution remains the essential basis for recognizing artistic works assisted by generative AI, while current regulations have yet to provide adequate legal certainty. Therefore, regulatory reforms that are adaptive and humanistic are required to ensure that legal protection remains relevant and equitable in the era of generative AI development.
REPOSITIONING THE VICTIM’S LEGAL STANDING: TRANSFORMING UNLAWFUL ACT LAWSUITS INTO SUBSTANTIVE RESTITUTION EXECUTION CERTAINTY IN ASSAULT CASES UNDER LAW NO. 20 OF 2025." Stefanus Fernandus Pardosi; Faizin Sulistio; Djumikasih
International Journal of Educational Review, Law And Social Sciences (IJERLAS) Vol. 5 No. 6 (2025)
Publisher : CV. RADJA PUBLIKA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54443/ijerlas.v5i6.5094

Abstract

This study examines the paradigm shift in criminal procedure law, moving from an offender-centered focus toward the restoration of victim rights through restitution mechanisms. Article 101 of the old Criminal Procedure is considered to have failed in providing effective justice because it positioned compensation as an "accessory" claim subject to civil procedure. This placed the burden of independent proof on the victim and resulted in court orders that were difficult to execute. Using normative legal research with a conceptual approach, this study analyzes the urgency of Law No. 20 of 2025 (the New Criminal Procedure Code), effective as of January 2, 2026. The results indicate that Articles 183-192 of the New Criminal Procedure Code carry out a significant transformation by fully integrating restitution into the criminal justice system. This innovation shifts the burden of proof to the Public Prosecutor and provides enforcement power through substitute imprisonment for offenders who refuse to pay. This procedural transformation cuts through the complexity of judicial bureaucracy and guarantees legal certainty and substantive recovery of victim rights. This arrangement serves as a solution to the legal vacuum and the ineffectiveness of the old mechanism, particularly in ordinary criminal cases, to realize comprehensive restorative justice.
Implementation of Client-Entrusted Payment of the Duty on the Acquisition of Land and Building Rights to Land Deed Officials Nadia Natashya Amarilis; Djumikasih; R. Imam Rahmat Sjafi’i
YURISDIKSI : Jurnal Wacana Hukum dan Sains Vol. 22 No. 2 (2026): September in progress
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Merdeka University Surabaya, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55173/yurisdiksi.v22i2.373

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the practice of depositing and paying the Duty on the Acquisition of Land and Building Rights by clients to Land Deed Officials, to examine the legal basis of the officials’ authority, and to assess the forms of legal liability that arise therefrom. This research employs an empirical juridical method with statutory and conceptual approaches, supported by primary data obtained through field research in Malang City and secondary data derived from primary and secondary legal materials. The results indicate that the practice of fund deposit occurs factually as a form of transactional efficiency; however, it lacks an explicit legal basis in statutory regulations. This condition creates a normative gap that potentially leads to misuse of funds and ambiguity in legal accountability. The novelty of this study lies in affirming a legal construction that such practice is not merely an administrative issue, but also carries multidimensional implications in civil, administrative, and criminal law domains. Furthermore, this study offers an argument for the necessity of reconstructing legal norms that explicitly regulate third-party deposit mechanisms. Therefore, comprehensive regulation is required to ensure legal certainty, protect the parties involved, and maintain the integrity of Land Deed Officials within the land law and taxation system.
Project Account Regulations In Property Development Preproject Selling System In Indonesia Satriyo Cahyo Bagaskoro; Yenny Eta Widyanti; Djumikasih
YURISDIKSI : Jurnal Wacana Hukum dan Sains Vol. 22 No. 2 (2026): September in progress
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Merdeka University Surabaya, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55173/yurisdiksi.v22i2.375

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the weaknesses in legal regulations related to the use of escrow accounts in the pre-project selling system in Indonesia and to formulate an ideal regulatory model based on a comparative approach. The practice of pre-project selling, which has developed through Sales and Purchase Agreements (PPJB), demonstrates an imbalance in the position of consumers and developers, particularly in terms of fund management. The absence of mandatory escrow account use raises the risk of misuse of funds, default, and potential systemic consumer losses. This study uses normative legal research methods with statutory, conceptual, and comparative approaches, comparing the Indonesian legal system with those of Singapore and Saudi Arabia. The results show that Indonesia still relies on a contractual approach (contract-based protection), which is unable to provide optimal legal protection, especially in the preventive aspect. In contrast, Singapore and Saudi Arabia have adopted a regulatory-based protection approach through mandatory escrow account use, fund segregation, progress-based disbursement, and independent oversight. This difference indicates a normative gap that has impacted weak legal certainty and consumer protection in Indonesia. The conclusion of this study emphasizes the need for legal reconstruction through imperative escrow account regulations, accompanied by an integrated oversight mechanism and effective sanctions. This reform is expected to create preventative legal protection, increase transparency and accountability, and strengthen public trust in the property sector.