Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
6.285
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Lentera Hukum Prosiding Seminar Nasional Jurnal Ilmiah Ekonomi Islam JOURNAL OF PRIVATE AND COMMERCIAL LAW Journal of Law Science Jurnal Pengabdian Dharma Laksana Al-Manhaj: Jurnal Hukum dan Pranata Sosial Islam JIHAD : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Administrasi International Journal of Business, Law, and Education RIO LAW JURNAL JHCLS Veteran Justice Journal Formosa Journal of Multidisciplinary Research (FJMR) Proceeding of International Conference Health, Science And Technology (ICOHETECH) Jurnal Penelitian Serambi Hukum Sanskara Hukum dan HAM The Easta Journal Law and Human Rights Innovative: Journal Of Social Science Research West Science Law and Human Rights Journal of Sustainable Development and Regulatory Issues Sinergi International Journal of Law Ex Aequo Et Bono Journal of Law Causa: Jurnal Hukum dan Kewarganegaraan Jurnal Inovasi Global El-Mujtama: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Insight : International Journal of social research International Journal of Law and Society Multidisciplinary Indonesian Center Journal International Journal of Law Analytic Contrarius
Rina Arum Prastyanti, Rina Arum
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Humanities Astronomy Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Earth & Planetary Sciences Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Engineering Environmental Science Health Professions Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Mathematics Medicine & Pharmacology Neuroscience Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 52 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 52 Documents
Search

 2   3   4   5   6 
Penegakan Hukum Terhadap Tindak Pidana Perjudian Ditinjau Berdasarkan Pasal 303 Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana Joyokusumo, Raden Sumito; Prastyanti, Rina Arum; Habib, Muhammad; Elisanti, Evi
JURNAL PENELITIAN SERAMBI HUKUM Vol 19 No 01 (2026): Jurnal Penelitian Serambi Hukum Vol 19 No 01 Tahun 2026
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Batik Surakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59582/sh.v19i01.1471

Abstract

This study aims to determine 1) the law enforcement against gambling crimes as reviewed based on Article 303 of the Criminal Code. 2) the obstacles and challenges faced in law enforcement against gambling crimes as reviewed based on Article 303 of the Criminal Code. This research method uses an empirical juridical approach, which is research that examines legal realities that occur in society, by looking at it from an empirical perspective. The types of data used are primary data through interviews and secondary data sourced from primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials. Data collection techniques are carried out through interviews and literature studies. Data analysis techniques are carried out descriptively qualitatively with data reduction, data presentation, and drawing conclusions. The results of the study indicate that law enforcement against gambling crimes as reviewed based on Article 303 of the Criminal Code based on law enforcement theory according to Soerjono Soekanto, the success of law enforcement is influenced by five factors: legal factors (legal substance), law enforcement factors, means or facilities factors, community factors, legal culture factors. Article 303 of the Criminal Code provides a clear legal basis for prosecuting perpetrators of gambling crimes, both as organizers and participants. Obstacles faced in law enforcement against offline gambling include proving the elements of the crime, limited human resources and infrastructure of law enforcement officers, and social and cultural factors, where gambling is still considered a tradition or social entertainment that is difficult to eradicate. Obstacles faced in law enforcement against online gambling include limited regulations in the Criminal Code, difficulties in identifying and tracking perpetrators, and digital evidence. Challenges to law enforcement under Article 303 of the Criminal Code include the principles of legality and legal certainty, inter-institutional coordination, and rapid technological developments, which pose challenges for law enforcement. Another challenge faced in law enforcement is the weak deterrent effect of criminal sanctions imposed on gambling perpetrators.
Does Regulatory Forfeiture of Fiduciary Assurance Undermine Justice? Prastyanti, Rina Arum; Hang, Nguyen Thi Thu; Ikhayere, Imiefoh Andrew
Contrarius Vol. 2 No. 2 (2026): Contrarius
Publisher : Lembaga Contrarius Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.53955/contrarius.v2i2.273

Abstract

This study examines fiduciary security by emphasising the legal consequences arising from the seizure of fiduciary objects upon the rights of creditors and debtors, and by comparing fiduciary regulatory frameworks in Indonesia, Australia, and the United States. The research adopts a normative legal method utilising secondary data in the form of primary and secondary legal materials. The approaches employed include statutory, conceptual, and comparative approaches to analyse the norms, principles, and practices governing fiduciary law across different jurisdictions. The research is descriptive and analytical, and it applies qualitative juridical analysis. The findings indicate that the seizure of fiduciary objects carries significant legal implications for both creditors and debtors, and that the implementation of Law Number 42 of 1999 concerning Fiduciary Security has not fully safeguarded the interests of all parties. The international comparison reveals the necessity for clearer mechanisms for the enforcement of fiduciary security and the protection of creditors’ rights. Accordingly, a reconstruction of the normative framework within the Fiduciary Security Law is required to realise Rawlsian justice, through the strengthening of legal protection, the certainty of enforcement, and the equitable balance of rights between creditors and debtors.
Co-Authors -, ARYONO - Agista, Yessa Ayu Arief Budiono Aris Prio Agus Santoso Aryono Carmo, Giovania Madeira Do Damayanti, Adelina Destyarini, Normalita Difa Amallia, Sabrina Dwi Arianti, Zahra Erby, Efriza Erma Rusdiana Evi Elisanti, Evi Fausta, Vania Sokya Firdausi, Anita Hang, Nguyen Thi Thu Hentriawan, Luki Hermawan, Risma Dewi Ikhayere, Imiefoh Andrew Imani, Tita Amalia Nur Indah Maulani Indra Hastuti, Indra Joyokusumo, Raden Sumito Kelik Wardiono Manullang, Jus Marsondang Maulidina, Reva Alya Maulidina Muftiyanto, R. Taufiq Nur MUHAMMAD HABIB Nafi’ah, Lutfiah Sholikhatun Nashira Ryan, Az Zahra Ningsih, Widi Nugraha Nur Arifin, Firman Oktaviana Ayu Sekar A Pambudi, Amanda Devina Cellia Pangesti, Trias Pratama, Andreas Pandhita Prattana Srisuk Prayoga, Evandito Raihan Putri, Gusni Cahaya Ramadhani, Shahnata Putri Dwi Rini, Fitri Setyo Ryan, Az Zahra Nashira S. Andi Sutrasno, S. Andi Sari, Ruli Vita Setiyani, Devy Sharma , Ridhima Simanungkalit, Jo Brinson Sobirov, Bobur Sofiyana, Nurani Tengpongsthorn, Wuthichai Wardoyo, Nanda Puspitasari Warsito Warsito Yafi, Eiad Yuliana, Margareta Evi Zulaeka, Cindy Atika