Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Peningkatan Hasil Belajar Luas Bangun Datar Menggunakan Model Jigsaw di SDN 21 Limau Sundai Narti, Sri
e-Jurnal Inovasi Pembelajaran Sekolah Dasar Vol 2, No 2 (2014): (Agustus-Desember) e-JIPSD
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24036/e-jipsd.v6i1.2867

Abstract

This study aims to describe the use of jigsaw type cooperative learning model to improve the learning outcomes widescreen flat in class V SDN 21 Limau Sundai Batang Kapas. The subjects of this study are researchers as teachers who teach, and students who numbered 24 people. The type of research is classroom action research. This research shows that in cycle I, the average 67,85 cycle II increased to 89,28. Activity of teacher of cycle I got an average of 70, and cycle II increased to 95. Student activity of cycle I got an average of 67,5, and cycle II increased to 90. Result of learning cycle I cognitive, affective and psychomotor aspect got average 70 and cycle II increased to 80.41. It can be concluded that the use of jigsaw type cooperative learning modl can improve the widespread learning outcomes. Keywords: Learning outcomes, wake up flat, jigsaw
PENINGKATAN HASIL BELAJAR LUAS BANGUN DATAR MENGGUNAKAN MODEL JIGSAW DI SDN 21 LIMAU SUNDAI Narti, Sri; Ahmad, Syafri; Masniladevi, Masniladevi
e-Jurnal Inovasi Pembelajaran Sekolah Dasar Vol 2, No 2 (2014): (Agustus-Desember) e-JIPSD
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24036/e-jipsd.v6i1.2923

Abstract

Abstrack This study aims to describe the use of jigsaw type cooperative learning model to improve the learning outcomes widescreen flat in class V SDN 21 Limau Sundai Batang Kapas. The subjects of this study are researchers as teachers who teach, and students who numbered 24 people. The type of research is classroom action research. This research shows that in cycle I, the average 67,85 cycle II increased to 89,28. Activity of teacher of cycle I got an average of 70, and cycle II increased to 95. Student activity of cycle I got an average of 67,5, and cycle II increased to 90. Result of learning cycle I cognitive, affective and psychomotor aspect got average 70 and cycle II increased to 80.41. It can be concluded that the use of jigsaw type cooperative learning modl can improve the widespread learning outcomes. Keywords: Learning outcomes, wake up flat, Jigsaw
PENINGKATAN HASIL BELAJAR LUAS BANGUN DATAR MENGGUNAKAN MODEL JIGSAW DI SDN 21 LIMAU SUNDAI Narti, Sri
e-Jurnal Inovasi Pembelajaran Sekolah Dasar Vol 2, No 2 (2014): (Agustus-Desember) e-JIPSD
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24036/e-jipsd.v6i1.2922

Abstract

Abstrack This study aims to describe the use of jigsaw type cooperative learning model to improve the learning outcomes widescreen flat in class V SDN 21 Limau Sundai Batang Kapas. The subjects of this study are researchers as teachers who teach, and students who numbered 24 people. The type of research is classroom action research. This research shows that in cycle I, the average 67,85 cycle II increased to 89,28. Activity of teacher of cycle I got an average of 70, and cycle II increased to 95. Student activity of cycle I got an average of 67,5, and cycle II increased to 90. Result of learning cycle I cognitive, affective and psychomotor aspect got average 70 and cycle II increased to 80.41. It can be concluded that the use of jigsaw type cooperative learning modl can improve the widespread learning outcomes. Keywords: Learning outcomes, wake up flat, Jigsaw
EVALUASI BIMBINGAN KONSELING DI SEKOLAH DENGAN PENDEKATAN GOAL FREE EVALUATION Narti, Sri
Edukasi: Jurnal Penelitian dan Artikel Pendidikan Vol 2 No 5 (2010): Vol. 2 No. 5, Desember 2010
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Magelang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Evaluation can be formal or informal. Formal evaluation sought to determine whether a series of guidance activities carried out according to plan programs that have been done in order to achieve certain concrete goals, indeed achieve the expected effects. The core part of formal evaluation lies in the determination and implementation of appropriate procedures, namely whether a sequence of activities that have been implemented guidance clearly produce significant changes in student behavior, according to various criteria that is consistent with guidance service goals.Informal evaluation is a process of assessment of the effectiveness of counseling services without holding on to a scientific design and without using methods and tools specified in the design. Informal evaluation is usually done while walking and is a mental activity a person who is performing a task. For example if school counselors provide career guidance to groups of students in grade school, he opened ears and eyes to get an indication about the efficiency and effectiveness of all activities undertaken jointly with the guidance of the students in the class.Evaluation guidance counseling with a goal free evaluation approach is not completely free from the goal, but only out of special purposes. This model considers only the general objectives to be achieved. Keep in mind how outsiders judge the program not only to know what the quality, but also knowing what should be done, what was done in all parts, on all that has been produced, intentionally or unintentionally. The latter is the task of goal-free evaluators who do not know the purpose of the program.