Pratama Herry Herlambang
Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Negeri Semarang

Published : 24 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 24 Documents
Search

Peranan Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara dalam Upaya Peningkatan Eksekusi Putusan Pengadilan Herlambang, Pratama Herry; Muhtada, Dani; Yudhanti, Ristina; Pratama, Nugroho Wahyu; Wiguna, Candra Aditya; Santalia, Miftah; Suwinda, Suwinda; Safarin, Muhammad Habiby Abil Fida
Bookchapter Hukum dan Politik dalam Berbagai Perspektif Vol. 3 (2024)
Publisher : Bookchapter Hukum dan Politik dalam Berbagai Perspektif

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/hp.v3i1.216

Abstract

Peraturan hukum di Indonesia tidak hanya mengatur warga negara pada umumnya, tetapi pejabat negara juga ikut masuk dalam peraturan hukum. Hal ini merupakan konsekuensi logis dari sebuah bentuk negara hukum yang di anut oleh para the founding fathers dan mothers Republik Indonesia. Pejabat Tata Usaha Negara atau sering kali disebut dengan Pejabat TUN, tidak bisa lepas dari tanggung jawab hukum bilamana pejabat TUN melaksankan kebijakan bertentangan dengan undang-undang. Undang-Undang No. 51 Tahun 2009 tentang Perubahan Kedua atas UndangUndang No. 5 Tahun 1986 Tentang Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara (UU Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara) mengatur terdapat dua jenis eksekusi putusan pengadilan tata usaha negara yang dalam doktrin biasa dikenal sebagai eksekusi otomatis dan eksekusi hierarkis. Dalam eksekusi hierarkis maka dibutuhkan kesadaran hukum dari pejabat pemerintahan untuk melaksanakan putusan peradilan tata usaha negara yang telah berkekuatan hukum tetap. Seringkali pejabat pemerintahan tidak bisa atau tidak mau melaksanakan putusan tersebut dengan berbagai alasan yang membuat seolah-olah peradilan tata usaha negara tidak memiliki wibawa untuk memaksa pemerintah melaksanakan putusannya.
Kepatuhan Terhadap Standar Bahasa Indonesia Bagi Dosen Asing Dalam Perspektif Hukum Ketenagakerjaan Putri Asari, Talitha Faya; Pratama Herry Herlambang
Law Research Review Quarterly Vol. 11 No. 3 (2025): Various Issues on Law and Development
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/llrq.v11i3.26295

Abstract

The internationalization of higher education encourages Indonesian universities to recruit foreign lecturers to enhance academic quality and global collaboration. However, foreign lecturers must comply with legal requirements regarding Indonesian language use as stipulated in Law No. 24 of 2009, Government Regulation No. 57 of 2014, Government Regulation No. 34 of 2021, and Ministerial Regulation of Education and Culture No. 70 of 2016. These regulations mandate foreign lecturers to obtain the Indonesian Language Proficiency Test (UKBI) certificate as official proof of language competence. This study investigates the regulation and implementation of Indonesian language proficiency standards for foreign lecturers, analyzing their legal implications within employment law. Using a normative juridical approach, the research analyzes legal materials through library research, assessing norm compliance and practical implementation. Findings indicate weak enforcement of language proficiency requirements due to unclear sanctions and regulatory inconsistencies. Hiring foreign lecturers without language proficiency certification results in defective employment contracts, potential administrative penalties, and industrial relations imbalances. Furthermore, inadequate language skills among foreign lecturers negatively impact educational quality and students' rights. The study recommends harmonizing language and employment regulations, reinforcing oversight of UKBI implementation, and mandating language proficiency certification for foreign lecturer recruitment. These actions are vital to ensure legal certainty, protect local workforce rights, and uphold Indonesian as a key national language for academic and legal purposes.
Juridical Disparity in Interfaith Inheritance Law: A Comparative Study Between Islamic Law and Positive Law in Indonesia Pratama Herry Herlambang; Fenny Wulandari
INKLUSIF (JURNAL PENGKAJIAN PENELITIAN SYARIAH DAN ILMU HUKUM) Vol. 10 No. 1 (2025): June 2025
Publisher : UIN Siber Syekh Nurjati Cirebon

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24235/inklusif.v10i1.20071

Abstract

The plurality of religions in Indonesia presents significant challenges to the multidimensional implementation of the existing inheritance law. A particularly complex issue arises when heirs hold differing religious beliefs, which may occur due to interfaith marriages among their parents or individual conversions by the heirs themselves. This divergence in faith introduces a dualism of norms, as it contrasts the exclusive normative provisions of Islamic law with the inclusive approach espoused by Indonesian positive law, which seeks to promote substantive justice. This current research aims to investigate juridical disparities within interfaith inheritance law through a normative and comparative juridical approach. The findings suggest that the absence of an integrated legal framework leads to legal uncertainty, creating interpretative gaps that adversely affect individual civil rights. Consequently, this research advocates for the reformulation of national inheritance law arrangements and policies, emphasizing a foundation of sustainable and equitable legal pluralism.
Juridical Disparity in Interfaith Inheritance Law: A Comparative Study Between Islamic Law and Positive Law in Indonesia Pratama Herry Herlambang; Fenny Wulandari
INKLUSIF (JURNAL PENGKAJIAN PENELITIAN SYARIAH DAN ILMU HUKUM) Vol. 10 No. 1 (2025): June 2025
Publisher : UIN Siber Syekh Nurjati Cirebon

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24235/inklusif.v10i1.20071

Abstract

The plurality of religions in Indonesia presents significant challenges to the multidimensional implementation of the existing inheritance law. A particularly complex issue arises when heirs hold differing religious beliefs, which may occur due to interfaith marriages among their parents or individual conversions by the heirs themselves. This divergence in faith introduces a dualism of norms, as it contrasts the exclusive normative provisions of Islamic law with the inclusive approach espoused by Indonesian positive law, which seeks to promote substantive justice. This current research aims to investigate juridical disparities within interfaith inheritance law through a normative and comparative juridical approach. The findings suggest that the absence of an integrated legal framework leads to legal uncertainty, creating interpretative gaps that adversely affect individual civil rights. Consequently, this research advocates for the reformulation of national inheritance law arrangements and policies, emphasizing a foundation of sustainable and equitable legal pluralism.