Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
3.609
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Pythagoras: Jurnal Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika Kreano, Jurnal Matematika Kreatif-Inovatif SIGMA: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Delta-Pi : Jurnal Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika Jurnal Ilmiah Soulmath : Jurnal Edukasi Pendidikan Matematika Jurnal Cendekia : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika NANAEKE An Nisa' Al asma : Journal of Islamic Education Alauddin Journal of Mathematics Education (AJME) Euler : Jurnal Ilmiah Matematika, Sains dan Teknologi Hipotenusa: Journal of Research Mathematics Education (HJRME) Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Universitas Lampung
Andi Dian Angriani, Andi Dian
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Humanities Computer Science & IT Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Materials Science & Nanotechnology Mathematics Social Sciences Other

Published : 23 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search
Journal : Euler : Jurnal Ilmiah Matematika, Sains dan Teknologi

 1 
Analisis Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis dan Penalaran pada Soal Open Ended: Dampak Model Problem Based Learning dan Model Discovery Learning Mujahidah, Mujahidah; Nursalam, Nursalam; Suharti, Suharti; Majid, Ahmad Farham; Angriani, Andi Dian
Euler : Jurnal Ilmiah Matematika, Sains dan Teknologi Volume 13 Issue 2 August 2025
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Gorontalo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37905/euler.v13i2.31332

Abstract

Critical thinking and reasoning skills are essential cognitive aspects that must be developed in mathematics education to address the demands of the 21st century. This study aimed to analyze the differences in students’ critical thinking and reasoning abilities in solving open-ended problems through the implementation of Problem-Based Learning and Discovery Learning models. A quantitative approach was used, employing an experimental method with a factorial design. The sample consisted of two groups of students, each receiving a different treatment, with a total of 58 participants. The research instrument was a set of open-ended essay questions. Data were analyzed using univariate t-tests and multivariate mean difference tests. The findings indicated no significant difference in critical thinking skills between students taught with the two learning models. However, a significant difference was found in reasoning ability, as well as a simultaneous difference in both critical thinking and reasoning between the groups.
Co-Authors Agustini, Jum'anil Alwi, Besse Marjana Alwi, Besse Marjani Amalia, Devi Amin, Muliaty Ananda, Aulia Andi Halimah Andi Kusumayanti, Andi Annisa, Fitri Asmuliana, Asmuliana Ayu, Andi Nur Egidia Fahmi Baharuddin Abbas, Baharuddin Baharuddin Baharuddin DB, Rahma Rahima Fitriani Nur, Fitriani Garaika Gina Mahitza Ilyas Ismail Jabbar, Fitriani Jannah, Nur Miftahul Jayawarsa, A.A. Ketut Kahar, A. Karmila Latuconsina, Nur Khalisah Lisnasari Andi Mattoliang Majid, Ahmad Farham MARDHIAH Mardiati, Sueti Masnaeni, Masnaeni Mattoliang, Lisnasari Andi Muhammad Ardi, Muhammad Muhammad Rusydi H. Mujahidah Mujahidah Nasrul Nasrul Nur, Ahmad Hasan Nurkhalisah Latuconsina, Nurkhalisah Nursalam Nursalam Nursalam Nurul Hikmah Patiung, Dahlia Prastika, Nurul Aini Fitrah Putra, Andi Rafli Permana Rahma Rahma Salam, Nursalam Sompa, A. Tenri Megga Sri Sulasteri, Sri Sri Wahyuni Suardi, Achmad Fauzan Suharti Syam, Lisa Kurnia Tahir, M. Yusuf Tampa, Alimuddin Yaser Arafah, Ahmar Zaky Yamani Yuliany, Nur