Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
5.451
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal JURNAL MAGISTER HUKUM UDAYANA Masalah-Masalah Hukum Unram Law Review UIR LAW REVIEW Humani (Hukum dan Masyarakat Madani) EQIEN - JURNAL EKONOMI DAN BISNIS Unes Law Review Jurnal Yuridis JURNAL HUKUM dan KENOTARIATAN PALAR (Pakuan Law review) Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Journal of Law and Policy Transformation JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW Walisongo Law Review (Walrev) Jurnal Paradigma Hukum Pembangunan Indonesian Journal of International Law International Journal of Humanities Education and Social Sciences Indonesian Notary Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Digital Business Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia (Japendi) Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan Jurnal Cendekia Ilmiah
Velentina, Rouli Anita
Faculty Of Law, Universitas Indonesia
Humanities Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Electrical & Electronics Engineering Engineering Environmental Science Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Physics Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 40 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 40 Documents
Search

 1   2   3   4 
Legal Certainty For Foreign Investors In Coal Mining In Indonesia Velentina, Rouli Anita Velentina Anita
Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan
Publisher : UI Scholars Hub

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Since 2009, there have been significant regulatory changes in coal mining in Indonesia, beginning with the enactment of Law No.4 of 2009 concerning Mineral and Coal Mining, which replaced the prior system of contracts and mining authorizations (Kuasa Pertambangan; KP) with mining business permits (Ijin Usaha Pertambangan; IUP). There are two types of IUP: exploration and production operation. Then, the mechanism of Clean and Clear was created to reduce the large numbers of overlapping licenses. This article explores Indonesian regulatory changes and court rulings in coal mining and clarifies share divestment requirements for foreign investors in Indonesian coal-mining operations, which should not be classified as indirect expropriations.
Pengaturan Pembatasan Penggunaan Data Nasabah Bank Untuk Mencegah Penggelapan Dana Nasabah Di Bank Nainggolan, Nathasya Nauli; Velentina, Rouli Anita
Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan
Publisher : UI Scholars Hub

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

As financial institutions, banks are required to have customer data protection mechanisms. This is for the sake of the banking busines’ continuity that is being undertaken. The sustainability of a bank's business is largely determined by the trust of the customers to save funds and use bank services. The customer data protection mechanism is one of a risk management form that is primarily aimed at protecting customer personal data, which is useful for preventing the risk of misuse of bank customer data by irresponsible persons. This study aims to discuss the provisions regarding the protection of customer data by banks in Indonesia in order to prevent banking crimes, especially embezzlement of customer funds. In order to conduct this study's normative legal research, secondary data sources were examined by collecting legal materials by means of a literature search supported by interviews. Based on the results of the research, it was found that although banks have their own protection mechanisms following the provisions stipulated by the Financial Services Authority (OJK) and Bank Indonesia (BI) as part of risk management, each bank has a system that is not necessarily the same as other banks. By reviewing the implementation of PT. Bank X and PT. Bank Y, Banks in general have an IT system to store customer data which can only be accessed by certain bank employees with an interest, and the opening of this data can be done in accordance with banking regulations. For fraud prevention mechanisms, banks enforce various kinds of internal and external protection in accordance with OJK and BI regulations.
Ultimum Remedium Terhadap Keterlibatan Notaris Dalam Perbuatan Melawan Hukum Fairuzia, Halwa; Velentina, Rouli Anita
Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan
Publisher : UI Scholars Hub

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Ultimum Remedium is a principle that means criminal sanctions should be the last resort in solving a problem, where civil and administrative sanctions are prioritised. In this journal, the researcher will discuss how this principle relates to the authority held by the Notary Honorary Council in limiting actions against the law committed by notaries. This study uses normative juridical research, where the law serves as a foundation for examining legal regulations related to legal issues regarding unlawful acts committed by notaries.
Sovereign Wealth Fund (Swf) Institution: Roles And Challenges Of The Indonesia Investment Authority (Ina) Vincent Guo; Rouli Anita Velentina
Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia Vol. 6 No. 6 (2025): Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia
Publisher : Publikasi Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59141/japendi.v6i6.7963

Abstract

Sovereign Wealth Fund (SWF) is a term in the realm of finance that refers to a state-owned financing institution. One of the Sovereign Wealth Funds owned by the Indonesian government, the Indonesia Investment Authority (INA), has been operational since 2024. As a progressive step in the development of Sovereign Wealth Funds in Indonesia, INA can be considered successful as a state investment management institution that has attracted the attention of foreign investors. Since its establishment, INA has played a role in driving investments in infrastructure, transportation, logistics, digitalization, healthcare, food security, green energy, and sustainable development. The sectors funded by INA range from geothermal energy in the green energy sector, the Belawan terminal infrastructure project, until Plasma Derivative Drug Products in healthcare. However, INA’s success is also accompanied by challenges, such as securing prospective investors, balancing economic interests with sustainable developmental priorities, and the impact of the global economic slowdown on investor confidence. Additionally, regulatory challenges—including policy alignment and even jurisdictional conflicts with other government institutions—are critical concerns for INA’s future growth. This research attempts to elaborate on the role of INA in the development of the Indonesian economy and the challenges faced by INA as Indonesia’s Sovereign Wealth Fund.
The Formation of Danantara: Between Efficiency and the Threat of Moral Hazard for State Investments M Faiz Muttaqin; Indry Septiarani; Rouli Anita Velentina
Walisongo Law Review (Walrev) Vol. 7 No. 1 (2025)
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Walisongo Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21580/walrev.2025.7.1.26982

Abstract

The establishment of Danantara as a state investment agency reflects Indonesia’s effort to enhance the efficiency of state asset management, yet it simultaneously raises significant legal and governance concerns regarding transparency and accountability. This study examines the legal risks inherent in the formation of Danantara, a state entity tasked with managing strategic SOE assets under Law No. 1/2025 and Government Regulation No. 10/2025. Employing a doctrinal legal method with a normative-prescriptive approach, it compares the regulatory frameworks of Danantara and Singapore’s Temasek Holdings. The analysis reveals significant vulnerabilities, including moral hazard, concentration of unchecked authority, and exclusion from the state finance regime. These structural flaws may undermine legal accountability and public oversight. Drawing on comparative legal insights, this paper proposes reforms to strengthen institutional independence, ensure transparent asset management, and restore checks and balances in sovereign investment governance. The findings contribute to the ongoing discourse on state capitalism and the legal architecture required to support it. Pembentukan Danantara sebagai Lembaga investasi negara mencerminkan Upaya Indonesia untuk meningkatkan efisiensi pengelolaan aset negara, namun menimbulkan kekhawatiran hukum dan tata kelola terkait transparansi dan akuntabilitas. Studi ini mengkaji risiko hukum yang melekat dalam pembentukan Danantara, sebuah entitas negara yang ditugaskan untuk mengelola aset BUMN strategis berdasarkan Undang-Undang No. 1 Tahun 2025 dan Peraturan Pemerintah No. 10 Tahun 2025. Dengan menggunakan metode hukum normatif dan pendekatan preskriptif, studi ini membandingkan kerangka regulasi Danantara dengan Temasek Holdings di Singapura. Analisis menunjukkan adanya kerentanan signifikan, termasuk potensi moral hazard, konsentrasi kewenangan tanpa pengawasan memadai, serta pengecualian dari rezim keuangan negara. Kelemahan struktural ini dapat melemahkan akuntabilitas hukum dan pengawasan publik. Berdasarkan wawasan perbandingan hukum, tulisan ini mengusulkan reformasi untuk memperkuat independensi institusional, memastikan pengelolaan aset yang transparan, serta memulihkan mekanisme checks and balances dalam tata kelola investasi negara. Temuan ini berkontribusi pada diskursus yang berkembang mengenai kapitalisme negara dan arsitektur hukum yang dibutuhkan untuk mendukungnya. Keywords: Danantara; State Investment; Good Governance; Transparency; Accountability; Moral Hazard.
Mekanisme Akuntabilitas Sovereign Wealth Fund: Perbandingan antara BPI Danantara dan GPFG Norwegia Priatna, Azzahra Vinka; Tasman, Annisha Rahmadhila Adha; Velentina, Rouli Anita
Eqien - Jurnal Ekonomi dan Bisnis Vol 14 No 03 (2025): Journal Of Economics and Business
Publisher : Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis Universitas Islam DR KH EZ Mutaqien

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.34308/eqien.v14i03.2218

Abstract

The accountability mechanism in Sovereign Wealth Funds (SWF) is a crucial aspect in ensuring transparency and sustainability in the management of state investment funds. This mechanism is reflected in the implementation of oversight and managerial responsibility within SWFs. BPI Danantara, as Indonesia’s SWF, operates under an internal oversight system involving a Board of Supervisors, an audit committee, and external monitoring from public auditors and relevant state institutions in a decentralized manner. In terms of managerial responsibility, the Business Judgment Rule (BJR) is applied, providing legal protection for managers in investment decision-making, as long as it is conducted in good faith and without negligence. However, this mechanism still poses a significant risk of corruption due to Indonesia’s low Corruption Perceptions Index (CPI) score. Meanwhile, Norway’s Government Pension Fund Global (GPFG) has a stricter oversight structure, with a hierarchical reporting system from Norges Bank Investment Management (NBIM) to the Ministry of Finance and direct supervision by the Norwegian Parliament. Although GPFG does not apply BJR, it has consistently achieved the highest transparency scores and enjoys stronger public trust in its governance. This study aims to analyze the differences in supervisory regulations and managerial accountability between these two institutions.
Kedudukan Perjanjian Pengikatan Jual Beli Terhadap Akta Jual Beli Hak atas Tanah Velentina, Rouli Anita
Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) Vol 14 No 2 (2025)
Publisher : University of Udayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24843/JMHU.2025.v14.i02.p04

Abstract

This study has two aims. The first aim is to examine the binding force of the Conditional Sale and Purchase Agreement of the Right of Land (CSPA-Land) based on applicable provisions and Supreme Court Circular No.4/2016 (SCC No.4/2016). The second aim is to examine the legal position of the CSPA-Land to Sale and Purchase Agreement of the Right of Land (SPA-Land) when there is a prospective buyer’s bad faith based on Decision Number 241/Pdt.G/2021/PN.Jkt.Tim jo. Decision Number 126/Pdt/2023/PT DKI. The research method employed is the doctrinal legal research method using secondary data. There are two conclusions. First, under Article 1338 (1) jo. Article 1340 (1) of the Civil Code, a valid CSPA-Land has binding force as law for the parties. Based on SCC No.4/2016, the CSPA-Land results in the transfer of land rights provided the price has been paid in full and the object is controlled by the buyer in good faith. Second, referring to Decision No.241/Pdt.G/2021/PN.Jkt.Tim jo. Decision No.126/Pdt/2023/PT DKI, the CSPA-Land is an agreement that regulates the obligations of the parties that must be fulfilled to make a SPA-Land. When there is any obligation not fulfilled by one party, the other party's refusal to make the SPA-Land does not constitute a default. The existence of the prospective buyer’s bad faith is the basis for the cancellation of the CSPA-Land.” litian ini memiliki dua tujuan. Pertama, mengkaji kekuatan mengikat Perjanjian Pengikatan Jual Beli Hak atas Tanah (PPJB-Tanah) berdasarkan ketentuan yang berlaku dan Surat Edaran Mahkamah Agung No.4/2016 (SEMA No.4/2016). Kedua, mengkaji kedudukan hukum PPJB-Tanah terhadap Akta Jual Beli Hak atas Tanah (AJB-Tanah) dalam hal adanya itikad tidak baik calon pembeli berdasarkan Putusan No.241/Pdt.G/2021/PN.Jkt.Tim jo. Putusan No.126/Pdt/2023/PT DKI. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah metode penelitian hukum doktrinal dengan menggunakan data sekunder. Ada dua simpulan. Pertama, berdasarkan Pasal 1338 (1) jo. Pasal 1340 (1) KUHPerdata, PPJB-Tanah yang sah mempunyai kekuatan hukum mengikat bagi para pihak yang membuatnya. Berdasarkan SEMA No.4/2016, PPJB-Tanah menyebabkan pemindahan hak atas tanah sepanjang harga telah lunas dan objek dikuasai pembeli dengan itikad baik. Kedua, mengacu pada Putusan No.241/Pdt.G/2021/PN.Jkt.Tim jo. Putusan No.126/Pdt/2023/PT DKI, PPJB-Tanah merupakan perjanjian yang mengatur tentang kewajiban para pihak yang harus dipenuhi untuk membuat AJB-Tanah. Apabila ada kewajiban yang tidak dipenuhi oleh suatu pihak, maka penolakan pihak yang lain untuk membuat AJB-Tanah bukan merupakan suatu wanprestasi. Adanya itikad tidak baik calon pembeli merupakan dasar untuk PPJB-Tanah batal.
ULTIMUM REMEDIUM TERHADAP KETERLIBATAN NOTARIS DALAM PERBUATAN MELAWAN HUKUM Fairuza, Halwa; Velentina, Rouli Anita
PALAR (Pakuan Law review) Vol 9, No 4 (2023): Volume 9, Nomor 4 Oktober-Desember 2023
Publisher : UNIVERSITAS PAKUAN

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33751/palar.v9i4.9338

Abstract

AbstrakTujuan Penelitian ini ialah untuk menjelaskan bahwa Ultimum Remedium merupakan asas yang artinya pidana dijadikan sebuah upaya terakhir dalam menyelesaikan suatu permasalahan, dimana sanksi perdata dan administratif lebih didahulukan. Dalam jurnal ini peneliti akan membahas bagaimana keterkaitan mengenai asas tersebut dengan kewenangan yang dimiliki oleh Majelis Kehormatan Notaris terhadap batasan dalam menindak notaris. Penelitian ini menggunakan penelitian yuridis normatif, dimana hukum menjadi sebuah pondasi untuk mengkaji peraturan perundang-undangan dengan timbulnya permasalahan mengenai perbuatan melawan hukum yang dilakukan oleh notaris.  Kata Kunci: Ultimum Remedium, Perbuatan Melawan Hukum, Sanksi. AbstractThe aim of this research is to explain that Ultimum Remedium is a principle which means that criminal law is used as a last resort in resolving a problem, where civil and administrative sanctions take precedence. In this journal, researchers will discuss how these principles relate to the authority of the Notary Honorary Council regarding the limitations in taking action against notaries. This research uses normative juridical research, where the law becomes a foundation for studying laws and regulations with the emergence of problems regarding unlawful acts committed by notaries. Keywords: Ultimum Remedium, Unlawful Acts, Sanctions.
Perlindungan Hukum Pihak Ketiga Terhadap Objek Yang Dijadikan Harta Pailit Putri Ramadhita, Mouva; Anita Velentina, Rouli
UNES Law Review Vol. 7 No. 2 (2024)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v7i2.2366

Abstract

Kepailitan merupakan sebuah sita umum atas kekayaan debitor yang dinyatakan pailit yang pengurusan dan pemberesan atas hartanya dilakukan oleh kurator. Putusan No.48/Pdt.Sus.GLL/2020/PN.Niaga.Jkt.Pst jo. No.353/Pdt.Sus.PKPU/2021/PN.Niaga.Jkt.Pst, mengungkapkan fakta hukum bahwa benda yang dijadikan objek jaminan utang debitur merupakan milik pihak ketiga. Selain itu, kreditur separatis yang piutangnya dijaminkan dengan benda objek jaminan tersebut tidak bersedia untuk menyerahkan benda dimaksud kepada kurator. Penelitian ini menganalisis perlindungan hukum bagi pihak ketiga yang benda miliknya merupakan objek jaminan utang debitor yang dinyatakan pailit. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian doktrinal. Data yang digunakan adalah data sekunder yang dikumpulkan dengan cara studi kepustakaan. Hal yang dapat dilakukan oleh pihak ketiga adalah dengan mengajukan nilai penggantian dari sisa harta pailit debitur serta dengan actio pauliana, pihak ketiga dapat mengajukan upaya hukum untuk mempertahankan haknya kepada Pengadilan Niaga.
Hukum Kontrak Dagang Internasional Kedudukan Klausula Arbitrase Terhadap Keabsahan Kontrak Internasional Iswanti Rachmanisa; Rouli Anita Velentina
J-CEKI : Jurnal Cendekia Ilmiah Vol. 5 No. 1: Desember 2025
Publisher : CV. ULIL ALBAB CORP

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56799/jceki.v5i1.13241

Abstract

Klausula arbitrase dalam kontrak dagang internasional memiliki kedudukan yang terpisah dari kontrak utamanya berdasarkan prinsip Separability Clause. Prinsip ini menegaskan bahwa pembatalan kontrak utama tidak serta-merta membatalkan klausula arbitrase, selama klausula tersebut dibuat secara sah dan tidak bertentangan dengan hukum. Melalui Putusan No. 631 K/Pdt.Sus/2012, Mahkamah Agung menegaskan pentingnya penghormatan terhadap forum arbitrase internasional dan memperkuat kepastian hukum bagi para pihak. Penerapan prinsip ini mencerminkan konsistensi Indonesia dalam menjunjung tinggi kebebasan berkontrak serta komitmennya terhadap Konvensi New York Tahun 1958.
Co-Authors A. Partomuan Pohan Achmad, Mustafid Milanto Akbar, Vedita Amelia Maulanasari Anfasya, Raka Haikal Arenza Ravandito Arfah, Azizah Bustanul Arifin Chhachhar, Varun Davina Azzahra Aldien Fairuza, Halwa Fairuzia, Halwa Fattah, Akhmad Kautsar Fitriani, Maulida Handayani, Rohana Amelia Putri Hayaty, Lydya Hayaty, Lydya Hertaty Sianturi Indry Septiarani Intan Saputri Iswanti Rachmanisa Jessica Priscilla Simanungkalit Kumar, Sanjeev M Daffa Sahrim Wira M Faiz Muttaqin Manthovani, Kelly Melati Pertiwi Nabila Shafira Karenina Nafis, Abdul Haris Nainggolan, Nathasya Nauli Nasution, Disriani Latifah Soroinda Nur Jani Jalal Priatna, Azzahra Vinka Prihantono, Pradipta Putri Ramadhita, Mouva Rahardi, Andriyan Rayi Kharisma Rajib Rena Elvaretta Suryatantra Reza Ria Nanda Rizky, Faiz Muhammad Rohana Amelia Putri Handayani Safiulloh, Safiulloh Salsabila Sofwah Salwa Fakhirah Sonyendah Retnaningsih, Sonyendah Supriyadi, Mohammad Wangsit Tasman, Annisha Rahmadhila Adha Tjhong Sendrawan Vincent Guo Wilson Delion