Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
2.144
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Kertha Patrika DE JURE Jurnal Mahasiswa Fakultas Hukum Jurisprudentie INDONESIAN JOURNAL OF CRIMINAL LAW STUDIES JOURNAL EQUITABLE Jurnal Hukum Volkgeist Asia Pacific Fraud Journal Ekspose: Jurnal Penelitian Hukum dan Pendidikan Law Research Review Quarterly Rambideun : Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat Journal of Community Development The Digest: Journal of Jurisprudence and Legisprudence BUANA GENDER : Jurnal Studi Gender dan Anak Shahih : journal of islamicate multidisciplinary HUNILA : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Integrasi Peradilan Taawun: Jurnal Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat Justice Law Review
Muh Sutri Mansyah
Universitas Muhammadiyah Buton
Religion Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Arts Humanities Computer Science & IT Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Mathematics Nursing Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 21 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : justice law review

 1 
Legal Protection for Victims of Fraud in Online Buying and Selling Transactions from the Perspective of Islamic Law Sumiati; Muh Sutri Mansyah
Justice Law Review Vol. 1 No. 1 (2025): Justice Law Review
Publisher : PT Justitia Legal Research

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.64317/jlr.v1i1.14

Abstract

The rapid development of information technology, particularly in online buying and selling transactions, has increased the risk of fraud that harms consumers. This study aims to examine the form of legal protection for victims of fraud in online transactions from the perspective of Islamic law. The method used is a normative juridical approach, analyzing both Indonesia's positive law and sharia principles. The results show that legal protection can be carried out through penal (repressive) and non-penal (preventive) approaches. In Islamic law, fraudulent practices (gharar and tadlis) are prohibited acts, and perpetrators must be held morally and legally accountable. Islam emphasizes justice, honesty, and transparency in muamalah, including online transactions. In addition to national legal mechanisms such as the Criminal Code (KUHP) and the Electronic Information and Transactions Law (UU ITE), protection for victims can also be strengthened through educational approaches based on Islamic values to improve digital literacy and transaction ethics in society. The main obstacles in victim protection include weak oversight, low public legal awareness, and the suboptimal integration of Islamic principles into the practice of positive law. Therefore, synergy between national law and Islamic values is essential to create a fair and comprehensive protection system in the digital era.
Testing Witness Testimony According to the Criminal Code and Qanun Kaswandi; Hayun; Muh Sutri Mansyah
Justice Law Review Vol. 1 No. 1 (2025): Justice Law Review
Publisher : PT Justitia Legal Research

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.64317/jlr.v1i1.18

Abstract

Witnesses who testify in court are required to speak the truth; however, there are also instances where witnesses provide false testimony. The challenges of implementing Articles 291 and 373 of the current Indonesian Criminal Code (KUHP) and Article 170 of the Aceh Qanun in prosecuting witnesses who give false testimony are important to examine and analyze. This research uses a normative method with legislative, historical, conceptual, and futuristic approaches. The analytical techniques employed in this study are descriptive and prescriptive. Legal materials are analyzed by evaluating the collected data. The interpretation methods used are systematic and grammatical. The findings of this study show that the primary objective of Articles 291 and 373 of the current Indonesian Criminal Code and Article 170 of the Aceh Qanun is to ensure that witnesses provide truthful testimony in court based on what they have seen, experienced, or heard, whether directly or indirectly. However, challenges also arise in prosecuting witnesses who give false testimony. There is potential for multiple interpretations because neither Articles 291 and 373 of the Criminal Code nor Article 170 of the Aceh Qanun specify how many times a witness must give false testimony before these articles can be applied, or whether a single instance of false testimony is sufficient for the application of these articles. This creates the potential for judges to apply these articles subjectively. Therefore, future legislation by the government and lawmakers must establish clear benchmarks for determining when a witness has provided false testimony.
Co-Authors Abdul Rahim Abdul Razak Abdul Razak Achmad Busro Alfajar, Subhan Ali, La Ode Bunga Andara, Darojatun Bimasakti, David Haryo Darojatun Andara Darojatun Andara Dewi, Rasmala Edy Nurcahyo Edy Nurcahyo Edy Nurchyo Eko Satria Erick Bason Gurusi, La Hadi Supriyanto Hasirudin Hasri Hasirudin Hasri Hayun Hayun Kahar, Amrun Karim, La Ode Muhammad Kaswandi Kaswandi La Ode Bunga La Ode Bunga Ali La Ode Bunga Ali La Ode Muhammad Karim Lee, Kirsty mashendra, Mashendra Muh. Ramlan Nurcahyo, Edy Purnamasari, Yety Rasmala Dewi Rizki Mustika Suhartono Safrin Salam Salad, Hariasi Sambar Serah, Yayan Suhartono, Rizki Mustika Sulayman Sumiati Vera Merdekawati Yunanto Yunanto Zudin Zudin Zudin, Zudin