Articles
<![CDATA[Analisis Yuridis Anak Sebagai Pelaku Tindak Pidana Dalam Pemberitaan Hoax Melalui Media Sosial ]]>
<![CDATA[Yusuf Hondawantri Naibaho]]>;
<![CDATA[Triono Eddy]]>;
<![CDATA[Alpi Sahari]]>
<![CDATA[ Legalitas: Jurnal Hukum Vol 13, No 2 (2021): Desember ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Batanghari Jambi ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.33087/legalitas.v13i2.271
<![CDATA[Dampak negatif akibat dari pada pemberitaan hoax dikalangan masyarakat awam yang tingkat literasinya masih sangat rendah biasanya mudah menerima informasi begitu saja tanpa melakukan pengecekan, bahkan menyebarkannya tanpa mempertimbangkan tingkat ketepatan informasi yang diterimanya. Pertanggungjawaban anak di bawah umur yang melakukan tindak pidana penyebaran berita hoax, harus melihat ketentuan hukum positif di Indonesia yang menedfinisikan anak sebagai orang yang belum dewasa ataupun orang yang belum mencapai usia tertentu yang ditetapkan Undang-undang sebagai batasan usia dewasa. pengertian anak pun berbeda-beda pada setiap peraturan di Indonesia. Beberapa sarjana mencoba memberikan pengertian mengenai anak, yakni anak adalah keadaan manusia normal yang masih muda dan sedang menentukan identitas serta sangat labil jiwanya sehingga sangat mudah kena pengaruh lingkungan. Menurut Undang-undang No 11 Tahun 2012 tentang Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak. Sanksi hukuman yang berupa pidana terdiri atas pidana pokok dan pidana tambahan. Untuk pidana pokok terdiri dari 5 (lima) macam sebagaimana telah ditetapkan Pasal 71 ayat (1) dan sanksi pidana tambahan terdiri dari 2 (dua) macam dalam Pasal 71 ayat (2) Undang-Undang Sistem Peradilan Anak. Suatu unsur-unsur terjadinya delik yaitu jika adanya perbuatan yang menimbulkan suatu akibat dan perbuatan tersebut memenuhi unsur melawan hukum yang subjektif dan objektif, sedangkan unsur melawan hukum subjektif yang dimaksud adalah adanya kesengajaan dari pembuat delik untuk melakukan suatu perbuatan yang melawan hukum. Unsur melawan hukum objektif penilaiannya bukan dari pembuat tetapi dari masyarakat. Unsur-unsur tindak pidana yang terdapat dalam Pasal 28 ayat (2) UU No. 11 Tahun 2008 tentang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik, yaitu: Setiap orang, yaitu pelaku penyebar berita bohong atau hoax; Kesalahan yang dilakukan dengan sengaja, yaitu kesengajaan dan tanpa hak menyebarkan berita bohong atau hoax; Tanpa hak atau Melawan hukum, yaitu dalam penyebaran berita bohong atau hoax merupakan tindakan yang melawan hukum dan bertentangan dengan hak seseorang; Perbuatan, yaitu seseorang telah menyebarkan berita tidak sesuai dengan fakta; Objek, yaitu berita bohong atau hoax; Akibat menimbulkan rasa kebencian atau permusuhan individu dan/atau kelompok masyarakat tertentu berdasarkan atas suku, agama, ras, dan antargolongan (SARA). ]]>
<![CDATA[Perbuatan Melawan Hukum Terhadap Tindak Pidana Pengambilan Benda Bergerak Sebagai Objek Pembiayaan Leasing ]]>
<![CDATA[Tito Alhafezt]]>;
<![CDATA[Triono Eddy]]>;
<![CDATA[Alpi Sahari]]>
<![CDATA[ Journal of Education, Humaniora and Social Sciences (JEHSS) Vol 3, No 1 (2020): Journal of Education, Humaniora and Social Sciences (JEHSS) Agustus ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Mahesa Research Center ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (141.824 KB)
|
DOI: 10.34007/jehss.v3i1.206
<![CDATA[The principle of the pacta sun servanda agreement stating that the agreement made by the parties to the agreement, will be the law for both, remains in force and becomes the main hope in the law of the agreement. But the agreement that provides fiduciary guarantees under the hand cannot be executed. The execution process must be carried out by submitting a lawsuit to the Negri Court through normal procedural law so that the court's ruling decreases. This paper aims to analyze or examine the legal arrangements for the taking of movable objects as objects of leasing financing and criminal liability for the actions of taking movable objects as objects of leasing financing. The results of this study indicate that criminal policies against financial institutions in the execution of fiduciary guarantees by debt collectors who have changed hands under the law number 42 of 199 concerning fiduciary guarantees to ensure legal certainty are made akata by the notary public and registered with the fiduciary office. Law enforcement against leasing parties in withdrawing fiduciary collateral by debt collectors based on law number 42 of 1999 concerning fiduciary explains that the right of execution is the authority of the court, not the authority of the seller of debt collection services that are usually leased by the leasing party.]]>
<![CDATA[Pemberian Sanksi Pidana Bagi Pelaku Penyebaran Hoax Ditinjau Dari Aspek Tindak Pidana Terorisme ]]>
<![CDATA[Afdal Junaidi]]>;
<![CDATA[Triono Eddy]]>;
<![CDATA[Alfi Sahari]]>
<![CDATA[ Journal of Education, Humaniora and Social Sciences (JEHSS) Vol 3, No 2 (2020): Journal of Education, Humaniora and Social Sciences (JEHSS) December ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Mahesa Research Center ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (58.941 KB)
|
DOI: 10.34007/jehss.v3i2.321
<![CDATA[This research, descriptive analysis, with a statutory approach, conseptual approach. The purpose of this research is to analyze the from of spreading fake news in Indonesia legislation and criminal sactions for the perpetrators of spreading fake news in term of the criminal act of terrorism. The results of this study indicate that the form of spreading fake news can be categorized as criminal act of terrorism, where the criminal act of terrorism is also threatening the safety of the nation and the state, causing divisions, causing uproar in the community, even though the act of spreading fake news is not regulated in the terrorism law but causes the effect that may be the same as that of terrorism, it’s just that the act of spreading fake news does not threaten the lives of many people. Whereas the criminal sanction for the perpetrators of spreading fake news inthe terms of the aspect of the criminal act of terrorism are equivalent to the convictions of criminal conspiracy, attempted and assisting in committing the crime of terrorism.]]>
<![CDATA[Peran Detasemen Gegana Satuan Brimob Polda Sumatera Utara Dalam Penanggulangan Tindak Pidana Terorisme ]]>
<![CDATA[Ghofur Hidayat]]>;
<![CDATA[Triono Eddy]]>;
<![CDATA[Alpi Sahari]]>
<![CDATA[ Journal of Education, Humaniora and Social Sciences (JEHSS) Vol 3, No 1 (2020): Journal of Education, Humaniora and Social Sciences (JEHSS) Agustus ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Mahesa Research Center ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (146.432 KB)
|
DOI: 10.34007/jehss.v3i1.191
<![CDATA[The eradication of criminal acts of terrorism in Indonesia is very intensively carried out due to the threat of terror, causing many casualties and public unrest at the strata of society. Therefore the government issued various regulations to overcome the criminal acts of terrorism. The eradication of the crime of terrorism certainly requires facilities and infrastructure, one of which is the bomb disposal unit. A detachment of the Gegana Brimob Bomb disposal unit is tasked with defusing bombs which are usually used by terrorists in carrying out their actions. This paper aims to analyze or examine the role of the North Sumatra Regional Police Mobile Brigade Detachment in the handling of terrorism crimes and the obstacles experienced by the North Sumatra Police Mobile Brigade Detachment in dealing with terrorism crime. The results of this study indicate that the role of the Police Mobile Brigade Corps Gegagana is carried out by bomb disposal which is carried out through the stages of preparation, implementation, and consolidation. The barriers experienced by the North Sumatra Regional Police Mobile Brigade Detachment Unit consisted of several internal and external factors.]]>
<![CDATA[Penegakan Hukum Persidangan Cepat Dalam Penyelesaian Perkara Pelanggaran Lalu Lintas (Studi Satlantas Polrestabes Medan) ]]>
<![CDATA[Foni Mega Wahyuni]]>;
<![CDATA[Triono Eddy]]>;
<![CDATA[Alpi Sahari]]>
<![CDATA[ Journal of Education, Humaniora and Social Sciences (JEHSS) Vol 3, No 1 (2020): Journal of Education, Humaniora and Social Sciences (JEHSS) Agustus ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Mahesa Research Center ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (77.155 KB)
|
DOI: 10.34007/jehss.v3i1.197
<![CDATA[Procedures for handling cases of traffic violations in Indonesia are regulated by Law Number 22 of 2009 concerning Road Traffic and Transport (LLAJ Law) which is a substitute for Act Number 14 of 1992 concerning Road Traffic and Transportation and Law Number 8 Year 1981 concerning Criminal Procedure Law. In addition, there are several derivative regulations that complement the provisions in the Act. Traffic violations in the Criminal Procedure Act (KUHAP) are grouped together with minor criminal offenses to follow the procedure for examining fast events. The method in this research is empirical juridical legal research type, which is a study that conducts a study of research in the field, conducted a direct research (risearch) regarding the enforcement of court proceedings quickly in the settlement of traffic violation cases. This research uses a qualitative approach. Based on the research, it was found that there were several obstacles in enforcing fast trial law in the settlement of traffic violations, among others: First, the number of traffic violations in Medan City which made the Judges who heard would be overwhelmed, coupled with less extensive room facilities or inadequate infrastructure facilities. which will make the room will be filled with traffic violators who will sit in the courtroom. Second, in the trial process of fast events there are still many traffic violators who use brokers in their law enforcement processes, because the crowds of court officials sometimes find it difficult to distinguish which brokers often play in the maintenance of the law enforcement process.]]>
<![CDATA[Penyidikan Tindak Pidana Pemilihan Umum Gubernur dan Wakil Gubernur Sumatera Utara Tahun 2018 ]]>
<![CDATA[Agustami Lubis]]>;
<![CDATA[Triono Eddy]]>;
<![CDATA[Mahmud Mulyadi]]>
<![CDATA[ Journal of Education, Humaniora and Social Sciences (JEHSS) Vol 2, No 3 (2020): Journal of Education, Humaniora and Social Sciences (JEHSS) April ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Mahesa Research Center ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (33.713 KB)
|
DOI: 10.34007/jehss.v2i3.127
<![CDATA[Pemilihan gubernur dan wakil gubernur Sumatera Utara pada tahun 2018 merupkan proses memilih orang untuk menduduki jabatan melalui mekanisme dan proses demokrasi yang jujur dan adil. Dalam proses pelaksanaan pemilu pemilu banyak terjadi pelanggaran-pelanggaran baik pelanggaran bersifat administrasi, maupun bersifat tindak pidana. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk untuk menganalisis pengaturan tindak pidana pemilu pada pemilihan gubernur dan wakil gubernur propinsi Sumatera Utara menurut UU No. 10 Tahun 2016. Pasangan calon Jopinus Ramli (JR) Saragih dan Ance Selian yang dibatalkan KPU propinsi terkait tindak pidana dalam bentuk pidana pemalsuan surat dokumen, sebagaimana disebutkan dalam Pasal 184 dengan UU No. 10 Tahun 2016 tentang Pemilihan Gubernur, Bupati, dan Walikota, dan mengetahui proses penyidikan tindak pidana pemilihan umum gubernur dan wakil gubernur provinsi Sumatera Utara. Hasil penulisan ini menunjukan bahwa peraturan dalam tindak pidana pemilu gubernur dan wakil gubernur merujuk pada UU No. 10 Tahun 2016 dan proses penyelidikan oleh Kepolisian atas temuan BAWASLU menunjukan bukti-bukti, fakta hukum dan saksi yang menyimpulkan terjadinya tindak pidana pemalsuan dokumen dan KPU membatalkan pasangan calon Jopinus Ramli (JR) Saragih dan Ance Selian.]]>
<![CDATA[ANALISIS YURIDIS PERAN PENGADILAN DALAM UPAYA MEMBERIKAN LAYANAN BANTUAN HUKUM TERHADAP ORANG MISKIN MENURUT UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 16 TAHUN 2011 TENTANG BANTUAN HUKUM ]]>
<![CDATA[M. Rizqi Darmawan]]>;
<![CDATA[Triono Eddy]]>
<![CDATA[ JURNAL DOKTRIN REVIEW Vol 1, No 1 (2022): Desember ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[JURNAL DOKTRIN REVIEW ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
<![CDATA[The State of Indonesia is a state of law, which means that all forms of problems concerning matters between citizens and citizens or citizens and the state (government), must be based on the laws and regulations in force in Indonesia. As a consequence, every citizen is also entitled to the same legal protection without exception. So the State understands this problem with the issuance of Law Number 16 of 2011 concerning Legal Aid as a real action in protecting the equality of its citizens before the law. The problems raised are the role and process of courts in providing legal aid to the poor, legal consequences for legal aid institutions that do not provide legal aid for the poor, and efforts by law enforcement agencies to provide legal assistance to the poor. The role and process of the court in providing legal aid to the poor who provide legal assistance to the accused or suspect still has the same position in the eyes of the law in accordance with the values of Pancasila which is socially just and does not discriminate, especially for economic differences. The legal consequences for legal aid institutions that do not provide legal aid for the poor will be sanctioned in accordance with the provisions of the applicable law, the Government through the ministry of law and human rights revokes funds for legal aid services for the poor (izim OBH). The efforts of the legal apparatus in providing legal assistance to the poor, namely the court guarantees that the suspect or defendant is accompanied by legal counsel in accordance with Law 16 of 2011 concerning Legal Aid.]]>
<![CDATA[PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP ASISTEN RUMAH TANGGA DALAM TINDAK PIDANA KEKERASAN DALAM RUMAH TANGGA (ANALISIS PUTUSAN NOMOR:791/Pid.B/2015/PN.Mdn) ]]>
<![CDATA[Johanes M. Aritonang]]>;
<![CDATA[Triono Eddy]]>
<![CDATA[ JURNAL DOKTRIN REVIEW Vol 1, No 1 (2022): Desember ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[JURNAL DOKTRIN REVIEW ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
<![CDATA[Household Assistants are vulnerable to arbitrary actions by their employers, where these arbitrary actions always occur in the house which is a private and personal area or area that cannot be reached by other people, even areas or areas that are very hidden from view. general vision. So to find out the legal protection for ART in domestic violence crimes, it is necessary to research on regulations related to legal protection for ART in domestic violence crimes, and efforts to resolve legal problems against ART in domestic violence crimes, as well as the obstacles faced in efforts to implement protection for ART victims. domestic violence. It is known that the regulation related to legal protection for ART in PKDRT is in Law no. 23 of 2004 concerning (UUPKDRT) Article 2 paragraph (1) letter (c) explains that the scope of the household includes. People who work help the household and stay in the household. People who work as referred to in letter c are considered as family members for the period of time they are in the household in question. And Efforts to resolve legal problems against ART in domestic violence crimes, by carrying out criminal legal efforts, which are the duties and authorities of institutions tasked with enforcing the law, by making complaints to law enforcement, namely the Police]]>
<![CDATA[The Controversy of Environmental Law Policies from Regulation Perspective ]]>
<![CDATA[Triono Eddy]]>
<![CDATA[ International Journal of Law Reconstruction Vol 7, No 1 (2023): International Journal of Law Reconstruction ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[UNISSULA ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.26532/ijlr.v7i1.31162
<![CDATA[Government Regulation in Lieu of Act No. 2 of 2022 was born as a result of obstacles in the investment sector, not due to the issue of climate change as contained in the Job Creation Government Regulation. The purpose of the research was to find out and analyze because the issuance of PERPPU Job Creation ignores the Constitutional Court Decision Number 91/PUU-XVIII/2020, which is related to Article 22 of the 1945 Constitution concerning the urgency which imposes benchmarks according to circumstances and is necessary to prevent a legal vaccum. The method used is normative research which studies legal norms and literature. Government Regulations in Lieu of Laws become the full authority of the President in accordance with the constitution and are regulated in Article 22 Paragraph 1 of the 1945 Constitution. In this Government Regulation in lieu of the Job Creation Law there are articles that have problems with the environment. The article will regulate issues of environmental permits, the role of the community in the AMDAL (Environmental Impact Analysis), use of forest areas and criminal sanctions.]]>
<![CDATA[PENYELIDIKAN TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI DI BIDANG PERTANAHAN DI KEJAKSAAN NEGERI DELI SERDANG ]]>
<![CDATA[Khairur Rahman Nasution]]>;
<![CDATA[Triono Eddy]]>;
<![CDATA[Didik Miroharjo]]>
<![CDATA[ TAQNIN: Jurnal Syariah dan Hukum Vol 5, No 01 (2023): Januari-Juni 2023 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.30821/taqnin.v5i01.15501
<![CDATA[ABSTRACTThe increase in corruption crimes in the land sector has had a very bad impact because it is very detrimental to the state. Corruption can no longer be classified as an extraordinary crime. In addition to causing losses to the state, it also affects the life of the nation and state. Government policies in dealing with eradicating corruption include the Decree of the People's Correctional Assembly of the Republic of Indonesia Number XI/MPR/1998 concerning the Implementation of a State that is Clean and Free of Corruption, Collusion and Nepotism. However, in 1999 the government issued Law Number 28 of 1999 concerning State Administration Clean and Free from Corruption, Collusion and Nepotism and Law Number 31 of 1999 concerning Eradication of Corruption Crimes. Various ways by individuals and officials to commit acts of corruption include those carried out including in the Government Land section, namely the Honorarium budget fund for structuring and inventorying land assets and resolving land conflicts and monitoring government land issues. That is why the author here is interested in studying and conducting research with the title "Investigation of Corruption Crimes in the Land Sector at the Deli Serdang District Attorney's Office".Keywords: Investigations, Corruption Crimes, In the Land Sector.]]>
