Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
1.884
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Pancasila dan Kewarganegaraan Jurnal Hukum Acara Perdata ADHAPER Legal Standing : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum DIVERSI : Jurnal Hukum Yustisia Merdeka : Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum MIZAN, Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Jurnal Hukum Acara Perdata Indonesian Journal of Law and Economics Review UNISKA LAW REVIEW Jurnal Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat Suloh : Jurnal Fakultas Hukum Universitas Malikussaleh Journal of Law, Poliitic and Humanities HUKMY : Jurnal Hukum Indonesian Journal of Criminal Law Studies Indonesian Journal of Law and Islamic Law (IJLIL) Khazanah Hukum
Zainal Arifin
Dosen Di Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Islam Kadiri
Religion Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Arts Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Environmental Science Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 22 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 22 Documents
Search

 1   2   3 
Quo Vadis Kebijakan Penyusunan Kabinet Koalisi Jokowi Tinjauan Filosofis, Historis, Teoritis dan Yuridis Zainal Arifin; Emi Puasa Handayani; Saivol Virdaus
Khazanah Hukum Vol. 2 No. 1 (2020): Khazanah Hukum Vol 2, No 1 April (2020)
Publisher : UIN Sunan Gunung Djati

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15575/kh.v2i1.8282

Abstract

Makalah berjudul  Quo Vadis Kebijakan Penyusunan Kabinet  Koalisi  Dimasa Yang Akan Datang Tinjauan Filosofis, Historis, Teoritis Dan Yuridis ini bertujuan untuk menjawab dua permasalahan yaitu: 1. Bagaimana bentuk kabinet yang sudah dilakasanakan pemerintahan Jokowi saat ini? 2. Bagaiamana formulasi kedepan  kabinet yang seharusnya  dibentuk oleh Pemerintah Presiden Jokowi? Metode penelitian  menggunakan metode yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan koseptual, historis dan perundang-undangan. Hasilnya adalah bahwa bentuk kabinet yang sudah dilakasanakan pemerintahan Jokowi saat ini, masih tetap mengakomodir kepentingan partai politik pengusung pada saat Pemilu Presiden tahun 2009, serta masih belum mandiri dan profesional dalam menyusun para mentri, sehingga masih ditemukan  kelemahan dan adanya menteri yang tidak berperan dan menjalankan tugas secara profesioanal. Kedua bahwa penyusunan  kabinet yang seharusnya  dibentuk oleh Pemerintahan Presiden Jokowi jilid kedua adalah mengabaikan tekanan partai pengusung yang tergabung dalam partai koalisi, sehingga formulasi kabinet yang terbentuk kedepan adalah profesional dan hanya presiden saja yang berhak menyusun.
Legal Analysis of the Violation of Concurrent Office by Ministers and Deputy Ministers Under Article 23 of Law No. 39 of 2008 on State Ministries Mohamad Candra Oktavian N; Zainal Arifin; Saivol Virdaus
Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities Vol. 6 No. 4 (2026): (JLPH) Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities
Publisher : Dinasti Research

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/jlph.v6i4.3392

Abstract

Dual office-holding by ministers and deputy ministers constitutes a legal issue with direct consequences for the quality of governance in Indonesia. This study aims to analyze the legal provisions prohibiting dual positions under Article 23 of Law No. 39 of 2008 on State Ministries, and to examine the legal consequences arising from violations thereof by ministers and deputy ministers. A normative legal research method is employed, utilizing a statutory approach and a conceptual approach, grounded in the theoretical framework of good governance and clean government. The findings reveal that Article 23 expressly prohibits ministers from concurrently serving as commissioners or directors of companies, other state officials, or leaders of organizations funded by the state budget, with the prohibition extended to deputy ministers through Constitutional Court Decision No. 128/PUU-XXIII/2025. Violations of this provision result in three dimensional legal consequences: administratively, through the nullity of legal acts and dismissal from office under the contrarius actus principle; civilly, through liability for unlawful governmental acts (onrechtmatige overheidsdaad); and criminally, through potential corruption liability where violations are accompanied by the abuse of authority causing financial losses to the state. This study concludes that the absence of explicit sanction provisions in the State Ministries Law undermines enforcement effectiveness, and therefore recommends an amendment to Article 23 incorporating explicit sanctions, strengthened institutional oversight, and mandatory periodic disclosure of positions held.
Co-Authors Afifah Endah Rahayu Ali Huristak Hartawan Hasibuan Delya Lucyana Emi Puasa Handayani Emi Puasa Handayani Emi Puasa Handayani Evi Yufita Fernando, Zico Junius Hary Masrukin HASWANGGA RISKIAN CAHYA PURBA Huzaimah Al Anshori Iskandar Zulkarnain Mahfud Fahrazi Mochammad Wachid Hasyim Mochammad Wachid Hasyim Mohamad Candra Oktavian N Muhammad Ayman al-Akiti Muhammad Ihsan Muhlashon Naufal Ghani Bayhaqi Reymon Baja Nababan5 Saivol Virdaus Saivol Virdaus Sholahuddin Al-Fatih Trinas Dewi Hariyana Virdaus, Saivol Wachid Hasyim