Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 24 Documents
Search

Seeking Justice: Criticizing the Decision of the Tapak Tuan District Court Number 37/Pid.Sus/2020/PN. Ttn Regarding Domestic Violence Lubis, Andi Hakim; Sitompul, Ariman; Pinem , Serimin; Zulyadi , Rizkan; Siagian, Fahrizal
Al-Qadha : Jurnal Hukum Islam dan Perundang-Undangan Vol 11 No 1 (2024): Al-Qadha: Jurnal Hukum Islam dan Perundang-Undangan
Publisher : Hukum Keluarga Islam IAIN LANGSA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32505/qadha.v11i1.8591

Abstract

The research aimed to analyze the alignment between the judge's decision in cases of domestic violence against children and the provisions of Law Number 23 of 2004 on the Elimination of Domestic Violence and Qonun Number 9 of 2019 on the Implementation of Handling Violence Against Women and Children. The study also considered moral considerations and the overall benefits. The research methodology employs a case law study, which involves examining court decisions to get insight into the application of the law in specific circumstances. Specifically, the study focuses on the Decision of the Tapak Tuan District Court Judge Number 37/Pid.Sus/2020/PN. Case law is utilized to examine court rulings to comprehend how the law is implemented in specific instances. The library research method is employed in conjunction with a sociological juridical perspective. The data for the research is sourced from the Law and various pertinent articles addressing the research difficulties. Furthermore, to bolster the ideas of the study, the paper also incorporates the findings of several empirical studies. According to the findings, it appears that the judge primarily focuses on formal factors and gives little weight to material considerations in their decision-making process. This aligns with the viewpoint expressed by Member Judge II and the concurring opinion within the panel of judges. However, the author acknowledges and values the decision made by the panel of judges. The author recognizes the challenging nature of the judges' task, as they must not only consider the legal interests involved in the case, but also consider the community's sense of justice in order to achieve legal certainty.
Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Penanam Ganja Berdasarkan Undang-Undang tentang Narkotika Siagian, Fahrizal S
Kajian Ilmiah Hukum dan Kenegaraan Vol. 2 No. 2 (2023): Desember
Publisher : Penerbit Goodwood

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35912/kihan.v2i2.2412

Abstract

Purpose: Narcotics abuse is a chronic problem that plagues Indonesia. Narcotics are not intended for purposes other than medical purposes. However, there are still people who still dare to plant marijuana trees which are strictly prohibited as regulated in Articles 111 and 112 Paragraph 1 of Law Number 35 of 2009 concerning Narcotics which explains the prohibition on growing marijuana unlawfully. The formulation of the problem in this research is first, How is Narcotics Crime Regulated in Indonesia? Second, what is the criminal responsibility of marijuana growers according to Law Number 35 of 2009 concerning Narcotics? The aim of the research is to answer this research problem. Methodology: The type of research used is normative legal research which refers to research studies on statutory regulations combined with primary, secondary and tertiary legal materials. The data collection technique is by using Library Research. The nature of the research is descriptive analysis. Results: The research results show that Indonesia has strict regulations that do not legalize narcotics carelessly, the prohibition is regulated in Article 111 Paragraphs 1, 2 and 112 Paragraphs 1, 2 of Law 35 of 2009 concerning Narcotics. Second, every person who without right or against the law plants, maintains, owns, stores, controls or provides narcotics in the form of plants legally and convincingly can be held criminally liable. In conclusion, Indonesia as a legal country has strict regulations to protect the young generation of the Indonesian nation from the dangers of narcotics abuse. Every person who owns, processes and distributes narcotics against their rights can be held liable for imprisonment for a minimum of 4 years, a maximum of 12 years, a fine of at least 800 million and a maximum of 8 billion rupiah. Limitation: This research is to explain and/or describe and describe all data obtained from data sources related to criminal liability for marijuana growers. Contribution: Indonesia does not legalize the use of narcotics against the law. If this happens, they can be held criminally liable.
Implementation of Straight Liability and Liability Based on Fault Concepts in Environmentally Sound Economic Development in Indonesia Siagian, Fahrizal S.; Saragih, Geofani Milthree; Firouzfar, Saied
Socius: Jurnal Penelitian Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial Vol 1, No 11 (2024): June
Publisher : Penerbit Yayasan Daarul Huda Kruengmane

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.11409099

Abstract

This research aims to answer problems related to the regulation of the concept of punishment in environmental aspects in the Indonesian criminal justice system. Secondly, this research aims to answer the juridical implementation of the concept of Straight Liability and Liability Based On Fault in environmentally sound economic development in Indonesia. This research uses normative legal research that focuses on primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials. This research obtained several important points including legal arrangements related to the concept of environmental crime regulated in Law Number 32 of 2009 concerning Protection and Management of the Indonesian Environment. Second, the implementation of the concept of Straight Liability and Liability Based On Fault in environmentally sound economic development in Indonesia so far has not been maximised. This is due to the lack of mentality and consistency of law enforcement officials to enforce environmental law in a complex manner. So that this research proposes to strengthen the essence and existence of law enforcement officials in enforcing environmental law in order to preserve Indonesia's environmental ecosystem.
Optimizing Lawrence Meir Friedman's Legal System Theory in the Authority to Investigate Corruption Crimes in Indonesia Fahrizal S.Siagian
JUSTICES: Journal of Law Vol. 2 No. 4 (2023): Progressive and Critical Law Review
Publisher : Perkumpulan Dosen Fakultas Agama Islam Indramayu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58355/justices.v2i4.93

Abstract

This study aims to answer the regulation of eradicating corruption in Indonesia, second, answer the optimization of Lawrence Meir Friedman's legal system in the authority to investigate corruption crimes in Indonesia. The research method used is normative legal research which refers to research studies on laws and regulations combined with primary, secondary and tertiary legal materials. The data collection technique is by using (Library Research). The nature of research is descriptive analysis. First The results of the study, the Eradication of Corruption Crime is regulated in Law Number 20 of 2001 and other laws and regulations. Second, that the investigation of corruption crimes in Indonesia has not been perfect in accordance with the theory of Lawrence Meir Friedman's legal system. The problems of the three elements of the legal system are still an obstacle to investigating corruption crimes in Indonesia.
Implementation of Straight Liability and Liability Based On Fault Concepts in Environmentally Sound Economic Development in Indonesia Fahrizal S.Siagian; Geofani Milthree Saragih; Frans Maruli Silaban
JUSTICES: Journal of Law Vol. 3 No. 3 (2024): Progressive and Critical Law Review
Publisher : Perkumpulan Dosen Fakultas Agama Islam Indramayu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58355/justices.v3i3.111

Abstract

This research aims to answer problems related to the regulation of the concept of punishment in environmental aspects in the Indonesian criminal justice system. Secondly, this research aims to answer the juridical implementation of the concept of Straight Liability and Liability Based On Fault in environmentally sound economic development in Indonesia. This research uses normative legal research that focuses on primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials. This research obtained several important points including legal arrangements related to the concept of environmental crime regulated in Law Number 32 of 2009 concerning Protection and Management of the Indonesian Environment. Second, the implementation of the concept of Straight Liability and Liability Based On Fault in environmentally sound economic development in Indonesia so far has not been maximised. This is due to the lack of mentality and consistency of law enforcement officials to enforce environmental law in a complex manner. So that this research proposes to strengthen the essence and existence of law enforcement officials in enforcing environmental law in order to preserve Indonesia's environmental ecosystem.
Justice based corruption eradication policy: A comparison between Indonesia and Denmark Fahrizal S. Siagian; Andi Hakim Lubis; Nabila Afifah Salwa; Saied Firouzfar
Integritas: Jurnal Antikorupsi Vol. 10 No. 1 (2024): INTEGRITAS: Jurnal Antikorupsi
Publisher : Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32697/integritas.v10i1.1134

Abstract

: This research was conducted to obtain an explanation of corruption eradication policies in Denmark and Indonesia. In addition, to find out the justice-based corruption eradication policy in a comparative study of Indonesia and Denmark. This research uses a normative juridical method with a literature study. Based on this, the required results are that corruption eradication policies in Indonesia and Denmark have significant differences. Denmark inserts corruption eradication provisions into each of its laws and regulations and uses a strict element of transparency in state financial management. Denmark utilizes social sanctions supported by the legal culture of its highly law-abiding society. Second, the policy reconstruction that can be used in Indonesia to eradicate corruption adopts the Danish policy. Namely, the anti-corruption agency with independent status integrates corruption eradication regulations into national legislation emphasizing strict sanctions and transparency of state financial management correlated with the wealth of state officials. The independence of the Corruption Eradication Commission is crucial. Applying Denmark’s mechanisms could lead to a breakthrough in corruption eradication in Indonesia.
The Role of the Code of Ethics and Code of Conduct in Maintaining the Honor and Dignity of Judges Lubis, Andi Hakim; Zulyadi, Rizkan; Pinem, Serimin; Siagian, Fahrizal S.; Muazzul, Muazzul
Law and Justice Vol. 9 No. 1 (2024): Law and Justice
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23917/laj.v9i1.4760

Abstract

The public has high expectations of judges and the judicial system, given that the judiciary is an institution authorized to decide cases and provide justice. However, in recent years, the public has been watching the behavior of judges and the quality of their decisions in adjudicating cases. Not a few judges' decisions invite criticism and cynicism, lead to public distrust, and form a considerable skepticism towards the judiciary. The research method used is normative legal research. This research is descriptive analytical. The data collection technique was carried out by means of literature study. The result of the research is that the role of ethical guidelines and judge behavior is needed in order to maintain and uphold the honor and dignity, as well as the behavior of judges. The code of ethics and behavior of judges is the core inherent in the profession of judges containing ethical and moral values, to realize a court that has good authority and dignity. Obstacles arise from within the judiciary itself, especially in relation to the lack of effective internal supervision, and the tendency to increase various forms of abuse of authority by judges. The implementation of the Code of Ethics and Code of Conduct for Judges must be carried out effectively without interference from various parties with interests. So as to be able to maintain the dignity, honor and nobility of the judicial profession.   Masyarakat memiliki ekspektasi yang tinggi terhadap hakim dan sistem peradilan, mengingat peradilan adalah lembaga yang berwenang untuk memutuskan perkara dan memberikan keadilan. Namun, dalam beberapa tahun terakhir, publik mencermati perilaku hakim dan kualitas putusannya dalam mengadili perkara. Tidak sedikit putusan hakim yang mengundang kritik dan sinisme, menimbulkan ketidakpercayaan masyarakat, dan membentuk skeptisisme yang cukup besar terhadap lembaga peradilan. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah penelitian hukum normatif. Penelitian ini bersifat deskriptif analitis. Teknik pengumpulan data dilakukan dengan cara studi kepustakaan. Hasil penelitian ini adalah peran pedoman etika dan perilaku hakim sangat diperlukan dalam rangka menjaga dan menegakkan kehormatan dan keluhuran martabat serta perilaku hakim. Kode etik dan perilaku hakim merupakan inti yang melekat pada profesi hakim yang mengandung nilai-nilai etika dan moral, untuk mewujudkan peradilan yang berwibawa dan bermartabat. Hambatan muncul dari internal lembaga peradilan sendiri, terutama terkait dengan belum efektifnya pengawasan internal dan kecenderungan meningkatnya berbagai bentuk penyalahgunaan wewenang oleh hakim. Penerapan Kode Etik dan Pedoman Perilaku Hakim harus dilakukan secara efektif tanpa adanya campur tangan dari berbagai pihak yang memiliki kepentingan. Sehingga mampu menjaga keluhuran martabat, kehormatan dan keluhuran profesi hakim.
Kajian Yuridis Tindak Pidana Penanam Ganja Berdasarkan Undang-undang Tentang Narkotika Indonesia Fahrizal S.Siagian; Putra, Najuasah; Imam, Muhammad Khairul
Neoclassical Legal Review: Journal of Law and Contemporary Issues Vol. 2 No. 2 (2023): Neoclassical Legal Review: Journal of Law and Contemporary Issues
Publisher : Talenta Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32734/nlr.v2i2.13563

Abstract

Penyalahgunaan Narkotika merupakan sebuah permasalahan kronis yang melanda Indonesia. Namun, masih terdapat masyarakat yang tetap melakukan penanaman pohon ganja diluar keperluan medis yang dilarang keras oleh undang-undang. Rumusan masalah dalam penelitian ini pertama, Bagaimanakah Pengaturan Tindak Pidana Narkotika di Indonesia? Kedua, Bagaimanakah Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Penanam Ganja Menurut Undang-undang Nomor 35 Tahun 2009 Tentang Narkotika? Tujuan penelitian untuk menjawab permasalahan penelitian ini. Jenis Penelitian yang digunakan yakni penelitian hukum normatif yang mengacu pada studi penelitian pada peraturan perundang-undangan yang dipadukan dengan bahan hukum primer, sekunder dan tersier. Teknik pengumpulan data menggunakan Penelitian Kepustakaan (Library Research). Sifat penelitian ini deskriptif analisis. Hasil penelitian bahwa Indonesia memiliki aturan ketat yang tidak melegalkan narkotika secara sembarangan, sesuai Undang-undang 35 Tahun 2009 Tentang Narkotika. Kedua, setiap orang yang tanpa hak atau melawan hukum menanam, memelihara, memiliki, menyimpan, menguasai, atau menyediakan narkotika golongan I dalam bentuk tanaman dapat dimintai pertanggungjawaban pidana. Kesimpulannya bahwa Indonesia sebagai negara hukum memiliki regulasi yang ketat untuk menjaga generasi muda bangsa Indonesia dari bahaya penyalahgunaan narkotika. Setiap orang yang memiliki, menamam dan menyebarkan narkotika secara melawan hak maka dapat dimintai pertanggungjawaban pidananya
Review of the Applicability of Advocate Immunity Rights in Indonesia : A Comparative Study with the Australian Solicitor Siagian, Fahrizal S.; Lubis , Andi Hakim; Firouzfar, Saied
Neoclassical Legal Review: Journal of Law and Contemporary Issues Vol. 1 No. 1 (2022): Neoclassical Legal Review: Journal of Law and Contemporary Issues
Publisher : Talenta Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32734/nlrjolci.v1i1.16858

Abstract

Advocates are one part of the Law Enforcement Officers who have rights and obligations that must be obeyed by each party. Advocate Immunity Rights which is a right that states advocates cannot be prosecuted civilly or criminally in carrying out their professional duties in good faith for the benefit of client defense. Problems are how is the influence of legal sociology in supporting the professional duties of advocates? and how is the applicability of advocate immunity rights in accordance with the indonesian advocates law and the australian solicitor studied based on legal compliance theory? The purpose of this study is to answer the various problems of this research. Normative juridical method with a comparative study approach in Indonesia and Australia. The essential influence of legal sociology in supporting the professional duties of advocates is because advocates will be faced with diverse community cultures. Legal compliance theory of advocate immunity rights in accordance with Advocate Law Number 18 of 2003 is still often ignored by other law enforcement officials. Advocates are still often criminalized in carrying out professional duties, namely defending their clients, unlike in Australia which prioritizes immunity rights. This is a special concern for each of the law enforcement institution to respect each other, in order to create fair law enforcement
Legal Politics of Investigation Authority in Criminal Offences Under the Draft Criminal Procedure Code (RKUHAP) Panca Sarjana Putra; S.Siagian, Fahrizal; Brimob Ritonga; Saied Firouzfar; Dedi Kurniawan
JUSTISI Vol. 11 No. 3 (2025): JUSTISI
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Muhammadiyah Sorong

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33506/js.v11i3.4273

Abstract

The aim of investigative research is a pro justisia stage that serves to gather two pieces of evidence to find the perpetrator of a criminal act after an investigation. This process is known as due process of law, which is contained in the Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP). The renewal of criminal procedure law is to balance the pre-enactment of the 2026 Criminal Law. Therefore, several research objectives were obtained, namely to explain the authority of investigation in criminal acts in the 1981 KUHAP. Then, another objective is to explain the legal policy review related to the authority of investigation in criminal acts based on the Draft National Criminal Procedure Code. The method used in this study is normative juridical research combined with empirical data, through a conceptual approach, a legislative approach, and a case approach. Novelty This study is novel in that criminal procedure law, particularly dominus litis authority, cannot be expanded and the portion of investigation must remain with the state police investigators. This refers to the effectiveness and efficiency of law enforcement and the principles of human rights. The results of this study show that the authority to investigate criminal acts in Law No. 8 of 1981 on Criminal Procedure is vested in the Indonesian National Police. The legal policy review regarding investigative authority in criminal cases based on the Draft National Criminal Procedure Code aims to prioritize the prosecutorial authority of the public prosecutor in the handling of criminal cases. However, this situation may lead to undesirable issues in the future, such as violations of human rights and the inefficiency of the criminal justice process. The conclusion of this study is that the expansion of the authority of public prosecutors as criminal investigators is dangerous. Therefore, in terms of efficiency, effectiveness, and the enforcement of human rights, the expansion of the authority of public prosecutors in investigations under the Draft Criminal Procedure Code has the potential to undermine the sense of legal justice.