Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 27 Documents
Search

Justice based corruption eradication policy: A comparison between Indonesia and Denmark Siagian, Fahrizal S.; Lubis, Andi Hakim; Salwa, Nabila Afifah; Firouzfar, Saied
Integritas: Jurnal Antikorupsi Vol. 10 No. 1 (2024): INTEGRITAS: Jurnal Antikorupsi
Publisher : Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32697/integritas.v10i1.1134

Abstract

: This research was conducted to obtain an explanation of corruption eradication policies in Denmark and Indonesia. In addition, to find out the justice-based corruption eradication policy in a comparative study of Indonesia and Denmark. This research uses a normative juridical method with a literature study. Based on this, the required results are that corruption eradication policies in Indonesia and Denmark have significant differences. Denmark inserts corruption eradication provisions into each of its laws and regulations and uses a strict element of transparency in state financial management. Denmark utilizes social sanctions supported by the legal culture of its highly law-abiding society. Second, the policy reconstruction that can be used in Indonesia to eradicate corruption adopts the Danish policy. Namely, the anti-corruption agency with independent status integrates corruption eradication regulations into national legislation emphasizing strict sanctions and transparency of state financial management correlated with the wealth of state officials. The independence of the Corruption Eradication Commission is crucial. Applying Denmark’s mechanisms could lead to a breakthrough in corruption eradication in Indonesia.
Implementation of the Principle of Justice for Crime Victims in the Criminal Procedure Process in Indonesia Based on the Perspective of Natural Law Philosophy Fahrizal S.Siagian
JUSTICES: Journal of Law Vol. 4 No. 4 (2025): Progressive and Critical Law Review
Publisher : Perkumpulan Dosen Fakultas Agama Islam Indramayu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58355/justices.v4i4.215

Abstract

The implementation of the principle of justice for crime victims in the criminal justice process is a crucial issue in efforts to reform criminal law in Indonesia. The perspective of Natural Law Philosophy provides a strong normative foundation through the idea that every human being has natural rights that must be respected by the state, including the right of victims to obtain just redress. This study examines the extent to which Natural Law principles, such as moral justice, respect for human dignity, and balance of rights, are reflected in policies and practices for protecting crime victims. The method used is a normative juridical approach through analysis of relevant laws and regulations, doctrines, and court decisions. The results of the study indicate that although positive legal instruments such as the Witness and Victim Protection Law, provisions on restitution and compensation, and assistance mechanisms have accommodated victims' rights, their implementation remains inadequate. Barriers arise in the form of limited access, minimal understanding among law enforcement officials, and suboptimal service providers. These imperfections create a gap between the ideals of natural justice and positive sentencing practices. This research emphasizes the need to prioritize reformulating sentencing policies that are more oriented toward victim recovery so that the Indonesian legal system aligns with the universal values of Natural Law Philosophy and is able to deliver substantive justice in every law enforcement process.
Sacred Waters and Environmental Virtue: A Comparative Study of Religious Rituals and Water Conservation Ethics Fibry Jati Nugroho; Eko Sutrisno; Fahrizal S.Siagian
Green Philosophy: International Journal of Religious Education and Philosophy Vol. 2 No. 1 (2025): January: Green Philosophy: International Journal of Religious Education and Phi
Publisher : International Forum of Researchers and Lecturers

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70062/greenphilosophy.v2i1.261

Abstract

This study explores the intersection of sacred water rituals and ecological awareness, examining how religious practices related to water shape environmental virtues and promote water conservation efforts. Various religious traditions, including Islam, Christianity, Hinduism, and indigenous practices, treat water as a sacred resource, emphasizing its purity, sanctity, and the responsibility of humans to protect it. These rituals, such as Islamic ablution (wudhu), Christian baptism, and Hindu purification rites, not only serve spiritual purposes but also embody environmental ethics that encourage restraint, humility, and stewardship in the use of water. The study employs a comparative qualitative approach, integrating textual exegesis, ethnographic observations, and interviews with religious practitioners to analyze how different faith traditions frame water as sacred and how these frameworks translate into practical behaviors regarding water conservation. The findings reveal that religious water rituals contribute to an ecological self, fostering a deep respect for nature and a commitment to sustainable water use. However, challenges exist in reconciling traditional practices with modern water scarcity issues, especially in regions where water conservation is a critical concern. Despite these challenges, religious communities have the potential to leverage their ritual heritage to foster global awareness and action toward water conservation. Future research should explore interfaith collaborations in water conservation and investigate the impact of ritual practices on real-world water conservation behaviors. This study highlights the potential of sacred water rituals as powerful tools for promoting environmental stewardship and addressing global water challenges.
KAJIAN HUKUM TERHADAP ANAK BERHADAPAN DENGAN HUKUM YANG MENIMBULKAN KORBAN JIWA DALAM LINGKUP KELUARGA DITINJAU DARI PERSPEKTIF KEADILAN Gultom, Gerry Anderson; Siagian, Fahrizal S.; Pasaribu, Johannes; Marlina, Marlina
RIO LAW JURNAL Vol 7, No 1 (2026): Rio Law Jurnal
Publisher : Universitas Muara Bungo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36355/rlj.v7i1.1977

Abstract

ABSTRAKKasus kekerasan atau pembunuhan dalam keluarga yang dilakukan Anak yang Berhadapan dengan Hukum sering kali menimbulkan dilema antara pendekatan retributif dan restoratif di Indonesia. Pendekatan restoratif menekankan pemulihan korban, pelaku, dan komunitas, namun terbatas pada kasus fatal seperti korban jiwa. Sejauh mana restorasi pidana dapat diterapkan pada ABH penyebab korban jiwa dalam keluarga? Bagaimana perspektif keadilan restoratif selaras dengan beberapa peraturan perundang-undangan nasional tentang Diversi? Penelitian yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan konseptual dan kasus, menganalisis undang-undang, yurisprudensi Mahkamah Agung, serta doktrin keadilan restoratif ala Howard Zehr. Restorasi pidana memungkinkan melalui diversi jika ada pengakuan kesalahan, restitusi, dan rehabilitasi, meski korban jiwa memerlukan mediasi khusus melibatkan keluarga korban. Pendekatan restoratif terhadap ABH penyebab korban jiwa dalam keluarga layak diterapkan demi kepentingan terbaik anak, asal dibatasi oleh prinsip keadilan substantif dan persetujuan korban. Tantangan utama adalah konflik dengan budaya hukum pidana nasional yang seringkali masih bersifat retributif, sehingga diperlukan revisi regulasi untuk memperkuat restorative justice pada kasus domestik fatal.Kata Kunci:  Restorasi, pidana, ABH, keadilan restoratif.
Artificial Intelligence in Criminal Investigations: Legal Implications for Evidence Admissibility, Accountability, and Protection of Fundamental Human Rights Satriya Nugraha; Kiki Kristanto; Fahrizal S.Siagian
Journal of Civil Criminal Law Vol. 1 No. 3 (2025): December : International Journal of Civil Criminal Law
Publisher : International Forum of Researchers and Lecturers

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70062/jccl.v1i3.141

Abstract

The rapid development of Artificial Intelligence (AI) has brought significant changes to the criminal justice system, particularly in criminal investigations and evidentiary processes, while simultaneously raising complex legal and ethical challenges. Objective: This study aims to analyze the legal implications of the use of AI in criminal investigations, focusing on its benefits, risks, and challenges related to the admissibility of AI-based evidence, as well as the need for regulatory frameworks that ensure fairness, transparency, and accountability. Methods: This research employs a normative qualitative approach through the analysis of legal regulations, a review of legal and technological literature, and a comparative approach across jurisdictions, complemented by case studies of AI applications in law enforcement practices. Results: The findings indicate that AI enhances investigative efficiency through data analysis, crime prediction, and digital forensics; however, it also poses risks such as algorithmic bias, human rights violations, and issues concerning the reliability and transparency of evidence. Furthermore, differences across legal systems result in the absence of uniform standards for the admissibility of AI-based evidence. Therefore, adaptive regulatory frameworks grounded in the principles of fairness, transparency, and accountability are required, along with strengthened human oversight to ensure that the use of AI aligns with the principles of justice and human rights protection.
The Transformation of Public Service Law in Smart Cities: Balancing Technological Innovation, Accountability, and Inclusive Governance Aziz Widhi Nugroho; Dewa Gede Sudika Mangku; Fahrizal S.Siagian
Discourse Journal on Law and Society Vol. 1 No. 2 (2025): May: Discourse on Law and Society
Publisher : International Forum of Researchers and Lecturers

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70062/djls.v1i2.150

Abstract

The rapid development of smart cities, integrating technologies like artificial intelligence (AI), the Internet of Things (IoT), and big data analytics, has transformed urban environments, improving public services and governance. However, this progress presents challenges in inclusivity, accountability, and equity, requiring updates to public service law to address emerging concerns. As digital technologies reshape governance, legal frameworks must balance innovation with citizens' rights protection. This study explores the intersection of law, technology, and society in smart cities, focusing on the implications of digital transformation on public service law. It identifies challenges in governance, including the digital divide, privacy protection, and data security. The research aims to propose an inclusive legal framework that supports technological innovation while promoting accountability and social equity in smart cities. A socio-legal approach is used, combining case studies, policy analysis, and stakeholder interviews. The findings reveal that while digital transformation improves efficiency, challenges remain in citizen participation and reducing inequalities. Successful smart city models, such as those in Barcelona and Tallinn, prioritize inclusivity, accountability, and participation. The study highlights the need for flexible, adaptive legal frameworks to ensure that smart cities are governed inclusively, transparently, and equitably.
Analisis Terhadap Penyebab Terjadinya Kebanjiran Di Kota Medan Akibat Pencemaran Lingkungan Perspektif Undang-Undang Nomor 32 Tahun 2009 Fahrizal S.Siagian; Geofani Milthree Saragih; David Chrisna Pangihutan; Frans Maruli Silaban; Gamal Abdul Nasser; Muhammad Hanafie Arrasyid
Jurnal Hukum dan Sosial Politik Vol. 2 No. 3 (2024): Agustus: Jurnal Hukum dan Sosial Politik
Publisher : International Forum of Researchers and Lecturers

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59581/jhsp-widyakarya.v2i3.3446

Abstract

This research analyzes the causes of flooding in Medan City due to environmental pollution, with the perspective of Law Number 32 of 2009 concerning Environmental Protection and Management (UU-PPLH). Medan City is one of the flood-prone areas in North Sumatra, which experiences flooding almost every year. Factors that cause flooding include poor city drainage systems and environmental pollution due to careless dumping of rubbish. Law Number 32 of 2009 regulates environmental management and protection, but its implementation is not yet optimal. The research method used is normative legal research with a document study and field observation approach. The research results show that public awareness of the importance of waste management and environmental preservation is still low, which contributes to flooding. There is a need to increase supervision and law enforcement as well as educate the public to reduce the risk of flooding in the future.