Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
3.137
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal DiH : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Jurnal Akta Bina Hukum Lingkungan Jurnal Hukum Volkgeist JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW KADARKUM: Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat Journal of Law, Poliitic and Humanities Bina Hukum Lingkungan Proceeding ISETH (International Summit on Science, Technology, and Humanity) Jurnal Penelitian Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial Jurnal Mitrawarga Strata Social and Humanities Studies Kanun: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Journal of Transcendental Law Educommunity Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Proceeding International Conference Restructuring and Transforming Law
Achmad Miftah Farid
Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta
Religion Arts Humanities Computer Science & IT Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Engineering Environmental Science Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Medicine & Pharmacology Social Sciences Other

Published : 21 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 21 Documents
Search

 1   2   3 
Judicial Interpretation of the Principle of Equality Before the Law in Maintaining Impartiality in the Handling of Pro Bono Cases at the Surakarta District Court Welly Cahya Saputra; Achmad Miftah Farid
Proceeding International Conference Restructuring and Transforming Law Vol. 5 No. 1 (2026): Proceeding International Conference Restructuring and Transforming Law
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The principle of equality before the law affirms that everyone has equal standing before the law without distinction of social or economic background. This principle relates to the fulfillment of access to justice, including through the provision of free legal aid (pro bono) for the underprivileged. This study aims to examine (1) how judges at the Surakarta District Court interpret the principle of equality before the law in the matter pro bono; and (2) how judges apply the principle of equality before the law to maintain impartiality in the judicial process pro bono. This study uses an empirical legal research method with a socio-legal approach and case studies. Data were obtained through interviews, observations, and literature studies, then analyzed qualitatively. The results show that judges at the Surakarta District Court interpret the principle of equality before the law as the equal standing before the court, regardless of economic background or legal aid status. Judges assess cases based on the arguments, evidence, and facts revealed in court. The application of this principle is reflected in the provision of equal opportunity to the parties in court, from the presentation of arguments, the submission of evidence, witness examination, to the delivery of legal opinions. The judge's neutral attitude in presiding over the trial and the preparation of legal considerations based on facts and legal provisions are also part of efforts to maintain impartiality in case handling pro bono.
Co-Authors Amin Muhammad, Amin Anastasya, Dita Nadya Arief Budiono Arum Dwi Arta Setyoningsih Catur Prasetyo, Dimas Putra Chandra, Rizky Aditya Denny Saptono Fahrurodzi Dewi Sulistyowati, Dewi Diana Setiawati Fahreza, Fandi Ahmad Fatihah, Nada Nabila Febriani, Hanifah Firmansyah, Shandy Herlian Hanafi, Muhammad Amin Hardina, Hardina Herlina Basri Indah Maulani Indahsari, Novi Nur Isyana Kurniasari Konoras Kelik Wardiono Kuswardhani Kuswardhani M.Junaidi Muhammad RM Fayasy Failaq Nuria Siswi Enggarani Pontoh, Pangeran Bintang Putra S Pratama, Fauzan Arya robert lengkong weku Rusdin Alauddin Sayang Bidul Siti Purwanti Spaltan, Bita Gadsia Sukmawati, Adik Syaifuddin Zuhdi Umar, Mahmud Hi. Wardah Yuspin Welly Cahya Saputra Zalva Zahiah Putri Hecinda