Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
3.981
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Legal Standing : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Jurnal Ilmiah Galuh Justisi Legalite: Jurnal Perundang Undangan dan Hukum Pidana Islam Jurnal Ilmu Hukum KYADIREN Jurnal Syntax Imperatif : Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Pendidikan Indonesian Journal of Law and Economics Review Jurnal Cahaya Mandalika Jurnal Nuansa Akademik: Jurnal Pembangunan Masyarakat Jurnal Humaya: Jurnal Hukum, Humaniora, Masyarakat, dan Budaya USRAH: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Islam Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik (JIHHP) Jurnal Ilmu Multidisplin Aurelia: Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat Indonesia Journal of Community Health Provision Golden Ratio of Law and Social Policy Review (GRLSPR) AL-SULTHANIYAH Jurnal As-Syar’i: Jurnal Bimbingan & Konseling Keluarga Jurnal Ar Ro'is Mandalika (Armada)
Prasetyo, Boedi
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Humanities Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Computer Science & IT Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Health Professions Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Mathematics Medicine & Pharmacology Nursing Public Health Social Sciences Veterinary

Published : 30 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 30 Documents
Search

 1   2   3 
Implementation of Punishment for Perpetrators of Aggravated Theft Based on the New Criminal Code: Implementasi Pemidanaan Terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Pencurian Dengan Pemberatan Berdasarkan KUHP Baru Reano, Arfan; Prasetyo, Boedi
Indonesian Journal of Law and Economics Review Vol. 20 No. 4 (2025): November
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Sidoarjo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21070/ijler.v20i4.1397

Abstract

General background: Aggravated theft remains one of the most prevalent property crimes in Indonesia, generating significant social and economic harm. Specific background: The enactment of the New Criminal Code (Law No. 1 of 2023) introduces substantial reforms to the formulation and classification of aggravated theft, replacing the long-standing provisions under Article 363 of the former Criminal Code. Knowledge gap: Despite these changes, there is limited scholarly analysis regarding how the new provisions affect sentencing practices, evidentiary assessment, and legal certainty within the criminal justice system. Aims: This study analyzes the implementation of criminal sentencing for aggravated theft under Article 477 of the New Criminal Code and compares it with the regulatory framework of the previous code. Results: The findings indicate that the New Criminal Code provides clearer, more systematic, and more coherent formulations of aggravating factors, alongside more proportional sentencing scales, thereby facilitating investigation, prosecution, and judicial decision-making. Novelty: This study demonstrates that the restructuring of aggravated theft provisions enhances interpretive consistency and reduces ambiguity in legal application. Implications: Overall, the revised provisions strengthen sentencing effectiveness, reinforce deterrence, and establish greater legal certainty in adjudicating aggravated theft cases. Highlights: Clarifies the shift from Article 363 (Old KUHP) to Article 477 (New KUHP) in defining aggravated theft. Highlights improved clarity, structure, and proportionality in the New Criminal Code’s sentencing framework. Emphasizes the enhanced legal certainty and consistency for law enforcement and judicial practice. Keywords: Aggravated Theft, New Criminal Code, Sentencing, Legal Certainty, Proportionality  
Perlindungan Hukum terhadap Penyandang Disabilitas Korban Kekerasan Seksual: Studi Putusan Nomor 78/PID.SUS/2024/PN RAH Huring, Vinna Clarissa; Prasetyo, Boedi
AL-SULTHANIYAH Vol. 14 No. 2 (2025): AL-SULTHANIYAH
Publisher : Institut Agama Islam Sultan Muhammad Syafiuddin Sambas

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37567/al-sulthaniyah.v14i2.4511

Abstract

Legal protection for victims resulting from a criminal act must be provided to every citizen, including people with disabilities. This study explains that the judge's decision is based on the facts revealed during the trial, with a specific example in the case of decision 78/PID.SUS/2024/PN RAH. This study uses a normative juridical legal approach. The approaches used in this study are the case approach, the statutory approach, and the conceptual approach. Decision Number 78/PID.SUS/2024/PN RAH substantively acknowledges the vulnerability of victims with disabilities by making powerlessness an aggravating factor and applying the criminal norms of Law No. 12/2022, thus emphasizing the perpetrator's responsibility. However, the decision does not outline crucial procedural accommodations such as legal and psychosocial assistance, disability-sensitive medical/forensic examinations, accessible communication, and examination room arrangements, resulting in a gap between legal recognition and the realization of the right to access justice and the practical recovery of victims. The imposition of fines has the dual potential of acting as both a retributive sanction and a restorative instrument if there is a clear allocation mechanism. However, because the decision does not regulate the management or restitution clause of the fine, the opportunity to fulfill distributive and restorative justice for the victim is missed. Therefore, the imposition of fines should ideally be accompanied by a restitution obligation, a transparent mechanism for fund management, and a guarantee of service referrals so that the financial sanction truly repairs the victim's losses, rather than simply punishing the perpetrator.
Investigation Mechanism to Obtain Information from Suspects Allegedly Committing Criminal Acts: Mekanisme Penyidikan untuk Mendapatkan Keterangan Terhadap Tersangka yang Diduga Melakukan Tindak Pidana Romlih, Rheihan Nurrizki; Prasetyo, Boedi
Indonesian Journal of Law and Economics Review Vol. 21 No. 1 (2026): February
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Sidoarjo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21070/ijler.v21i1.1401

Abstract

General background of this study lies in the central role of investigation as a crucial stage in the Indonesian criminal justice process, where investigators are responsible for collecting evidence and obtaining suspect statements under KUHAP. Specific background concerns recurring procedural deviations in practice, including coercive interrogation, absence of legal counsel, and improper documentation, which undermine due process and violate constitutional protections. Knowledge gap emerges from limited scholarly analysis that systematically connects the normative framework of KUHAP with its practical implementation in suspect examinations. This study aims to examine the investigation mechanisms for obtaining suspect statements while prioritizing legal protection, based on a normative legal research method analyzing statutory rules and legal doctrine. Results show that although KUHAP clearly regulates summons procedures, notification of rights, voluntary statements, prohibition of coercion, and standardized documentation through BAP, significant discrepancies remain in field practices. Novelty of this research lies in offering an integrated assessment of normative provisions, operational challenges, and concrete procedural reforms, particularly mandatory audio-visual recording and strengthened oversight. Implications highlight the urgency of improving investigator professionalism and ensuring transparent, accountable investigations to safeguard suspect rights and preserve the integrity of the criminal justice system. Highlights: Clear KUHAP procedures often differ from actual investigative practices. Suspect statements must be obtained voluntarily without coercion. Strong oversight and audio-visual recording are essential for accountable investigations. Keywords: Investigation, Suspect Rights, KUHAP, Legal Protection, Criminal Procedure
Implications of Disparities in District Court and Supreme Court Decisions in Realizing Justice: Implikasi Disparitas Putusan Pengadilan Negeri dan Mahkamah Agung dalam Mewujudkan Keadilan Tarnama, Eins Mitchelle; Prasetyo, Boedi
Indonesian Journal of Law and Economics Review Vol. 21 No. 1 (2026): February
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Sidoarjo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21070/ijler.v21i1.1406

Abstract

The general background of this study lies in the central importance of judicial consistency in upholding legal certainty within Indonesia’s criminal justice system. The specific background concerns the contrasting outcomes in the Gregorius Ronald Tannur case, where the Surabaya District Court acquitted the defendant while the Supreme Court later imposed a prison sentence, revealing potential procedural irregularities and integrity issues within the judiciary. The knowledge gap emerges from the limited scholarly examination that systematically connects judicial disparity with its legal, institutional, and socio-justice implications. This study aims to analyze the disparity between Decision No. 454/Pid.B/2024/PN.Sby and Decision No. 1466/K/Pid/2024, and to evaluate its impact on public trust, legal certainty, and judicial accountability. The results show that differences in legal interpretation, assessment of evidence, procedural deviations, and external influences contribute significantly to the disparity, with substantial consequences for the perception of justice. The novelty of this research lies in offering an integrated normative–comparative analysis that links judicial reasoning, structural weaknesses, and ethical considerations within one evaluative framework. The implications emphasize the urgent need for strengthened judicial supervision, clearer sentencing guidelines, and systemic reforms to ensure fairness, transparency, and the restoration of public confidence in Indonesia’s legal system. Highlights: Highlights how differing court decisions undermine legal certainty and consistency. Emphasizes the role of judicial integrity in maintaining public confidence. Identifies the need for stronger oversight and clearer sentencing guidelines. Keywords: Judicial Disparity, Legal Certainty, Judicial Integrity, Sentencing Inconsistency, Public Trust
Inconsistency in the Implementation of Corruption Criminalization Guidelines Based on PERMA No. 1 of 2020 in the Harvey Moeis Case Decision Cristofel, Moses; Prasetyo, Boedi
Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Kyadiren Vol 7 No 2 (2026): Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Kyadiren
Publisher : PPPM, Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum (STIH) Biak-Papua

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46924/jihk.v7i2.367

Abstract

This study analyzes the inconsistency in applying Supreme Court Regulation (PERMA) No. 1 of 2020 on Sentencing Guidelines for Corruption Cases in the Central Jakarta District Court Decision No. 70/Pid.Sus-TPK/2024/PN.Jkt.Pst concerning Harvey Moeis. The research employs a normative juridical method with statutory and conceptual approaches, using library research on primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials analyzed through a descriptive qualitative framework. The findings reveal that the sentencing failed to align with the principles of proportionality and justice mandated by PERMA No. 1 of 2020. Weak judicial oversight, subjective interpretation by judges, and declining professional ethics have led to sentencing disparities that erode public trust in judicial integrity. Systemic reconstruction is therefore required through stronger compliance mechanisms, an enhanced role of the Judicial Commission, and moral-based judicial training to ensure the consistent realization of substantive justice.
Legal and Bioethical Implications of Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) by Doctors in Indonesia Sarana, Harmin; Sutarno , Sutarno; Prasetyo, Boedi
Golden Ratio of Law and Social Policy Review Vol. 4 No. 2 (2025): January - June
Publisher : Manunggal Halim Jaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.52970/grlspr.v4i2.1337

Abstract

This paper examines the legal and bioethical implications of Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) decisions made by physicians in Indonesia, using a juridical and literature analysis approach. DNR decisions, which involve withholding or discontinuing life-sustaining treatment, are complex and fraught with legal, ethical, and cultural challenges. In Indonesia, the lack of explicit legal guidance regarding DNR creates significant ambiguity for healthcare professionals. This paper examines the relationship between the legal framework, medical ethics, and cultural influences that shape these decisions. It highlights the role of autonomy, beneficence, impartiality, and justice in ethical considerations surrounding DNR. Furthermore, it considers the influence of Indonesia's largely religious and collectivist culture, which often places family decisions above patient autonomy. Through a literature review and legal analysis, this paper suggests the need for clearer guidelines and greater protections for healthcare providers involved in DNR decisions. It also proposes enhanced bioethics education for medical professionals and increased public awareness of patient rights in end-of-life care.
Kompetensi Pengadilan Negeri Dalam Pemutusan Sengketa Pemilihan Umum Di Indonesia Artana, I Putu Juni; Prasetyo, Boedi
Nuansa Akademik: Jurnal Pembangunan Masyarakat Vol. 10 No. 2 (2025)
Publisher : Lembaga Dakwah dan Pembangunan Masyarakat Universitas Cokroaminoto Yogyakarta (LDPM UCY)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47200/jnajpm.v10i2.3240

Abstract

This study examines the competence of the district court in resolving election disputes based on the Central Jakarta District Court Decision Number 757/Pdt.G/2022/PN Jkt Pst, which granted the People's Justice and Prosperity Party (PRIMA)'s lawsuit against the General Elections Commission (KPU) and ordered the suspension of the election stages. The lawsuit was constructed as an unlawful act (PMH), thus the District Court declared itself authorized to adjudicate the case. However, the KPU's actions in verifying political party administration constitute public legal action and fall within the scope of state administrative disputes. Based on Law No. 7 of 2017 concerning Elections, resolving disputes over election processes and decisions falls under the authority of the Elections Supervisory Agency (Bawaslu) and the State Administrative Court (PTUN), while disputes over election results fall under the jurisdiction of the Constitutional Court. This District Court decision demonstrates a conflict of jurisdiction and ignores the principle of lex specialis derogat legi generali.
Drawing the Line: Criminal Responsibility of In-House Legal Counsel Febriyani, Febriyani; Prasetyo, Boedi
Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Kyadiren Vol 7 No 2 (2026): Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Kyadiren
Publisher : PPPM, Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum (STIH) Biak-Papua

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46924/jihk.v7i2.402

Abstract

The criminal prosecution of in-house legal counsel in corporate cases has generated significant debate concerning the boundaries of criminal liability within the legal profession in Indonesia, particularly where legal opinions serve as the basis for corporate policy decisions. This study examines the legal limits of criminal liability for in-house legal counsel, evaluates the legal character of legal opinions in relation to the concept of deelneming, and critically analyzes the judicial reasoning in Decision Number 534/Pid.B/2024/PN Jakarta Selatan. Employing a normative legal research method with statutory, conceptual, and case-based approaches, this study finds that the criminal liability of in-house legal counsel is determined by causal contribution and substantive intent rather than by formal position alone. Legal opinions may give rise to criminal liability when they function as instruments of legitimacy for unlawful conduct. The study concludes that the decision adopts a functional approach to professional legal accountability and underscores the necessity of clear normative boundaries to prevent the excessive criminalization of in-house legal counsel.
Implementasi Hukum Operasional TNI Dalam Penanganan Wilayah Perbatasan di Pulau Sebatik Studi pada Rumah yang Melintasi Dua Negara S D, R Deltanto; Zulkifli, Dedy; Prasetyo, Boedi
AURELIA: Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat Indonesia Vol 5, No 1 (2026): January 2026
Publisher : CV. Rayyan Dwi Bharata

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.57235/aurelia.v5i1.6988

Abstract

Wilayah perbatasan Pulau Sebatik antara Indonesia dan Malaysia menyimpan permasalahan kompleks, khususnya pada rumah-rumah warga yang secara fisik melintasi garis batas negara. Keberadaan rumah-rumah tersebut menimbulkan tantangan dalam penegakan kedaulatan, pengawasan wilayah, serta implementasi hukum nasional. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis implementasi hukum operasional Tentara Nasional Indonesia (TNI) dalam menangani kondisi tersebut, dengan fokus pada kewenangan, hambatan, dan solusi hukum yang dapat diterapkan. Menggunakan metode yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan studi kasus, penelitian ini menemukan bahwa peran TNI dalam operasi militer selain perang (OMSP) telah dijalankan dalam kerangka hukum nasional, namun masih menghadapi tantangan batas yurisdiksi, tumpang tindih kewenangan, dan keterbatasan perangkat hukum di kawasan perbatasan. Diperlukan penguatan kerangka hukum, kerja sama lintas sektor, serta penguatan peran TNI sebagai aktor strategis dalam menjaga keutuhan wilayah negara di perbatasan.
Medical Dispute Resolution Between Dentists and Patients Through Mediation Mechanisms Syafri, Deni; Efrila, Efrila; Prasetyo, Boedi
Jurnal Ar Ro'is Mandalika (Armada) Vol. 6 No. 3 (2026): JURNAL AR RO'IS MANDALIKA (ARMADA)
Publisher : Institut Penelitian dan Pengembangan Mandalika Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59613/armada.v6i3.6262

Abstract

Medical disputes between dentists and patients often arise due to negligence in medical treatment. This study aims to conduct a further analysis of the resolution of medical disputes between dentists and patients. This research is classified as normative juridical research using a statutory approach and legal concept analysis. The data collection technique was carried out through a literature review. The results of the study indicate that medical dispute resolution can be conducted through mediation, either through arbitration bodies, the Indonesian Medical Discipline Honorary Council (MKDKI), or the Indonesian Dental Association (IDI) as a professional organization of dentists that has the authority to act as a mediator. Through mediation, disputes are expected to be resolved fairly and efficiently without going through lengthy legal proceedings that may potentially disadvantage one of the parties. In conclusion, the resolution of medical disputes between dentists and patients should prioritize mediation efforts in order to achieve a satisfactory settlement for both parties.
Co-Authors Angel Monica, Racheline Arianto, Rafi Fadhlurrohman Arief Fahmi Lubis Artana, I Putu Juni Baehaqi Cristofel, Moses Dharmaputra, Rio Perdana Dwi Putra, Guntur Yudha Efrila, Efrila Febriyani, Febriyani Huring, Vinna Clarissa Husain, Bahtiar Idris, Berlian IVAN SAVERO, IVAN Kantikha, I Made Kusumawardhana, Vishnu Markoni Markoni Maulanda, Yogen Mulyono Mulyono Nasser, M Nasser, Nasser Negoro, Luhung Wikant Bakti Prastopo Prastopo, Prastopo Priscilia, Viona Reano, Arfan Romlih, Rheihan Nurrizki S D, R Deltanto Sahary, Fitry Taufik Sarana, Harmin Sastria, Evan Satriawan Satriawan, Satriawan Setyawan, Gerald Febrian Sidabutar, Hamonangan Priambodho Silitonga, Vera Dumonda Sitorus, Steven Sutarno , Sutarno Syafri, Deni Tarnama, Eins Mitchelle Tetty Melina Lubis Wijaya, jesica Natalia Wijayanti, Edy Zulkifli, Dedy