Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
3.916
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Cita Hukum Bureaucracy Journal : Indonesia Journal of Law and Social-Political Governance Journal Evidence Of Law Journal of Innovation Research and Knowledge PENANOMICS: INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS SENTRI: Jurnal Riset Ilmiah ARMADA : Jurnal Penelitian Multidisiplin Jurnal Hukum Indonesia Mutiara: Multidiciplinary Scientifict Journal Jurnal Riset Ilmiah Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengkajian Ilmiah Asian Journal of Social and Humanities Jurnal Sains, Ekonomi, Manajemen, Akuntansi dan Hukum
Maryano, Maryano
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Aerospace Engineering Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Arts Humanities Astronomy Automotive Engineering Biochemistry, Genetics & Molecular Biology Chemical Engineering, Chemistry & Bioengineering Chemistry Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Computer Science & IT Control & Systems Engineering Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Dentistry Earth & Planetary Sciences Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Electrical & Electronics Engineering Energy Engineering Environmental Science Health Professions Immunology & microbiology Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Materials Science & Nanotechnology Mathematics Mechanical Engineering Medicine & Pharmacology Neuroscience Nursing Physics Public Health Social Sciences Transportation Veterinary Other

Published : 30 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 30 Documents
Search

 1   2   3 
KEPASTIAN HUKUM DALAM PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI TERKAIT UJI FORMIL Ratib, Victor Albadi’u; Hedwig Adianto Mau; Maryano, Maryano
Journal of Innovation Research and Knowledge Vol. 5 No. 4: September 2025
Publisher : Bajang Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Since its establishment, the Constitutional Court of Indonesia has been instrumental in upholding the supremacy of the 1945 Constitution through its constitutional review mechanism. While initially focusing on the substantive aspects of legislation, the Court has progressively extended its scrutiny to include the formal constitutionality of the lawmaking process. This study adopts a normative juridical approach, employing statutory, case, conceptual, and analytical methods. Legal materials were gathered from primary, secondary, and tertiary sources and analyzed through grammatical, systematic, and teleological interpretation. The research finds that the Constitutional Court has evolved from a moderate stanceprioritizing legal continuity—to a more assertive role in guarding procedural legitimacy, particularly through the introduction of the concept of conditional unconstitutionality. Recent jurisprudence, however, demonstrates a pragmatic approach wherein laws are annulled only if procedural violations are deemed substantial and infringe upon democratic principles such as representation and public participation. Decisions No. 27/PUU-VII/2009, No. 91/PUU-XVIII/2020, and No. 132/PUU-XXII/2024 reflect the Court’s increasing commitment to ensuring that legislative procedures align with constitutional standards. These developments reinforce the principle that procedural compliance is not merely formalistic, but essential to the legitimacy of democratic lawmaking and the realization of legal certainty in Indonesia.
Kepastian Hukum Pembagian Legitieme Portie Dalam Warisan Dengan Adanya Hutang Pewaris Kumeang, Indira Assadiyah; Maryano, Maryano; Koto, Zulkarnein
Mutiara: Multidiciplinary Scientifict Journal Vol. 1 No. 10 (2023): Mutiara: Multidiciplinary Scientifict Journal
Publisher : Al Makki Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.57185/mutiara.v1i10.95

Abstract

Penelitian ini membahas Dalam konteks pembagian hukum waris ketika ahli waris meninggalkan utang, penelitian ini mengkaji tentang kepastian hukum. Proses pembagian warisan bisa jadi rumit, apalagi jika ahli waris mempunyai hutang yang harus dibayar. Menemukan hambatan hukum dan solusi untuk memastikan distribusi warisan yang adil dalam menghadapi tanggung jawab keuangan ahli waris adalah tujuan utama dari penelitian ini. Dengan mengkaji putusan pengadilan terkait serta peraturan perundang-undangan terkait, penelitian ini menerapkan metodologi hukum normatif. Temuan studi ini menunjukkan bahwa ketika utang harus dilunasi, kepastian hukum seputar pembagian warisan menjadi lebih rumit. Memprioritaskan pembayaran utang, bagaimana utang mempengaruhi klaim ahli waris atas sebagian warisan, dan akibat hukum bagi ahli waris yang bukan pihak yang berhutang hanyalah beberapa kekhawatiran yang muncul. Dengan demikian, penelitian ini memberikan kontribusi terhadap pemahaman tentang kepastian hukum dalam pembagian warisan dengan adanya hutang pewaris, sekaligus memberikan rekomendasi untuk perbaikan sistem hukum yang dapat mengakomodasi situasi ini dengan lebih adil dan efisien.
Kepastian Hukum Status Barang Bukti yang Diduga Hasil Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang dari Tindak Pidana Asal Narkotika terhadap Terdakwa yang Meninggal Dunia Trapsilo, Lier Budhi; Maryano, Maryano; Ismed, Mohamad
CENDEKIA : Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengkajian Ilmiah Vol. 2 No. 8 (2025): CENDEKIA : Jurnal Penelitian Dan Pengkajian Ilmiah, Agustus 2025
Publisher : Lembaga Pendidikan dan Penelitian Manggala Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62335/cendekia.v2i8.1744

Abstract

The problematic confiscation of assets of money laundering defendants whose convictions were finalized and subsequently dismissed by the court due to the defendant's death is the focus of this thesis research, which examines the duties of law enforcement agencies—the prosecutor's office and the police—to recover state assets owned by heirs who received assets from money launderers, through mechanisms in accordance with the principle of the presumption of innocence. The research questions are formulated as follows: 1) What are the provisions in the Money Laundering Law related to narcotics crimes? 2) What is the legal certainty regarding the status of evidence suspected of being the proceeds of money laundering from narcotics-based crimes against deceased defendants? The research method used in this dissertation is a normative juridical research method, conducted in an effort to obtain the necessary data related to the problem. The data used are secondary data and tertiary legal materials. In addition, primary data is also used to support the secondary legal materials. Data analysis is carried out using a qualitative juridical analysis method. Using a theoretical framework, namely the theory of evidence and the theory of legal certainty, to examine this problem. The research results indicate that the law does not regulate a mechanism for the restitution of state losses for deceased convicts, as this contradicts Article 83 of the Criminal Code. Consequently, there is no legal certainty regarding the status of evidence suspected of being the proceeds of money laundering from narcotics-based crimes against deceased defendants. Proven state losses that must be returned cannot be carried out by prosecutors acting as executors for deceased convicts. State attorneys can file civil lawsuits against the convict's heirs to repatriate assets obtained from money laundering to the state or state treasury as state revenue. The author's recommendation to legislators is to add articles that clearly relate to the mechanism for executing compensation or procedures for the restitution of state losses in the form of compensation to the provisions of the law, as well as to enable heirs of convicts convicted of money laundering to fulfill their legal responsibility, namely to return assets used by the heirs of convicts convicted of money laundering.
Unlimited Discretion, Eroded Certainty: Reformulating Criminalization of Narcotics Crime in Indonesia Arianti, Nofalinda; Maryano, Maryano; Rattanapun , Supot
Journal Evidence Of Law Vol. 4 No. 2 (2025): Journal Evidence Of Law (Agustus)
Publisher : CV. Era Digital Nusantara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59066/jel.v4i2.1446

Abstract

Sentencing in narcotics crime cases in Indonesia remains problematic, particularly concerning legal certainty. The striking disparity in court decisions—despite similar legal facts—reflects the absence of standardized sentencing parameters. Furthermore, the wide scope of judicial discretion without objective guidelines increases the risk of injustice in criminal adjudication. This study aims to examine the realization of legal certainty in narcotics sentencing, analyze the role and limits of judicial discretion, and formulate the need for sentencing reform in Indonesia. Using a normative and empirical legal approach, the study analyzes 25 court verdicts and is supported by interviews with legal practitioners. The findings reveal that disparity and unregulated discretion contribute to systemic uncertainty in sentencing practices. Therefore, comprehensive reform is necessary, including binding sentencing guidelines, restricted judicial discretion, and strengthened rehabilitative approaches. This research contributes to the formulation of progressive criminal law reforms based on justice, proportionality, and predictability.
TANGGUNG JAWAB DIREKSI TERHADAP PEMEGANG SAHAM ATAS PELANGGARAN PRINSIP KETERBUKAAN INFORMASI DI PASAR MODAL. Nianzah, Raodha Putri; Maryano, Maryano; Widodo, Gatut Hendro Tri
SENTRI: Jurnal Riset Ilmiah Vol. 3 No. 2 (2024): SENTRI : Jurnal Riset Ilmiah, February 2024
Publisher : LPPM Institut Pendidikan Nusantara Global

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55681/sentri.v3i2.2306

Abstract

This study examines the responsibilities held by the board of Directors of the company to shareholders in the context of violations of the principle of disclosure of information in the capital market. With a focus on the dynamics of the relationship between the board of directors and shareholders, this study analyzes the impact of violations of the principle of disclosure of information on shareholder confidence and the value of the company. The results of the study are expected to provide insight into the role of the board of directors in ensuring proper information disclosure, as well as highlighting relevant legal and regulatory aspects in maintaining the integrity of the capital market. This study uses the type of normative juridical research by analyzing legal materials sourced from legislation and realized with various references from literature review. The results of this study that in the context of Capital Markets, companies that go public get additional capital from the public stock buyers. Previously, shares were only owned by a certain number of people such as family, relatives, and friends. However, by going public, shares are issued and sold to the general public, creating independent shareholders whose motivation is more on making a profit. The principle of disclosure becomes important, realized through the preparation of a prospectus that must contain all the details and material facts, made clear, and accountable to the board of directors. Violation of the principle of openness by the board of Directors may result in sanctions, such as reprimand or dismissal from office, in accordance with Law No. 40 of 2007. At the General Meeting of shareholders (GMS), the board of directors must account for their actions, and the legal consequences may include dismissal and civil or criminal liability. This principle affirms the importance of integrity in maintaining transparency and trust in the capital market.
KEPASTIAN HUKUM AKTA PEMBERIAN HAK TANGGUNGAN TANPA SEPENGETAHUAN KURATOR ATAS HARTA DEBITOR PAILIT DAN AKIBAT HUKUMNYA Zulkarnain, Debi; Maryano, Maryano; Mustafa, Marni Emmy
SENTRI: Jurnal Riset Ilmiah Vol. 3 No. 3 (2024): SENTRI : Jurnal Riset Ilmiah, Maret 2024
Publisher : LPPM Institut Pendidikan Nusantara Global

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55681/sentri.v3i3.2415

Abstract

Bankruptcy is a general seizure of all the assets of a bankrupt debtor whose management and settlement is carried out by the curator under the supervision of the Supervising Judge. The debtor by law loses his right to control and take care of his property included in the bankruptcy estate from the date of the decision on the declaration of bankruptcy. The phenomenon that occurs is the transfer of the bankrupt debtor's property to another party after the bankruptcy decision is pronounced by The Commercial Court without the knowledge of the curator by making a deed of granting mortgage rights to the bankrupt debtor's property. The theory used in this writing is the theory of legal consequences according to Soeroso and the theory of legal certainty according to Jan Michiel Otto. The method used in this study with the type of normative research is legal research with secondary data using primary, secondary and tertiary sources of legal materials. The research approach used is the approach of legislation, conceptual, case, and analytical and legal material collection techniques carried out by identifying and inventorying positive legal rules, researching library materials and other sources of legal materials relevant to the legal issues under study. Legal material analysis technique is done by legal interpretation (interpretation) grammatical, historical and systematic. From the results obtained that the legal consequences of the deed of granting the mortgage without the knowledge of the curator of the bankrupt debtor's property is the deed of granting the mortgage is null and void, with the decision of the judge whose status has permanent legal force which gives sanctions in the form of cancellation of the deed of granting the mortgage, is a manifestation of the legal consequences. As for the legal certainty of the deed of granting a mortgage without the knowledge of the curator of the bankrupt debtor's property does not have legal certainty, with the judge's decision whose status has permanent legal force which states that the deed of granting the mortgage is null and void, the legal certainty of the deed of granting the mortgage has been realized.
Legal Culture Obligation to Submit Tax Data and Information from Agencies, Institutions, Associations, and Other Parties Maryano, Maryano; Natalius, Natalius; Anggraeni, RR Dewi
Jurnal Cita Hukum Vol. 11 No. 3 (2023)
Publisher : Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum, UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/jch.v11i3.37474

Abstract

Law Number 28 of 2007 and Government Regulation Number 31 of 2012 mandate the provision of tax data by government agencies, institutions, associations and other parties (ILAP) to the Directorate General of Taxes (DJP). Even though criminal sanctions have been regulated, the implementation of these obligations is not optimal. DJP adopted alternative methods, such as a Memorandum of Understanding/MoU, to obtain tax data from ILAP. This research uses a research method that focuses on positive law with the theory of legal certainty by Gustav Radbruch, the theory of authority by Max Weber, and the theory of taxation by Adam Smith. The results of the research show that there is a discrepancy in the implementation of the obligation to submit tax data with positive law and the theory of legal certainty. Steps are needed to create a Memorandum of Understanding/Agreement/MoU up to a Cooperation Agreement by the DJP with ILAP to make the obligation to submit tax data and information from ILAP run smoothly in accordance with the study. theory of authority by Max Weber. To realize legal certainty in these regulations and to increase state revenues in accordance with the study of tax theory by Adam Smith, it is recommended that there be changes to norms in Law Number 28 of 2007 by adding an article regarding the making of a Memorandum of Understanding/MoU/Cooperation Agreement to increase legal certainty. and contribution to state revenue.Keywords: Reconstruction of Obligations; Data Submission; Tax Information; Legal certainty
Ideal Formulation of Extraordinary Legal Remedies Review By The Public Prosecutor From The Perspective of Justice and Legal Certainty Murti, Krisna; Yusuf Hasibuan, Fauzie; Maryano, Maryano
Asian Journal of Social and Humanities Vol. 3 No. 2 (2024): Asian Journal of Social and Humanities
Publisher : Pelopor Publikasi Akademika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59888/ajosh.v3i2.426

Abstract

One of the crucial issues of legal problems that is still a pro and con in society is the extraordinary legal effort of judicial review by the public prosecutor. The research research is to analyze the implementation of the submission of extraordinary legal efforts of judicial review by the public prosecutor against criminal cases based on statutory regulations and to analyze and find the formulation of the ideal criminal case review system by the public prosecutor to realize justice and legal certainty in Indonesia. This research uses a type of normative juridical legal research. Research that uses a philosophical approach, a statutory approach, a case approach and a comparative approach. The sources of legal materials collected are analyzed descriptively to answer the research problems. The results of this study conclude that the Implementation of the submission of extraordinary legal efforts of judicial review by the Public Prosecutor against criminal cases based on statutory regulations has not achieved justice and legal certainty. In practice, the addition of the prosecutor's authority to file a judicial review as stipulated in Article 30C letter h and the Explanation of Article 30C letter h of Law Number 11 of 2021 concerning Amendments to Law Number 16 of 2004 concerning the Prosecutor's Office of the Republic of Indonesia cannot be implemented because it is considered contrary to the 1945 Constitution.
Integration of The Principle of Restorative Justice In Law Enforcement of Tax Crimes To Achieve Legal Certainty In Indonesia Soesilo, Soesilo; Yusuf Hasibuan, Fauzie; Maryano, Maryano
Asian Journal of Social and Humanities Vol. 3 No. 3 (2024): Asian Journal of Social and Humanities
Publisher : Pelopor Publikasi Akademika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59888/ajosh.v3i3.463

Abstract

This research analyses the implementation of judges' decisions on law enforcement of taxation crimes in Indonesia and identifies ideal criminal law policies to achieve legal certainty. The method used is normative juridical with analytical descriptive approach, which is supported by the theory of judicial power, theory of legal certainty, and theory of law enforcement. The results show that the ultimum remedium principle has not been fully applied consistently, with some serious tax offences going directly to the criminal realm even though administrative mechanisms are still possible. Conversely, some other offences are resolved administratively, even though the criminal elements have been fulfilled. This inconsistency suggests the need for uniform technical guidelines to reduce differences in legal interpretation. This research is an integration of restorative justice principles in Indonesian tax law, which allows offenders to settle tax liabilities along with penalties before being subject to criminal sanctions. This approach balances the recovery of state losses and the deterrent effect for offenders, while supporting sustainable taxpayer compliance. This research recommends the preparation of pretrial guidelines and harmonization of regulations to improve legal certainty in tax cases in Indonesia.
Perlindungan Hukum terhadap Anggota Terkait Koperasi Simpan Pinjam yang Dinyatakan Pailit Kendati, Cynthia; Yuhelson, Yuhelson; Maryano, Maryano
ARMADA : Jurnal Penelitian Multidisiplin Vol. 2 No. 1 (2024): ARMADA : Jurnal Penelitian Multidisplin, Januari 2024
Publisher : LPPM Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi 45 Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55681/armada.v2i1.1121

Abstract

Fenomena hukum terhadap Anggota Koperasi Simpan Pinjam tersebut dinyatakan pailit sebagai perangkat Organisasi dari suatu badan hukum koperasi, Anggota bertanggung jawab atas perbuatannya jika terjadi resiko kerugian pada Koperasi tersebut. Rumusan Masalah dalam penelitian ini adalah Bagaimana Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Anggota Terkait Koperasi Simpan Pinjam Yang Dinyatakan Pailit? Dan Bagaimana? Akibat Hukum Terhadap Koperasi Simpan Pinjam Yang Dinyatakan Pailit? Teori yang digunakan adalah Teori Akibat Hukum dari Soeroso dan Teori Perlindungan Hukum dari Satjipto Rahardjo. Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini dengan jenis penelitian yuridis normatif yaitu penelitian hukum kepustakaan atau data sekunder dengan sumber bahan-bahan hukum primer, sekunder dan tersier. Adapun pendekatan penelitian yang dipergunakan pendekatan perundang-undangan, pendekatan konseptual, pendekatan analitis, pendekatan kasus dan teknik pengumpulan bahan hukum dilakukan dengan cara mengidentifikasi dan menginventarisasi aturan hukum positif, literatur buku, jurnal dan sumber bahan hukum lainnya. Untuk teknik analisa bahan hukum dilakukan dengan penafsiran hukum gramatikal, sistematis dan metode konstruksi hukum. Dari hasil penelitian dapat disimpulkan bahwa a) Akibat hukum terhadap Koperasi Simpan Pinjam Yang Dinyatakan Pailit Sangatlah penting Akibat dari Kepailitan tersebut tidak hanya dirasakan oleh Debitor saja akan tetapi Kreditor juga sebagai pihak yang dirugikan, Koperasi yang telah diputuskan pernyataan pailitnya oleh Pengadilan Niaga, maka haruslah melakukan pemberesan atau penyelesain pembubaran melalui Tim Penyelesaian, b) harus adanya Perlindungan Hukum terkait Anggota apabila Koperasi simpan Pinjam di Nyatakan Pailit dan Saran dari penulis perlunya penyempurnaan Undang-Undang Pengkoperasian dan Undang-Undang Kepailitan  khusunya mengenai hak dan kewajiban anggota koperasi simpan pinjam yang turut di berikan tangggujawab dalam koperasi simpan pinjam yang dinyatakan pailit dan saran untuk mengatur secara jelas dalam Undang-Undang Pengkoperasian.
Co-Authors Achmad Fitrian Agil, Marwan Agus Wicaksono Susanto Akkapin , Supaphorn Akkapin, Supaphorn Alan, Alan Robert White Anggraeni, RR Dewi Arianti, Nofalinda Chandra, Tofik Yanuar Dandel, Lukman Syafri Darodjat, Tubagus Achmad Diana, Anisa Roshda Dwi Budi Santoso Ekky Saputra Ekwanto, Hafiz Nur Erich, Erich Fuspitasari, Nova Hedwig Adianto Mau Hendri, Fahzal Herwibowo, Bambang Hajar Hutomo, Putra Iqbal, Mochamad Ismed, Mohamad Kendati, Cynthia Kirana, Claradyta Koto, Zulkarnein Krisna Murti Kristiawanto, Kristiawanto Kumeang, Indira Assadiyah Lingga, Win Salamsyah Martanti, Yurisa Mau, Hedwig A Mau, Hedwig A. Mochammad Imron Awalludin Mustafa, Marni Emmy Mustofa, Marni Emmy Nara, Vicheth Natalius, Natalius Nianzah, Raodha Putri Ningsih, Eci Marisna Novena, Elisabeth Rahmansyah, Fuad Ratib, Victor Albadi’u Rattanapun , Supot Soesilo, Soesilo Somajaipeng , Kacha Trapsilo, Lier Budhi TW, Gatut Hendro Wanti, Tiara Yuliana Widodo, Gatut Hendro Tri Yuhelson Yuhelson Yusuf Hasibuan, Fauzie ZULKARNAIN, DEBI