cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Amelia
Contact Email
melameliaaa99@gmail.com
Phone
+6281224442977
Journal Mail Official
jurnaledunity@gmail.com
Editorial Address
Jl. Desa Susukan Kecamatan Cipicung Kabupaten Kuningan
Location
Kab. kuningan,
Jawa barat
INDONESIA
Edunity: Kajian Ilmu Sosial dan Pendidikan
Published by PT. Publikasiku Academic Solution
ISSN : 29633648     EISSN : 29648653     DOI : https://doi.org/10.57096/edunity
Core Subject : Economy, Humanities, Science, Education, Social,
Humanities Computer Science & IT Economics, Econometrics & Finance Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Social Sciences
Edunity: Kajian Ilmu Sosial dan Pendidikan is a double-blind, open-access peer-reviewed academic journal in social and educational fields. This journal is published monthly by PT. Publikasiku Academic Solution. Edunity: Kajian Ilmu Sosial dan Pendidikan provide a means for ongoing discussion of relevant issues that fall within the focus and scope of the journal that can be checked empirically. This journal publishes research articles that cover all aspects of social science, from management, economics, culture, education, law, social health and religion which are included in the social context. Published articles are articles that result from critical and comprehensive research, studies or scientific studies on important and current issues, or reviews of scientific books.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Ilmu Sosial (Lain-Lain)
Articles 423 Documents
 39   40   41   42   43 
Analysis of Test Items for the 10th-Grade Visual Arts Course Using ANATES Software Version 4.0.9 Miftahul Jannah; Rufi’I; Sabariah
Edunity Kajian Ilmu Sosial dan Pendidikan Vol. 5 No. 7 (2026): Edunity: Social and Educational Studies
Publisher : PT Publikasiku Academic Solution

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.57096/edunity.v5i7.543

Abstract

Learning evaluation is an important component of the educational process for obtaining information regarding the achievement of learning objectives and students’ abilities. The accuracy of evaluation results is greatly influenced by the quality of the instruments used; therefore, test item analysis is necessary as a basis for determining the characteristics and feasibility of each test item. This study aimed to analyze the quality of Class X Visual Arts subject test items on the material Introduction to Fine Arts Around Us using ANATES software version 4.0.9. The study employed a quantitative descriptive approach involving 36 students. The analyzed instrument consisted of 25 multiple-choice questions. The analysis included test reliability, difficulty level, discriminating power, and distractor quality. The test result data were analyzed using ANATES software version 4.0.9 and interpreted based on the criteria for each test item analysis indicator. The results showed that the instrument had a reliability coefficient of 0.49, which was categorized as moderate. The difficulty level analysis revealed that the items were dominated by very easy and easy categories, while the discriminating power varied from very poor to very good. Most distractors functioned effectively, although several items still required improvement. In conclusion, the test instrument was considered reasonably feasible for use as a learning evaluation tool; however, revisions are still needed for several items. The analysis results can serve as a basis for teachers to improve and develop higher-quality evaluation instruments capable of measuring students’ abilities more accurately.
Modeling Transportation Mode Choice Using the Multinomial Logit (MNL) Model in the City of Kotamobagu Rendy Lodewiyk Suwu; Lucia Ingrid Regina Lefrandt; Joice Waani
Edunity Kajian Ilmu Sosial dan Pendidikan Vol. 5 No. 7 (2026): Edunity: Social and Educational Studies
Publisher : PT Publikasiku Academic Solution

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.57096/edunity.v5i7.545

Abstract

This research aims to analyze the factors affecting transportation mode choice in Kotamobagu City, measure the influence of travelers’ socioeconomic characteristics, and determine the probability of choosing among motorcycles, private cars, and bentor (motorized three-wheeled vehicles). The research employed a quantitative descriptive method using a survey approach conducted across four sub-districts. Primary data were collected through questionnaires administered to 153 respondents and analyzed using the Multinomial Logit Model (MNL) in SPSS. The results of the simultaneous tests showed that all independent variables examined (cost, safety, travel time, and convenience considerations) significantly contributed to transportation mode choice decisions. However, based on partial tests, three main factors were found to be the most dominant and statistically significant, namely gender, travel destination, and the reasons for choosing a mode, particularly cost and travel time considerations. Male travelers and those traveling for work-related purposes demonstrated a higher tendency to choose motorcycles. Meanwhile, segments such as housewives, students, and civil servants showed a stronger preference for bentor compared with motorcycles. The final results of the modeling indicate that mobility preferences in Kotamobagu City are highly dominated by private vehicles, with a combined market share of 94%. Motorcycles and private cars are the two most dominant modes, with choice probabilities of 47.64% and 46.36%, respectively. In contrast, bentor occupies the lowest position, with a choice probability of only 6.00%. These findings indicate that bentor remains a secondary transportation option, primarily serving specific passenger segments or particular travel needs in Kotamobagu City.
Integrasi ChatGPT dalam Pembelajaran Bahasa Indonesia: A Systematic Literature Review Tren, Peluang, dan Tantangan Era Kurikulum Merdeka Bagaskara Nur Rochmansyah; Ifutya Warnisa; Nur Amelia
Edunity Kajian Ilmu Sosial dan Pendidikan Vol. 5 No. 7 (2026): Edunity: Social and Educational Studies
Publisher : PT Publikasiku Academic Solution

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.57096/edunity.v5i7.548

Abstract

Perkembangan pesat kecerdasan buatan generatif, khususnya ChatGPT, telah mengubah lanskap pendidikan secara global. Di Indonesia, penekanan Kurikulum Merdeka pada pembelajaran berdiferensiasi menghadirkan peluang sekaligus tantangan bagi integrasi AI dalam pembelajaran Bahasa Indonesia. Penelitian ini bertujuan memetakan secara sistematis tren, peluang, dan tantangan integrasi ChatGPT dalam pembelajaran Bahasa Indonesia pada era Kurikulum Merdeka. Metode yang digunakan adalah Systematic Literature Review (SLR) dengan mengadopsi panduan PRISMA 2020. Sumber data diperoleh dari tiga basis data utama, yaitu Google Scholar, Scopus, dan SINTA, dengan kata kunci kombinatorik terkait ChatGPT, Artificial Intelligence, dan pembelajaran Bahasa Indonesia. Dari 247 artikel yang teridentifikasi pada pencarian awal, sebanyak 36 artikel memenuhi kriteria inklusi setelah proses screening judul, abstrak, dan full-text. Analisis tematik menghasilkan lima tema utama: (1) ChatGPT sebagai asisten pengembangan keterampilan menulis dan pemberi umpan balik otomatis; (2) pemanfaatan ChatGPT dalam penyusunan bahan ajar dan modul pembelajaran; (3) personalisasi pembelajaran melalui prompting pedagogis; (4) tantangan integritas akademik, plagiarisme, dan etika penggunaan AI; serta (5) implikasi terhadap implementasi Kurikulum Merdeka dan Profil Pelajar Pancasila. Hasil sintesis menunjukkan bahwa ChatGPT memiliki potensi signifikan untuk meningkatkan efisiensi perencanaan pembelajaran, memperkaya umpan balik menulis, serta memfasilitasi pembelajaran berdiferensiasi. Namun, pemanfaatannya menuntut literasi digital guru yang memadai, kerangka etika yang jelas, dan kebijakan institusi yang komprehensif. Penelitian ini memberikan rekomendasi berupa pengembangan model prompting pedagogis berbahasa Indonesia, pelatihan literasi AI bagi guru Bahasa Indonesia, serta penyusunan pedoman integritas akademik yang adaptif terhadap perkembangan teknologi generatif.

Page 43 of 43 | Total Record : 423

 39   40   41   42   43 

Filter by Year

2022 2026


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 5 No. 7 (2026): Edunity: Social and Educational Studies Vol. 5 No. 6 (2026): Edunity: Social and Educational Studies Vol. 5 No. 5 (2026): Edunity: Social and Educational Studies Vol. 5 No. 4 (2026): Edunity: Social and Educational Studies Vol. 5 No. 3 (2026): Edunity: Social and Educational Studies Vol. 5 No. 2 (2026): Edunity: Social and Educational Studies Vol. 5 No. 1 (2026): Edunity: Social and Educational Studies Vol. 4 No. 12 (2025): Edunity: Social and Educational Studies Vol. 4 No. 11 (2025): Edunity: Social and Educational Studies Vol. 4 No. 10 (2025): Edunity: Social and Educational Studies Vol. 4 No. 9 (2025): Edunity: Social and Educational Studies Vol. 4 No. 8 (2025): Edunity: Social and Educational Studies Vol. 4 No. 7 (2025): Edunity: Social and Educational Studies Vol. 4 No. 6 (2025): Edunity: Social and Educational Studies Vol. 4 No. 5 (2025): Edunity: Social and Educational Studies Vol. 4 No. 4 (2025): Edunity: Social and Educational Studies Vol. 4 No. 3 (2025): Edunity: Social and Educational Studies Vol. 4 No. 2 (2025): Edunity: Social and Educational Studies Vol. 4 No. 1 (2025): Edunity: Social and Educational Studies Vol. 3 No. 12 (2024): Edunity: Social and Educational Studies Vol. 3 No. 11 (2024): Edunity: Social and Educational Studies Vol. 3 No. 10 (2024): Edunity: Social and Educational Studies Vol. 3 No. 9 (2024): Edunity: Social and Educational Studies Vol. 3 No. 8 (2024): Edunity : Social and Educational Studies Vol. 3 No. 7 (2024): Edunity : Social and Educational Studies Vol. 3 No. 6 (2024): Edunity : Social and Educational Studies Vol. 3 No. 5 (2024): Edunity : Social and Educational Studies Vol. 3 No. 4 (2024): Edunity : Social and Educational Studies Vol. 3 No. 3 (2024): Edunity : Social and Educational Studies Vol. 3 No. 2 (2024): Edunity : Social and Educational Studies Vol. 3 No. 1 (2024): Edunity : Social and Educational Studies Vol. 2 No. 12 (2023): Edunity: Social and Educational Studies Vol. 2 No. 11 (2023): Edunity : Social and Educational Studies Vol. 2 No. 10 (2023): Edunity : Social and Educational Studies Vol. 2 No. 9 (2023): Edunity : Social and Educational Studies Vol. 2 No. 8 (2023): Edunity : Social and Educational Studies Vol. 2 No. 7 (2023): Edunity : Social and Educational Studies Vol. 2 No. 6 (2023): Edunity : Social and Educational Studies Vol. 2 No. 5 (2023): Edunity : Social and Educational Studies Vol. 2 No. 4 (2023): Edunity : Social and Educational Studies Vol. 2 No. 3 (2023): Edunity : Social and Educational Studies Vol. 2 No. 2 (2023): Edunity : Social and Educational Studies Vol. 2 No. 1 (2023): Edunity : Social and Educational Studies Vol. 1 No. 04 (2022): Edunity : Social and Educational Studies Vol. 1 No. 03 (2022): Edunity : Social and Educational Studies Vol. 1 No. 02 (2022): Edunity : Social and Educational Studies Vol. 1 No. 01 (2022): Jurnal Edunity: Kajian Ilmu Sosial dan Pendidikan Vol. 1 No. 01 (2022): Edunity : Social and Educational Studies More Issue